May not be a good fit for errata, but to this non-lawyer, adding the refs below would significantly strengthen the legal case to have all mRNA shots removed from the market. Another excellent post as usual btw!!
Rationale:
* Eliminating dependence on unknowns, like batch quality, will close the door on opposition arguments in these areas and lead to a quicker winning verdict.
* Basing case on Nobel-Prize-winning discoveries, long taught in med-schools, will be difficult to argue against successfully.
#3 = Medical References (to confirm Dr Bhakdi’s views and add historical basis)
* Roitt's Essential Immunology 13th Edition (Martin, Burton, Roitt, and Delves; 2017) {basic immunology involved is covered in Chapter-1}
* History of Organ and Cell Transplantation (Hakim and Papalois; 2003) {history of related discoveries, ref’d in Roitt’s}
* A History of Transplantation Immunology 1st Edition (Brent; 1996) {history of related discoveries, ref’d in Roitt’s}
#4 = Overview of relevant points (by this non-MD, same as in post but all in one place):
The mRNA in jabs, cause cells they infect to make foreign, non-self-proteins, which finger these mRNA-infected cells for violent death by “complement” (killer system #2). (so, all mRNA shots are unsafe)
* Blood vessels damaged first, causing blood clots and leaks (enable organ damage)
* Sudden death, and most other mRNA injuries, are explained by mechanisms in above Refs
Not exactly an erratum, but I would beg you most piteously to remove the word “germ” everywhere your non-scientifically-trained self employed it in your otherwise superb article. Thank you.
ERRATA:
1) Corrected the spelling of Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi's name.
May not be a good fit for errata, but to this non-lawyer, adding the refs below would significantly strengthen the legal case to have all mRNA shots removed from the market. Another excellent post as usual btw!!
Rationale:
* Eliminating dependence on unknowns, like batch quality, will close the door on opposition arguments in these areas and lead to a quicker winning verdict.
* Basing case on Nobel-Prize-winning discoveries, long taught in med-schools, will be difficult to argue against successfully.
Refs:
1# = https://rumble.com/v21ppz6-all-mrna-vaccines-will-cause-harm-prof.-dr.-bhakdi.html (see first 13-mins, Dr Bhakdi basics at Jr-High level)
#2 = 00:45-29:00 of https://rumble.com/v1p3855-friday-roundtable-worrying-developments-with-michael-palmer-m.d.-sucharit-b.html (see first 18-mins, Dr Bhakdi credentials plus basics at Jr-High level)
#3 = Medical References (to confirm Dr Bhakdi’s views and add historical basis)
* Roitt's Essential Immunology 13th Edition (Martin, Burton, Roitt, and Delves; 2017) {basic immunology involved is covered in Chapter-1}
* History of Organ and Cell Transplantation (Hakim and Papalois; 2003) {history of related discoveries, ref’d in Roitt’s}
* A History of Transplantation Immunology 1st Edition (Brent; 1996) {history of related discoveries, ref’d in Roitt’s}
#4 = Overview of relevant points (by this non-MD, same as in post but all in one place):
The mRNA in jabs, cause cells they infect to make foreign, non-self-proteins, which finger these mRNA-infected cells for violent death by “complement” (killer system #2). (so, all mRNA shots are unsafe)
* Blood vessels damaged first, causing blood clots and leaks (enable organ damage)
* Sudden death, and most other mRNA injuries, are explained by mechanisms in above Refs
Not exactly an erratum, but I would beg you most piteously to remove the word “germ” everywhere your non-scientifically-trained self employed it in your otherwise superb article. Thank you.