I don't know why I anxiously wait for your newsletter, cause when i do i end up internally screaming at my monitor or phone about all the obvious stuff that no one seems to know or care to learn about.
Iām not sure which made me laugh harder the āforelorn cargo shipsā or ālike a Wuhan bat out of Hadesā. Thanks as always for the news and the laughter Jeff!! House of cards is getting wobbly!
For the love of all things holy, Jeff........You infiltrate my relatively normal and calm Monday morning with images of Brandon prancing around the oval office - or wherever the heck they've installed him - utterly pale skinned and leafless! There goes breakfast.
"JUST SAY NO" was Nancy Reagan's catch-phrase against drug abuse in THE WAR ON DRUGS . I believe a case can be made that mandating vaccines ahead of natural immunity, nutrition and less-invasive medications is a strategy used by DRUG-PUSHERS. Perhaps this position has support in case law. We currently have an epidemic of addiction to covid vaccines "pushed" by media hype to a large segment of the population who no longer need a cure. Now we know that adverse reactions inflicted by mandating vaccine on top of natural immunity has a negative risk-benefit outcome. ie: "Your plane is more likely to crash".
For example - Back in the 1980's the popularity of crack cocaine led to an increase in the number of Americans who became addicted to cocaine. In 1985, the number of people who said they used cocaine on a routine basis increased from 4.2 million to 5.8 million by 1987. This demonstrates to me that drugs can be both a social (peer) and a physical addiction. Like cigarettes, right?
ADDICTION TO VACCINES follows the same trend where the JAB is too often regarded as a "quick-fix" to inconvenience and perceived "liberty".
In the 1980's the schedule for babies included 7 vaccines. According to the CDC every baby today is given about 70 doses of 16 vaccines.
Today, Nancy Reagan might agree vaccines are a social addiction: "JUST SAY NO"
Jeff, if you haven't watched David Martin, this NEW presentation is a must see for you. It's about 35 minutes. You will appreciate his take on the Jacobson case and a Supreme Court case from 1934. Everyone needs to watch this.
WOW: Lancet study proves the shot does not prevent transmission. āfully vaccinated individuals with breakthrough infections have peak viral load similar to unvaccinated cases and can efficiently transmit infection in household settings, including to fully vaccinatedā
Why is this SO important?
The 1905 SCOTUS case Jacobson v Massachusetts held that mandates can only be considered to āprevent the spread of contagious disease.ā
As all studies show the shots donāt stop transmission, Covid mandates are obviously illegal.
I very much enjoyed your list of CNNās shifting narrative, er, headlines. And I could have sworn that thereās another recent headline that says something about āwhy myocarditis isnāt as bad as it soundsā but canāt find it now to link.
"Look, I am NOT saying the science says the injections are ādangerous.ā Donāt cancel me. "
I AM. Darn rights I am.
How can I give informed consent when information is being withheld? I canāt and as such I refuse to do so. What information is being withheld? I'm so glad you asked!!
1) Their patents have "company proprietary secret sauce ingredients" and the government let them get away with that! This is NOT Kentucy Fried Chicken. This is an irreversible experimental gene therapy injection.
2) The raw data from the āPhase 2 Human Experimental Trialsā which completed in October 2020, has not been made publicly available. Pfizer & Moderna have said that they will release it āsometime in 2022ā. Talk to me AFTER that.
There is NO NEGOTIATION on this point. You do NOT claim "science" and get to withhold information that they admit exists. NO, NEIN, NYET, NEVER.
Without the raw data we cannot verify their claims for safety & efficacy.
Think about the precedent you are setting. You are letting large corporations with:
1) A blatant financial conflict of interest.
2) A recent history of maiming and killing thousands of the ācustomersā annually.
3) Decide what information about their āproductsā I get to see.
And I have to take it? ROTFLMAO. No. That is stark raving mad.
I want so badly to include similar language in the moral portion of my 2-part (moral and religious) accommodation request. but will refrain and do my darndest to keep it clean, and express how much "I LOVE working here" (except, since this began, this assertion has become a YUGE LIE)
Jeff please review and bring attention to the fact that HB 1B/SB 2B will not deliver true freedom from discrimination as it still allows employer mandates! Please have the RRT change its stance to match the NVIC and Florida citizens alliance.
Praying without ceasing!
I don't know why I anxiously wait for your newsletter, cause when i do i end up internally screaming at my monitor or phone about all the obvious stuff that no one seems to know or care to learn about.
Thanks for another good article
Iām not sure which made me laugh harder the āforelorn cargo shipsā or ālike a Wuhan bat out of Hadesā. Thanks as always for the news and the laughter Jeff!! House of cards is getting wobbly!
House of Cards, baby, House of Cards. ā ļø ā¦ļø ā„ļø ā£ļø šŗšøšš»šŖš»
For the love of all things holy, Jeff........You infiltrate my relatively normal and calm Monday morning with images of Brandon prancing around the oval office - or wherever the heck they've installed him - utterly pale skinned and leafless! There goes breakfast.
"JUST SAY NO" was Nancy Reagan's catch-phrase against drug abuse in THE WAR ON DRUGS . I believe a case can be made that mandating vaccines ahead of natural immunity, nutrition and less-invasive medications is a strategy used by DRUG-PUSHERS. Perhaps this position has support in case law. We currently have an epidemic of addiction to covid vaccines "pushed" by media hype to a large segment of the population who no longer need a cure. Now we know that adverse reactions inflicted by mandating vaccine on top of natural immunity has a negative risk-benefit outcome. ie: "Your plane is more likely to crash".
For example - Back in the 1980's the popularity of crack cocaine led to an increase in the number of Americans who became addicted to cocaine. In 1985, the number of people who said they used cocaine on a routine basis increased from 4.2 million to 5.8 million by 1987. This demonstrates to me that drugs can be both a social (peer) and a physical addiction. Like cigarettes, right?
ADDICTION TO VACCINES follows the same trend where the JAB is too often regarded as a "quick-fix" to inconvenience and perceived "liberty".
In the 1980's the schedule for babies included 7 vaccines. According to the CDC every baby today is given about 70 doses of 16 vaccines.
Today, Nancy Reagan might agree vaccines are a social addiction: "JUST SAY NO"
Jeff, if you haven't watched David Martin, this NEW presentation is a must see for you. It's about 35 minutes. You will appreciate his take on the Jacobson case and a Supreme Court case from 1934. Everyone needs to watch this.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/tRrJ3gzmvMt8/
We should strive to be Drug Free.
This is copied from a Telegram post. I hope the reference to the 1905 SCOTUS case is true. Source...https://t.me/AmericasFrontlineDoctors/350?single
WOW: Lancet study proves the shot does not prevent transmission. āfully vaccinated individuals with breakthrough infections have peak viral load similar to unvaccinated cases and can efficiently transmit infection in household settings, including to fully vaccinatedā
Why is this SO important?
The 1905 SCOTUS case Jacobson v Massachusetts held that mandates can only be considered to āprevent the spread of contagious disease.ā
As all studies show the shots donāt stop transmission, Covid mandates are obviously illegal.
I very much enjoyed your list of CNNās shifting narrative, er, headlines. And I could have sworn that thereās another recent headline that says something about āwhy myocarditis isnāt as bad as it soundsā but canāt find it now to link.
PFIZER'S NEW ORAL MED (Paxlovid) MIMICS the ACTION of IVERMECTIN (Dr. John Campbell)
https://groups.google.com/g/town-square-news/c/25kLmfPSTJA
"Look, I am NOT saying the science says the injections are ādangerous.ā Donāt cancel me. "
I AM. Darn rights I am.
How can I give informed consent when information is being withheld? I canāt and as such I refuse to do so. What information is being withheld? I'm so glad you asked!!
1) Their patents have "company proprietary secret sauce ingredients" and the government let them get away with that! This is NOT Kentucy Fried Chicken. This is an irreversible experimental gene therapy injection.
2) The raw data from the āPhase 2 Human Experimental Trialsā which completed in October 2020, has not been made publicly available. Pfizer & Moderna have said that they will release it āsometime in 2022ā. Talk to me AFTER that.
There is NO NEGOTIATION on this point. You do NOT claim "science" and get to withhold information that they admit exists. NO, NEIN, NYET, NEVER.
Without the raw data we cannot verify their claims for safety & efficacy.
Think about the precedent you are setting. You are letting large corporations with:
1) A blatant financial conflict of interest.
2) A recent history of maiming and killing thousands of the ācustomersā annually.
3) Decide what information about their āproductsā I get to see.
And I have to take it? ROTFLMAO. No. That is stark raving mad.
I want so badly to include similar language in the moral portion of my 2-part (moral and religious) accommodation request. but will refrain and do my darndest to keep it clean, and express how much "I LOVE working here" (except, since this began, this assertion has become a YUGE LIE)
There is a tik tok out there showing all the main stream media Pfizer has ads on. Sponsored by Pfizer is practically all of them.
8 year old girl tells SB she hopes they all go to jail for forcing children to wear masks.
https://www.infowars.com/posts/victory-florida-school-district-ends-mask-mandate-after-8-year-old-girl-told-them-they-should-be-in-prison/
Jeff please review and bring attention to the fact that HB 1B/SB 2B will not deliver true freedom from discrimination as it still allows employer mandates! Please have the RRT change its stance to match the NVIC and Florida citizens alliance.
https://floridacitizensalliance.com/call-to-action-flca-position-update-for-special-session-nov-15-send-today-and-share/
http://nvicadvocacy.org/members/resources/newsletterarchives/amendfloridahb1bsb2b.aspx