You'll be healthier with the CDC tracking you; a mini-roundup of Roe Draft news; Murthy rues a lack of robust discussion about pandemic policy; supply chain woes; a wild new study; and more...
I dont see any contradiction between being pro choice and understanding that Roe vs Wade was a bad decision. The benefit of states rights exceeds that of federally mandated anything. The pandemic has demonstrated that. I would be happy if every state had some kind of framework for legal and safe abortions but it is most certainly a states issue.
Also I see the cdc has extended its masking recommendation in planes and trains. So, for comparison to other parts of the world (1st hand experience)
- England, mask only at gates where destination requires
- Holland, mask only beyond security (not enforced)
- Hungary,mask only at gates where destination requires
- France, mask on public transport
- austria, mask on public transport and supermarkets
- Belgium, mask on public transport
Many other examples abound. But suffice to say the "mask on public transport" is one of those globally coordinated things that is being done because it needs to be shown that it can be done. Resist and boycott with all your might
Abortion will never be safe. You won’t hear about the women victims, unless you listen to alternative sources. What abortion does to destroy women’s lives is unbelievable. Suicide rates skyrocket. Over 60% of the women who abort feel pressured by someone to do so (Guttmacher Institute). Some choice. Dad’s have no say. Couples often break up after an abortion. Abortion has many victims. Abortion is never safe, needless to say, for the babies either
My wife is a Nurse Practitioner who, true to her training, takes a thorough social history from all her patients. (Why is it that many of us bonehead MDs can't do the same?) Anyway, she will attest to the carnage women experience in later life, following a decision to abort a child early on. Many women are still traumatized and grief-ridden decades later and have never forgiven themselves.
Your comment made me think of of something I heard some time ago from a woman who had been through it, and looked back on it years later, that "abortion doesn't make you not a mother; it just makes you the mother of a dead child".
Interesting perspective. I don't disagree with your logic. I heard a saying some time ago that still resonates: "Pray for the dead and work like hell for the living." And then we may also ask: When does life begin? ...I support the idea of the plan B morning after pill, and raincoats! [I do believe that there are sketchy details re the recycling of human body parts, and PP ain't no saint.]
If by "it" you are referring to a tumor or cyst or other foreign object, then yes. If by "it" you are referring to a human child, with a beating heart and tiny fingers and toes, nestled in your womb, then no. As a former fetus myself, I can definitively state that I was just as much alive and "me" before I was born as I was in the seconds following my birth, and after. Kill me then, kill me now--still murder.
Most civilized societies generally frown on murdering people for the sake of convenience. Murder is always illegal. Plenty of solutions to unwanted pregnancies other than the murder of innocents. There are contraceptives and adoption, for starters.
You had that choice when you chose to engage in sexual intercourse. Every human being is created by and a gift from God. Abortion is murder and often has catastrophic physical and emotional effects on the woman. The complete disregard for human life in this country is a very sad commentary on the state of our nation.
Oh, I thought where there was risk, there had to be choice. Anyway, people are legally allowed to do all kinds of things that aren't safe. It's not a safety issue.
To do things to THEMSELVES. Like, if somebody chops their foot off, they won't be prosecuted. It doesn't mean others should be allowed to assist their self-damage. But our current medical standards allow doctors to remove healthy body parts if the patient feels like it, chop their limbs off, remove female reproductive organs if this woman believes she's a "man" (and later regrets) with no consequences. It's all about $$ making.
Especially, repeated abortions (with less time in between than births). I knew a young women who ended up in a hospital after her 8th or 9th abortion within 2-3 years. Birth control pills take time to kick in, every time she already found herself pregnant. Her bf wouldn't use condoms, what for if she can easily get another abortion.
For all the hysteria around abortion, there is a vast territory that is occupied by around 75% of the population: abortions legal in the first trimester, abortions illegal after that (with rare exceptions regarding life of the mother).
I can't understand why "we" are letting the fringes jerk us around. This should be a settled issue, but politicians and the abortion industry are beneficiaries of the status quo so work very hard to keep it in place.
Most people who are pro-choice don't have that big a problem with time-based restrictions (that are reasonable, not the ones that are so short they're basically bans). Many states have them now and it's fine. But the laws that will come from this reversal in many states will be full bans.
These two instances are similar but not the same. With vaccines, there is only one human body asking for freedom from something being foisted upon it. With abortion you have two, the child’s body and the woman’s body. The child cannot choose what is done to its body in an abortion, much like forced vaccinations, but even less freedom. If you were to ask that samechild from the womb say 10 years later, if you can kill it, most likely the child would object. But being that those two cells that will only become a human have not yet learned language, they are unable to object to being killed. Hence the tragedy of abortion. The voiceless cannot object to losing their life, someone who co-authored their life has chosen instead to take it. We have a voice against vaccinations, a child in the womb does not. THAT is what is difficult to understand about wanting “freedom in both instances.”
I don't think any doctor should be forced to give anyone an abortion. I just don't think it's the government's business if a person wants said services and has a doctor willing to perform them. Nobody's obliged to do anything.
Women don’t realize how many more chains have been thrust upon us with the so-called freedom from the sexual revolution. Now we have the added burden of the option, the right, the choice, to murder our children in our bodies. The physiological damage is the price we get to pay for “freedom.”
Menstrual cycle, conception and pregnancy aren't a decision, those are biological functions. A decision would be to give the baby away for adoption, to abstain from having sex, to use contraception, to take plan B after drunk sex in college, very early interventions like mifepristone/misoprostol (luxuries not available to previous generations). Otherwise, the majority of "decisions" include other people, spouses and bfs, families, communities, doctors, employer, government etc. (just fear of a bad reaction from a bf or employer or feeling isolated is enough). Those aren't woman's decisions at all, especially, being traumatizing for her. Do you think it would be great if pregnancy isn't seen as some debilitating, adverse condition only tolerable if the woman is enthusiastic about having a child, adoption isn't stigmatized and communities aren't destroyed? And doctors' efforts are about improving women's and baby's health naturally? I have friends who made decisions to have their babies completely on their own and never visit doctors, so bad it is.
You are correct. I gave birth to my first in May of 1973 and my fourth in 1982. The medical establishment was already so awful that I didn’t want them to come near me or my babies. They were all midwife deliveries with cooperative prenatal care. I was blessed, I felt I had heaven’s assistance in setting that all up.
When my oldest became pregnant with my first grandchild, her husband was a military pilot and she was seeing a navy doctor. He told her the fetus seemed abnormal and wanted her to have amniocentesis to determine if she should have an abortion.
She told him no. It would be pointless because no matter whatever they told her she would continue the pregnancy. She was so distressed and uncomfortable with her care after that.
Today, that’s my 21 year old pilot grandson; soon to graduate from University of Georgia, owns his own flight company, has been married for a year to his childhood sweetheart, is handsome, smart and all you could hope for and so much more. His 3 younger brothers have a helluva act to follow!
Those last three boys were all midwife deliveries, after that first horrible experience that could have taken an exceptional life. My blood boils when I think of it 😡
Thank you for sharing this story! I have read of others who were pressured to abort because of a test showing abnormality, didn't abort, and the child was perfectly normal. In my own family, my grandfather sent my grandmother (they were married, of course) to the Dr. for 8 abortions before the Dr. finally said enough, she is young and healthy let her have a child. That was my father. Then when my mother got pregnant a 4th time (again, married of course to my father) and didn't feel well, and had 3 small children, same grandfather said, "get rid of it." They did, and their relationship was never the same. The guilt and loss followed them the rest of their lives. My dad said he used to often dream about playing catch with the son he never had. Then when my sister got pregnant in high school (not married), she thought the route was abortion. My brother, who well remembered the veil of darkness that descended when our parents aborted, talked her out of it. She and the baby's dad got married and started their family. That child is my niece. She is all her father has now, after my sister's death a few years later, wife #2 and wife #3 both leaving him, and daughter #2 committing suicide (pharmaceutical induced psychosis). She and her husband and son are all the family he has, and they almost did away with her. Thank God, for him, and for us, that they did not.
Dear God, that is sad. And such stories are far too common. Do you know about the Rachel’s Vineyard Ministry for the healing of emotions related to abortion? Catholic run ministry, but it is for everyone. I’ve had first hand experience, and it’s awesome. Gentle and healing.
I know a lot of people, who in their early years decided they would not have children. Now, 50 or so years later, their extended families and friends are dying off and they have no one.
My sister and brother-in-law, almost 40 years ago now, aborted a baby because they already had a daughter and a son who were now adolescents and they had a goal to become millionaires. By the time this niece and nephew were adults, they had dropped all ties with their parents. They moved in together. My niece got a degree in Women’s Studies, but never really had a job. She has remained dependent on her brother all these years. Neither ever married. They lived for a couple of decades in the same city as their parents, but refused contact. Recently, their father, fully vaxxed, boosted and indoctrinated in every way, an active cyclist going into his 80s, dropped dead, while cycling. His children would not attend any memorial service or participate in any way.
This sickness is overwhelming the world. But God is merciful and loving and will forgive the grossest of sin, when we repent.
Being in my eighth decade, having seen so much, I believe I can sense in women I get to know , if they have had abortions that they’ve never gotten healing from. With some there is a sad confusion. They have great difficulty making decisions and feel at fault for everything. Others are bitter and hard and aggressive, with their hearts and minds closed up tight. They desperately seek to make others affirm that what they did was perfectly right and normal.
I was reading about this before. It has to do with the mammary glands and disruption of milk production after an abortion and all the various hormonal disruptions with an abrupt end to pregnancy. Oddly enough, miscarriages do not contribute to breast cancer though the same results of cessation of milk production occurs. The body has a way of protecting the woman from cancer in a natural abortion, but not a mechanical/induced/purposeful abortion.
Thanks for this explanation! I’ve only known one woman who talked about her abortion, and she just needed to unburden her load of guilt about it. She also developed breast cancer in her 50’s, which she survived, thank God! But so very sad!
A lot of people (see other responses) still consider that an abortion. As they would prenatal death, and other scenarios where the baby cannot survive/ the mother may die.
Also, "sucking the brains out" means 2nd trimester onwards, or later even. I think
Ectopic pregnancies can occur anywhere in the abdominal cavity. I have transported many of these women experiencing these when I worked as a paramedic.
That is what it entails. Or sucking body parts off while still alive. Or injecting a lethal substance into the brain stem of a live baby. Or injecting a substance that chemically burns the baby. You can look up abortion survivors and see what horrors they lived through somehow. It is truly barbaric. Abby Johnson, who worked for planned parenthood was assigned the job of piecing together the body parts of the aborted babies to make sure they got all the parts out. They have videos showing the babies moving away from the abortionist who is trying to suck them apart or inject them with something as if they are trying desperately to stay alive. If you truly truly look into abortion and what it entails, it is absolutely sickening.
For eons of time, ectopic pregnancy, early prenatal death, and early induction of labor even when baby is expected to die but mother’s life is in danger have all been allowed as normal, morally acceptable medical procedures or events. These may in some technical vocabulary be termed “abortions,” since “to abort” means “to end,” and these do end the pregnancy. But these are NOT what is now conventionally known as elective abortion.
Elective abortion is a mom and/or dad electing to end the pregnancy when there is no fetal or maternal reason for doing so. Ending the pregnancy when, if such pregnancy was allowed to continue, it’s typical and expected end would be the birth of a live human.
Yes, of course not all normal pregnancies end with a live or healthy baby or mom. Of course there are heartbreaking and tragic exceptions to this typical experience. This is, in part at least, precisely why a stillborn baby or a baby born with health problems is so very, very difficult and sorrowful.
I tend to sit on the "legal right, moral wrong" on elective abortions as you referred to them. In a perfect world they would be legally possible and no one would do it.
Yes. I am not quite there w the “legal right,” but I agree absolutely that ultimately there are no laws that will prevent a person from doing what he/she wants to do, if she/he really wants to do it. Ultimately these are a matter of having a moral law written on our hearts. This is why our Founding Fathers talked about a moral compass and belief in God our Creator as necessary for continued self-government. Because it is SELF-government.
When individuals govern themselves well, we have little need for external government interference.
Bash, in elective abortion, which is mostly what people differ over, a woman chooses to end the life of her unborn baby (and this us usually for reasons of convenience, including late term [Guttmacher]). In elective abortion, the *point* of the procedure is a dead baby.
In an ectopic pregnancy, a surgical procedure is performed to save the life of the mother. It necessarily ends the life of the unborn baby, as would have not doing the procedure that saves the life of the mother, but it is not the *point* of the procedure. See the difference?
If the baby is already dead (intrauterine fetal demise), then labor is induced, not unlike induction when the baby is alive. The baby's life obviously could not be saved, because it was already dead, so killing the baby is not the point.
When I learned obstetrics, I was taught that we have two patients (and indeed they are identifiable by their separate DNA). If the baby is of an age where it could reasonably be safely delivered, if the mother's life is endangered, then we deliver the baby, often by C-section because it's fastest. If the baby is too young to survive outside the mother, then we prioritize saving the mother's health and life, because that saves both patients.
If you come up with another scenario, I'll try to address it, too.
And ectopic pregnancies will never, ever come to term. That poor baby will never have the chance to reach its full potential as it is not tucked safe into a womb. Their little life is indisputably not able to come to fruition under any circumstance, hence why the mothers life is the priority. And ectopic pregnancies can be very serious, especially with excess bleeding.
I totally get it, and doctors / obstetricians are imo the best qualified to get into the meat of it in terms of this case or that. I guess there is not much debate on the merits in those cases
On elective / convenience abortions, they do sound unsavory when put in those terms. I dont see why anything beyond first trimester for "convenience" should exist personally. But its a touchy subject for a lot of ppl!
You're the one who said abortion in ectopic pregnancy and said it was dangerous. It's generally not considered abortion in that case because the pregnancy isn't viable anyway.
Nobody wants to consider the epidemic mental health issues associated with abortion even when they are performed under the best of procedures. The Morning-after-pill is now available to make abortions mostly a thing of the past.
This is my question as well. Part of it is that insurance still doesn't cover birth control. Another factor is pharmacists who have refused to dispense things like the morning after pill.
Morning-After vs. Abortion Pill (RU486) -- Availability of pills to prevent or terminate pregnancy were not available 50 years ago during Roe vs.Wade SCOTUS deliberations.
How would SCOTUS have ruled if these medications had been available at the time?
Weighing in here as a woman: my mother's generation had to fight for the right to vote, hold property, or have legal rights to their own children. Women were kept ignorant as to the facts of sex, and child birth until they experienced them all too often in the not so distant past.
I am 62 now, and remember thinking as a young girl how propounded unfair the entire set up was to me personally. Girls with opinions were attacked, always. We were to be "seen and not heard," if we were to be approved of by most males.
What does this historical view have to do with reproductive rights? Well, we women, (and men,) who have studied this understand very clearly that others, mostly male others, have been deciding for women what they can and cannot do WITH THEIR OWN BODIES for millennia. In patriarchal societies, which we certainly are.
And, women are uniquely susceptible to sexual violence which can, and often does, result in pregnancy.
Given this history, I personally have come to the conclusion that sad as it is, men have no right to tell a woman whether or not she must carry an unwanted pregnancy. And neither does anyone else.
We need a Constitutional Admendment that protects a woman's right to a first trimester termination of pregnancy, because of the injust history of our own civilization.
The second trimester is perfect fighting grounds for all the right and left wing foot soldiers, in the states and the federal government, as there are important considerations on both sides.
Third trimester should be utterly forbidden, unless for life-threatening medical reasons, fetal death, etc.,.
No one, ever, anywhere should, (in a civilized society that doesn't perform child sacrifice,) have an at will "abortion" of a healthy third trimester child! That is murder in my book.
Finally, sorting through these issues is something America, and Americans, appear to have lost the honesty, intelligence and moral capacity to accomplish.
Let's hope and pray that these profoundly challenging times start raising up some courageous individuals who can speak and reason with compassion and courage on very difficult subjects, accepting the limitations that exist in legislating the world we wish to live in, yet achieving the highest in expanding, "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness," for all Americans, rich or poor, male or female, or "other." Reproductive Rights are critical to this. Hence the fight we are are about to witness.
A constitutional amendment enshrining bodily autonomy and medical freedom would address many injustices of today and not be subject to reversal on the whim of the Supreme Court.
I agree, 100%! That is exactly what is required. Bodily autonomy, which has yet to be clearly spelled out legally for all Americans, is a foundational principle which cannot be breached. Especially in the "bioengineering" world that has recently developed.
Just to chime in, I'm closing in on 70 and did not see girls' opinions 'always attacked' out in the rural area where I grew up.
Those of us with good grades and scholastic aptitude were however, encouraged to attend college. There was a lot of work being done in those years to assure equal rights for women, and prohibit discrimination of women.
Title IX was signed by Nixon in 1972 and I regretted narrowly missing the benefits of the girls' athletic programs that were added to the schools out there.
Agree that not all women had benefits of female family or friends to clue them in on how to avoid or handle situations that risked pregnancy. My own mother could not clearly convey to me where the risks were. A friend's mom and my SiL could be a bit more base in their explanations.
Women's lib to some extent ushered in a notion of sexual equality for women, to choose when to get pregnant and with whom. Sadly, that included Roe v Wade.
I'm younger than you and was constantly put down for having and voicing my own ideas. Didn't and don't live in a rural area, Northern state, rust belt. Got great grades, went to college. Still get put down for voicing a dissenting opinion or one that's not of the alleged majority.
BtW, in U.S., my gandmother's generation fought for the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution that stated no one could be denied the right to vote on account of their [biological] sex, and thus granted American women the right to vote, a right known as women’s suffrage, and was ratified on August 18, 1920, ending almost a century of protest and a year before my mother was born.
I have Canadians friends and they are so blasé about all Canadas requirements….it’s infuriating and unbelievable to me that they are so complicit! Of course they are fully jabbed and boosted!!😝
Every unvaccinated person i know all over the world has some sort of fake vaccine paperwork issued. Pretty elaborate "vaccine pass laundering" methods as well
I’ve believed shedding has always been a problem. For the first year of the jabs I have SIX cases of shingles until my holistic doctor figured out a way to protect my system from the overload. I’d hope it was spike being shed and not the vaxx itself. Every time I was in and around allot of vaxxed people I came down with it. Still have to travel up to deep blue heavy vaxxed and boosted New England to see my Dad but at least now I don’t get sick. Thanks for another great roundup!
Please share how your doctor figured out how to protect your system. Currently dealing with shingles and I never want this again! I am barely over 50, unvaxxed, not immune compromised, not under great stress, and otherwise healthy. So why did I develop this now? At the urgent care I went to in our area, she said I was the 8th person she had seen within the last month or so with shingles. What are the chances of that at one urgent care?! I believe the shedding is a real thing based on my case.
I know several people who decided to get the shingles vaccine also. Is there a possibility that this vaccine is shedding also creating new cases which in turn sells more vaccine??
Oh geez. Had c-pox as child but have refused shingles shot, even tho aware of potential for excruciating pain and terrible effects if cranial nerves affected, especially opthalmic.
To hear about the rise in shingles cases and potential of others shedding this stuff, sux.
Just another datapoint, but in the summer of 2020, I came down with shingles at the age of 45. Similar to you, healthy, not stressed, and it seemed very weird. Obviously, that was before Covid vaccines were even a thing, so it’s quite possible that this is something related to Covid spike protein, both natural and artificial.
For anyone else coming across this, if you feel a strange tingling sensation confined to a narrow band spiraling down an arm or leg (look up “dermatone” for an illustration) and you’ve had chickenpox in the past, suspect shingles and get early diagnosis and antivirals. Caught mine immediately because it was just such a weird sensation (pins and needles crossed with a mild sunburn) and my wife happened to figure it out long before I would’ve even been bothered enough to see a doctor, especially during the height of Covid hysteria. Because I got on antivirals the same day the first small rash started to appear, I was slightly uncomfortable for a few days, but never had severe pain or even a bad rash.
Thank you for that. I was going to get the shingles shot, but then my husband's uncle got bell's palsy 2 days after getting that shot, this was just before the covid shots rolled out. Then the lying went into overdrive, and have decided I don't even trust the flu shot. So NO shingles shot for me, but good to know early symptoms to ward it off if I do get. I keep seeing sponsored ads for the shingles shot all over the place. Weird, huh?
You couldn't pay me enough to get a shingles vax. Someone wrote about it on our Nextdoor chat site and there were so many stories of people actually being paralyzed for a year from that shot in that small sample. I was shocked and looked up the chance of that side effect and it was actually 6%. There is no scenario where I wouldn't take a month or so of pain vs a year of being paralyzed. Once again, public is not informed.
You are so lucky to have caught it early Chris! It was a weird sensation for me also, very sore back at the bottom of my left rib and also sore and tingling feeling at the bottom of my ribs of left chest. Just thought that my back was out of place and needed an adjustment. Got the adjustment which helped it to feel better than before, so didn’t suspect anything. Then the next day, a few small rash spots show up. Still didn’t think too much about it. Thought maybe my clothing irritated my skin or something like that. Felt a little run down, but nothing out of the ordinary. Next day, many more spots show up. That sent me to the doctor! Only when it got to that point, did we start to suspect this was more than a random rash. Wish I would have caught it sooner, but there was no reason for me to suspect it was shingles. I still caught it early enough for the antiviral to begin helping but a catching it a couple days prior would be making a big difference right now!
I’m taking an antiviral called Valacyclovir. There are three antiviral medications available which work well to help the body get rid of the infection.
Usually it’s not “something” but some life events such as acute stress or anything that suppresses the immune system. Your immune system keeps it at bay. Hence why older folks tend to get it more commonly to with diminishment of the immune system as they age. A lot of people have them pop up in intensely stressful times of life like loss of spouse, job, etc.
Lynne, please share the holistic doctor's way to protect from shingles. I just recovered from a very light case, but I do not want it again! I am very healthy, retired, and stress is practically gone from my life so there was no reason for me to have a shingles outbreak.
Yes it is this … taken two tablets daily two times on an empty stomach. Knocks it out quicker than the pharmaceutical remedy. Taken as a preventative when being exposed and stops it from occurring. Amazing! Standard Process Multizyme and the Zymex capsules.
So sorry. My hubby got shingles winter of 2020. The sickest he has ever been outside of triple bypass surgery. Then “bronchitis” on top of it which I am sure was Covid but he never tested. I got a mild something then too and antibody test last summer showed antibodies. He was so miserable with shingles. He then got the shingles shots. I declined. I’m very robust health wise.
Sorry to hear he was so sick! You have such a hard time sleeping with this, that you can easily pick up on other viruses from being sleep deprived. Thankfully it’s on my side and back and not on my face or eye area, those cases can be very serious, but it is still miserable.
Stay sane. Sleeping was horrible for him. He had to sleep in the guest room for a couple of months. Then I believe he had Covid funny when he went to doc early in January 2021 coughing and such. Feverish. The doc did not give him a Covid test. I found that strange given the timing.
The protocol is easy and works amazingly as a cure and preventative. Standard process brand Multizyme and Zymex. Two tablets twice a day on an empty stomach.. then no food for 30 min at least. Cures it so much faster than pharmaceuticals. I use it now as a preventative whenever I and out of my circle. Two days before, while traveling, and for two days after. Haven’t had it once since she figured it out.
The Roe v Wade reversal draft was most certainly leaked intentionally. That’s no surprise to anyone that’s following this crap show of the last 3 years. What continues to disappoint me is that our Supreme Court is intentionally in on the takeover. I feel betrayed by all the drama we witnessed with the Kavanagh theater and later Coney-Barrett. All just theater.
Both the right and Left have used the pro-life and pro-choice as planks in their platforms for decades and done nothing other than fund PP every year, while winking and nodding.
The earlier than anticipated leak I believe was to give cover against 2000 Mules coming out. That nasty mosquito, “election fraud” won’t go away. I know in the backwaters of mid Michigan tickets for all viewings were sold out almost immediately. The timing of this leak may not have been well thought out with Mother’s Day this weekend. I sincerely hope that the Left have overshot the target once again.
I agree with you! Same with viewings in Florida! Sold out, sold out, sold out. We wanted to go to the theater but everywhere anywhere near us was sold out. So we have paid for the live showing Saturday night to watch. The proof has been here all along but they have worked OT, holidays and weekends to keep it suppressed. It’s way past time to expose this.
You are correct without a doubt all theater. Paxson's case after election representing almost half the states was not heard due "lack of standing" All I can say is WTF?
CDC had the tracking data to show that people's travels and obedience to lockdowns did NOT correlate with Coof outbreaks. The NYT obtained the same data, used it to fingerpoint the red states for leaving their few-blocks radius (duh, outside NY people have to drive places), but they couldn't connect human activity with viral activity. Who cares, right CDC? Muh violence. 😒
Talking to my neighbor in West VA about how their church, high in a tiny mountain town, with a congregation of about 30 people, had its FB streaming shut down 3 times over the past 2 years because the preacher talked about something objectionable to the FB police. At first I just thought, oh yeah FB shut them down, they do that . . . then I thought WHAT kind of massive surveillance must be going on for them to even notice this tiny church??? The FB stream was for elderly church members who wanted to stay home and still attend church -- and this was taken away from them for 30 days, then 90 days. The preacher is anti-vaxx, anti-mask, and preaches that marriage is between a man and a woman only. My neighbor wasn't sure which un-approved viewpoint got him shut down.
And my once beloved church would not give out religious exemptions and now their nonprofit is collecting for Ukraine…total sell out! I am out…no longer a sheep!
Ordered my faraday bag today. Had looked into them but never bothered. Yeah I know you have to pull them out of the bag to make a call of whatever, but decided I am going to make it harder on the trackers. But I am not one of those people who are attached to their phones 24/7. Mainly use it to call, text or check email.
"Politically homeless" is a nice way to say "utterly unrepresented." Everyone in power is using these issues we care about, that affect our lives, purely for political capital. Everyone.
Truly I am politically unmoored as well. I despise both houses. But I feel free actually. I have been both sides in my long life. Same Dance with the Devil—a 2 faced one that just takes turns leading.
May the evil tactic of the enemy to use the threat of the loss of the “right” to poison and dismember and suck from their mothers’ wombs tiny human children to garner Democrat votes backfire in the faces of the snarling, hysterical, screaming masses bent on committing heinous sins, the consequences for which are paid for by innocent blood. Oh God, help us.
I always ask the Branch Covidians to honestly answer one question. If they never watched or listened to the MSM in the last two years and they didn't see anyone wearing a mask, would they even know that there was a "pandemic" taking place and would they notice anything different about their lives. The answer is always "No".
All the pink pussie hats have one distinct advantage over the babies they wish to exterminate, all there mothers valued their life and gave birth to them....
You don't know that... they could've been horribly abused by those mothers and they don't want to repeat patterns. People make tough choices for many reasons and we can't pretend to know why. It's actually none of anyone's business. Why we are still talking about this BS in 2022 is beyond comprehendible to me - oh right. It's a topic of contention so we will never let it go - even when we are all on our 106th mandatory experimental jab and can barely function.
That’s one way to justify cold blooded murder. You might be more BS than you realize. Life. Adoption. Reflect. Pro life and pro death, pro choice is a cop out for those that’d prefer to kill an innocent life. Natural immunity is the gold standard. Welcome to enlightenment!
The pink had protests were a prime example of mass formation at work. It causes people to do absurd things that no one would otherwise do - Like wear women’s private parts in public, or turn their neighbors in to the gestapo.
They can’t even be trusted to do that. Tried and failed. I remember the big push in the late 80’s to hand out condoms at high schools and colleges.
That produced the abortion boom because guess what? Condoms aren’t full proof and they didn’t want to teach abstinence or conservative values like self control or personal responsibility. 🙄
While I understand what you are saying, IMO schools should stick to math, reading, writing, accurate history and civics. Add in financial classes and some trade school electives and then we’re back to school being what school should have always stayed.
My head is spinning as I read your report this morning Jeff. Vaccine aerosol spray? Roe vs Wade and the midterms? Supply chain woes? What kind of mind thinks up this stuff? This is what sets us apart from these sociopaths in office and in high places elsewhere. We think of ways to better the world for the good of the whole. They only think of ways to control and kill us off in the largest numbers they can fathom. (There - I said it). And now it makes sense to me that Roe vs Wade decision is to get them more votes in Nov. They had to do something and they did. An insurance policy. God-forbid they work on inflation, or keeping shelves stocked etc etc. SMH
Evidence for Aerosol Transfer of SARS-CoV2-specific Humoral Immunity (Preprint on 5/4/22)
Abstract
Despite the obvious knowledge that infectious particles can be shared through respiration, whether other constituents of the nasal/oral fluids can be passed between hosts has surprisingly never even been postulated, let alone investigated. The circumstances of the present pandemic facilitated a unique opportunity to fully examine this provocative idea. The data we show provides evidence for a new mechanism by which herd immunity may be manifested, the aerosol transfer of antibodies between immune and non-immune hosts.
Well, maybe they already created the contagious "vaccine" and used it in one or more lot numbers of the CV-19 experiment. There are a lot of posts about recent cases of shingles on the board.
"There’s another way of designing transmissible vaccines that is likely to prove even safer, Nusimer says. These vaccines will use benign viruses, which can infect a person or animal without making it sick. Known as cytomegaloviruses (CMV), they actually belong to the herpes family. They’re very common in both humans and other mammals. In fact, between 50 and 80 percent of adults in the United States are infected with CMV by age 40, although most have no symptoms."
Oct 01, 2007 · CMV is a type of virus in the herpes family -- the kind of viruses that also causes chicken pox, shingles and cold sores. CMV is also knows as human herpes virus type 5, or HHV5.
Even more frightening as the article goes on, they boast about being able to target only one species and leave others. I think we can all see where this is headed.
"These viruses can already spread easily, and many stick to just one species. So scientists could design vaccines that would limit themselves just to the kind of animals they have chosen to vaccinate."
They are also developing vaccines to be genetically inserted into vegetables. They've mentioned head lettuce. Probably because that's the only veggie most Americans will eat. So, veggies will now be off limits? FYI, it'll also be in the seeds. Edited to correct grammar.
Uh secede? Have you seen the county maps of red vs blue? There aren't that many blues! They just make the most noise. Silent majority, wake up! Anyway you can't trust the elections in this third world country. It's embarrassing that we don't protect our elections. The rinos were just as complicit in the coverup. This is why wars happen. Because no one ever gives you your rights or freedom back.
County maps are misleading. Those blue dots that are cities that vote blue often dominate in numbers the red counties that surround them. Secession would be difficult now because the geographic division isn't anywhere nearly as easy as 'North-South.'
Contagious vaccines are a pipe dream as even the Spanish flu and diptheria and other "TRANSMISSIBLE" diseases were not found to be. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/67902
And I'm gonna rant on both parties
The left was my body my choice on abortion, drugs, etc. But not vaccines.
The right is my body my choice on vaccines/medicine but not other things.
I would argue that the present-day right is still far more libertarian - the key issue in the abortion debate in particular is that most on the right regard the baby as NOT "your body", but the baby's body.
Always a dumb argument. If it was only a baby's body, then just remove it from the mother. Problem solved. That fact that it can't survive means you are forcing one person to be responsible for another. That's also exactly what we've seen in this pandemic. We are being forced to do things to protect other people and our rights are removed. Don't agree with it on either account.
Society generally expects parents to be responsible for their children (and in some cases, removes the children if they aren't). The particular issue of abortion is obviously much more difficult because the child CAN'T be removed for ~ 9 months without dying. Especially in the case of rape, there's a reasonable argument to be made along the lines of, "I never consented to carry a child so why should I have to, even if the child doesn't survive?"; the counter-argument is of course "neither did the child consent to anything, or do anything deserving of being killed". As I said, it's not easy.
However, I would like to ask you -- if your objection is based on being forced to care for a child you didn't ask for, would you then be ok with forbidding abortion in the future if there was sufficient technology to safely remove the child at < 3 months, and have it survive (and it was paid for, and people were there to adopt the child, etc - I'm interested in your moral position, not arguing over the practicalities of it)?
Really? Where's the proof that even the mRNA causes spike proteins?
Viruses and "spikes" look awfully similar to exosomes and cellular debris. I really don't buy that any of this crap works. Crispr gene editing was also a failure, despite the huge hype.
Want to know why they are injuring people?
Moderna had an issue with the same LIPID NANOPARTICLES years before con-vid.
They accumulated and caused similar issues to what we have today.
Guess what, pfizer also licenses the same lipids.
mRNA, we have no clue whether it works or not. We also have no clue whether the adenovirus vectors work.
Vaccine science is so corrupt that there's no real analysis of what is going on.
DNA/RNA transcription is well enough understood (outside the context of just vaccines) that we're pretty safe in saying, *IF* the RNA gets into the cell, it will cause the cell to build the proteins that it codes for (in this case the spike). As far as cell debris "looking like" spikes, well that depends what was going on in the cell, doesn't it? If the cell was producing spikes, then the debris when it dies will contain those spikes.
On your second point, yes - it was already shown in studies on rats that the LNPs were toxic to the rats (although at higher dosage per bodyweight than they use on humans... but it still doesn't exactly promote confidence in their safety).
So I found the linked article quite interesting, but I'm not entirely sure if that was supposed to be a direct response to my comment or not. (I quite agree that the current understanding of genetics and cellular processes is a form of "groping in the dark", rather like a wannabe hacker manipulating random bits of data in a piece of software in the hope that something interesting happens.)
My understanding is that the so-called "junk" DNA is more often called "unexpressed" DNA nowdays, and is understood to be involved in regulating translation and expression of genes... but nobody really understands exactly how.
Exactly. They're guessing their way through, that's why it takes a lot of computing power. They're trying to make a picture out of puzzle pieces. Once mathematics takes over a field, it goes into subjectivity, because the models are only as good as the proof in the pudding and they got very little of it. A lot of what they call "exogenous virome" is really "dna" that they detect in the body, but have nothing to map it to.
I'm not sure of how inaccurate genetics are in determining sickness but if its anything like virology, it's probably bunk.
Example: 99.9% of people who have HPV virus don't get cervical cancer.
And the upcoming scam is Epstein Barr Virus aka mononucleosis, causing cancer. But a huge majority have the virus code, so that's like saying that everyone who gets cancer drinks water and lives in a house, lol.
I'm wondering about all the Amazon fulfillment centers. Are they running low on products made in China?? Don't get me wrong I'd love to see 75%+ of products made in the USA.
We did it to ourselves by buying cheap products made offshore by low-wage workers. I distinctly remember "Made in Japan" as a little kid 60 some-odd years ago. Same as food. High quality food costs more. We are addicted to cheap goods and we get what we pay for. It's in our hands to change all this. But we all need to know that there's no such thing as a free lunch.
I have two items on continual renewal. Both of them are delayed or not complete. I think Amazon is finally getting affected by the shipping delays now.
The Roe v. Wade issue has triggered a flood of commentary from alert readers of this blog. I suggest all of us keep our focus on the blatant disregard for the bodily autonomy of ALL human beings on this planet via the experimental injection scheme. There's a good chance that the injections will disrupt/permanently impair hormones and fertility in many recipients. Not to mention reactivation of cancers/old viral infections, and an increase in autoimmune disease. This is a massive spiritual battle and the Roe v Wade issue is certainly an aspect of it, but not central.
I dont see any contradiction between being pro choice and understanding that Roe vs Wade was a bad decision. The benefit of states rights exceeds that of federally mandated anything. The pandemic has demonstrated that. I would be happy if every state had some kind of framework for legal and safe abortions but it is most certainly a states issue.
Also I see the cdc has extended its masking recommendation in planes and trains. So, for comparison to other parts of the world (1st hand experience)
- England, mask only at gates where destination requires
- Holland, mask only beyond security (not enforced)
- Hungary,mask only at gates where destination requires
- France, mask on public transport
- austria, mask on public transport and supermarkets
- Belgium, mask on public transport
Many other examples abound. But suffice to say the "mask on public transport" is one of those globally coordinated things that is being done because it needs to be shown that it can be done. Resist and boycott with all your might
Abortion will never be safe. You won’t hear about the women victims, unless you listen to alternative sources. What abortion does to destroy women’s lives is unbelievable. Suicide rates skyrocket. Over 60% of the women who abort feel pressured by someone to do so (Guttmacher Institute). Some choice. Dad’s have no say. Couples often break up after an abortion. Abortion has many victims. Abortion is never safe, needless to say, for the babies either
My wife is a Nurse Practitioner who, true to her training, takes a thorough social history from all her patients. (Why is it that many of us bonehead MDs can't do the same?) Anyway, she will attest to the carnage women experience in later life, following a decision to abort a child early on. Many women are still traumatized and grief-ridden decades later and have never forgiven themselves.
Your comment made me think of of something I heard some time ago from a woman who had been through it, and looked back on it years later, that "abortion doesn't make you not a mother; it just makes you the mother of a dead child".
Unless you're both in private practice, it's because she's allowed more time by her employing 'health system.'
Maybe we could just let the women decide, or something. Freedom does not hinge on safety. Pregnancy and childbirth will never be safe either.
Maybe we should let the baby decide. It’s his/her body, his/her choice.
Interesting perspective. I don't disagree with your logic. I heard a saying some time ago that still resonates: "Pray for the dead and work like hell for the living." And then we may also ask: When does life begin? ...I support the idea of the plan B morning after pill, and raincoats! [I do believe that there are sketchy details re the recycling of human body parts, and PP ain't no saint.]
If it's inside the physical boundaries of my body, I have a right to remove it. Same way I have a right to refuse things being put into it.
If by "it" you are referring to a tumor or cyst or other foreign object, then yes. If by "it" you are referring to a human child, with a beating heart and tiny fingers and toes, nestled in your womb, then no. As a former fetus myself, I can definitively state that I was just as much alive and "me" before I was born as I was in the seconds following my birth, and after. Kill me then, kill me now--still murder.
Definitively, eh? Interesting.
May God have mercy on your soul.
God might have a different opinion on that.
Over 60% feeling pressured is not freedom
It's hard to "pressure" someone more than passing a law making what she wants to do illegal.
Most civilized societies generally frown on murdering people for the sake of convenience. Murder is always illegal. Plenty of solutions to unwanted pregnancies other than the murder of innocents. There are contraceptives and adoption, for starters.
And if she doesn’t want to do it, and is being pressured, which is the majority?
Legislation based on the majority being too weak to resist "pressure?"
Maybe she needs to learn to resist "pressure" and say "just say no."
Supposedly. It doesn't matter when it comes to legislating abortion. Why don't you lobby to outlaw pressuring women to have abortions?
You had that choice when you chose to engage in sexual intercourse. Every human being is created by and a gift from God. Abortion is murder and often has catastrophic physical and emotional effects on the woman. The complete disregard for human life in this country is a very sad commentary on the state of our nation.
Abortion 100% fatal for the baby plus many times it has lasting psychological effects for the mother.
Pregnancy and child birth pretty safe in comparison ( cdc says 700 deaths related to pregnancy a year in US)
Oh, I thought where there was risk, there had to be choice. Anyway, people are legally allowed to do all kinds of things that aren't safe. It's not a safety issue.
It is if it results in taking the life of another.
To do things to THEMSELVES. Like, if somebody chops their foot off, they won't be prosecuted. It doesn't mean others should be allowed to assist their self-damage. But our current medical standards allow doctors to remove healthy body parts if the patient feels like it, chop their limbs off, remove female reproductive organs if this woman believes she's a "man" (and later regrets) with no consequences. It's all about $$ making.
Especially, repeated abortions (with less time in between than births). I knew a young women who ended up in a hospital after her 8th or 9th abortion within 2-3 years. Birth control pills take time to kick in, every time she already found herself pregnant. Her bf wouldn't use condoms, what for if she can easily get another abortion.
Neither are COVID vaccines, and they were forced upon us...
Yeah, and they shouldn't have been, even if they were safe. What's so hard to understand about wanting freedom in both instances?
For all the hysteria around abortion, there is a vast territory that is occupied by around 75% of the population: abortions legal in the first trimester, abortions illegal after that (with rare exceptions regarding life of the mother).
I can't understand why "we" are letting the fringes jerk us around. This should be a settled issue, but politicians and the abortion industry are beneficiaries of the status quo so work very hard to keep it in place.
Most people who are pro-choice don't have that big a problem with time-based restrictions (that are reasonable, not the ones that are so short they're basically bans). Many states have them now and it's fine. But the laws that will come from this reversal in many states will be full bans.
These two instances are similar but not the same. With vaccines, there is only one human body asking for freedom from something being foisted upon it. With abortion you have two, the child’s body and the woman’s body. The child cannot choose what is done to its body in an abortion, much like forced vaccinations, but even less freedom. If you were to ask that samechild from the womb say 10 years later, if you can kill it, most likely the child would object. But being that those two cells that will only become a human have not yet learned language, they are unable to object to being killed. Hence the tragedy of abortion. The voiceless cannot object to losing their life, someone who co-authored their life has chosen instead to take it. We have a voice against vaccinations, a child in the womb does not. THAT is what is difficult to understand about wanting “freedom in both instances.”
You confuse freedom with somebody's obligation to give you services.
I don't think any doctor should be forced to give anyone an abortion. I just don't think it's the government's business if a person wants said services and has a doctor willing to perform them. Nobody's obliged to do anything.
Do you not understand how society has been warped by the sexual revolution and then abortion, which had to follow?
Once women had the protection of men being told, ‘You got her pregnant. The right thing is to marry her.’
Now, a woman is told, ‘Get an abortion. If you don’t, the burden is all on you.’
If she’s lucky, the man may feel obligated to pay half the abortion fee.
This world is critically ill from decades of playing god. Humans are no where close to being smart enough. What a mess we have made.
Amazing how Big Pharma controls the future
Women don’t realize how many more chains have been thrust upon us with the so-called freedom from the sexual revolution. Now we have the added burden of the option, the right, the choice, to murder our children in our bodies. The physiological damage is the price we get to pay for “freedom.”
Way to miss the point entirely, Anne. Perhaps a course in philosophy would prove helpful...
Or men, since men can now get pregnant...
And - let the father decide also - if he doesn't want the baby because it's a bad time for him, he's off the hook.
Does the male ever get a vote (say, if they're married)? Since we're allowing the responsible parties to act.
The father certainly should have a voice in this.
Menstrual cycle, conception and pregnancy aren't a decision, those are biological functions. A decision would be to give the baby away for adoption, to abstain from having sex, to use contraception, to take plan B after drunk sex in college, very early interventions like mifepristone/misoprostol (luxuries not available to previous generations). Otherwise, the majority of "decisions" include other people, spouses and bfs, families, communities, doctors, employer, government etc. (just fear of a bad reaction from a bf or employer or feeling isolated is enough). Those aren't woman's decisions at all, especially, being traumatizing for her. Do you think it would be great if pregnancy isn't seen as some debilitating, adverse condition only tolerable if the woman is enthusiastic about having a child, adoption isn't stigmatized and communities aren't destroyed? And doctors' efforts are about improving women's and baby's health naturally? I have friends who made decisions to have their babies completely on their own and never visit doctors, so bad it is.
You are correct. I gave birth to my first in May of 1973 and my fourth in 1982. The medical establishment was already so awful that I didn’t want them to come near me or my babies. They were all midwife deliveries with cooperative prenatal care. I was blessed, I felt I had heaven’s assistance in setting that all up.
When my oldest became pregnant with my first grandchild, her husband was a military pilot and she was seeing a navy doctor. He told her the fetus seemed abnormal and wanted her to have amniocentesis to determine if she should have an abortion.
She told him no. It would be pointless because no matter whatever they told her she would continue the pregnancy. She was so distressed and uncomfortable with her care after that.
Today, that’s my 21 year old pilot grandson; soon to graduate from University of Georgia, owns his own flight company, has been married for a year to his childhood sweetheart, is handsome, smart and all you could hope for and so much more. His 3 younger brothers have a helluva act to follow!
Those last three boys were all midwife deliveries, after that first horrible experience that could have taken an exceptional life. My blood boils when I think of it 😡
Thank you for sharing this story! I have read of others who were pressured to abort because of a test showing abnormality, didn't abort, and the child was perfectly normal. In my own family, my grandfather sent my grandmother (they were married, of course) to the Dr. for 8 abortions before the Dr. finally said enough, she is young and healthy let her have a child. That was my father. Then when my mother got pregnant a 4th time (again, married of course to my father) and didn't feel well, and had 3 small children, same grandfather said, "get rid of it." They did, and their relationship was never the same. The guilt and loss followed them the rest of their lives. My dad said he used to often dream about playing catch with the son he never had. Then when my sister got pregnant in high school (not married), she thought the route was abortion. My brother, who well remembered the veil of darkness that descended when our parents aborted, talked her out of it. She and the baby's dad got married and started their family. That child is my niece. She is all her father has now, after my sister's death a few years later, wife #2 and wife #3 both leaving him, and daughter #2 committing suicide (pharmaceutical induced psychosis). She and her husband and son are all the family he has, and they almost did away with her. Thank God, for him, and for us, that they did not.
Dear God, that is sad. And such stories are far too common. Do you know about the Rachel’s Vineyard Ministry for the healing of emotions related to abortion? Catholic run ministry, but it is for everyone. I’ve had first hand experience, and it’s awesome. Gentle and healing.
I know a lot of people, who in their early years decided they would not have children. Now, 50 or so years later, their extended families and friends are dying off and they have no one.
My sister and brother-in-law, almost 40 years ago now, aborted a baby because they already had a daughter and a son who were now adolescents and they had a goal to become millionaires. By the time this niece and nephew were adults, they had dropped all ties with their parents. They moved in together. My niece got a degree in Women’s Studies, but never really had a job. She has remained dependent on her brother all these years. Neither ever married. They lived for a couple of decades in the same city as their parents, but refused contact. Recently, their father, fully vaxxed, boosted and indoctrinated in every way, an active cyclist going into his 80s, dropped dead, while cycling. His children would not attend any memorial service or participate in any way.
This sickness is overwhelming the world. But God is merciful and loving and will forgive the grossest of sin, when we repent.
Being in my eighth decade, having seen so much, I believe I can sense in women I get to know , if they have had abortions that they’ve never gotten healing from. With some there is a sad confusion. They have great difficulty making decisions and feel at fault for everything. Others are bitter and hard and aggressive, with their hearts and minds closed up tight. They desperately seek to make others affirm that what they did was perfectly right and normal.
Check out reasons behind women's mental problems-big one is abortion.
Effects many men as well. The forgotten victims
Also the death rate on aborted children is very high.
Murder!!
Breast cancer rates are exponentially higher among women who’ve had abortions, I didn’t look up the stat on that, but it’s long been known.
I was reading about this before. It has to do with the mammary glands and disruption of milk production after an abortion and all the various hormonal disruptions with an abrupt end to pregnancy. Oddly enough, miscarriages do not contribute to breast cancer though the same results of cessation of milk production occurs. The body has a way of protecting the woman from cancer in a natural abortion, but not a mechanical/induced/purposeful abortion.
Thanks for this explanation! I’ve only known one woman who talked about her abortion, and she just needed to unburden her load of guilt about it. She also developed breast cancer in her 50’s, which she survived, thank God! But so very sad!
There are plenty of legitimate scenarios- ectopic pregnancy, prenatal death, etc where I would strongly disagree
That’s not an abortion. Neither of those situations. An abortion is sucking the brains out of a baby that is alive.
What is it then?
A miscarriage, or a removal of a Fallopian tube, or wherever the ectopic pregnancy occurs.
A lot of people (see other responses) still consider that an abortion. As they would prenatal death, and other scenarios where the baby cannot survive/ the mother may die.
Also, "sucking the brains out" means 2nd trimester onwards, or later even. I think
Ectopic pregnancies can occur anywhere in the abdominal cavity. I have transported many of these women experiencing these when I worked as a paramedic.
Plenty of you tube videos describing/showing what happens in various types of abortions. Check it out for yourself.
"Sucking the brains out of a baby that is alive." ?! I think you need to do some real research on what an abortion entails.
That is what it entails. Or sucking body parts off while still alive. Or injecting a lethal substance into the brain stem of a live baby. Or injecting a substance that chemically burns the baby. You can look up abortion survivors and see what horrors they lived through somehow. It is truly barbaric. Abby Johnson, who worked for planned parenthood was assigned the job of piecing together the body parts of the aborted babies to make sure they got all the parts out. They have videos showing the babies moving away from the abortionist who is trying to suck them apart or inject them with something as if they are trying desperately to stay alive. If you truly truly look into abortion and what it entails, it is absolutely sickening.
For eons of time, ectopic pregnancy, early prenatal death, and early induction of labor even when baby is expected to die but mother’s life is in danger have all been allowed as normal, morally acceptable medical procedures or events. These may in some technical vocabulary be termed “abortions,” since “to abort” means “to end,” and these do end the pregnancy. But these are NOT what is now conventionally known as elective abortion.
Elective abortion is a mom and/or dad electing to end the pregnancy when there is no fetal or maternal reason for doing so. Ending the pregnancy when, if such pregnancy was allowed to continue, it’s typical and expected end would be the birth of a live human.
Yes, of course not all normal pregnancies end with a live or healthy baby or mom. Of course there are heartbreaking and tragic exceptions to this typical experience. This is, in part at least, precisely why a stillborn baby or a baby born with health problems is so very, very difficult and sorrowful.
I tend to sit on the "legal right, moral wrong" on elective abortions as you referred to them. In a perfect world they would be legally possible and no one would do it.
Yes. I am not quite there w the “legal right,” but I agree absolutely that ultimately there are no laws that will prevent a person from doing what he/she wants to do, if she/he really wants to do it. Ultimately these are a matter of having a moral law written on our hearts. This is why our Founding Fathers talked about a moral compass and belief in God our Creator as necessary for continued self-government. Because it is SELF-government.
When individuals govern themselves well, we have little need for external government interference.
Well put
Bash, in elective abortion, which is mostly what people differ over, a woman chooses to end the life of her unborn baby (and this us usually for reasons of convenience, including late term [Guttmacher]). In elective abortion, the *point* of the procedure is a dead baby.
In an ectopic pregnancy, a surgical procedure is performed to save the life of the mother. It necessarily ends the life of the unborn baby, as would have not doing the procedure that saves the life of the mother, but it is not the *point* of the procedure. See the difference?
If the baby is already dead (intrauterine fetal demise), then labor is induced, not unlike induction when the baby is alive. The baby's life obviously could not be saved, because it was already dead, so killing the baby is not the point.
When I learned obstetrics, I was taught that we have two patients (and indeed they are identifiable by their separate DNA). If the baby is of an age where it could reasonably be safely delivered, if the mother's life is endangered, then we deliver the baby, often by C-section because it's fastest. If the baby is too young to survive outside the mother, then we prioritize saving the mother's health and life, because that saves both patients.
If you come up with another scenario, I'll try to address it, too.
And ectopic pregnancies will never, ever come to term. That poor baby will never have the chance to reach its full potential as it is not tucked safe into a womb. Their little life is indisputably not able to come to fruition under any circumstance, hence why the mothers life is the priority. And ectopic pregnancies can be very serious, especially with excess bleeding.
I totally get it, and doctors / obstetricians are imo the best qualified to get into the meat of it in terms of this case or that. I guess there is not much debate on the merits in those cases
On elective / convenience abortions, they do sound unsavory when put in those terms. I dont see why anything beyond first trimester for "convenience" should exist personally. But its a touchy subject for a lot of ppl!
I don't see why anyone's life should be forfeit for convenience, no matter how young they are.
If a woman gets an abortion with an ectopic pregnancy she can die
Oh, come on. A woman who tries to carry out an ectopic pregnancy is in much more danger of dying.
Of course the woman needs proper medical care for an ectopic pregnancy. This is not the same as abortion.
You're the one who said abortion in ectopic pregnancy and said it was dangerous. It's generally not considered abortion in that case because the pregnancy isn't viable anyway.
😢😭😠😡. Sometimes I’m just so tired of this evil world. I need a break.
I understand. Do whatever it takes to separate yourself from the fear and find joy in every little thing. Take a break from all this stuff!
In an abortion, SOMEONE is going to die, and it may be more than just the baby.
There are many birth control methods today that were not available at the Roe vs Wade era. Irresponsibility is no excuse!
Yep, no excuses these days.
Nobody wants to consider the epidemic mental health issues associated with abortion even when they are performed under the best of procedures. The Morning-after-pill is now available to make abortions mostly a thing of the past.
Why is there no mention of readily available contraceptives?
This is my question as well. Part of it is that insurance still doesn't cover birth control. Another factor is pharmacists who have refused to dispense things like the morning after pill.
Very well said!
Morning-After vs. Abortion Pill (RU486) -- Availability of pills to prevent or terminate pregnancy were not available 50 years ago during Roe vs.Wade SCOTUS deliberations.
How would SCOTUS have ruled if these medications had been available at the time?
https://www.verywellhealth.com/the-morning-after-pill-vs-the-abortion-pill-906574
Interesting observation/speculation!
Weighing in here as a woman: my mother's generation had to fight for the right to vote, hold property, or have legal rights to their own children. Women were kept ignorant as to the facts of sex, and child birth until they experienced them all too often in the not so distant past.
I am 62 now, and remember thinking as a young girl how propounded unfair the entire set up was to me personally. Girls with opinions were attacked, always. We were to be "seen and not heard," if we were to be approved of by most males.
What does this historical view have to do with reproductive rights? Well, we women, (and men,) who have studied this understand very clearly that others, mostly male others, have been deciding for women what they can and cannot do WITH THEIR OWN BODIES for millennia. In patriarchal societies, which we certainly are.
And, women are uniquely susceptible to sexual violence which can, and often does, result in pregnancy.
Given this history, I personally have come to the conclusion that sad as it is, men have no right to tell a woman whether or not she must carry an unwanted pregnancy. And neither does anyone else.
We need a Constitutional Admendment that protects a woman's right to a first trimester termination of pregnancy, because of the injust history of our own civilization.
The second trimester is perfect fighting grounds for all the right and left wing foot soldiers, in the states and the federal government, as there are important considerations on both sides.
Third trimester should be utterly forbidden, unless for life-threatening medical reasons, fetal death, etc.,.
No one, ever, anywhere should, (in a civilized society that doesn't perform child sacrifice,) have an at will "abortion" of a healthy third trimester child! That is murder in my book.
Finally, sorting through these issues is something America, and Americans, appear to have lost the honesty, intelligence and moral capacity to accomplish.
Let's hope and pray that these profoundly challenging times start raising up some courageous individuals who can speak and reason with compassion and courage on very difficult subjects, accepting the limitations that exist in legislating the world we wish to live in, yet achieving the highest in expanding, "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness," for all Americans, rich or poor, male or female, or "other." Reproductive Rights are critical to this. Hence the fight we are are about to witness.
A constitutional amendment enshrining bodily autonomy and medical freedom would address many injustices of today and not be subject to reversal on the whim of the Supreme Court.
I agree, 100%! That is exactly what is required. Bodily autonomy, which has yet to be clearly spelled out legally for all Americans, is a foundational principle which cannot be breached. Especially in the "bioengineering" world that has recently developed.
Just to chime in, I'm closing in on 70 and did not see girls' opinions 'always attacked' out in the rural area where I grew up.
Those of us with good grades and scholastic aptitude were however, encouraged to attend college. There was a lot of work being done in those years to assure equal rights for women, and prohibit discrimination of women.
Title IX was signed by Nixon in 1972 and I regretted narrowly missing the benefits of the girls' athletic programs that were added to the schools out there.
Agree that not all women had benefits of female family or friends to clue them in on how to avoid or handle situations that risked pregnancy. My own mother could not clearly convey to me where the risks were. A friend's mom and my SiL could be a bit more base in their explanations.
Women's lib to some extent ushered in a notion of sexual equality for women, to choose when to get pregnant and with whom. Sadly, that included Roe v Wade.
Yeah, I'm older than she is, too, and I never had a problem expressing an opinion.
I'm younger than you and was constantly put down for having and voicing my own ideas. Didn't and don't live in a rural area, Northern state, rust belt. Got great grades, went to college. Still get put down for voicing a dissenting opinion or one that's not of the alleged majority.
BtW, in U.S., my gandmother's generation fought for the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution that stated no one could be denied the right to vote on account of their [biological] sex, and thus granted American women the right to vote, a right known as women’s suffrage, and was ratified on August 18, 1920, ending almost a century of protest and a year before my mother was born.
SCOTUS has a choice not to hear R. v. W but chose to meddle.
SCOTUS chose to meddle in Roe vs Wade, giving federal powers. They are “unmeddling” by returning it to the states. The way it was originally
Maybe so but in doing so SCOTUS conservative majority are meddling with the mid-term elections by giving a boost to the Libs.
They did not plan when the case came to them. Someone is meddling by leaking. There is no other reason to leak and leak at this time.
How do we know it wasn't planned? Timing is amazingly perfect, isn't it?
Yeah, makes you wonder what they're getting paid for furthering fascism.
Not hearing it would also be meddling, based on the Roe decision. Feds should not have meddled in state business.
I have Canadians friends and they are so blasé about all Canadas requirements….it’s infuriating and unbelievable to me that they are so complicit! Of course they are fully jabbed and boosted!!😝
Not all of us.
Ya gota love Elon's 'Canadian truckers rule!'
Good for you. Fight the good fight!
Every unvaccinated person i know all over the world has some sort of fake vaccine paperwork issued. Pretty elaborate "vaccine pass laundering" methods as well
I'm Canadian and am backing Pierre. I've already maxed my 2022 donations and will do more however I can
I’ve believed shedding has always been a problem. For the first year of the jabs I have SIX cases of shingles until my holistic doctor figured out a way to protect my system from the overload. I’d hope it was spike being shed and not the vaxx itself. Every time I was in and around allot of vaxxed people I came down with it. Still have to travel up to deep blue heavy vaxxed and boosted New England to see my Dad but at least now I don’t get sick. Thanks for another great roundup!
Please share how your doctor figured out how to protect your system. Currently dealing with shingles and I never want this again! I am barely over 50, unvaxxed, not immune compromised, not under great stress, and otherwise healthy. So why did I develop this now? At the urgent care I went to in our area, she said I was the 8th person she had seen within the last month or so with shingles. What are the chances of that at one urgent care?! I believe the shedding is a real thing based on my case.
I know several people who decided to get the shingles vaccine also. Is there a possibility that this vaccine is shedding also creating new cases which in turn sells more vaccine??
Don’t get the shingles vaccine!!! Horrible new technology.
What is the new technology being used?
https://historyofvaccines.org/vaccines-101/what-do-vaccines-do/different-types-vaccines
The old one was a live attenuated vaxx like polio or MMR. This one is not. Also has more side effects and requires two. I don’t trust any of the “new”
ways especially when they say “safe and effective”.
Oh geez. Had c-pox as child but have refused shingles shot, even tho aware of potential for excruciating pain and terrible effects if cranial nerves affected, especially opthalmic.
To hear about the rise in shingles cases and potential of others shedding this stuff, sux.
😤😖😠
I did have bad chickenpox when I was a kid, so the chance to get shingles has always been there. But a trigger now, just doesn’t add up.
Just another datapoint, but in the summer of 2020, I came down with shingles at the age of 45. Similar to you, healthy, not stressed, and it seemed very weird. Obviously, that was before Covid vaccines were even a thing, so it’s quite possible that this is something related to Covid spike protein, both natural and artificial.
For anyone else coming across this, if you feel a strange tingling sensation confined to a narrow band spiraling down an arm or leg (look up “dermatone” for an illustration) and you’ve had chickenpox in the past, suspect shingles and get early diagnosis and antivirals. Caught mine immediately because it was just such a weird sensation (pins and needles crossed with a mild sunburn) and my wife happened to figure it out long before I would’ve even been bothered enough to see a doctor, especially during the height of Covid hysteria. Because I got on antivirals the same day the first small rash started to appear, I was slightly uncomfortable for a few days, but never had severe pain or even a bad rash.
Thank you for that. I was going to get the shingles shot, but then my husband's uncle got bell's palsy 2 days after getting that shot, this was just before the covid shots rolled out. Then the lying went into overdrive, and have decided I don't even trust the flu shot. So NO shingles shot for me, but good to know early symptoms to ward it off if I do get. I keep seeing sponsored ads for the shingles shot all over the place. Weird, huh?
I’ve noticed the uptick in shingles vaccine ads lately too. I wonder why??? Hmmm…
You couldn't pay me enough to get a shingles vax. Someone wrote about it on our Nextdoor chat site and there were so many stories of people actually being paralyzed for a year from that shot in that small sample. I was shocked and looked up the chance of that side effect and it was actually 6%. There is no scenario where I wouldn't take a month or so of pain vs a year of being paralyzed. Once again, public is not informed.
You are so lucky to have caught it early Chris! It was a weird sensation for me also, very sore back at the bottom of my left rib and also sore and tingling feeling at the bottom of my ribs of left chest. Just thought that my back was out of place and needed an adjustment. Got the adjustment which helped it to feel better than before, so didn’t suspect anything. Then the next day, a few small rash spots show up. Still didn’t think too much about it. Thought maybe my clothing irritated my skin or something like that. Felt a little run down, but nothing out of the ordinary. Next day, many more spots show up. That sent me to the doctor! Only when it got to that point, did we start to suspect this was more than a random rash. Wish I would have caught it sooner, but there was no reason for me to suspect it was shingles. I still caught it early enough for the antiviral to begin helping but a catching it a couple days prior would be making a big difference right now!
Can you say which antiviral you took?
I’m taking an antiviral called Valacyclovir. There are three antiviral medications available which work well to help the body get rid of the infection.
Valacyclovir. Me too. Had it on my head and face before vaccines rolled out. I think stress caused mine though.
Another characteristic of shingles is it’s always j on me sided…doesn’t cross the midline if the body.
Sorry, I just saw this, but it was Valacyclovir for me too.
I also had bad case as a kid. Still got it.
Yes, unfortunately, once the virus is in your body, it is dormant until something causes it to reactivate somewhere in the body. 😕
Usually it’s not “something” but some life events such as acute stress or anything that suppresses the immune system. Your immune system keeps it at bay. Hence why older folks tend to get it more commonly to with diminishment of the immune system as they age. A lot of people have them pop up in intensely stressful times of life like loss of spouse, job, etc.
Lynne, please share the holistic doctor's way to protect from shingles. I just recovered from a very light case, but I do not want it again! I am very healthy, retired, and stress is practically gone from my life so there was no reason for me to have a shingles outbreak.
Shared!
@Lynne Ferreira
Can you please share the protocol that works for you to protect against possible vaccine shedding effects?
Shared
You keep saying, "Shared," but you're not sharing anything.
Look in the thread. I shared the protocol I used.
Thanks! I did finally find it. I hadn't gone down the pages far enough.
Omg! 6 times! Is there a holistic remedy?
Yes it is this … taken two tablets daily two times on an empty stomach. Knocks it out quicker than the pharmaceutical remedy. Taken as a preventative when being exposed and stops it from occurring. Amazing! Standard Process Multizyme and the Zymex capsules.
How does that help Shingles?
It works for me just like an antiviral
but faster cure without harmful side effects.
Valacyclovir worked very fast for me.
Shared
So sorry. My hubby got shingles winter of 2020. The sickest he has ever been outside of triple bypass surgery. Then “bronchitis” on top of it which I am sure was Covid but he never tested. I got a mild something then too and antibody test last summer showed antibodies. He was so miserable with shingles. He then got the shingles shots. I declined. I’m very robust health wise.
Sorry to hear he was so sick! You have such a hard time sleeping with this, that you can easily pick up on other viruses from being sleep deprived. Thankfully it’s on my side and back and not on my face or eye area, those cases can be very serious, but it is still miserable.
Stay sane. Sleeping was horrible for him. He had to sleep in the guest room for a couple of months. Then I believe he had Covid funny when he went to doc early in January 2021 coughing and such. Feverish. The doc did not give him a Covid test. I found that strange given the timing.
The protocol is easy and works amazingly as a cure and preventative. Standard process brand Multizyme and Zymex. Two tablets twice a day on an empty stomach.. then no food for 30 min at least. Cures it so much faster than pharmaceuticals. I use it now as a preventative whenever I and out of my circle. Two days before, while traveling, and for two days after. Haven’t had it once since she figured it out.
wow-- that sounds great, thank you!
This is for the exposure to the potential vaccine shedding? Or for shingles?
Both. Cures a case and stops it from being activated from the shedding.
The Roe v Wade reversal draft was most certainly leaked intentionally. That’s no surprise to anyone that’s following this crap show of the last 3 years. What continues to disappoint me is that our Supreme Court is intentionally in on the takeover. I feel betrayed by all the drama we witnessed with the Kavanagh theater and later Coney-Barrett. All just theater.
Both the right and Left have used the pro-life and pro-choice as planks in their platforms for decades and done nothing other than fund PP every year, while winking and nodding.
The earlier than anticipated leak I believe was to give cover against 2000 Mules coming out. That nasty mosquito, “election fraud” won’t go away. I know in the backwaters of mid Michigan tickets for all viewings were sold out almost immediately. The timing of this leak may not have been well thought out with Mother’s Day this weekend. I sincerely hope that the Left have overshot the target once again.
I agree with you! Same with viewings in Florida! Sold out, sold out, sold out. We wanted to go to the theater but everywhere anywhere near us was sold out. So we have paid for the live showing Saturday night to watch. The proof has been here all along but they have worked OT, holidays and weekends to keep it suppressed. It’s way past time to expose this.
You are correct without a doubt all theater. Paxson's case after election representing almost half the states was not heard due "lack of standing" All I can say is WTF?
CDC had the tracking data to show that people's travels and obedience to lockdowns did NOT correlate with Coof outbreaks. The NYT obtained the same data, used it to fingerpoint the red states for leaving their few-blocks radius (duh, outside NY people have to drive places), but they couldn't connect human activity with viral activity. Who cares, right CDC? Muh violence. 😒
Talking to my neighbor in West VA about how their church, high in a tiny mountain town, with a congregation of about 30 people, had its FB streaming shut down 3 times over the past 2 years because the preacher talked about something objectionable to the FB police. At first I just thought, oh yeah FB shut them down, they do that . . . then I thought WHAT kind of massive surveillance must be going on for them to even notice this tiny church??? The FB stream was for elderly church members who wanted to stay home and still attend church -- and this was taken away from them for 30 days, then 90 days. The preacher is anti-vaxx, anti-mask, and preaches that marriage is between a man and a woman only. My neighbor wasn't sure which un-approved viewpoint got him shut down.
And my once beloved church would not give out religious exemptions and now their nonprofit is collecting for Ukraine…total sell out! I am out…no longer a sheep!
W. T. Eff.
Check our those surveillance balloons HIGH above us on monkeywerx over watch sitrep. Incredible proof of being watched constantly!
That is one of the saddest things I've ever heard.
Ordered my faraday bag today. Had looked into them but never bothered. Yeah I know you have to pull them out of the bag to make a call of whatever, but decided I am going to make it harder on the trackers. But I am not one of those people who are attached to their phones 24/7. Mainly use it to call, text or check email.
Check out info on gov't spy balloons high above us on monkeywerx over watch strep. We are constantly monitored!
"Politically homeless" is a nice way to say "utterly unrepresented." Everyone in power is using these issues we care about, that affect our lives, purely for political capital. Everyone.
Truly I am politically unmoored as well. I despise both houses. But I feel free actually. I have been both sides in my long life. Same Dance with the Devil—a 2 faced one that just takes turns leading.
May the evil tactic of the enemy to use the threat of the loss of the “right” to poison and dismember and suck from their mothers’ wombs tiny human children to garner Democrat votes backfire in the faces of the snarling, hysterical, screaming masses bent on committing heinous sins, the consequences for which are paid for by innocent blood. Oh God, help us.
The Scamdemic as a massive prank:
https://markoshinskie8de.substack.com/p/the-corona-overreaction-has-been?s=w
Nice post, I especially like the list of questions. You should post that separately.
I always ask the Branch Covidians to honestly answer one question. If they never watched or listened to the MSM in the last two years and they didn't see anyone wearing a mask, would they even know that there was a "pandemic" taking place and would they notice anything different about their lives. The answer is always "No".
Excellent! Your summation paragraph(s) were very well written!
Wow. Brilliant. I agree with Jeff, you should put up the questions separately here in the comments.
Excellent food for thought. I did feel bad for Anne though :)
You took the thoughts out of my head and articulated them beautifully. Thanks, Mark!
Love it, practical and proactive:
“If you want to do something to help locally, lobby your county commission to pass new rules encouraging manufacturing and transportation industries.”
*resident Brandon yesterday stated that a fetus is a child, during a speech that was supposed to show his support for abortion: https://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahbarkoukis/2022/05/04/three-words-biden-ruined-dem-messaging-abortion-n2606740 ... Biden: The gift that keeps on giving (to conservative political campaigns).
All the pink pussie hats have one distinct advantage over the babies they wish to exterminate, all there mothers valued their life and gave birth to them....
You don't know that... they could've been horribly abused by those mothers and they don't want to repeat patterns. People make tough choices for many reasons and we can't pretend to know why. It's actually none of anyone's business. Why we are still talking about this BS in 2022 is beyond comprehendible to me - oh right. It's a topic of contention so we will never let it go - even when we are all on our 106th mandatory experimental jab and can barely function.
That’s one way to justify cold blooded murder. You might be more BS than you realize. Life. Adoption. Reflect. Pro life and pro death, pro choice is a cop out for those that’d prefer to kill an innocent life. Natural immunity is the gold standard. Welcome to enlightenment!
We can agree to disagree! That’s what’s great about being human. We can all form our own opinions and use them how we wish.
Agree to disagree? Around here? Good luck.
Oh it's not bad around here. Or on most substacks.
Try fb or twitter or reddit. Absolute censorship and complete partisan nut jobs over there.
The pink had protests were a prime example of mass formation at work. It causes people to do absurd things that no one would otherwise do - Like wear women’s private parts in public, or turn their neighbors in to the gestapo.
So, that's what the hats represent! I kept wondering, "What's up with the pink cat ears hats?" Wow!
Perhaps schools should focus more on the facts of reproduction, birth control and how to avoid pregnancy, than on crt and transgenderism.
They can’t even be trusted to do that. Tried and failed. I remember the big push in the late 80’s to hand out condoms at high schools and colleges.
That produced the abortion boom because guess what? Condoms aren’t full proof and they didn’t want to teach abstinence or conservative values like self control or personal responsibility. 🙄
While I understand what you are saying, IMO schools should stick to math, reading, writing, accurate history and civics. Add in financial classes and some trade school electives and then we’re back to school being what school should have always stayed.
My head is spinning as I read your report this morning Jeff. Vaccine aerosol spray? Roe vs Wade and the midterms? Supply chain woes? What kind of mind thinks up this stuff? This is what sets us apart from these sociopaths in office and in high places elsewhere. We think of ways to better the world for the good of the whole. They only think of ways to control and kill us off in the largest numbers they can fathom. (There - I said it). And now it makes sense to me that Roe vs Wade decision is to get them more votes in Nov. They had to do something and they did. An insurance policy. God-forbid they work on inflation, or keeping shelves stocked etc etc. SMH
Evidence for Aerosol Transfer of SARS-CoV2-specific Humoral Immunity (Preprint on 5/4/22)
Abstract
Despite the obvious knowledge that infectious particles can be shared through respiration, whether other constituents of the nasal/oral fluids can be passed between hosts has surprisingly never even been postulated, let alone investigated. The circumstances of the present pandemic facilitated a unique opportunity to fully examine this provocative idea. The data we show provides evidence for a new mechanism by which herd immunity may be manifested, the aerosol transfer of antibodies between immune and non-immune hosts.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.28.22274443v1.full.pdf
Well, maybe they already created the contagious "vaccine" and used it in one or more lot numbers of the CV-19 experiment. There are a lot of posts about recent cases of shingles on the board.
https://www.popsci.com/contagious-vaccine-virus/
"There’s another way of designing transmissible vaccines that is likely to prove even safer, Nusimer says. These vaccines will use benign viruses, which can infect a person or animal without making it sick. Known as cytomegaloviruses (CMV), they actually belong to the herpes family. They’re very common in both humans and other mammals. In fact, between 50 and 80 percent of adults in the United States are infected with CMV by age 40, although most have no symptoms."
Cytomegalovirus (CMV)
https://www.thebody.com/article/cytomegalovirus-cmv
Oct 01, 2007 · CMV is a type of virus in the herpes family -- the kind of viruses that also causes chicken pox, shingles and cold sores. CMV is also knows as human herpes virus type 5, or HHV5.
Even more frightening as the article goes on, they boast about being able to target only one species and leave others. I think we can all see where this is headed.
"These viruses can already spread easily, and many stick to just one species. So scientists could design vaccines that would limit themselves just to the kind of animals they have chosen to vaccinate."
We may be late on that whole secession idea.
They are also developing vaccines to be genetically inserted into vegetables. They've mentioned head lettuce. Probably because that's the only veggie most Americans will eat. So, veggies will now be off limits? FYI, it'll also be in the seeds. Edited to correct grammar.
Uh secede? Have you seen the county maps of red vs blue? There aren't that many blues! They just make the most noise. Silent majority, wake up! Anyway you can't trust the elections in this third world country. It's embarrassing that we don't protect our elections. The rinos were just as complicit in the coverup. This is why wars happen. Because no one ever gives you your rights or freedom back.
County maps are misleading. Those blue dots that are cities that vote blue often dominate in numbers the red counties that surround them. Secession would be difficult now because the geographic division isn't anywhere nearly as easy as 'North-South.'
Sherman. Small cities can be burned, displacing the blue to other states, cities, diluted into the red counties.
Well the new yorkers outside of the city outweigh inside the city 11-8.
"Outweigh" in what sense? They elect Republicans to statewide office? I don't think so.
Contagious vaccines are a pipe dream as even the Spanish flu and diptheria and other "TRANSMISSIBLE" diseases were not found to be. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/67902
And I'm gonna rant on both parties
The left was my body my choice on abortion, drugs, etc. But not vaccines.
The right is my body my choice on vaccines/medicine but not other things.
Both parties strip us of our bodily autonomy
Both parties are AUTHORITARIAN
I would argue that the present-day right is still far more libertarian - the key issue in the abortion debate in particular is that most on the right regard the baby as NOT "your body", but the baby's body.
Always a dumb argument. If it was only a baby's body, then just remove it from the mother. Problem solved. That fact that it can't survive means you are forcing one person to be responsible for another. That's also exactly what we've seen in this pandemic. We are being forced to do things to protect other people and our rights are removed. Don't agree with it on either account.
Society generally expects parents to be responsible for their children (and in some cases, removes the children if they aren't). The particular issue of abortion is obviously much more difficult because the child CAN'T be removed for ~ 9 months without dying. Especially in the case of rape, there's a reasonable argument to be made along the lines of, "I never consented to carry a child so why should I have to, even if the child doesn't survive?"; the counter-argument is of course "neither did the child consent to anything, or do anything deserving of being killed". As I said, it's not easy.
However, I would like to ask you -- if your objection is based on being forced to care for a child you didn't ask for, would you then be ok with forbidding abortion in the future if there was sufficient technology to safely remove the child at < 3 months, and have it survive (and it was paid for, and people were there to adopt the child, etc - I'm interested in your moral position, not arguing over the practicalities of it)?
"Viruses" may not be transmissible, but mRNA certainly is.
Really? Where's the proof that even the mRNA causes spike proteins?
Viruses and "spikes" look awfully similar to exosomes and cellular debris. I really don't buy that any of this crap works. Crispr gene editing was also a failure, despite the huge hype.
Want to know why they are injuring people?
Moderna had an issue with the same LIPID NANOPARTICLES years before con-vid.
They accumulated and caused similar issues to what we have today.
Guess what, pfizer also licenses the same lipids.
mRNA, we have no clue whether it works or not. We also have no clue whether the adenovirus vectors work.
Vaccine science is so corrupt that there's no real analysis of what is going on.
DNA/RNA transcription is well enough understood (outside the context of just vaccines) that we're pretty safe in saying, *IF* the RNA gets into the cell, it will cause the cell to build the proteins that it codes for (in this case the spike). As far as cell debris "looking like" spikes, well that depends what was going on in the cell, doesn't it? If the cell was producing spikes, then the debris when it dies will contain those spikes.
On your second point, yes - it was already shown in studies on rats that the LNPs were toxic to the rats (although at higher dosage per bodyweight than they use on humans... but it still doesn't exactly promote confidence in their safety).
https://viroliegy.com/2022/01/26/the-epistemological-crisis-in-genomics/
That's why despite mapping the genome, we still have not much to show for it, in actual functional purposes. And somehow most of DNA is junk???
BTW, more than 50% of DNA "matches" are actually false positives. That's the fact that they use that in court cases to fight DNA testing...
So I found the linked article quite interesting, but I'm not entirely sure if that was supposed to be a direct response to my comment or not. (I quite agree that the current understanding of genetics and cellular processes is a form of "groping in the dark", rather like a wannabe hacker manipulating random bits of data in a piece of software in the hope that something interesting happens.)
My understanding is that the so-called "junk" DNA is more often called "unexpressed" DNA nowdays, and is understood to be involved in regulating translation and expression of genes... but nobody really understands exactly how.
Exactly. They're guessing their way through, that's why it takes a lot of computing power. They're trying to make a picture out of puzzle pieces. Once mathematics takes over a field, it goes into subjectivity, because the models are only as good as the proof in the pudding and they got very little of it. A lot of what they call "exogenous virome" is really "dna" that they detect in the body, but have nothing to map it to.
I'm not sure of how inaccurate genetics are in determining sickness but if its anything like virology, it's probably bunk.
Example: 99.9% of people who have HPV virus don't get cervical cancer.
And the upcoming scam is Epstein Barr Virus aka mononucleosis, causing cancer. But a huge majority have the virus code, so that's like saying that everyone who gets cancer drinks water and lives in a house, lol.
I'm wondering about all the Amazon fulfillment centers. Are they running low on products made in China?? Don't get me wrong I'd love to see 75%+ of products made in the USA.
We did it to ourselves by buying cheap products made offshore by low-wage workers. I distinctly remember "Made in Japan" as a little kid 60 some-odd years ago. Same as food. High quality food costs more. We are addicted to cheap goods and we get what we pay for. It's in our hands to change all this. But we all need to know that there's no such thing as a free lunch.
I have two items on continual renewal. Both of them are delayed or not complete. I think Amazon is finally getting affected by the shipping delays now.
I've never bought anything from amazon. I don't believe in them. It's against my religion of buying crappy stuff from crappy people.
The Roe v. Wade issue has triggered a flood of commentary from alert readers of this blog. I suggest all of us keep our focus on the blatant disregard for the bodily autonomy of ALL human beings on this planet via the experimental injection scheme. There's a good chance that the injections will disrupt/permanently impair hormones and fertility in many recipients. Not to mention reactivation of cancers/old viral infections, and an increase in autoimmune disease. This is a massive spiritual battle and the Roe v Wade issue is certainly an aspect of it, but not central.
No, not central, but don’t they want to make something, or anything central rather than the horribly negative information coming out about injections?