617 Comments
User's avatar
Dave aka Geezermann's avatar

"Justice" Jackson is a disgrace to the Supreme Court. And there are people who applaud this? Disgusting.

And we are seeing the real President give real press conferences, answering real questions with real answers. Why wait until Jan 20, the inauguration should be moved up a month.

Expand full comment
Jpeach's avatar

I pray every day that America makes it to January 20th.

Expand full comment
Holly's avatar

…and beyond!

Expand full comment
laura-ann Knox's avatar

Dad's home. Small shenanigans will occur but everyone knows that once Dad is rested up and ready, the shenanigans will STOP

Expand full comment
Queen Hotchibobo's avatar

As the saying goes…Daddy’s home and he’s *mad.*

Expand full comment
Charles Clemens's avatar

That's no Malarkey, Queen Hotchibobo.

Expand full comment
Carlos's avatar

Amen

Expand full comment
Joanne Curley's avatar

Amen.

Expand full comment
Cindi's avatar

The same disgusting people applauding Brown are the same disgusting ones (women AND men) wetting their panties over the CEO murderer & contributing to his defense fund

Expand full comment
WP William's avatar

hey, at least she/her isn't doing an Only Fans side hustle

Expand full comment
SadieJay's avatar

Are you sure???

Expand full comment
Clara's avatar

I was going to say that! 😂

Expand full comment
Fred Richmond's avatar

Have you seen her??

Expand full comment
SadieJay's avatar

I am not sure how to take this question. Lol.

Expand full comment
daverkb's avatar

That brief clip is proof that Woke Marxism is an injudicious adolescent sales pitch. Worse still is that this judge really is bought into this Marxist delusion which has created an 'elite' ruling class which is now the laughing stock of the world. The display is pathetic and devoid of any real education, wisdom and judgment.

Here is one of the nation's highest court judges and her supreme desire is to play the fool on Broadway. Totally mind boggling.

Expand full comment
Reasonable Horses's avatar

KBJ is a tool elevated to mock our system and humiliate us, and her not-subtle pro-trans lobbying on Broadway should get her booted off the bench.

As for her extended-mileage verbosity, let me first state for the record, I love to hear [most] women talk. That often prevents me from saying too much. This comment will be an exception because I’m going to just up and point out that the loquacious KBJ and her outspoken colleagues of the fairer sex prove what a woman is. Vive la différence.

Expand full comment
Dawn B's avatar

We can't say we weren't warned right?

Jude 1:18 that they were saying to you, “In the last time there will be mockers, following after their own ungodly lusts.”

2 Peter 3:3 Know this first of all, that in the last days mockers will come with their mocking, following after their own lusts,

Proverbs 21:24 “Proud,” “Haughty,” “Scoffer,” are his names,

Who acts with insolent pride.

Expand full comment
daverkb's avatar

I get what you are saying, particularly when it comes to technical/mechanical matters.

The real horror is that people like Brown Jackson really believe this insane stuff they spew. And that they really need 'empowering' to cover up their vast tracts of vacuous lack.

Expand full comment
Dave aka Geezermann's avatar

"vast tracks of vacuous lack". Love that.

Expand full comment
daverkb's avatar

Thanks! I'm glad someone pays attention to things that chime the ears. Life does need some sparkle in it. All dross makes too dreary.

So thanks for saying. You make my day!

Expand full comment
KATHERINE JERNIGAN's avatar

I don’t object to a SCOTUS stint on Broadway, but she should now recuse herself from judging trans issues since it’s pretty clear which side she’s on.

Expand full comment
LamedVav disavows all vaxes.'s avatar

Amen! Selah!

Expand full comment
Marsha McGrath's avatar

Takes me back to our brilliant writer Jeff Childers who refers to Polonius with, “Brevity is the soul of wit.” He then goes on to write, “It’s you, not us.” Says so much!

Expand full comment
Dawn B's avatar

Yep. It just goes to show that these people are either stupid, controlled, or both.

It is all for show to demoralize and desensitize us. They have been doing it for decades and probably since the invention of TV and earlier by different means. Oh yeah, the press. They have always had the tools to use on us "tools."

Expand full comment
daverkb's avatar

Yup! I've lived outside 'the culture' for all of my adult life. It's pretty much the only way to stay sane, healthy and thinking right. God bless!

Expand full comment
Sue Rosenthal's avatar

Thinking smart

Expand full comment
NinaG's avatar

Talk about a “Court Jester”! She fit the role perfectly, the dumb bint.

Expand full comment
daverkb's avatar

The court jester was typically a fool who was not wholly a fool, but often an advisor to a king who could get away with saying things to the king which the king's court and advisors could not say or were afraid to say plainly out load. This role was under cover of wit and faux folly as a foil.

Do most American under-appreciate how stupid Brown Jackson looks? Maybe, and if so it is because Americans have been so long scalded in a cauldron of Woke 'inane-insane' that they have lost perspective. Not so for the rest of the world looking on. And a lot of harm is being done by Brown Jackson's five year old Broadway romp in terms of American credibility abroad, which is already at the bottom of the trash barrel.

I looked at the clip and I asked myself, "What are these people thinking?" My second thought is one of revulsion, revulsion and horror in that people like Brown Jackson actually believe all this Woke nonsense. Such people could learn a lot by a reading of Alice in Wonderland.

Expand full comment
Marsha McGrath's avatar

At least we can say this thing is supreme about her.

Expand full comment
Debra's avatar

The real Supreme's were truly supreme! Those ladies could belt out a song!

KBJ - Stop! In the Name of Love!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=py3W2iks6xs

Expand full comment
Garden Lover's avatar

We are dealing with this Marxist crap in my little town (well, all of CA, really), and it’s always the same. They come in with their crap ideology (communism) and the belief that the residents are too dumb to know what is best for them and their lives. This pisses off the people, but we have so many uninformed voters they vote these idiots in only to end up being angry. If only they took a bit of time to educate themselves rather than expect the government to do the “right thing,” we wouldn’t be in this mess. Also, get the indoctrination out of the schools.

Expand full comment
daverkb's avatar

I know, I know. I dealt with this for a long time, even before I caught on to what was going on. Gardens are much more statisfying!

Expand full comment
Garden Lover's avatar

They are.

Expand full comment
S.P.H.'s avatar

Not one backbone in W,DC to initiate impeachment of this make believe Justice.

Expand full comment
SuezCanal's avatar

Is there provision to impeach a Supreme Court justice?

Expand full comment
S.P.H.'s avatar

Per my minor research yes, Samuel Chase 1804. Though the Senate acquitted him a year later. No Justice has been removed.

Expand full comment
Fran Angel's avatar

Maybe when it's definitively proven that the 2020 election was stolen, that Biden is/ was illegitimate as POTUS, all his acts, appointments, EO's can be reversed and corrected...and remove this DEI appointment to our sacred Supreme Court....she's been a sick joke from the get-go.

Expand full comment
S.P.H.'s avatar

interesting thought Fran...

Expand full comment
daverkb's avatar

Well, this is close to 100% right as you say ... "Not one backbone in Washington ..."

But then again, some people have backbone or else the Wacko Crazed Radicals would not be on the run now as they evidently are. For example, no matter what I think of DJT one way or another, I have to give the president-elect backbone, courage and manliness. And I acknowledge him as being an exceptional man.

Things are often such a mixed bag.

Expand full comment
CStone's avatar

That’s what I have been saying. Move it up a month.

Expand full comment
PrayerWarrior's avatar

I like that it gives trump 4 years and 3 months of working as POTUS

The 3 months without the title of president doesn’t seem to stop him from leading our great nation back to sanity and prosperity

Expand full comment
KATHERINE JERNIGAN's avatar

I think that on the day they certify the election, the next Presidency begins.

Expand full comment
AJF's avatar

Dave wasn't that long period to change administrations decided during horse & buggy days?

Expand full comment
Dave aka Geezermann's avatar

AJF - yes, it was March before that. Now there is no need to wait more than 30 days to inaugurate the next President. Look at the damage being done during this "transition".

Expand full comment
Kathleen Janoski's avatar

She looks like one of those munchkins in The Wizard of Oz.

Expand full comment
Dave aka Geezermann's avatar

lol, yes, the version they did with Michael Jackson.

Expand full comment
Based Florida Man's avatar

In honor of our DEI justice, order your "A black woman is speaking listen and learn" T-Shirt. Just in time for Kwanza.

https://www.amazon.com/black-woman-speaking-listen-learn/dp/B08PDLYQDJ

Expand full comment
Dave aka Geezermann's avatar

Based Florida Man - that's a real thing? Yikes. But yes, there are SOME black women who are based, not woke, and worthy of being listened to.

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

Candace Owens for one.

Expand full comment
Alice P. Liddell's avatar

Carolyn M. Swain is another.

Expand full comment
Connect The Dots's avatar

Ha! Add that to the bottom of the t-shirt with iron on letters:

"A black woman is speaking listen and learn with Candace Owens"

That'll put their knickers in a twist.

Expand full comment
Abiding Dude's avatar

Her X story on the USS Liberty and the filthy jews that attacked it was great.

Truth is, we should be backing Iran and Russia... Iran less of a terrorist nation and Russia far more dependable and militarily strong than the Zionist pigs.

Expand full comment
Dawn B's avatar

It seems, in this upside down world climate, one must de-base themselves to climb the government ladder or any other media means to reach the masses.

It is what they "show" us, but it is not reality.

They, (evil people at the top), want to destroy our family, values, health, sanity, reasoning, history, etc. If you only watch TV, you would think most people support this sodom and gomorrah lifestyle, but that is their trick to change our beliefs and ideas. It works and keeps us divided.

This viseo shows how they do it. (I do not believe all of it, but you get the gist.)

How They Programmed Your Subconscious Mind since Childhood (no bs) How to break free

https://www.bitchute.com/video/eAydapPXCS7I/

Expand full comment
Bandit's avatar

It's not just government or media, it's corporate, too. Corporate jobs will kill you if you don't follow the woke BS.

Expand full comment
Dawn B's avatar

I was a teacher 35 years and quit in 2020. It just got too much and the masks did it for me. Fortunately I could quit and survive.

Expand full comment
Bandit's avatar

My mother was a teacher, too. She retired early, because she couldn't stand the BS any more, either. It was 1984.

Expand full comment
Dave aka Geezermann's avatar

Dawn B - yes, thank you.

Expand full comment
Fred's avatar

True, but those women don’t announce their “superiority.”

Expand full comment
Oona Pilot's avatar

Winsome Sears!

Expand full comment
SadieJay's avatar

They obviously don't know how to add a comma where it belongs in the sentence. So, by all means don't read and learn.

Expand full comment
Dave aka Geezermann's avatar

When printed on a T-shirt there is no need for the comma.

Expand full comment
SadieJay's avatar

Oh. I missed that part in my English class.

Expand full comment
Dave aka Geezermann's avatar

It's okay, I was always a stickler for grammar too, lol.

Expand full comment
SadieJay's avatar

I am not a comma fan, so me defending it is an anomaly.

Expand full comment
Rick Olivier's avatar

Based, so funny on so many levels. well done

Expand full comment
JT's avatar

Wonder how our “wise Latina” feels about that T-shirt? (Wait, shouldn’t that be LatinX?)

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

Only if you pronounce like Ben Shapiro: La-tinks

Expand full comment
My Favorite Things's avatar

🤣😂🤣

Expand full comment
Bandit's avatar

🙌 Amen!

Expand full comment
Lisa Ca's avatar

Seriously!

Expand full comment
LamedVav disavows all vaxes.'s avatar

I agree, January 20 is too long to wait. Let’s all phone our congress and tell them to make it January 1.

Expand full comment
CMCM's avatar

Jackson was embarrassingly undignified. Not appropriate for a Supreme Court Justice. She should be ashamed of herself.

Expand full comment
Peter GL's avatar

Justice Jackson may not have been a DEI choice for the Supreme Court (highly doubtful), but she DEFINITELY was DEI choice for Broadway, which missed the memo that DEI is on its deathbed.

Expand full comment
Jeff Snell's avatar

I think the Romans had the same issues with Nero, did they not?

Expand full comment
Lisa Ca's avatar

Posting here for visibility.

Anyone remember the high quality interview and video program for legacy interviews that someone posted? Its a gift to give

Expand full comment
Kelly's avatar

Take her policies and your personal feelings out of it: why shouldnt she be on the stage for one night? Let her be human and have fun. Where's the sin in that?

Expand full comment
MnmMom's avatar

Your question is a good one for discussion. I might be inclined to agree w you if the public performance did NOT have any political leanings at all. Through this grotesque “theater” display she is telegraphing her political worldview that will be guiding her decisions on the Supreme Court bench. And engaging is this kind of public theater it could be argued that she is engaging politically to rally public opinion and public pressure for her agenda. There is also a level of respectability, and dignity that should be held by lifelong Supreme Court Justices. Seems Like any participation in any Broadway performance would bring down the dignity of this highest court in our land.

Expand full comment
Momcat's avatar

just think if Justice Thomas had done something similar? The libs would be howling!

Expand full comment
Kelly's avatar

Just like the repubs are.

Expand full comment
Kelly's avatar

Here politics are already known. She is definitely no conservative. I dont see her as rallying people any more than any other person.

Expand full comment
Momcat's avatar

From the Supreme Court Code of Conduct:

A Justice may engage in extrajudicial activities, including law-related

pursuits and civic, charitable, educational, religious, social, financial,

fiduciary, and government activities, and may speak, write, lecture, and teach

on both law-related and nonlegal subjects. However, a Justice "should not

participate in extrajudicial activities that detract from the dignity of the

Justice’s office", interfere with the performance of the Justice’s official duties,

reflect adversely on the Justice’s impartiality, lead to frequent disqualification,

or violate the limitations set forth below.

Expand full comment
MnmMom's avatar

🎯

Expand full comment
FlatEarthFlyer's avatar

This may be off-topic for today’s C&C, but I suspect everybody’s a bit distressed about the recent Christian school shootings. The problem with Christian schools is that they become nannies to troubled kids. Parents think a Christian school will cure whatever spiritual, psychological or behavioral problem troubles their child, when in reality the troubled kid just infects the other school children. The only safe way to educate kids is to do it at home, like God instructs us in His Word. What’s more important to you: a nice car, enviable home, chic clothes and luxurious vacations? Or the safety and well-being of your children? Austerity is better for children, not excess. Nobody should ever say, “I just want my kid to have more than I had,” because in all likelihood, you had too much as a kid to begin with. Kids don’t need two working parents so they can have more “stuff” in life, they need the constant attention and tutelage of loving parents, and they need LESS STUFF and no internet access so their imaginations will grow and their brains will learn.

Expand full comment
Julie Ann B's avatar

I’ve seen many Christian schools do a great job educating students, especially classic Christian schools so I don’t necessarily agree that these schools are full of troubled children. The schools I’ve seen have strict disciplinary codes that allow them to expel a child after repeated infractions. However, the homeschooled children I see not only have a solid education but also have a strong faith and knowledge of God’s Word, the true source of wisdom. The private school affiliated with my church locks every door while students are in the building. And they provide the students with a solid core academic curriculum.

Expand full comment
Jeff C's avatar

Exactly. But a so-called Christian school must be explicitly biblical, i.e. every decision made at the school is based on the Bible. Many Christian schools are Christian in name only.

Expand full comment
Lisa Ca's avatar

This may be true but it is unfair to generalize this to all Christian schools. Also to assume thats why someone sends kids there.

Expand full comment
Reasonable Horses's avatar

Institutions are no different than the people running them. Quality of output varies. There are excellent public schools, especially smaller ones in less-urban districts, and there are awful "Christian" schools desperate for tuition income and willing to take students banned from all but reform school and not yet jailable. For goodness sakes, moms and dads, engage your kids regularly in "What did you learn today" dinner talk, have them show you their books and homework, get to know their teachers and administrators on more than just a professional level, and by all means, trust but verify.

Expand full comment
Lisa Ca's avatar

True. I’m sure most here do that. We have a hybrid program so I am FULLY aware of what she is learning.

Expand full comment
Jeff C's avatar

Hi Lisa - I didn't say it was all Christian schools but "many". The context of my comment was specifically regarding Christian schools that aren't explicitly biblical. That is they don't follow what the Bible clearly states. I didn't make any assumptions regarding why people send their kids there.

Further, there's nothing wrong with generalizing things. God gave us a brain and reasoning capability so we can spot patterns. It's the basis of common sense, when we see destructive patterns we should avoid them to protect ourselves and our families.

You have been taught that it's wrong to observe things and make conclusions so you find offense at people that do so. There's nothing wrong about it, but you have been conditioned by the world to think no one is ever allowed to "judge" anyone or anything else. It's a false gospel that is directly contradicted by scripture. Further, it leads people into ruin as they blindly proceed into situations in which they should flee.

Expand full comment
Lisa Ca's avatar

Sorry Jeff my comment was more in response to the original comment. Yes you said explicitly biblical. Because I am surrounded by biblical church and school I often forget MANY are not. sigh. 😩

Expand full comment
Bryan Dair's avatar

So, they should stone unruly children to death?

Deuteronomy 21:18-21 ESV

'If a man has a stubborn and rebellious son who will not obey the voice of his father or the voice of his mother, and, though they discipline him, will not listen to them, then his father and his mother shall take hold of him and bring him out to the elders of his city at the gate of the place where he lives, and they shall say to the elders of his city, ‘This our son is stubborn and rebellious; he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton and a drunkard.’ Then all the men of the city shall stone him to death with stones. So you shall purge the evil from your midst, and all Israel shall hear, and fear.'

Expand full comment
Jeff C's avatar

Any comment that starts with "so..." then puts words into the mouth of the speaker that they didn't say, is de-facto evidence of bad faith.

Not even worth responding to as your mind is obviously made up and you don't want to have a conversation but score cheap points.

Edit: Adding here that I get it as I was you many decades ago. You're an angry atheist that resents the implication that there's any moral boundaries whatsoever on your behavior. You use condescension and belittling to ridicule people that do exercise constraint and self-control rather than attempting to understand why they think this way.

Their contention that we will all be held accountable stirs that pang of guilt deep within you that interferes with your hedonism. So you snarkily reply in a dismissive manner as you don't want to seriously evaluate the worldview that motivates others. You use bad faith tactics (such as misrepresenting what others are saying) to mock and demean them.

Yup, I was you so much that it's almost uncanny. There is a better way to live.

Expand full comment
Bryan Dair's avatar

I hope that you and your many wives and concubines have had a wonderful evening after beating your slaves and stoning your disobedient children to death. After all, it is all about living Biblically.

Expand full comment
Reasonable Horses's avatar

Remember who tempted Jesus with context-free snippets of scripture in the wilderness? Hint: it was a character interested in reductio ad absurdum rather than truth, love, and peace.

Expand full comment
Peter GL's avatar

Sola scriptura in and of itself is not fully correct. The fullness of the Church comes not solely from Scripture but ALSO from the early Church fathers who gave us the collection of the Scriptures and explained them.

Expand full comment
Reasonable Horses's avatar

How do you mean, “fullness of the church,” and where does scripture make that a point of salvation or privileged access to grace? Far as I know, the prophets, Jesus, and apostles didn’t establish any institution or person other than Christ between us, salvation, and the Father. The precise opposite and basis for the Reformation seems clear. “Jesus answered, ‘I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me’” (John 14:6). “There is one God and one mediator between God and mankind, the man Christ Jesus” (1 Timothy 2:5). “For I resolved to know nothing while I was with you except Jesus Christ and him crucified” (1 Corinthians 2:2). Does that need more conditions and complications?

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

Same with the Classical School in our area. And the doors automatically lock in this school.

Expand full comment
L1's avatar

I think there is a wide range of Christian schools, some would have more troubled kids as mentioned, still not a majority. Others would have very few. Depends on the policies of the individual school. Homeschooling is a good option.

Expand full comment
Lisa Ca's avatar

Exactly Julie Ann!!! 100%. Ours also screens as closely as possible for believers.

Expand full comment
William Foster's avatar

Christian or Classical education is no guarantee. Woke education practices have affected all education, mainly because most parents know no other model and expect private education to be similar, just without the assaults, disorder and teen pregnancies.

https://open.substack.com/pub/yuribezmenov/p/librarian-of-celaeno-podcast?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=b9xjx

Expand full comment
Valerie's avatar

We had our kids in Christian schools over the years and this wasn’t out experience. But we specifically looked for schools that would not accept kids that had been kicked out or otherwise had discipline issues at public school. There are actually schools that actively market to/recruit those kids. Your point is mostly true, but I would just say that there are really good Christian schools out there, but like anything else you have to do your due diligence.

Expand full comment
WP William's avatar

Charter Schools are the MAIN dumping grounds for problematic students

Expand full comment
Reasonable Horses's avatar

Last resort in some cases, although mileage varies. Parents have far more power than many think. Maybe they can't change districts, but they can and do influence staffing, curriculum, and their kids' awareness of what is right and wrong in a classroom. Public schools are a product of the same process that gives us the govt we do or don't elect.

Expand full comment
FlatEarthFlyer's avatar

Very sad. It seems like all the institutions we used to have faith in and take for granted have been infected with evil…

Expand full comment
Dawn B's avatar

Mt charter school weeded the slacker parents out. They had to do a bunch of voluntary hours and if their kids was not doing well, we were on top of them. Most parents took their difficult kids out because they didn't want to deal with it.

Expand full comment
Jeff C's avatar

Explicitly biblical Christian schools don't. My kid's Christian high school will not accept any student that has a history of defiant behavior, drug use, or other extreme disciplinary issues. They recognize kids do stupid things, but there's a difference between a stupid stunt and defiance. There is zero tolerance.

What many Christians (specifically those who don't read their Bible) fail to realize is that it's a two-way street. They are biblically obligated to protect their children and others children under their care from harm. They don't get a free-pass to endanger those under their care to virtue signal their "Christian charity".

This is what happens when people don't know the Word and practice the world's Hallmark Card version of Christianity. There are places where disturbed children can be shown the love of Jesus without endangering other kids. But these people are so obsessed with showing "they care" they end up showing zero compassion for the good kids.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

💯 especially to that last paragraph!!! Hallmark version of Christianity is a great way of putting it.

Expand full comment
Lisa Ca's avatar

I said the same lol. Spot on

Expand full comment
Lisa Ca's avatar

Couldn’t say it any better than your “hallmark card version of Christianity”. Spot on. This is also what got much of the country in trouble during COVID.

Expand full comment
Jay Horton's avatar

Check out the book, "Shepards for Sale", Megan Basham. Much of the faithful were undermined by snakes and those with hidden agendas who infiltrated the upper management of church hierarchy and education. Disgusting, but so many don't read with discernment and meditation so they get duped and butt hurt. Same song same dance.

Later Jay

Expand full comment
Lisa Ca's avatar

Funny you say that. I know the premise but bought the book for my one Stocking gift from “santa”

Expand full comment
Jay Horton's avatar

Get it but be prepared. It's a good read. She writes well.

Later Jay

P.S. maybe you could barrow it back and read it yourself, just to verify the content. Know what I mean Vern?

Expand full comment
Lisa Ca's avatar

LOL I bought it for me.

Expand full comment
daverkb's avatar

Good point and said with a solid 'right on'. I for one am hesitent to comment on this topic precisely because people don't read their Bible. And when they do, vary often they do so without enough education so as to understand what they are reading.

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

That actually seems to be a problem across the board regardless of the issue under discussion.

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

Amen.

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

Right on target.

Expand full comment
Romgrp's avatar

Of course this shooting took place in the most liberal city and county in WI. So. Homeschooling is great. I schooled 3 boys for many years at home.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Yeah I noticed that too. Wonder if this is another trans shooter case 😕

Expand full comment
Miss Teacup's avatar

R. read she was on testosterone, but I was in another room when he called that out to me, so better check me.

Expand full comment
Janet's avatar

There’s a clue.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

I just read she was completely obsessed with school shooters/shootings and was consumed by hatred for males 😕 Sounds totally stable 😑🙄Wondering how no one saw or acted on those red flags 😕

Expand full comment
Miss Teacup's avatar

But the actions taken to address such issues usually make things even worse. She would probably have been given SSRIs, therapy, and plenty of affirmation in the hope that the strength of her emotions would eventually cool. These kids are so utterly desperate, and the laws themselves have been written so as to prosecute anyone who used to be able to help. Think so-called conversion therapy bans. Psychologists can only, by law, affirm whatever the client states is "their" truth. And parents? So many get blindsided, they have no idea of the new rules, meant to make them powerless SO that their kids will self-destruct and take others with them. I think what all kids need is good old-fashioned hands-on work, like cleaning stables, milking cows, digging post holes and ditches, prepping and cultivating nice big garden plots, etc. Kind of like some of the stuff we did as kids. And church. Sunday school, and having to help out in the parish. Which would necessitate the parents having to get involved, too. I know that's a pipe dream, but it wasn't THAT long ago that we lived like that and we were SANE, even through those teen years. Sorry to be so long winded.

Expand full comment
LamedVav disavows all vaxes.'s avatar

I completely agree with you, Miss Teacup.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Good points, well said.

Expand full comment
Jeff C's avatar

I'm reading these comments about people's Christian schools and church groups being ruined by bad kids and have to be blunt, you guys are attending lousy churches and schools. You need to find one that is biblical.

Godly men and women don't let this happen as they realize those good kids are entrusted by God to their care. They don't get to show off their "compassion" by endangering them. This is pretty messed up thinking and shows exactly why the Bible lays down strict godly qualifications for pastors and elders.

Expand full comment
Lisa Ca's avatar

Hearty A-men!!!

Expand full comment
Tonya's avatar

I agree that Christian schools are often seen as a last ditch effort to reform troubled kids. Administrators need to avoid enrolling kids like that. If they want to "show compassion" to them, they can do it in other ways without endangering all the other lives entrusted to them.

Expand full comment
Oma's avatar

Amen. I’ve seen too much of this in my years in the educational field. Suspended? Enroll at a Christian school. And no, not all Christian Schools are like that. The adhere to very strict behavioral guidelines; one mistake and you’re out with your parents.

Expand full comment
ViaVeritasVita's avatar

That's an interesting point you make about Christian schools side-functioning as nannies for the troubled. I certainly observed between say, 2000 and 2019, how children with problems (most often, children of divorced parents) corrupted the classroom, and worse--got un-problemed children to follow their example. Divorce is bad.

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

We have a friend that teaches preschool. A three year old was so violent he was kicked out of preschool. He was throwing chairs at the other 3 year olds, kicking the teacher. The mom was in her 50's and apparently too tired to discipline the child. Our friend said she had been warned about the child in her class and that he had been that way since he began there at 1 year old. 😳

Expand full comment
Susan Clack's avatar

Whenever I hear about such extreme behavior in a human being of ANY AGE, the word "DEMON" comes to mind immediately. This entire country needs DELIVERANCE!!!

Expand full comment
Melissa S's avatar

Just saw the film "Nefarious" last night on Amazon Prime. Definitely makes one think about what is going on in our world.

Expand full comment
Sir Jeff Morency, Ph.D.'s avatar

Pastor Ken Thornberg has a special ministry of casting demons out of people, especially Christian believers.

Expand full comment
Sir Jeff Morency, Ph.D.'s avatar

Christians especially have a problem with demons because "Jesus" IS the name of a demon according to Pastor Thornberg, my own personal experience and several other testimonies.

According to the Greek historian, Eusebius, the Roman Emperor, Constantine chose the name of the pagan Druid god, Hesus taken at the Council of Nicea in 325 CE and the name was approved. The theology formulated at this council was the foundation of the Catholic Church which continued to spread teaching about Hesus Krishna all around the world. According to Nexus Magazine, this name evolved into Jesus Christ and was solidified by the printing of the King James Bible in 1611. They wrote the name “Jesus” into the Greek New Testament in place of the name He had always been known as up until that time which was “Yahshuah”.

Expand full comment
ViaVeritasVita's avatar

I loved teaching Latin to middle-schoolers—and high-schoolers. Loved it. Until the district injected poison into the air, and made the environment toxic.

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

I hold the teaching record for shortest time: 3 days at an inner city school. I quickly discovered that I do not like babysitting teenagers, especially when they are much bigger than I am and they are hopped up on drugs.

Expand full comment
Oma's avatar

In the earliest years I was employed as Secretary at my children’s elementary school (they got tired of me being their every day to “volunteer” and the principal asked if I wanted to be Secretary since he and his Secretary were retiring. Of course I would!!) 27 years during which time as I ‘followed’ my children to high school in Administrative Assistant position, I retired! This was in the middle 70’s and ‘things’ were happening then. I was the only one in the Principal’s office and yes, ran the clinic, cleaned, and watched elementary kids at my work station who were too “bad” to be in class. But I knew where my children were and who their teachers were. And they knew me!! I took no crud from the kids, the parents, the teachers, nor the principal! I stood my ground. No Christian schools at that time. Just us Secretaries and clerks. The principals had county meetings!

Expand full comment
ViaVeritasVita's avatar

That does seem to be a problem with teaching Spanish—in my experience, “students” tend to choose it for the wrong reasons. You may imagine that I had rather less of that, teaching Latin…

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

I loved teaching Spanish.

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

Same with youth groups. Typically the children from church families suffer as staff struggle to entertain the rowdy kids they bring in from the community. We found out years ago that kids from the community on the church bus were watching things not suited for adults. We had to separate the boys from the girls in youth because there was no learning going on. Eventually, the neighborhood kids stopped coming because they just wanted out of the house for some social time which they assumed would be unsupervised. They didn't want to abide by the rules we set in place, nor did they have any interest in God's Word that was being taught.

Expand full comment
SA's avatar

Absolutely. I saw it at the Christian school I attended. Huge influx of kids kicked out of public school in high school and parents turned to our little Christian school. Then they were all expelled within the first year of attending the Christian school. It completely changed the culture and safety on campus. Not to mention, many Christian schools are not equipped with the funding to provide prison-like security at the same level public schools enjoy. No metal detectors and no SRO on our campus.

Expand full comment
RJ Rambler's avatar

This is truth and has been for at least fifty years ago when my mother was teaching there.

Expand full comment
Credenda's avatar

You nailed it!

For most, it’s a question of priorities, of lifestyle preservation. Homeschooling often requires a somewhat lower standard of living but what is more important than raising godly children?

Expand full comment
FlatEarthFlyer's avatar

Amen, Credenda…😊

Expand full comment
CStone's avatar

Absolutely true. I used to work at a Christian school. It was about half just good children from good homes, and half public school ‘rejects’ who had behavioral issues.

One beautiful blonde, blue-eyed little girl was born with alcohol syndrome and had been adopted. We found out she was beating up her parents. They had to put deadbolt locks on their bedroom doors, as she tried to kill them in their sleep!!

HOME SCHOOL is the only way.

Expand full comment
Lisa Ca's avatar

Geez. That is horrible

Expand full comment
Oma's avatar

But so true with adopted children. Especially out of the country children. We have 4 adopted out of the country (China and Vietnam) and 2 are special needs. Two were raised in a very strong Christian home but our Vietnam girl came into a our son’s already troubled marriage by spite on his ex-wife’s part. Little Grace had been locked in her room at the orphanage and meals brought to her. She was 8 when she came to to America. She suffers from Reactive Attachment Disorder where they love you one minute and the they are out the door. Counseling helped a little, but I keep reminding our son and our very Christian daughter in love, that our son gave her life and a chance to know Jesus. Both his adopted girls were at church when he had them and were baptized at their request at our church which their mother tried to have us arrested because we didn’t have her permission. And she enrolled them in a CHRISTIAN SCHOOL - term used loosely - so our son could not get any information on anything about them. I met ONE good teacher who cared about the kids. So not all churches and not all Christian schools are good. And there are some very warped people adopting special needs children - for $$$! I know one Evil One who will answer to The Great I Am one day.

Forgiveness? I’ve worked on it but dust the poop from my sandals and moved on. My version of that scripture lol

Expand full comment
Lisa Ca's avatar

Amen Oma. So true :( Many “Christian” churches are pushing a false gospel.

Expand full comment
Karen Bandy's avatar

Back when I was teaching junior high art in the early 80’s all the ‘resource room’ kids were put in the electives classes. So I had 18 regular kids and 6-8 kids who had problems of one sort or another.

The resource room teachers had 6-8 total in a classroom, I had regular kids AND resource kids. I was in my early 20’s, college didn’t teach us how to deal with this, because of Mainstreaming and Carter’s economy I only lasted three years.

Good news! I ran my own business for 35 years!!

Expand full comment
Rosalind McGill's avatar

Mainstream saying nothing about the young lady taking male hormones, identifying as a boy/ man.

Expand full comment
KBB's avatar

Hormones, maybe. SSRIs, definitely.

Expand full comment
FlatEarthFlyer's avatar

Her “boyfriend” claims she wasn’t…

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

Sounds like a copy-cat of the Nashville shooter.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

I thought the same thing 😕

Expand full comment
Dan (100% All in MAGA)'s avatar

Or... what if some delusional warped parent puts the child their specifically to act out on their destructive behavior?

Expand full comment
FlatEarthFlyer's avatar

Quite possible. Lots of sick people in the world today…

Expand full comment
Yuri Bezmenov's avatar

Cringey Brown Jackson is emblematic of our theater kid occupied government. She was appointed because she is a black woman, yet she cannot define what a woman is. Hamilton was the worst Broadway show.

Expand full comment
Jpeach's avatar

Brown’s wordiness and Kamala’s famous word salads, are their strategies to cover up a general lack of intelligence. Liberals fall for it.

Expand full comment
Ursula Gibson's avatar

Obama falls into the same category.

Expand full comment
Reasonable Horses's avatar

"I'm talking so I must be the smartest person in the room" is an odd turn our culture has taken. We used to understand that still waters run deep.

Expand full comment
Dan (100% All in MAGA)'s avatar

re: In other words, she got the part based on who she was rather than on her acting talents.

She was put on SCOTUS as a DEI hire and radical far left liberal, this is more of the same.

Expand full comment
79SmithW60's avatar

I don't know who first coined it and it may well have been around awhile, but I read it the other day the true meaning of the acronym DEI = Didn't Earn It. Simple and to the point.

Expand full comment
Parachutepants's avatar

Maybe she is part Indian, like Elizabeth Warren.

Expand full comment
Dan (100% All in MAGA)'s avatar

Yeah! I never thought of that. I think you are right!

Expand full comment
Skeptical Actuary's avatar

She may regret going on stage since now just about everyone knows HOW short she is. I had no idea.

I try not to think less of short people since my best friend growing up only reached 4'7", and I even push back at conservatives being throwing "short" jabs and jokes at people like Robert Reich and Anthony Fauci, but it is harder to take people seriously when they are the size of a child.

BTW she "officially" is 5'1". I'd say 4'10" is more likely.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

Just a continuation... sadly, these people can continue for a LONG time. One ill-deserved placement helps to promote them to another. I know, I've got a boss like this. He's an idiot.

Expand full comment
Inverted Pyramid's avatar

“Hamilton” was a Woke tool. First, the play put greater prominence on fiction than fact. Second, Hamilton was born not only out of wedlock (no shame for out of wedlock)... his father was unknown. Third, Hamilton was most fierce about making the President more like a King than a position that is defined by the Constitution. Fourth, Hamilton used the “Alien and Seditious Act” to shutdown Newspapers that printed articles critical of him. Fifth, he died in a duel against a political opponent. Sixth, he wasn’t born as an American.

Expand full comment
Reasonable Horses's avatar

Nice catch. Also and on his deathbed, he accepted Christ, reports say. I’m not an expert, but folks who watch and cite as fact documentaries and historical drama baffle me. Hamilton and that “modern take on Shakespeare” semi-starring KBJ drip with hubris and revisionist art history.

Wiki recently waved a similar red flag at me. Their entry for “Citizenship Clause, 14th Amendment, US Constitution” opened with this statement: “This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 3 June 2024.” I hope that referred to their commentary. Even Wiki doesn’t seem cheeky enough to revise the Constitution, but I didn’t bother reading any further.

Expand full comment
Skeptical Actuary's avatar

I think Hamilton was a good play, apart from the fact that whites were excluded from all roles other than King George III.

"Woke" by today's standards would have every third character being LGBTQIA++XYZ - including all the more heroic characters.

Expand full comment
Inverted Pyramid's avatar

Of course King George III would be White. King George was crazy, despotic, and a failure.

Expand full comment
Neil Kellen's avatar

There's a maxim in business: what you can't make in margin, make up for in volume.

Same goes for SCOTUS talking I guess.

Expand full comment
Tuco's Child's avatar

A master class in wordcraft 👏 🤣 !

"BlueSky was the progressive immune response to Elon Musk’s purchase of Twitter. It was initially seeded with the most delicate woke snowflakes, all seeking a safe, fully moderated social media environment free from any criticism of their deplorable sexual habits or the logical fallacies inherent in their worldviews. Indeed, they sought solace with their co-adventurers in progressivism, mutually applauding their brave life choices and bilaterally appreciating their constant virtue signaling in a deafening woke echo chamber."

Expand full comment
Jan Ravensbergen's avatar

Jeff, you really outdid yourself this morning with your TwitterVsBlueSky scenesetter for the ages.

✅Brilliantly done. ✅

“#DelicateWokeSnowflakes” 🤣🤣🤣🤣👍

Thanks & *much* appreciation for the way you manage to fuel the start of each day with joy, laughter, faith, perspective, and wisdom … especially lately‼️❣️

Expand full comment
Reasonable Horses's avatar

BlueSky is the social-media equivalent of stuffing fingers in ears and repeating, “I’m not listening I’m not listening.” It’s a tone deaf choir second only to the current occupants of our White House.

Expand full comment
J Boss's avatar

BlueSky's answer is simple and obvious. They want an exclusive club, right? So just charge liberals $200/month and the trolls will go away.

Expand full comment
FedUpInOR's avatar

They won’t pay it, they think everything should be free. ‘It’s my right!’

Expand full comment
Albert Steed's avatar

When Trump speaks, and he says things like 'Golden Age', I get a bit misty eyed.

47 years old, business owner for 24 of those years. My BEST time in business was Trumps 4 years. The last year has been rough. My kids are approaching launch phase and I'm concerned for them.

I hope the man who took a bullet, stood up and shouted "fight!" can do it.

Expand full comment
Anita from Tucson - Now In MI's avatar

I pray it be so as well.

Expand full comment
SadieJay's avatar

No doubt! Trumps years were glorious and prosperous for the good people. And he was hamstrung by RINOs the whole time. The whiners are those who prospered during the dark times because they were getting paid to do wrong in the shadows.

Expand full comment
Reasonable Horses's avatar

What he accomplished in spite of being hamstrung is pretty amazing. This time, I expect a major restoration.

Expand full comment
SadieJay's avatar

Amen!

Expand full comment
Robin Landry's avatar

I would prefer people who are the last stop for justice not needing to be on a stage getting applause for their wounded-egos.

There’s a time to put away childish things and while being on broadway might be a nice dream for someone still the needing the validation of strangers(which explains Hollywood & the predators who swim her waters) I would expect a Supreme Court justice to be past that stage.

Expand full comment
Irunthis1's avatar

Yes it is not only an obvious sign of her personal issues affecting her (lack of) judgement, but also a national embarrassment. She can be as woke as she wants in private but to take it to the world stage only emphasizes her utter stupidity and the stupidity of the president who nominated her and the morons in the senate who confirmed.

Expand full comment
c Anderson's avatar

I welcome Ketanji Brown Jackson’s utter stupidity. Yeah, for dumbest. It is the stealthily stupid like John Roberts that really hurt us. Obama is another stealth idiot.

Expand full comment
Valerie's avatar

Agreed. If nothing else, it makes her, as a SC judge, look emotionally weak. And that is NOT what we need.

Expand full comment
c Anderson's avatar

Val, get over it! Don’t you know yet that there is no such thing as being embarrassed anymore? It is all about becoming whatever fool you want to be without regard for anyone else and with no regrets. True narcissism.

Expand full comment
Valerie's avatar

Pretty much. 🙄

Expand full comment
Karen Bandy's avatar

You’re right. It’s fine when Al Roker does it, but a Supreme Court justice?

They sure love people fawning over them.

Expand full comment
MnmMom's avatar

👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

Expand full comment
Words Beyond Me Janice Powell's avatar

And turning His gaze toward His disciples, He began to say,

“Blessed are the poor, for yours is the kingdom of God.

Blessed are those who hunger now, for you shall be satisfied.

Blessed are those who cry now, for you shall laugh.

Blessed are you when men hate you, and exclude you, and insult you, and scorn your name as evil, for the sake of the Son of Man. Be glad in that day and leap for joy, for behold, your reward is great in heaven. For their fathers were doing the same things to the prophets.”

— Luke 6:20-23 LSB

Expand full comment
Gaye's avatar

And saying this, he perfectly described himself in the Be-Attitudes.

Expand full comment
Anita from Tucson - Now In MI's avatar

John 16:20-22 English Standard Version

20 Truly, truly, I say to you, you will weep and lament, but the world will rejoice. You will be sorrowful, but your sorrow will turn into joy. 21 When a woman is giving birth, she has sorrow because her hour has come, but when she has delivered the baby, she no longer remembers the anguish, for joy that a human being has been born into the world. 22 So also you have sorrow now, but I will see you again, and your hearts will rejoice, and no one will take your joy from you.

and

Hebrews 12:2

fixing our eyes on Jesus, the pioneer and perfecter of faith. For the joy set before him he endured the cross, scorning its shame, and sat down at the right hand of the throne of God.

Expand full comment
Lori P. Clark's avatar

First!

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

I’ve got first like. 🤣

Expand full comment
79SmithW60's avatar

"beth" almost beat both of you Juju and Lori!! LOL!

Expand full comment
Ed Thorrens's avatar

We were created to His image and unto His likeness, He is the creator and knows best!

“So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.”

‭‭Genesis‬ ‭1‬:‭27‬ ‭KJV‬‬

https://bible.com/bible/1/gen.1.27.KJV

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

Romans 1:18 The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, 19 since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. 20 For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse. 21 For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools ...24 Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25 They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen. 26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error. 28 Furthermore, just as they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, so God gave them over to a depraved mind, so that they do what ought not to be done.

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

Thanks Robin.

Folks who post bible verses help me learn. It also helps that their relevance applies in context of the substack. . .

Expand full comment
Tom's avatar

God gave them over.

God.

Good luck overcoming this, if one has been given over.

If God has given you over, then you are given over indeed.

True repentance is available. Will it be rejected? No. Will it happen? That is the question.

Expand full comment
Joanie Higgs's avatar

I happened to watch the press conference live, as it happened yesterday. Even as a Canadian, I felt the hair stand up on my head with excitement and joy, and love for this man, whose "reality tv" show I never could stand. Yes, America, Trump is the Real Deal. January 20th can't come soon enough.

Expand full comment
Beckadee's avatar

How many of your Prime Ministers [I believe that's their title] have resigned since Freeland. Ya'll hold their feet to the fire!

Expand full comment
Kathleen Janoski's avatar

Freeland with Nazi DNA.

Expand full comment
ChicNotGeek's avatar

Is it too corny to call her “Acting Justice Katenji brown jackson”?

But it makes me wonder if any of the SCOTUS cases coming up have any importance or consequence to any of the investors in the play.

Expand full comment
Fred's avatar

Yep…sorta like the drones and the pending legislation to give the govt more authority over UAPs. Someone else added, “and I’m sure just a few other things at the same time.”

Expand full comment
FedUpInOR's avatar

Wondered the exact same thing

Expand full comment
Anne Grinols's avatar

Drones = Distraction

Expand full comment
Bones's avatar

Every time I see Trump speak he gets more and more likable. It’s really God’s grace. There is so much that is happening right now, just because people have been praying and telling the truth and seeking the truth.

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

You know, just LAST night I commented to the wife that he seemed calmer, more controlled.

Is Trump on drugs?! Come on, man!

Expand full comment
Beckadee's avatar

I hope its calmness and not exhaustion. Except for the Micky D's and Coke he prefers, being a non drinker and smoker and having parents who lived to an old age will hopefully give him another 15+ years of living.

Expand full comment
Mary Suddath's avatar

Probably his near-death experience in July.

Expand full comment
Jeanne Schwass's avatar

On The Eye of the Storm (Badlands Media) Paul Fleuret opined that he thinks a new pandemic is coming, but it'll be over in like, 15 days because the cures (ivermectin, HCQ, etc) will be made available. And that will blow the lid off of the Covid cover up. We shall see.

Expand full comment
ASK's avatar

Creepy Peter Hotez has already come out and said some new pandemic will be starting January 21st, which hopefully puts a target on him. The problem for the globalists and the government trying to pull another psyop on us, like the UFO bs that is currently happening, is that no one is buying into it. We know they are going to try to pull something big off to scare us again, but only the remaining stupid sheeple are going to obey. The rest of us will tell them to bugger off.

Expand full comment
NofloChick's avatar

Pandemics/viruses have deadlines? :-)

Expand full comment
ASK's avatar

Yes, he actually said January 21st. Strange, huh, that he can predict something so specifically? Premeditated so we should be able to throw him in jail if it happens?

Expand full comment
c Anderson's avatar

You can’t have a pandemic that only lasts for 15 days because “pan” means all or every. A disease takes time to infect enough people around the world to become a pandemic. Epidemics are outbreaks that are locally observed. It is an important distinction that must be made because we are being manipulated by word usage.

Expand full comment
CHop's avatar

I keep both on hand. They are discovering they are good for many viruses. Ivermectin shows promise in cancer, dementia, excema, shingles and the list keeps growing.

Expand full comment
SeeingTruth's avatar

OHIOANS - URGENT - MEDICAL FREEDOM - ACTION NEEDED TODAY - ASAP

HB 73 - DAVE and ANGIE PATIENT and HEALTH PROVIDER PROTECTION ACT

SENATE HEALTH CHAIR REWROTE BILL LAST MINUTE - TAKES AWAY PATIENT PROTECTION TO GET DRUGS & MOST DR PROTECTION

FLCCC is AMPLIFYING PLEA ON X

--------

HB 73 was bipartisanly approved in Ohio's House to PROTECT PATIENTS to GET THE DRUGS they want to treat as PRESCRIBED BY DOCTORS from outpatient pharmacies and while in hospital, and PROTECT DRS LICENCES who speak out. It also PROHIBITS WHO "jurisdiction in OH".

BAIT & SWITCH LAST MINUTE REWRITE

Steve Huffman, SENATE Health Committe Chair, on his own REWROTE HB 73 completely BASTARDIZING IT and making it virtually UNRECOGNIZEABLE.

Power taken AWAY FROM DRs to prescribed in favor of FDA "RISK EVALUATION AND MITIGATION STRATEGIES".

Only 30% of the original bill is left:

- some free speech left for drs but only for off-label use - can't talk about vaxes

- some protection of drs licenses

- WHO clause

The bill is so far removed from its intent that the relatives of Dave and Angie, who this bill is named after who died because they didn't receive treatment, don't want Dave and Angie's names associated with this travesty as Huffman's rewritten HB 73 would not have protected their rights to treatment.

-------

CALL TO ACTION IS TO EMAIL REPUBLICAN SENATORS

Info in FLCCC tweets

Tweet 1 - Background https://x.com/Honest_Medicine/status/1868525064737743210

Tweet 2 - suggested letter to send - or write your own

https://x.com/Honest_Medicine/status/1868533160939786395

Tweet 3 - email address

https://x.com/Honest_Medicine/status/1868533589610307664

OAMF info and updates - listen to interviews to further understanding https://ohioamf.org/so/e1PFD0Ksa?languageTag=en

Expand full comment
Laura Kasner's avatar

SeeingTruth - you are on it! Emails sent yesterday. WE NEED TO HOUND THESE CRIMINALS!

Steve Huffman, who rewrote HB 73 taking out its original purposes, is not only the Ohio Senate Health Committe Chair, he is also an MD.

He has done everything possible to kill this bill - this last minute rewrite is further proof.

Question: why would Huffman, an MD, limit his own authority to prescribe pharmaceuticals?

Could Huffman be serving the interests of his political donors vs Ohioans?

Expand full comment
SeeingTruth's avatar

Thanks Laura! Couldn't do it without you!

Expand full comment
WP William's avatar

ALL Local OH Republican Leaders and Precinct captains esp. those in HIS district need to IMMEDIATELY inundate this turncoat Commie-servative with non-stop criticism of his work for Donors...expose all his communications and funding sources...tar and feather this TURD! Rabble Rise UP!

Expand full comment
Julie Ann B's avatar

Thank you for sharing! This is how the C&C army can make a difference!

Expand full comment
SeeingTruth's avatar

Absolutely Julie Ann! Great community we have here!

Expand full comment
WP William's avatar

sounds like Huffyman needs mass, unrelenting public excoriation over the next several weeks for being a corporate donor TOOL

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

Apparently, the rumors of the drones being used to look for radioactive objects might be true... or a psyops...? Anyone heard anything more on this?..................................................................................................

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Releases Report Confirming Radioactive Material Lost in Transit — Shipping Container Arrives Damaged and Empty in New Jersey

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/12/u-s-nuclear-regulatory-commission-releases-report-confirming/

If this is true, I believe the most likely suspect would be the insane NeoCons stealing the material to use to create a "false flag" event, such as a dirty bomb explosion to blame on the Russians so as to invoke Article 5 of NATO and take the US directly to war with Russia before Trump can take office. The patriotic parts of the US military need to stand up and oppose these deep state actors.

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

Beware Last 2 Weeks of December – Something is Not Right

Posted Dec 12, 2024 By Martin Armstrong

....I am concerned about this usurpation of the state’s military power in Congress’ newly unveiled annual defense bill that could soon be signed into law. The final version of this year’s National Defense Authorization Act is removing the National Guard Air defense to the Federal power. This is over the objections of some 55 state and territorial governors. WHY? This seems to be inspired by the threat of the States being able to resist the Feds. This is not a good sign...

... The risk remains that NATO is trying desperately to create war with Russia before Trump takes office. My concern here is that they will create a false flag to blame Russia...

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/beware-last-2-weeks-of-december-something-is-not-right/

Expand full comment
daverkb's avatar

Again, my Trump remark. That is,Trump saying 'they know, but aren't saying.' Trump was also asked if he was briefed on this (drones) and Trump said, "I rather not say."

Again, Trump may have just trumped the bad actors in whatever is going on. The threat is spilling the beans, and with consequences to any would be 'orchestrators' should they try to pull something off.

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

Based upon the last 8 years, I think you are correct to assume Trump must have a lot of political leverage he can use. Still, there is an on-going centralization of power at the fringes of perception to hem in the States and the Citizens of this country to a top-down tyranny and I don't see that ever being reversed.

Both Armstrong and EIR/LaRouche are concerned about what the NeoCons may do over the next month to stay in control as evidenced by my followup comment here. I liken the NeoCons to cornered snakes that only understand one instinct - to strike.

Expand full comment
daverkb's avatar

Well now, the NeoCon/Woke Marxist contingent has a big problem, and that's exposure and subsequent retribution now that Trump has the bully pulpit ... and in a few days, the full power of government. Also, that these Cretins did not dare to pull of another Banana Republic electoral coup d'etat signals that these folks are on the run. And for further confirmation of a change in weather patterns just look at Canada, France and Germany. Quite obviously, there is a new game in town. And I will believe it to be so for now unless I see divergences beginning to take root and dominate.

https://rumble.com/v608iqw-scholz-loses-confidence-vote.-canada-chaos-freeland-gone.-ukraine-sbu-assas.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp

And again, notice how much more confident Trump is this go around. And how he managed the drone press question is an indication writ large. It was as much a warning to whomever knows what is going on as anything else. The take home is that Trump is now also a master of controlling events by indirection.

There is no restoration going on. It is an oscillation in reverse gear within the containment vehicle of the government of usurpation dominate for the last hundred and twenty some years. Totalitarianism is only to be mitigated, to be toned down in order to head off a cattle stampede. People, including lawyers, like to play make believe. They like to play make believe with 'constitutional' rights when they are really dickering around with institutionalized totalitarian civil permissions which can wax and wan according to the whim of whom is in power. And as there is 'gender fluidity', there is also 'constitutional rights fluidity' which has nothing to do with the first American constitutions. And things get infringed upon all the time should anyone care to notice. It's all a sham, make believe, a pretense whereby the public is led around by a ring through the nose.

Caveat: I voted for Trump because a half loaf is better than none at all.

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

In retrospect, it appears to me that the whole plandemic democide, coupled with open borders, was an initiative of the Apex money power and now that has run it course and the herd can be placated with the destruction of the Marxist regime that carried it out. IE, after an assassination, the assassin is killed to cover the trail. Could be wrong but......

Since 1913, the Apex money power has been sucking on the productivity of the American people through debt service. Shortly after 1913, this was jump started by America's entry into two wars of world conquest and FDR's "remedy" for the great depression. Now this profit center is nearly exhausted having been mortgaged to the hilt and there is little profit left in the American body for the Apex money power. But there is a continent of natural resources to profit from by gaining access to it. So the American population must be reduced, subjugated and replaced to facilitate the opening of a new profit center in the rape of North America's resources, somewhat similar to their designs for Russia.

Makes sense to me. As you say, They view the "entire Western World as their special hunting preserve."

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

Would that Americans understood this! Or at least America's churches. The American church could be such a force in the culture but "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge." Without the leaven and salt of the vibrant body of Christ in the culture, what we are witness to will always be the result.

America had a short lived period out from under the thumb of the Apex power and the City of London which soon began to re-establish control with the Masonic coup of the Articles of Confederation lead by Washington in Philadelphia with the new constitution formally ratified in 1790 which centralized power in the Federal Government. Just 70 years later, operational control began with the election of Lincoln in 1860 who quickly declared war on the southern States. This was the initiation of "institutionalized totalitarian civil permissions" in place of the Founders' "unalienable Rights endowed by our Creator."

Then 53 years later, in quick succession, the Apex money power sank their teeth into America's neck with the passage of the Income Tax in Feb 1913, the direct election of Senators in Apr 1913 and the establishment of the Federal Reserve in Dec 1913. Thus was totalitarianism institutionalized. Ever since then and beginning with Lincoln, the USG has been in the empire building war business for the profit of the Apex Money Power.

I wonder when and how the reckoning of the Apex elite will happen. Is it going to take a 12,000 year Younger Dryas reset to bring them down? I wish I knew. Still, it is remarkable to me that the Marxist coup of 2020 is unseated just 4 years later. Maybe that really was the last gasp of Marxism. Aside from university professors, nobody believes in Marxism anymore - not even the Russians or the Chinese want to go back to that.

Expand full comment
daverkb's avatar

The habit of Man is Binary, and that view is reinforced by Nature ... and by Nature across the board. The number two for some reason is a forlorn number, upstaged by such numbers three, seven, ten, thirteen and so on. But in Nature, including the nature of Man, the number two is as fixed as the North Star. For example, the sun is either up or down, the tides either in or out, the sexes are twain and no more. And there is Good and Evil ... and there is fight or flight, the cornerstone of survival. That is, the habit by inclination of Man is reflexively Binary, and this can be vastly further multiplied in the exampled world. Consider that one is either well or not; or ponder on that remarkable name, the Double Helix which is the foundational armature upon which our genetic organization hangs! On the other hand, the habit of gradation which is the habit of thinking in terms of measure for measure, measure against measure, in Man has to be cultivated. This is because the Habit of Two, of either this or that is deeply rooted in the primitive regions of our brains and is the more compelling reflex.

Skating across the ice of history, but not plumbing the vast pools of water beneath the ice, it is easy to vilify poor George W. and raise up Patrick H. to a perched apotheosis. And yet the real plumbed history, replete with the ambiguities observed, with a cornucopia spewing non sequiturs in abundance , this begin to push one in another direction … and into the world of a gradation of grey tonality. That is, most of Man is neither Devil or Angel absolute, but rather an admixture of the two, and again … by varying gradations. And thus history itself must somewhat be judged be by gradation, by weight and measure, and as a studied affair. And yet at sane tune, we cannot except at our peril overlook absolute standards.

At this point, I should jump off the cliff into the Binary World of Right and Wrong. But this prospect of embark I shall elude as a useless tempting leading to no good result. I will instead say this for starters, that what Freemasonery has been throughout history has been a mixed bag and not exactly of the same character in varying periods throughout historical time. John Robison’s, Proof of Conspiracy, published around 1776 first got me clued into this. To wit, that the Lodges in the 18th century on the Continent were vastly different frin those in England, and most decidedly different from those in American. And this fact coupled with the Illuminati infiltration of the European lodges goes a long ways tin explaining why France got a proto-Marxist revolution and the Americans did not. But even this comes with difficulty in that people in America during the American War of Independence did not clearly understand the difference in character between the French Revolution and American Independence movement. This is because people tend to hear words, but overlook means, the philosophic and ideological underpinnings which are attached to words, phrases, slogans and whatnot. Thus, it eludes people that the one Revolution was genuinely a revolution which found its underpinnings in proto-Marxist attitude whereas the American War for Independence found its standing in Christian tradition and therefore was not so much a revolution as it was a restoration in the law of Christian precept, a law which the English king was largely apostate. Jefferson for one, the much heralded American titan of intellect, was clearly out to sea on the divergent distinctives propelling the divergent French and American movements. And this goes to show that the one who is possessed of a classical Christian education such as the Protestant Reformers were and was brought to America has treasure at their command beyond all reckoning.

And so, the short of it is that I believe you are off the mark as to Washington, the nature of Federation, the insufficiency of the Articles. Also, as to the Constitution for the United States (the original document) there is a tendency to overlook of what was put in and what was left out, and why. In my world, abject sellouts would not have put such things as is gold is money and that (in later passage) that tampering at the mint with the weight of the coinage in gold would be punishable by death. And by the way, I am not saying that Patrick Henry and a handful of others were not right to insist upon the inclusion of a Bill of Rights as amendings to the federal constitution. But I also hold that there exists perfectly reasonable grounds as to why the Bill of Rights was not considered in the first place as an indispensable inclusion. The Tenth Amendment points in this direction, as does the Creator/Creature distinction.

De Wife just waltzed in, back from a hair cut. And she got two round chocolates from Choc Zero for me out of the corner cabinet. There that delicious number two again! Yum! Every fellow should be so lucky!

Apologies for misspellings. I have dyslexic fingers!

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

“Nuclear weapons use is no longer unimaginable”....

The Next Several Weeks Until the 20th of January Are the Most Dangerous Ones Ever

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SaaUj4uIAoE

Stop World War III

Support HR 10218

Stratcom’s Adm. Buchanan Spills the Beans:

U.S. preparing for Nuclear War!

Use H.R. 10218 To Pull U.S. ATACMS Back from Ukraine Now!

.......expose the insanity in U.S. policy as revealed by Rear Adm. Thomas R. “TR” Buchanan, Director of U.S. Strategic Command’s Plans and Policy Directorate. Buchanan has stated that the U.S. should be prepared to use nuclear weapons, if the global leadership role of the United States was at stake.

It is urgent that the American people mobilize to urge Congress to immediately enact H.R. 10218, “To Prohibit the Transfer of Army Tactical Missile Systems to Ukraine (ATACMS) and for other Purposes”, introduced by Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA), and now before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. This is a matter of the utmost urgency, to turn the country from its current course of baiting Russia into nuclear brinkmanship and possible U.S. pre-emptive nuclear strike...

...Needless to say, any exchange of nuclear weapons between the US and Russia would lead to the probable extermination of human life on this planet, despite the fact that some circles in the US military and foreign policy establishment, such as Adm. Thomas Buchanan, Director of the Plans and Policy Directorate of the U.S. Strategic Command, are willing to contemplate their possible use.

Buchanan, at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) Nov. 20, stated a nuclear exchange would be acceptable as long as the U.S. emerged with enough nuclear capability to hold post-war dominance: “I think everybody would agree if we have to have an exchange, then we want to do it in terms that are most acceptable to the United States. So it’s terms that are most acceptable to the United States that puts us in a position to continue to lead the world, right?”

Are Members of Congress aware of these chilling comments by the Director of Plans and Policy of the U.S. Strategic Command, which are not obviously merely his personal views, but shared by others in the foreign policy and military establishment? That they mean the abandonment of the policy that “nuclear war cannot be won and therefore must not be fought”? But rather, “We must plan for nuclear war if that’s what it takes to maintain U.S. global dominance”?...

...Call your members of Congress now, at (202) 225-3121! Tell them to back H.R. 10218 now! And tell them to stay on the case beyond this session of Congress, in whatever actions are needed to pull the U.S. out of its present course to nuclear war...

...Buchanan there (CSIS) stated that the U.S. should be prepared to use nuclear weapons, if the global leadership role of the United States was at stake.

Buchanan used his keynote address to the CSIS conference to kick off... a national debate on the proposition that “nuclear weapons use is no longer unimaginable,”...

In introducing Buchanan, moderator Heather Williams, the Director of the PONI project and a consultant to STRATCOM’s Strategic Advisory Group, reported that a theme of discussions in earlier panels that morning was that “nuclear weapons use is no longer not imaginable.”...

...Weapons producer Northrop Grumman Corp. kindly paid for this discussion...

Expand full comment
daverkb's avatar

If they were insane enough to do 911 with 3,000 plus casualties, they are NeoCon insane enough to go another ten yards down the field.

Even Trumps says they know but are not saying. That Trumps says this may be like a 'tipping point' warning. As in, "We know, don't dare to do it." Hearing Trump weigh in, I thought that whatever it is ... is now less likely. You know ... with a spotlight having been turned on the subject matter.

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

To your point about 911, I totally agree. But is the spotlight on Ukraine a distraction from an even bigger problem? To wit, the USG's involvement in the Southwest Asia war being advanced by the Israeli State? Since Ukraine is for all intents and purposes a lost cause for the NeoCons, this ME war has the potential to pit the US in direct conflict with Russia while we are all focused on Ukraine. Israel cannot advance their war for the Greater Israel without the munitions supplied by the USG and the big question is how does Trump's anti-war stance apply to that conflict... or does it? I want to know if Trump is truly serving the interests of all Americans or does he intend to support the war of aggression being waged by Israel? There are too many players (like Turkey) on the board for me to even guess where this is going to go.

Armstrong's Socrates is projecting war through 2028 and it is clear to me that the Israeli State's objective is to absorb Lebanon and Jordan into their Greater Israel designs. The slaughter in Gaza is but the opening chapter to this war of aggression. As this progresses, Israel will come into conflict with Turkey (a NATO member) and eventually with Russia. This is a snake-pit the US must stay out of but our NeoCons will want to escalate this entire conflict.

Expand full comment
daverkb's avatar

The Ukraine is not a distraction. It is a abject unredeemable failure. Even bigger than Afghanistan due to the size of the objectives going into Project Ukraine, total domination of the Eurasian landmass.

Trump serves first and foremost the interests of the Apex Money Power who view the entire Western World as their special hunting preserve, and their sole franchise. Regular Americans are likely to benefit hugely in what is a walk back from going over the cliff. But for us, for regular folks, its mitigation. Or in other words, remedy and relief. It is so because we benefit from the walk back of Woke. Sometimes interests coincide, and both parties benefit. But we should not delude ourselves as to having to live under totalitarian rule. We should not let the appearance of the Velvet Glove delude us as to our conditions of enslavement no matter how benign a Trump Administration may be relative to things like the killing fields of Covid or the many political persecutions of which we have been made witness to, have been made subject thereof.

I would have assumed that the United States was totally mixed up with the Syrian thing. I still tend to think that way. But if it was a totally Turk run initiative, it would indicate the Sick Man Status of the American Empire, and on ropes, ripe for collapse. For the moment, I think the Turk narrative being tossed out serves as cover for the Americans. Yeah! Blame it all on the dirty bastard Turks and make out like 'we' are squeaky clean. But I would not be in the least surprised if it turned out that Americans are involved up to the gills. And if I would be inclined to think that way, I'd have to ask the next question. What's in this for the Turks? That could be a lot of things. Perhaps a little land, some money and some back room dealing? For now, I just toss this out speculatively and sit back to see how things shake out. But remember. Syria was always about a pipeline across Syria. Energy makes the world go around, as does money.

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

Yeah, I think you hit the nail on the head. Whether or not Turkey is involved, it has always been about the USG desire to overthrow Syria begun with Obama/Clinton 2011 (as Jeffrey Sachs discusses with Tucker). As Childers illustrated recently with the pipeline graphic, as you say these wars have been about the pipelines.

Expand full comment