3 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
SadieJay's avatar

Someone on here, the other day, when Jeff posted the Died Suddenly link said that there were some inaccurate portrayals, such as those dropping dead that could be tied to events that had nothing to do with the pandemic. They said it was a mistake and that it causes lack of credibility. But, at least they are talking about it.

Expand full comment
Fre'd Bennett, MAHA's avatar

"at least they're talking about it."

Agreed, Sadie. I'm highly skeptical of Stew Peters, but yours is a very good point. At least it is getting airplay, and maybe some normies will look into the dangers of the death jab.

Expand full comment
ConcernedGrammy's avatar

But, by including footage such as the removal of a clot from a beating heart that was from 2018, it severely damaged the entire antivax movement and the reputations of all involved. Steve Kirsch's defense is "don't throw out the baby with the bath water". Well, any journalist putting out any information should realize that including misinformation in something that runs against the narrative, will be found and exposed. "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me". In today's time, no one knows what to believe anymore. As a follow up to Stew Peters "snake venom in the water" theory, (which really turned many people off, as that theory is fraught with unexplainable holes), there's rumblings that Stew is controlled opposition, and these things are done on purpose, to get others to dismiss the entire idea. Like a counter psy-op. I was sorely disappointed that ANY misinformation or untruths were included in the show. I mean, there's plenty of true factual information that's out there, proven beyond doubt, there's no reason to pad the story, unless you're just looking for shock value. And dishonest shock value allows the fact-checkers some pretty good ammo to take the entire story down and reach the people who need to be reached.

Expand full comment