609 Comments
User's avatar
Words Beyond Me Janice Powell's avatar

Tyrants create problems then try to make you believe they can solve them. It will only cost you your livelihood and your freedom. No thanks to anything they come up with that will cure cancer or anything else. Their track record is somewhat dismal…

Meanwhile, on another note:

“Establish my footsteps in Your word,

And do not let any iniquity have dominion over me.

Redeem me from the oppression of man,

That I may keep Your precepts.

Make Your face shine upon Your servant,

And teach me Your statutes.

My eyes shed streams of water,

Because they do not keep Your law.

Righteous are You, O Lord,

And upright are Your judgments.

You have commanded Your testimonies in righteousness

And exceeding faithfulness.”

— Psalm 119:133-138 NASB1995

Expand full comment
Teresa Carstensen's avatar

My thoughts exactly! The thought of a "cure" at first made me hopeful (having been duped into the shots before I knew better, so maybe I could put the genie back in the bottle)...and then fearful to take anything new from those monsters!

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

Absolutely, stay away from them.

Expand full comment
Riki Tiki Tavi's avatar

Problem-Reaction-Solution = standard playbook.

Expand full comment
Julie Ann B's avatar

The “problem” they create!

Expand full comment
Riki Tiki Tavi's avatar

Yes, of course. That's the whole point of the Hegelian Dialectic. Example: Create a bioweapon in a lab. Own the patent on the magical vaccine. Manage the propaganda event(Reaction). Then suggest the solution--i.e.--the vaccine. Who owns the patents on the vaccines? CDC does for one. They are in the business of promoting vaccines. Investors like Bill Gates also own patents as well--to include a groovy little nano-chip, under Microsoft ownership. I researched this years ago. The V-chip has been on the schedule for possibly 20-30 years at the very least. Pax

Expand full comment
Julie Ann B's avatar

Spot on! Thank you for explaining it for those who haven’t heard of The Hegelian Dialectic. I didn’t know anything about that until April 2020 when Rev. Danny Jones from Northlake Baptist Church preached a sermon on it relating to the “Covid crisis”. It opened my eyes and I started sharing the info And researching on my own from that point forward! Thanks again!

Expand full comment
Riki Tiki Tavi's avatar

Also called --"Shaping the narrative." The WEF has a group called : "Global Shapers." Perception manipulation is a career for some folks. No one I know personally. ha ha

Expand full comment
Lisa P's avatar

It's called the Cancer Moon Shot because the 'cure' is going to be a shot, meaning a vaccine.

Regarding the reckon.com article on increased cervical cancer rates between 2001 and 2018 in Southern women, they completely fail to acknowledge that in 2001 0% of women/girls were getting the HPV (Gardasil) vaccine, and now whatever % it is, it's significantly higher than 0%. So, more women are getting cervical cancer despite the introduction of an HPV vaccine intendent to prevent cervical cancer. Their recommendation is to get annual pap smear. What does getting an annual pap smear have to do with abstinence only sex education? Absolutely nothing. Smdh.

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

Cancer Moon shot - use of moon is appropriate since Luna another name for moon is also the root word of lunatic. You have to be crazy to believe anything from corn pop, the government, msm media and medical community et al. Your best bet at health and a long life is to live a healthy lifestyle and avoid them all.

Expand full comment
INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

send HIM to the moon ! that would be a grand solution. Save lots of money too

Expand full comment
Leo's avatar

LOL - it is a hydra-headed System at work, not the actions of one person. Biden is merely the front man.

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

Bang zoom! Up to the moon! He is cray cray crazy 🤪

Expand full comment
INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

Hums along with Annie.. that sounds like a song LOL

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

I think the bang zoom quote was Jackie Gleason and the honeymooners.

Expand full comment
Janet's avatar

Needed 1/2 hip replacement after a fall last week. I will be putting together my own exit plan from the big medical system eventually after PT and such. They already send me emails to log in, sign up, sign this crap I’m ignoring it all.

Expand full comment
Lisa P's avatar

I've heard you can pre-donate your own blood in case a transfusion is needed during surgery. I'm so sorry about your grandchild and pray for you.

Expand full comment
Tracy's avatar

Definitely use your own blood. I have been reading about people questioning their health after receiving donated blood. Scary time for surgery. Have someone with you at all times. Too bad surgery is off limits. I'd want someone sitting in the corner to watch over me.

Expand full comment
INTJ Architect's avatar

I have heard of diabetics who needed to have a foot amputated, woke up after surgery, with the wrong one amputated. After this, I heard of some people going into surgery who wrote 'not this one' on the good leg/foot.

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

Good. I keep getting teladoc emails about signing in for my mental health. Leave me alone already. Lol.

Expand full comment
Janet's avatar

My grandkid was injured by the HPV shot. Significantly. Not acknowledged by parents. We live in certifiable crazy land now.

Expand full comment
Copernicus's avatar

😥

Expand full comment
Renee Sommers's avatar

Also a higher incidence of type 1 Diabetes after HPV 💉

Expand full comment
Karen Bandy's avatar

🤬 I’m so sorry

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 12, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Lisa P's avatar

We can't help Janet's grandchild, but you can help your niece. Just lookup Gardasil on wikipedia. If it's still there, it says right there on wikipedia that Japan no longer recommends the HPV vaccine at all. I think it's Japan, but it might have been South Korea.

Expand full comment
Janet's avatar

There are hundreds of lawsuits as well against this heinous product.

Expand full comment
KC & the Sunshine's avatar

I think the USA stopped administering the “safe & effective” HPV/gardisil 1, and now gives the nearly as bad gardisil 9. What did we do with all that leftover gardisil 1? Sent it to INDIA— courtesy of Billy (from the ) Gates of hell. What does that tell all those Indian girls???? Y’all NEEF to know, gardisil DOES usher many girls into early menopause— complete infertility, at age 12 or whenever they get it. It is horrific. NOW they give it to boys as well. All for a completely curable cancer if caught in time and all for naught, usually because the efficacy (as though it matters) usually wanes before the threshold of the disease. Women get it later- say in their 40’s. If you

get the shots in your teens, there is no efficacy at all.

Expand full comment
dagny awoke's avatar

I’m so sorry for Janet and all families impacted. I also know people who have reacted badly to the HPV vax. A nurse once casually informed me that reactions such as severe migraines are not rare, but because they last 6 months the reaction is only temporary! Since the rollout of the HPV vaccine on our youth the population has not aged enough to even prove its effectiveness. In addition, I have been told by a pediatric physician that the shot must be given before a child turns 14, but the earlier the better. Is it shocking / not shocking that the phenomenon of spontaneous gender identity disorder coincides with the same age (11/12) as when the dose is encouraged and most often administered? It’s taken more than 10 years of data to reveal this spontaneous identity reversal taking place during puberty, but the only theory put forth is that social media is the cause! Social media is a great scapegoat

Expand full comment
Janet's avatar

I have to add now that my injured grandchild is right now transitioning to a male. This is horrifying. I dare not reveal this to them. I right now am in the mood for murder. No more words.

Expand full comment
Janet's avatar

I asked my daughter if it was really needed. We don’t talk about anything to do with jabs. I did send her info about the boosters and immune system degradation plus the 8 mice debacle. She won’t share nor admit. Of course I pray for their safety all the time.

Expand full comment
AngelaK's avatar

So sorry that you arent on the same page. Keep praying. My daughter is pregnant and in her Democrat run state, her young obstetrician was harrassing her to get the covid vaccine!! She got covid, got over it, and now the obstetrician is finally leaving her alone. Crazy!!

I distinctly remember that they said the mrna shots were not advised for pregnant women or those with allergies or autoimmune conditions in the very beginning.

Expand full comment
JW's avatar

The 2 left hands do not have a clue what the 3 right hands are doing. I think they are all reading different medical journals, if at all.

Expand full comment
Kim D's avatar

I think prayer and our getting to the realization that each person has their own life experience destiny is about all we can do. It hurts when our loved ones make choices we feel are detrimental to their well being. It's difficult to be the observer without judgement but maybe that's our growth lesson just as their decisions are part of their growth lesson???

Expand full comment
Janet's avatar

That’s true. I’m here if needed. Wise advice. 👍🏻

Expand full comment
Carole's avatar

There is a class action suit against Gardasil going on right now. My oldest granddaughter will be 10 years old soon so ai have been discussing this with my son. There is no way their claim that it prevents cancer can be proven. Another PR snow job.

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

It just stupid and heinous

Expand full comment
Truthseeker's avatar

Yes

And guess who holds the mRNA cancer vaccine patents

Bill Gates

Cause it

And cure it.

It’s a very profitable business model

Expand full comment
SadieJay's avatar

Emerald Robinson's stack today was great. Short read, but SO worth it.

https://emeralddb3.substack.com/p/did-the-us-government-kick-me-off

Expand full comment
Tracy's avatar

I used to be skeptical of the connection between vaccines and autism. I started questioning how autism has skyrocketed in the last few decades. After what's happened in the last few years I am no longer a doubter.

Expand full comment
Fre'd Bennett, MAHA's avatar

Same here. Even though I’ve known ppl whose son was perfectly healthy b4 receiving vaxxed, then suddenly autistic (he’s now in his 20’s and will require lifelong care) I believed the official line that vaccines were not the cause of autism.

Now I’m positive these parents were right: the insane # of vaccines we give these kids (and the insane rise in autism rates since the 70s) is obviously the culprit.

One of my sons (now 22 yrs old) suffered terribly from eczema for the first 11-12 years of his life. It was so bad that he had to wear shorts even on the coldest days of the year, lest he break out in horrible hives.

Nothing helped except open air on his skin.

I now suspect it was an auto-immune problem related to a childhood vax schedule.

Expand full comment
Lone Starr's avatar

Thanks for the updates on Russia. I feel like all the news stories about Ukraine "winning" and killing hundreds of thousands of Russian troops are pure BS and propaganda. The truth is, there's no way Ukraine beats Russia. Ever. Russia's been "nice" this whole time. Not sure why. Maybe to avoid utterly destroying the country and turning it into a wasteland. Whatever the reason, Putin will eventually get fed up and just end them. Stubborn and pigheaded Zelensky is just going to get countless people killed.

Expand full comment
MadWorld's avatar

I'm no expert on Ukraine or Russia, but the fact that celebrities and politicians are heading to Ukraine to hobnob with new global celebrity Zalensky is suspect. Zalensky is opening the trading bell, and making social appearances, etc. Something seems very odd about this war. How much $ has the US sent over? Are Zalensky and Putin splitting it???Ukraine is where our elite politicians appear to launder money. This whole thing is suspect, but I have no doubt regular people are dying and lives are being destroyed. Sick.

Expand full comment
Lone Starr's avatar

Oh, for sure. The whole thing is super suspect. Biolabs, money laundering, and all kinds of shady things are probably going on over there.

Expand full comment
Kim's avatar

Zalensky and our own politicians are splitting our taxpayer money. If Putin wasn't disrupting their money laundering operation we wouldn't care what's going on over there.

Expand full comment
Kathy's avatar

I always had a suspicious feeling that there is so much more to this. I hope someday the truth will come out.

Expand full comment
Daily Growler's avatar

Only part of your comment that strikes me as odd is your asking whether Zelensky and Putin are splitting the spoils. Think what you will of him, Putin genuinely seems to care about his people, including the ethnic Russians in Ukraine. Zelensky, in contrast, is embedded with the n-a-z-i-s who have been killing the Russian speakers since atleast 2014 when the US engineered a coup and installed the n-a-z-i infested regime that does the bidding of the US. I think you're right to be suspicious of where all the money is going. How is it that zelensky is reportedly worth somewhere between $150,000,000 and $455,000,000?

Expand full comment
Surviving the Billionaire Wars's avatar

Putin isn't being paid off.

In fact, some higher up (forget who now) just admitted that Putin & Zelensky were on the brink of settlement a couple months back, when BoJo made an unannounced visit to Ukraine & told Zelensky no deal will be acceptable.

US is pushing this war & Zelensky is bring paid off, but also threatened.

Expand full comment
Fre'd Bennett, MAHA's avatar

What the heck is “BoJo?”

Expand full comment
WA Lunch Lady's avatar

I believe it stands for Boris Johnson. Former PM of UK.

Expand full comment
Fre'd Bennett, MAHA's avatar

Oh. Thank you.

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

That’s a good sign that something is not above board.

Expand full comment
AngelaK's avatar

Putin isnt getting anything other than efforts to destroy Russia through sanctions. I agree about the rest of what you say. The degenerate deranfed perverts of the new liberal one world order love Z, he is a member of the club.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 12, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

Why should Ukrainians be mad at the US? They aren't. They love us. We've sent a lot of aid that has made the difference and saved lives. Body armor, helmets, food, clothing, and weapons.

Why don't you just surrender and buy into the covid narrative? Are you mad because someone else has a different opinion?

For Ukraine, it's a life or death struggle. They don't want to be Russian. Just like we don't buy into the covid narrative.

Expand full comment
Lisa P's avatar

I agree. One of the other things that pro-Russian twitter accounts were saying over the weekend was that in the process of gaining this territory in the Kharkov region, the Ukrainian army had very heavy troop losses. So they gained territory, but at what cost? MoonofAlabama is a good resource. Up until now, Putin has called this a "special military operation", not a war. The Russian attack on Ukrainian civilian infrastructure signals the end of the special military operation and start of the war. https://www.moonofalabama.org/2022/09/the-izium-withdrawal-a-catalyst-for-starting-in-earnest.html#more

Expand full comment
Surviving the Billionaire Wars's avatar

MOA is ok, although initially called this one all wrong. In fact, at Mark Wauck's stack, several "no-nothings" (like me) took one look at the map & saw the firebag (aka cauldron). Later confirmed in interviews with 2 Russian colonels.

Along with Mark &MOA, I follow Larry Johnson & Martyanov, who both with high level military experience.

Expand full comment
AngelaK's avatar

Look up The Duran on Youtube. These guys are brilliant and have all the real info.

Expand full comment
Lisa P's avatar

Thank you. I normally keep up with what is going on in Ukraine from Martyanov and The Duran on youtube and also several twitter accounts. It's just easier and makes more sense to share articles here, since we're already reading, and MoA and thesaker are good source for articles usually.

I actually took last week off of Ukraine/SMO watching, so I'm playing catch up. I didn't see anyone call this a cauldron, but that is definitely what it looked like when it happened. The Russians did this a few months ago north of Kharkov, a planned retreat to draw in Ukrainian forces, specifically the Krakken division, and then slaughtered them.

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

Again, what cauldron?

Russian telegram channels are furious because when the russians left they abandoned lots of intel including names of collaborators and workers who are now being arrested by the SBU.

Not good if you aided russia in Ukraine.

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

What cauldron?

It's not 2014.

Russia got outplayed, out fought, and out led. That's why they offered to negotiate but Ukraine said no because that negotiation would not go back to pre-2014 lines, it would allow Russia to keep what it has seized.

The Ukrainian army is better equipped, better led, and more motivated. As one of them said "I have 4 grand sons. It is better to wear the heavy equipment of a soldier than the light collar of a slave".

Expand full comment
Surviving the Billionaire Wars's avatar

Try looking at a map 🙄

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

I did.

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

Russia gained territory, but at what cost?

It's bad when Ukraine goes on the offensive, but inevitable and expected and good when Russia does? A bit of a hypocritical approach.

Russia abandoned so much gear (and some of it is coming back to the US for evaluation) that it's enough to equip several more tank brigades and infantry brigades. That's not how wars are won.

Expand full comment
Surviving the Billionaire Wars's avatar

And the ghost of kiev is flying again! 🙄

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

Something we can learn from:

...This can best be seen in the war Putin waged against those billionaires who, in the 1990s and early 2000nds, tried to enter politics to prioritize their interests over all others. They were defeated and those who didn't flee to London have since stopped to interfere with the state.

Expand full comment
Surviving the Billionaire Wars's avatar

Putin responds in large part to the will of the people he governs. That is why his approval is over 80%.

He would prefer not to destroy infrastructure & civilians. Much of Ukraine was once part of Russia. At one point, Kiev was the capital of Russia.

He has raised the pain dial slowly to try to push Zelensky to negotiate. Now that it's all but officially war with Nato, all bets are off.

Expand full comment
John Raymond's avatar

Putin, while you're at it: WHO, WEF, BOURLA....

Expand full comment
John Raymond's avatar

Re Russia... I still think this is NWO atbplay, commies want America. Kruschev banging shoe on table and all that... Commies are serious.

Expand full comment
Surviving the Billionaire Wars's avatar

I disagree. I believe Putin is a nationalist. Yes, he did wef stuff. Yes, he goes to Davos. Keep your friends close & your enemies closer. To learn & keep tabs.

Bottom line: time will tell.

Expand full comment
John Raymond's avatar

Putin is complicated. He absolutely went to Davos and davos.

And he's kgb, and communist Russia threatened to control the world.

I see danger everywhere.

Expand full comment
Surviving the Billionaire Wars's avatar

Russia's government is not communist.

Expand full comment
whyrikkfre's avatar

Kiev was the capital of Russia a very very long time ago.

Expand full comment
Surviving the Billionaire Wars's avatar

And much of Ukraine was part of Russia for hundreds of years until relatively recently. The point being they have long history together, cultural affinity & most of the country is bilingual, including Kiev. Until Nuland's 2014 coup bought & paid for with our tax $B.

But hey, if you want to help a demented pedophile grifter & his meth-head son to destroy a country that has never done anything to us, do they can steal millions from us & the poorest of Europe, and possibly start WW3 in the process, have at it.

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

Russia has done plenty to us. Forget the Cold War? Where do you think democrats got bribe money from? Vacationed? And learned how communism is cool?

Expand full comment
whyrikkfre's avatar

No doubt. The Youcrain was part of Russia before this country existed.

However, WW3 already happened...this would be WW4.

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

It’s Ukraine. America was part of England. Should we go back?

Expand full comment
whyrikkfre's avatar

Don't forget the French.

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

It’s illegal to criticize Putin and call the operation in ukriane a war.

In tnose situations of course

You’ll have 80% “support”.

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

This narrative change exposed former balanced reporting sites to secretly having a pro Ukraine Nato slant. Only a deluded person could believe this crap. I am not anti Ukrainian people but their leader and government is as scummy as our current government. I have to say "Go Putin". Russia has held back.

Expand full comment
SadieJay's avatar

The fact that the whole world, but more Europe, has sanctioned their own demise by proverbially cutting off their nose to spite their face is an ongoing show. It will be a cold winter, but they did it to themselves because of sanctions against Russia. The virtue signaling with the human race as pawns in a giant chess game of evil is going on and we are part of it whether we like it our not.

Expand full comment
Surviving the Billionaire Wars's avatar

Not the whole world. Not even close.

China isn't

India isn't

Africa isn't

South America isn't

Most of the middle east isn't

Our decades of worldwide bullying has left us far more isolated than Russia

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

Except Europe is buying gas from other places now too. Will there be shortages? Sure. But Russia is losing far more. And between their neighbors getting invaded and their deutchmarks, pounds, and euros buying the bullets they've said their done.

Expand full comment
SadieJay's avatar

Germany gets over 60% of their energy from Russia. And now, the Russians have shut it down. Darn covid and lack of parts!

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

Trump told them 5 years ago to change. Did they? Nope. Idiots.

Expand full comment
Surviving the Billionaire Wars's avatar

Actually, Russia is doing quite well selling less oil for higher prices.

And those "other places" Europe is buying gas from, at a 5-10x markup -- where do you think they get it? Hint: from Russia

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

Russian inflation is higher than American inflation.

Having to cut back your cars from having ABS, air bags, and power

Windows is not “doing well”.

A lot of weapons Russia is burning in Ukraine are made with foreign components it can’t make and can’t get anymore

Expand full comment
Surviving the Billionaire Wars's avatar

"A lot of weapons Russia is burning in Ukraine are made with foreign components it can’t make and can’t get anymore"

Pure projection.

Expand full comment
Surviving the Billionaire Wars's avatar

Russia inflation was higher to start with ... and is dropping as the smo has gone on.

US is headed up. And would be even higher had Xiden not wasted half our "strategic oil reserves" trying to buy political wins in the upcoming midterms. God only knows how high it will be after November.

Nice try though. 🙄

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

You’re supporting an anti American tyrant?

Expand full comment
AngelaK's avatar

And what is American to you? The great indoctrination to our children of the alphabet soup agenda, the transsexual agenda, the pedophile agenda? Why do you think we really hate Russia. It refuses to cowtow to Soros and friends of the 'new liberal order west'.. Because this is all I see liberal Americans caring about, much to the amusement of many countries around the world.

Half this country still believes in God and His precepts, half still believe in freedom of speech and thought, and half hate anything remotely associated with Judeo-Christian values and will censor any ideas or speech that does not agree with them.. We are two Americas.

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

It's possible to be against a lot of things and also believe Russia is attacking American interests.

The same Russia that fuels discontent here and gets aid from iran and north korea is suddenly a bastion of Christian values?

Expand full comment
Citizen Satirist (CS)'s avatar

CORRECTION: Russia is attacking the business interests of Hunter Biden, Paul Manafort, John Kerry's son or step son or something, the Clinton Foundation, the US military industrial complex and a who lot more political donors.... We MUST fight to the last Ukrainian to defend those business interests...

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

Funny. Who's business interests are funding this? The poles sent 500 of their own tanks to aid Ukraine. This is what made the Kherson and Kharkiv offensives possible. Who are the Poles? They live next to Ukraine. And that's not counting the Hundreds of APCS, Artillery, Jets, guns, and billions of rounds of various ammunition.

So while you sit here and croon about alleged back door deals people on the ground in Slovakia, Poland, Czech Republic, Baltics, and others are sending whatever they can to stop Russia.

Expand full comment
CraigN's avatar

Which American interests are those exactly, perhaps Ukrainian bio labs? So N Korea is now flush with resources that they can provide aid to Russia. You're going to have to provide some very reliable and multiple sources to back any of this up. Until then I'm with CS that you are a bot or plant to stir things up here. Not buying it without substantial independent sources.

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

A Free ukraine benefits America in a couple ways-same as Poland. Right now Russia is losing this war. It's not ukraine flying bombers into alaska. It's russia.

Any source I provide will simply be labeled as propaganda and fake. I have spent countless time and hours aiding Ukraine and getting them setup on their equipment. I'm current US Army-unvaccinated still (my exemption is pending). So take it for what it's worth.

North Korea has a very, very large amount of artillery shells dating from the Cold War. It's of questionable safety. 122, 152, 120mm, etc. It could be purchased for a song since North Korea would probably rather have the cash than ten bajillion extra rounds. They still have mosin nagants somewhere as last ditch weapons and t34s.

Expand full comment
Citizen Satirist (CS)'s avatar

Notice he has ONLY appeared to comment on Ukraine on here? Paid for Ukraine troll... See:

Ukraine's Propaganda War: International PR Firms, DC Lobbyists and CIA Cutouts (Mintpressnews.com)

- Dan Cohen reveals the network of foreign strategists, Washington lobbyists and intelligence-linked media outlets behind Kiev's public relations blitz. https://www.mintpressnews.com/ukraine-propaganda-war-international-pr-firms-dc-lobbyists-cia-cutouts/280012/

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

"Russia gets aid from North Korea"...LMAO. Who is attacking American interests? Answer: the Bolshevik gov't inside the DC beltway along with their Nazi collaborators.

Expand full comment
Surviving the Billionaire Wars's avatar

I doubt anybody here supports Biden

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

I do not support biden.

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

I don't either.

Never have.

Gimme trump back.

Expand full comment
JCrutcher's avatar

Please.

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

How has russia held back?

They've been getting trounced.

Losing your flagship to a nation without a navy is quite the accomplishment.

Expand full comment
Citizen Satirist (CS)'s avatar

Look at Telegram channels Intel Slava Z and ASB Military News for more accurate picture. Also, there is a "Putin Direct" channel that I came across that translates what Putin says - NOT what the western MSM tells you he is saying...

RUSSIAsteria: Best Putin Invades Ukraine Memes (No GAZ for You as the Ukrainians Counterattack for More Cash!)

- “It's not you, it's me...” The GAZ situation summed up, fattening up the Zelensky regime with cash in preparation for more slaughter and more Putin invades Ukraine memes as the latter counterattacks!

https://covidsteria.substack.com/p/putin-invades-ukraine-memes-no-gaz-for-you

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

Intel Slava z literally posts propaganda directly from Russia. They claimed the 128th carpathian mountain brigade was destroyed. Yet it is still alive.

Ask them what happened in Kharkiv. They’ll say it was a regrouping. That’s a lie.

Expand full comment
Citizen Satirist (CS)'s avatar

Jeff, you got yourself a Ukraine troll or someone on their payroll as that is not what Intel Slava Z has been saying. They have been critical of Russia's strategy in Kharkiv BUT it does not matter. The last Ukrainian reserves who actually have military training are being ground up now...

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

"Someone doesn't agree with me! They must be a paid troll!"

Sound upset. Want a cookie?

Actually they did indeed say that. Do I have to post a link? They post a lot of nonsense. Alegedly the 35th Marine brigade was completely destroyed YET it was still capturing russian positions.

It's like catnip for conspiracy theorists.

Any day now Ukraine will collapse, huh?

Meanwhile, Ukraine is continuing to roll through russian occupied cities and villages and liberating them.

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

The thing is ukriane is winning. This is a David vs Goliath story. Russian dead are in the 50k range. The Russians wanted a USA style lightning war campaign. They got the dollar store version. We’ve spent 8 years training the Ukrainians to tnink and fight like us. And they have. They have done a terrific job blunting russian advances and tying them

Up and wearing them down. The offensive in Kherson pinned down 25k of Russia’s best troops and trapped them while another army in waiting struck Kharkiv and liberated it. Russia fled so fast from Kharkiv they abandoned thousands of rifles, tanks, apcs, and billions of rounds of ammuntion of all calibers. Kupyansk was a major hub for the entire region since it was tied together via the rail ways.

A super power is being whipped by a regional power.

Did you just roll over and get a Covid shot? Why not? It’s simpler and easier, right? Or did you stand up for your beliefs?

Expand full comment
Lone Starr's avatar

This is the propaganda the media would have people believe. Ukranians are free to fight if they want, but going up against Russia is suicide, despite what the lying media says. Wait and see...

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

Ukrainians have been fighting russia for 8 years now.

The USA beat Iraq in less than a week in 1991. 28 days in 2003.

In 2022 russia can’t beat a regional power in 7 months and right now ukriane is pushing russia back.

If Iraq pushed the USA back to almost Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, and no major changes for 7 months, it would have been an embarrassment. But yet here Ukraine is doing it to russia snd folks are saying it’s suicide.

Expand full comment
Adam Wagner's avatar

Russia so far has called this a special military operation. They have the firepower to blow Ukraine back to the stone age, but have not. As Jeff pointed out, the first thing you do if you want to destroy and occupy a country is turn out the power, which they just demonstrated they can easily do. You've been reading too many Tom Clancy novels. :)

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

Adam, don't encourage him. He just wants a platform to perform for his masters. Like my mother taught me, "Never abuse children."

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

Facts are hard.

203 days later putin can’t beat Ukraine.

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

They actually don't.

Jeff is not a military strategist. He is a lawyer. He needs to stick to his lane.

Russia expected Ukraine to fall in days. That didn't happen. Turns out when you commit genocide against someone and try to erase them from history they remember that and fight hard.

I have a bachelor's degree with a focus in history. So I do know a bit about Eastern europe which is where my roots come from.

How did Mariupol fare? What about Bucha? Kremenchuk? Kharkiv? Mikolaiv? Russia Flattened huge swaths of those cities. And right now they are using 50 year old missiles (KH22s) designed with a CEP (Circular area probability) of 600-5000M as land attack missiles that were made to target American aircraft carriers.

I have been supporting missionaries in Mikolaiv for a while now. They have russian missiles fly past their children's church camp and random artillery shells land close by. The russian army is disgusting.

Expand full comment
KC & the Sunshine's avatar

Is it within the realm

of possibility that Russia sent its old junker tanks and so on to start things off? Perhaps they have reserved their “good stuff” (which I’m sure they possess good stuff) for later, IF they don’t get the job done with the junk? I mean, if I were going in to change minds/ policies to get my way, and I had some junker-clunkers to rid myself of, that’s the way I’d play it. Little infrastructure damage, few civilian deaths, no biggie that we lost some

clunker tanks.

Then if it came to, “No More Mr. Nice Guy”, I’d hit them from the sea & air with my new weapons. But then, I’m no strategist.

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

Yeah, that bachelor's degree really serves you well.

Expand full comment
Lisa P's avatar

If you want to take the time to read this, I highly recommend it. A retired Swiss intelligence official's account of what has gone on with Ukraine starting 8 years ago or more. The Ukrainians haven't been fighting Russia for 8 years - Russia did very little to help LPR and DPR since 2014 until this invasion. The people of those regions formed militias and took over the armories and police stations in their regions to take control. Then they voted for independence. The Ukrainian army (the largest army in Europe) spent 8 years fighting militia forces and couldn't take back their own territory.

https://thewallwillfall.org/2022/04/17/retired-swiss-intelligence-officer-explains-ukraine/

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

Except the russians did send them lots of aid. There were certain tanks only the Russians had, such as T72B3s, T90s, etc which were present and those were russian.

The BUK missile system which shot down MH17 came from Russia and was operated by russian officers.

Expand full comment
Lisa P's avatar

Read the first 10 paragraphs. Everything you are saying is propaganda intended to cover up the fact that Ukrainian units were joining the Russian speaking DPR and LPR militias, a terrible embarrassment for Poroshenko. https://thewallwillfall.org/2022/04/17/retired-swiss-intelligence-officer-explains-ukraine/

Expand full comment
Citizen Satirist (CS)'s avatar

A leaked Ukraine document from this summer says 78,000 dead Ukrainians and something like 30-40k wounded which can't be right b/c its a rule of X 3 for wounded... What's really DISCUSTING is how the Ukrainians claim their KIAs are "missing" to avoid paying their families - no doubt they are stealing the $!

Some months ago, BBC searched Russian social media and could only find evidence of around 7,000 dead... Russians are using their proxies to do most of the fighting - my guess, 7k-15k dead and mostly among their proxies... DO NOT BELEIVE THE WESTERN PROPAGANDA!

Expand full comment
Lone Starr's avatar

I don't believe anything the media says. Usually, if they say one thing, the opposite it true. They are all on the same script about Ukraine "winning", which makes me suspect them even more.

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

I don't trust what the media says either.

I verify with my own sources.

Russia just lost 8400 square Kilometers of land, almost 7-8% of what they had seized, negating all gains made back to April. That is verified, NOT through the media.

Russian losses:

https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2022/02/attack-on-europe-documenting-equipment.html

Ukrainian losses:

https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2022/02/attack-on-europe-documenting-ukrainian.html

Click on each one and it showed a time stamp, date, and a photo.

But hey, I can lead a horse to water but I can't make them drink.

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

An actual correct number is somewhere in tne 25-38k dead for Ukraine.

Russians have 52k dead right now. Remember, the entire time tbey have been attacking and losing a lot of guys as they are poorly equipped. They are using DPR and LPR to do heavy fighting.

Expand full comment
Citizen Satirist (CS)'s avatar

Ukraine lost 30k+ in Mariupol alone - dead, wounded or captured... And no, they were NOT evacuated like western MSM claims. The last Azov Nazis surrendered after failed attempts to evacuate their NATO advisors OR leaders... Kherson front is now turning into another bloodbath for the Ukrainians while the Russians just had police like forces stationed in villages around Kharkiv - this was a mistake as the Telegram channels admit BUT the Ukrainians are loosing most of their reserves now (the Russians have NOT even done a partial mobilization while Ukraine is on their 5th or 6th)...

The NATO equipment provided to the Ukraine that does not get blown up by the Russians has proven to mostly be JUNK while the Russians are using old military equipment so as not to reveal the capabilities of their good weapons....

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

Hey now, wait a minute. I know Benjaminn must have counted the bodies - right? Hello??

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

Have you?

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

That is beyond false.

Ukraine didn't have 30k men in Mariupol. The majority did a fighting retreat north. They had about 2-3k who refused to leave and were trapped.

Russian police forces weren't in Kharkiv. They had enormous amounts of tanks, Artillery, trucks, and troops. That's not police forces. That's an army. The Ukrainians are losing men but it's not a blood bath. The Kherson offensive drew thousands of russia's best troops to the south and away from Kharkiv where Ukraine struck. Smart move.

Russia can't do a mobilization because that would attack what putin has been saying this entire time. He has said it's not a war (and it's a crime to call it one) and said it's going according to plan. Putin sees himself a tsar and he knows what took down the last Tsar of russia-a failing economy, social unrest, and mass mobilization.

The equipment being provided to the Ukrainians is largely the same stuff we use. M777s, Himars, M4s, m16s, excalibur, etc. If you say that's junk I can't help you. Russia can't intercept most of them because they don't have the ability to hit them. If you look at FIRMS data you'll see a drastic decrease in Russian gains starting in July when the first ones arrive. Ammunition depots, with GPS data provided by the US and NATO, allowed Ukraine to hit 3-4 dumps each night. They even rotated crews to keep the trucks running. Russia claimed to have struck 44 Himars. We provided Ukraine with 12-16. Russia, as always, lied.

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

Aww damn, this is going on longer than I thought. I got to get some more popcorn....and I didn't even have to buy a ticket for this.

Expand full comment
whyrikkfre's avatar

How many Youcranian military casualties?

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

Ukrainain casualties are probably in the 30-45k range.

Expand full comment
TNelius's avatar

If you all want to see minute by minute on the ground reports of Ukraine/Russian war, though difficult to see but you will have real-time information at the ground level-here is a link to follow: https://t.me/intelslava

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

Trusting intel slava for accurate and unbiased war reporting is like Asking anthony faucci for advise on covid prevention.

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

Kinda like asking Benjaminn about the Russian people....or Zelensky and his Nazis.

Expand full comment
Rachel Martin's avatar

Well, as a breast cancer patient, I have racked my brain trying to figure out the "why?" and "how?" did I get this disease. I didn't get the covid jab, and I was diagnosed in fall 2020. I did genetic testing and don't have the "caner gene". I went to nursing school from 2017-2019, where I had to get lots of required jabs; MMR, Tdap, hepB, flu, TB. And to top all that off, I got the rabies series in 2016 due to an unfortunate bat encounter. I had no underlying conditions that predisposed me to cancer, and I'm an active, normal weight, happy person.

I am convinced I have cancer from vaccines. I will not get another one, ever, even if it means I can't work as a nurse anymore. Of course, this is my own anecdotal observation and conclusion.

Expand full comment
AngelaK's avatar

in the 90s dogs started getting cancer at young ages and hearing about a 7 year old dog dying from cancer started becoming commonplace. One day while walking my young sheltie dog a strange woman approached me and brought up this topic, adding that it was the amount of vaccines they were now routinely giving dogs that was the cause.

It was like she was a heavenly messenger or something because it really was a strange encounter.

Anyway, I then started questioning the vet and sure enough they were giving unnecessary vaccines and boosters. I got on a conservative protocol (ex: rabies booster 1x every 3 years, instead of 1x every year, unnecessary shots like bortadella removed unless I had to board my dog). She lived to the very oldest expected age of her breed. Since then I have moved, changed vets, bought a new dog and noticed that vets were no longer doing that. They prided themselves on being more conservative, and it seems to me from all those I meet, dogs are living longer and healthier.

So: what did vets realize which human doctors REFUSE to recognize?

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

I started to question my vet as well. We aren’t doing vaccines; except when forced, so only once every 3 years. My elderly animals are getting no vaccines at this point.

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

Neither are mine. My one dog suddenly has an enlarged heart, right after the rabies shot. Screw them. I am protecting my furbabies from now on.

Expand full comment
Ellen Komorowski's avatar

Good for you!! We have to fight for them because they cannot fight for themselves!!

Expand full comment
Ellen Komorowski's avatar

Yes-our pets are dying of cancer because of really bad dog food and vaccines. We try to feed our dogs as close to raw as possible and human grade quality. We also do not vaccinate our dogs unless their antibody titers are low. It is more expensive to check their antibody levels than get the vaccine, but the cost is worth it to our wonderful pets. Go figure, a blood test is more expensive than the vaccine. I am sure that it is this way so more people will choose the vaccine. Also, look up Dr. Karen Becker. She is a holistic veteranarian. She wrote a book entitled, "Forever Dog." A must read for dog lovers!

Expand full comment
N Springer's avatar

Some vets maybe but not all. When I told my vet I didn’t want to vaccinate my horse for everything he said “What, are you afraid he’s going to get autism?” 🙄 No, I’m worried the uptick in all sorts of issues I see in horses, including bad reactions to all the pokes.

Expand full comment
Rachel Martin's avatar

I have two horses, and I feel the same way! I worm them regularly, but have stopped vaccinating them twice a year as recommended. They are both 22 and in amazing health, and hopefully will live another 10+ years.💞

Expand full comment
Karen Bandy's avatar

I went ahead and did Penny’s last 3 year rabies a year or two ago, but I am going to do the titer test next time. If she has antibodies I’ll not do another rabies shot. But, that’s a bit of a racket, they require titers every year. It’s crazy, the antibodies don’t go away and it’s not like she’s having play dates with raccoons 😃

Expand full comment
Ellen Komorowski's avatar

So sorry Rachel to hear about what you are going through. There are so many possible causes to cancer; especially these days. "They" are determined to kill us all off with pesticides, GMO's, chemtrails, vaccines, viruses, pharmaceuticals.....etc. We try as hard as we can to limit our exposure to all of these things, but unfortunately, there are just so many. Please find the organization, "The Truth About Cancer." They are an amazing organization that searches for alternative ways to treat cancer and they have amazing results! It is led by Ty Bollinger who is himself, a cancer survivor. They have a group of amazing doctors all around the world who are tapped into ways to really beat cancer without destroying your body in the process.

Expand full comment
axons007's avatar

Did anyone listen to Del Bigtree's interview (podcast) with Dr. Paul Thomas - called THE FINE LINE? i can't believe i had not heard of him as of yet. He did an amazing study - one that the CDC refuses to do (as Jeff often alludes to, maybe they don't have enough money...:) ) It's a complete study/review of everyone he has treated in his practice, what vaccines they took and when, including those who refused, and compared the rates of disease against those that follow the CDC vaccination schedule. Bottom Line: don't follow the CDC schedule and don't take as many as they recommend. The study results, which the CDC ASKED him to document, promptly resulted in the revocation of his license. Of course. Much safer to get the vaccines LATER when the child's immune system is more mature. It appears the data shows we also do not need 72! childhood shots. An excerpt from integrativepediatricsonline.com : Since 2008, Dr. Paul and the team at Integrative Pediatrics have been using the plan outlined below.

Combining this vaccine plan with exclusive breastfeeding, eating a diet of real food, getting enough

vitamin D, exercising, and avoiding toxins like acetaminophen, aspartame, and glyphosate, the children

in his practice have experienced superior health, and a significantly lower rate of autism (0 in 1336) than

the national average, which is 1 in 45.

If you have autism in the family, a history of autoimmune disorders, or an MTHFR

mutation: delay vaccines until at least age five, or never. Do discuss this with your

provider and know the risks of not vaccinating.

Pregnancy: No vaccines (No Tdap, No flu)

Birth: No Hep B

2 months: Hib, DTaP (No Hep B, Rotavirus, IPV)

3 months: Prevnar

4months: Hib, DTaP (No Rotavirus, IPV)

5 months: Prevnar

6 months: Hib, DTaP (No Hep B, Rotavirus, IPV)

7–9 months: Prevnar

1 year: Hib, Prevnar (No MMR, Hep A, Varicella)

18 months: DTaP

2 years (No Hep A)

3 years: Consider MMR (always give MMR by itself)

4-6 years: DTaP, (consider Varicella, IPV)

10 years: Tdap (boost every 5 – 10 years)

back to me: With all our millions and billions of dollars - couldn't we just study this ? try to duplicate the data with hundreds of pediatricians reporting ? Dr. Thomas may or may not be right but he certainly proved that the data exists, you just have to have the DESIRE to collect and analyze it and make conclusions based on the health and well being of the people instead of lining your pockets and justifying your existence. Can they not see that a CDC/FDA that saves lives and studies data would be a worthwhile agency? I have no idea what they actually do now but it certainly isn't that.

Expand full comment
Ellen Komorowski's avatar

Thanks for this info. Its groups like this who can band together and disseminate really good info for each other and hopefully wake up some people along the way!

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

I am so sorry.

Expand full comment
Citizen Satirist (CS)'s avatar

Genetic testing aside - No family history of breast or ovarian cancer?

Expand full comment
Rachel Martin's avatar

A family history with some female cancers, One aunt with breast cancer ( out of 7 ) and a grandmother with ovarian cancer.

I have come to believe genetic predispositions can be triggered in the right environment, possibly with catalysts like vaccines. It’s just a theory, but after seeing how these mRNA shots have affected the immune system and left the body open to cancer and auto immune diseases ect, I believe this can happen with traditional vaccines.

As a nurse, learning how rampant/prevalent the suppression of research, and manipulation of data occurs, I am open to believing anything, especially labeled a “conspiracy theory”.

Expand full comment
Citizen Satirist (CS)'s avatar

The grandmother with ovarian cancer is a BIG red flag.... but yea, we all have cancer in our bodies that is I guess suppressed by our immune system BUT SOMETHING TRIGGERS IT....

Expand full comment
Rachel Martin's avatar

I am amazed at myself how ignorant I was as to what the immune system actually does, and I am a nurse! In my mind I just thought of it as a Virus fighter, colds, flu, infection. I never appreciated how important supporting our immune system is in relation to fighting off other diseases like cancer, diabetes, arthritis, lupus, heart disease, ect.

Expand full comment
Citizen Satirist (CS)'s avatar

Also your teeth and gum health e.g. I think alot of heart issues etc may be caused by bacteria, pathogens etc entering the body due to poor dental hygiene and gums... I thought I read or heard that they have alot of heart problems in india due to viruses and other pathogens, probably in the water, food etc...

Expand full comment
Rachel Martin's avatar

I have read some research linking root canals to cancer. I had a tooth pulled because a root canal had gone bad, And because I was busy in nursing school I waited a year to get it looked at. maybe it was a perfect storm in my case.

It’s so important to look at other countries and look at their population data. I did this a lot during Covid because it was so difficult to put together what was actually occurring in the US. India is a great case study, their provinces have very different cultures, so they are perfect for discovering observational links to various Health and medical topics.

I learned about Blackseed oil, black cumin, from the observational data collected during Covid, and learned how much it helped those provinces Covid cases and hospitalizations in areas that ate this in their diet. Now I take it as a Covid prophylactic and immune support supplement daily,

Expand full comment
Copernicus's avatar

It’s always odd when folks try to say that lack of screenings causes cancer. Screenings DETECT something that’s already present. They don’t PREVENT a single thing. 🤦‍♀️ Now, they may DETECT something when it is at an earlier and easier to treat stage. But they sure don’t prevent anything.

Also, this is perhaps hair splitting, but I know you like to be precise w words. Re the cancer/heart attacks, the headline says heart FAILURE, which is not the same as a heart ATTACK. And it’s been known for quite some time that certain chemo drugs cause heart failure. 😥. Heart failure is weakness or inefficiency of the pumping action. Heart attack is blockage of blood flow (and thus oxygen and nutrients) to part of the heart. Heart attack can cause heart failure. But not all heart failure is due to heart attack. (Disclosure: I did not read the article.)

And yes, highly processed foods generally do spur high inflammation and insulin resistance, both of which increase risk for cancer. Funny, they also generally claim that unprocessed red meat increases colon cancer. 🙄🤦‍♀️ Guess they want us to eat unprocessed bugs, or something.

Expand full comment
Sunnydaze's avatar

Oh words don’t really matter 🙄 They twist them up into pretzels so we can dip them in mustard and move on. They choose their words very carefully so as not to be held accountable when they get caught. They took their training from the master “I did not have sex with that woman” Define sex.

Expand full comment
Copernicus's avatar

I was referring to Jeff’s commentary stating “heart attacks,” when the article headline says “heart failure.” Unlike the pretzel makers, Jeff DOES like words to be precisely used. 😀

Expand full comment
Sunnydaze's avatar

Yes. I know what you were referring to which I why I “liked” what you said. I know words matter and need to be precise, to Jeff and all of us. 😉

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

And all the screenings, mri and x-rays cause cancer too.

Expand full comment
AngelaK's avatar

Ct scans are used extensively. They are xray. MRI is better. It is magnetic. No radiation.

Expand full comment
Ellen Komorowski's avatar

I am the recipient of many CT's and over the years was told by every doctor that the contrast used, Gadolinium was safe as long as your kidneys were functioning. Well, just found out a year ago after having some issues, that I have gadolinium toxicity in the setting of normal kidney function. Always question the experts!!!! I have had to go through expensive detox treatment which insurance does not pay for. I have asked for MRI instead, but unfortunately, insurance will not cover it. You have to do a CT. Another way that 'they' are trying to kill us!

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

See, this is part of why I don’t really trust most doctors anymore. They assure you something is safe and then when a few years later, it’s determined that it is not safe at all, it’s “Oops! Sorry!” But they are not the ones reaping the awful consequences of their blithe assurances of safety 😡 I simply have a hard time believing them about anything anymore because there are no consequences to them when they are wrong so they don’t seem to even care (I realize this is a generalization and there are exceptions of course!). It’s maddening.

Expand full comment
Tory's avatar

Ellen, this is complete sloppiness, a lack of thinking on a physician’s part. You are right. I’m sorry.

Our best health is natural and stay out of the Dr. Office. The white coat does not give more critical thinking than you, just the tools to investigate. God Bless. We must do our own research and advocate.

Expand full comment
Ellen Komorowski's avatar

Thanks to the Rockefeller's, most of our physicians are brainwashed to be pill pushers!!!

Expand full comment
Tory's avatar

Ah, cost more…

Expand full comment
AngelaK's avatar

Never the less, when you go to an ER they usually do a CT scan first.

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

I have been reading the literature recently on screenings. Mammograms for example do not produce a better outcome. Do they cause harm? Possibly. I don’t have the data but it was a meta review of the literature.

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

I have had 4 benign breast cysts. 3 removed all from the same area. The 4th one I told them I felt it. They took standard mammogram pictures plus 4 additional pictures at that area. No cyst found. I said I know what I feel. Ultrasound found it . Size of a walnut. I said these mammograms are BS. 30 years later. Cyst is still there and no mammogram. Screw them. No cancer anywhere.

Expand full comment
Jane Scandurra's avatar

Glad the cyst is benign. Does that mean you stopped getting mammograms? I usually get mammo annually - and am due for one, but since the jab rollout, I’ve become so suspicious. I’m 62, healthy, unjabbed and don’t want to get tested for ANYthing. I know it sounds nuts, but after the last two years, a level of paranoia is not unfounded.

Expand full comment
Peace's avatar

Look into getting a thermogram instead of mammograms. Totally benign and the results will indicate trouble spots years before a mammogram would show any issues. Of course, insurance won't cover a thermogram, but they are usually less than $200 so well worth the opportunity to miss out on additional X-ray exposure and compression of breasts which may cause any cancerous areas to spread to surrounding tisues, lymph nodes, etc.

Expand full comment
Lorri Cahill's avatar

I agree with you. I am 61 and have made the decision to no longer get mammograms. The loss of trust in Pharma medicine runs strong. My eyes are wide open.

Expand full comment
Copernicus's avatar

I’m right there with ya’ on not wanting ANYthing.

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

I stopped. If anything I would do an ultrasound since that's what found it years ago. Since covid, I have had 2 friends and a client have their breast exams totally changed. One even was diagnosed with precancerous lump. The doctors canceled the mammograms. So if this breast cancer detection is so important before covid why the postponement of exams and check ups during and after the scamdemic? I don't trust them and I don't believe they really know what they are doing. Just my opinion.

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

I stopped as well. There were doesn't seem to be any advantage. The outcome doesn't change. There is thought that they actually cause more harm than they "prevent". I'm sorry I don't have that data to present.I'll keep looking

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

I read an article a while back about a well regarded oncologist in California (can’t remember her name unfortunately but might be able to find it) who started questioning the need for early diagnosis and intervention and began wondering if it all did more harm than good. It was super interesting and thought provoking and made me question the necessity too. My dad who is an electrical engineer and specialist in microwaves and radio and similar areas is adamant that repeated and frequent exposure to that kind of low level radiation is not a good idea. I really don’t know what the truth is but am increasingly skeptical.

Expand full comment
Jane Scandurra's avatar

Wow, thank you, ladies...I’m glad I asked! It’s so awful that it’s come to this destruction of trust in the healthcare system. But then, I guess that’s what the psycho globalists want, so they can build back “better” (aka, kill us in the process.) 🙄🤦‍♀️ The suddenly paranoid side of me started thinking, what’s to stop the technician from turning up the radiation level on my mammo when they see “unjabbed” on my chart?? Hey, you never know what incentives are out there. 🤷‍♀️

Expand full comment
Bryn Cannon's avatar

I have always disliked the one-size-fits-all approach of modern “health care”. I have no predisposing circumstances for breast or uterine cancer, but I do have fair skin, blue eyes, and a family history of skin cancer. So I have been going to the dermatologist every 6 months since I was in my 30s - it just makes sense. What doesn’t make sense is yearly mammograms (I read once that a mammogram = 3 months of sun exposure) and pap smears (they assume that everyone is sleeping around!) so I started pushing back during physicals. I found a pragmatic doctor who listened to my logical explanation based on the facts and supported my “less is more” philosophy. I ignored the annual letters from our insurance company telling me I’m overdue for “important” screenings.

Then the pandemic hit and I learned a lot more about vaccinations and modern medicine, and don’t think I will ever agree to anything ever again except basic, proven treatments that have been around a very long time. If I break an arm, I’ll get a cast. But no more vaccinations, no more screenings, no more pills!

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

My doctor wanted to do a pap smear even though I had a hysterectomy at age 42. And even though I am 60, I get asked if I am pregnant, seriously!?, or when was my last menstrual cycle!?, or if I am lactating!!!? Any of those questions are plain stupid and shows they are reading from a script. Plus if I actually was pregnant or lactating I would be a mental basket case. Lol 😅

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Wow that is ridiculous and also a waste of time!

Expand full comment
Copernicus's avatar

If you haven’t already, you may look into the role of veg oils (all the factory-made ones: canola, sunflower, safflower, corn, soy) in cancer and skin cancer. They’re highly related.

We use natural fats: butter, avocado oil (have to be careful which brands tho because many are adulterated w veg oils), coconut oil.

Expand full comment
Bryn Cannon's avatar

Yup, mostly butter, and a bit of olive oil on my homemade kale chips, which are good for cleaning out the free radicals that cause cancer!

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

I saw that too.

Expand full comment
CMCM's avatar

A few years ago my doctor said that since I am monogamous no further need for a PAP smear. And the "guidance" is to do mammograms every 2 years. Yet I can't forget a neighbor who never did diagnostics or mammograms but then was diagnosed with stage 3 or maybe it was 4 breast cancer when she was about 68 or so. I never know what to think. I'm not worried about the PAPs being gone, but I'm conflicted about the mammograms. But I don't trust the medical profession in general any more. It seems like they'll just casually tell you any old thing, mostly likely told to them by a drug rep or something. I've had a mistrust of doctors since I was 16 and my mother nearly died of undiagnosed celiac disease....multiple doctors told her it was "all in her head" like her severe weight loss and inability to keep food down was a psychiatric illness. However, for the most part my medical establishment skepticism has served me well, especially during covid mania.

Expand full comment
RandiG's avatar

Thank you! I learn so much from people’s comments here!! 👍🏼

Expand full comment
Bryn Cannon's avatar

About the mammograms, if you have predispositions for breast cancer, it might make sense to screen for it somehow. But I breastfed both kids for 2 years each, had children on the early side, have not taken birth control, don’t smoke, maintain a healthy weight, and the only family history of breast cancer was my grandmother who got it when she was 99, and I don’t take after her genetically anyway. So I’ll happily take my excellent chances with skipping a procedure that is more likely to give me breast cancer than to catch it!

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

I have those same conflicted feelings 😕

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

You have to do what you feel is in your best interest. 🙂

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

I feel much the same.

Expand full comment
Bryn Cannon's avatar

Forgot to mention, that several years ago when my husband was going through a lot of strange autoimmune symptoms, and one medication would just trigger another set of symptoms, a friend of mine said to me “medicine is just poison in small doses”. It was a turning point in his treatment: one by one, we took him off every medication against medical advice. He is slowly recovering. They said he would die.

Expand full comment
FH's avatar

I listened to a podcast of Sharyl Attkisson interviewing documentary filmmaker Megan S Smith, “bOObs: the War on Women’s Breasts”. I learned a LOT, have not watched the documentary.

Here’s a review for those interested https://www.ksdk.com/article/entertainment/movies/movie-reviews/boobs-the-war-on-womens-breasts/63-f72e0c88-b744-40ca-9206-7cb21445d78d

I didn’t save the podcast but am sure it can be easily found.

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

Thanks; more information equals more ammunition

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Thank you for sharing! I love Sharyl Attkisson, she is a true journalist!

Expand full comment
Copernicus's avatar

Interesting.

So I am not wrong for foregoing mine of the last couple of years. Ha.

They most definitely cause harm at least emotionally via false positives, harm via increased interventions and tests to evaluate false positives, and why would we suppose that annual doses of radiation for 20-30 years are without possible harm?

Expand full comment
FH's avatar

Me: never again. Using manual and visual detection & if anything is troublesome I will get imaged another way. I dread getting into the medical system.

Expand full comment
GoodGrief-239's avatar

Do you have a link to the meta review by chance?

Expand full comment
Wesley Hoyle's avatar

All is not lost! There is one substance known to the State of California to *not* cause cancer: mRNA vaccine. 🤡

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

Hahaha 😆 Unvaxxed creed - "I am so glad I didn't get vaxxed. It could have been so much worse." 😉 say that to a covidiot. They can't figure out why that sounds wrong.

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

I am borrowing that

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

I love that, I bet their expressions when you say that are priceless to behold 😂😆

Expand full comment
SadieJay's avatar

Nice one....and you are so right!

Expand full comment
Joe Karlovich's avatar

Everything causes cancer now. Its the same as saying nothing causes cancer which is what they want people to think about the vaccines.

So I see these studies you post and it reminds me of when I was in college studied for my degree learning about ANOVA analysis, and I, being a bored college student, would make up the labels to the data just for fun. Surprisingly it didn't change the results. Then I thought let me change the data set to something completely irrelevant. The results changed but found that my made up data proved one of my made up variables was statistically significant. The models behind statistics are very dumb, in a sense that they have no common sense. If you put garbage in, you get garbage out. And that is exactly how you get all these studies showing that everything causes cancer. They break basic assumptions and then use the results to justify their broken assumptions. What is for sure is that none of these studies could tell you HOW exactly whiteness or blackness or whatever actually causes cancer. Thats because they don't.

Expand full comment
Betsy Frost's avatar

Completely agree. I was a Math major who then went on into a graduate business program. I played around in my Quant Analysis class and proved the same to myself. It was a pain back then as we ancients had to use keyed in punch cards but I got such a kick out of playing around and manipulating results. I've been so skeptical of any data analysis since.

Expand full comment
Janet's avatar

OMG punch cards. My hubby had to use the building size computer at university of Illinois for a class in 1968. There were craft classes using used punch cards and gold spray paint to make wreaths. I remember that. Now--where is my watch?

Expand full comment
JW's avatar

I'm still trying to find my abacus!

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

Don't forget gardening. It can cause cancer. Lol.

Expand full comment
JW's avatar

And JOY!

Expand full comment
Rose Loomis's avatar

Exactly. This is very rudimentary but the opposite of those things they say cause cancer doesn’t prevent cancer or cure cancer either. Just like wearing 10 masks doesn’t make you healthier. It’s all driven by funding sources and commercial applications.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 12, 2022Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
FH's avatar

It’s what I hear in my head every single time I see/hear anything about causes of cancer. Sometimes I torture those around me by singing it out loud. 🤣

Expand full comment
RebeccaGrrrl's avatar

NICE find. Thank you.

Expand full comment
Birdingmom's avatar

So convenient to lock people down for 2 years and then blame "missed cancer screenings" for the uptick in cancer so they don't have to look at the real cause. 💉 Diabolical.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

And they were so noble to sacrifice all of us for the common good by locking everyone down and refusing to see patients for screenings 🙄🙄🙄 And now they wring their hands and cry about how many people are being diagnosed so they can feign compassion and act like their actions had nothing to do with the results, just like with kids and school 😡

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

Sheeple will believe it.

Expand full comment
M. Dowrick's avatar

Four acquaintances with cancer, three dead. The dead had (1) pancreatic cancer and (2) with breast cancer that had been in remission. Now next door neighbour has ovarian cancer. All occurred post vaxx. Probably just coincidental.

Expand full comment
SheThinksLiberty's avatar

Well, yes, and I'm sure you're aware that "coincidence" is the leading cause of death.

Expand full comment
Queen Hotchibobo's avatar

And the vax is the leading cause of coincidences.

Expand full comment
SheThinksLiberty's avatar

𝑬𝒙𝒂𝒄𝒕𝒍𝒚!

Expand full comment
Linda Sartain's avatar

I don't think so. These shots change your cells [misfolded proteins]and the lining of your blood vessels [inflammation ].

The spike proteins damage your circulatory system. Your own immune system is destroyed. So, cancer, heart disease, leukemia etc.

Cancer cells occur in our bodies anyway. Our healthy immune system does it job to kill errant cells.

Expand full comment
Bryn Cannon's avatar

Yup. I don’t personally know anyone who died of covid, but I know two who died of pancreatic cancer within days of being diagnosed, and one who died of a rare blood cancer that comes from a genetic mutation caused by environmental factors. 🤔 And a friend just texted this morning that his sister’s uterine cancer suddenly came back and she died last night! The difference in this “vaccine” era seems to be that the cancer comes suddenly and there’s no time for treatment before the poor person is gone.

Expand full comment
Richard's avatar

I'm beginning to think there may be no way to get out of this life alive.

Expand full comment
SheThinksLiberty's avatar

😂😂😂

Thank you for the laugh, Richard. When told that people were "afraid" re "COV!D", I asked, "What are they afraid of?" Stunned looks in return followed by, "They're afraid they're gonna die!" (Of course. Silly me.) To which I replied:

"They are."

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

And their heads exploded 😆😂

Expand full comment
SheThinksLiberty's avatar

Every time, plus a noticeable intake of air or name calling or calling me out for being mean or whatever.

Expand full comment
CitizenKC's avatar

The Lancet reported a cancer study in November 2011 where 650,000 Swedish women were divided into two groups. One group was screened annually for cancer, the other group only after 6 years. The researchers found one-third more invasive breast cancers in women screened annually. The authors concluded that many breast cancers regress spontaneously, either because they are abnormal cells or because the immune system detects and destroys them. So if you impair the immune system you will get more deadly cancers. HIV proved that in humans.

Expand full comment
SadieJay's avatar

I would faithfully get a mammogram every year. They kept finding suspicious masses that led to biopsies and the 3D mammograms. Always on the right side. They ruined my breasts by squishing them all to hell and by poking me. It is such bullshit and I said NO MORE. It was the cancer du'jour and I am just done. They nag me every year and it gives me great pleasure to tell them to stick it. I am taking my health back and taking my body back. My "healthcare provider" is ME!!

Expand full comment
Karen Bandy's avatar

This study ‘kills’ two birds with one stone. Don’t get mamo’s every year, and don’t get shots!!

I’m in the yearly cycle of mamos due to dense breasts, but I think I’ll give them a rest next year.

Trueblood!!

Expand full comment
FH's avatar

Please learn more about mammograms and dense breast tissue. In case you don’t see my earlier reply in this comments section, track down Sharyl Attkisson interview with Megan S Smith, here’s more info on who she is. I learned so much from that interview but have not yet watched the documentary.

https://www.ksdk.com/article/entertainment/movies/movie-reviews/boobs-the-war-on-womens-breasts/63-f72e0c88-b744-40ca-9206-7cb21445d78d

Expand full comment
Karen Bandy's avatar

Will do, thank you ❤️

Expand full comment
Happy1's avatar

look into thermography as a replacement for mammograms. no dangerous side effects and detects issues years before a mammogram would pick up anything.

Expand full comment
Karen Bandy's avatar

Frankly, I forgot about that option, not sure its available here anymore. Was really expensive too, such a shame we have to make that choice.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Yes this is similar to what I read about what a well regarded oncologist was saying a few years ago. She wondered if the aggressive early treatment might be causing more harm than good. I will have to see if I can find that article.

Expand full comment
Penny North's avatar

Truth.

Expand full comment
Deby Harrow's avatar

Wake up America. The only cancer we have is Commie Joe and his administration. Get rid of that cancer and maybe our other cancers will stop. It’s the vaccine and booster! Period!!

Do I hear “law suit” anyone?

Take that rat face Fauci and put him in jail for murder along with Commie Joe and Hunter!

Wake up America. That’s our new slogan. Stop with MAGA and change to WUA then bring back what we had.

Expand full comment
Teresa Carstensen's avatar

"rat face Fauci and put him in jail"...AFTER we chuck the little elf into the Potomac!

Expand full comment
John Raymond's avatar

Nuremberg Code violations does not stipulate jail. I will people would stop saying jail

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

Yeah. There needs to be a more permanent solution for some of the most evil partners in this crime against humanity.

Expand full comment
John Raymond's avatar

Death penalty

Expand full comment
Elaine H's avatar

What does it stipulate?

Expand full comment
John Raymond's avatar

Death penalty.

You should say this to every criminal out there...

Many pharmacists, freaken "health officers", hospital administrator, cold call and say it.

Write it on t shirt, community boards at gas station

Expand full comment
Mel's avatar

We know THREE men who died within 6-10 months after their two Pfizer jabs. Three. One had cancer (lymphoma) before he got the jabs. The jabs accelerated his death and how do I know this? Because 3 months before he died, he said to me at a little party, “What is so weird is, I started to get new lumps in my groin this past month and they biopsied the lumps and told me I now have a whole new type of lymphoma than my original lymphoma I was diagnosed with years ago!” The other two friends just simply got raging new cancers out of nowhere and died within 10 months of their shots. The first friend had so much cancer everywhere that they could never find the primary! He was a working stone mason before his jabs. The second, a very good friend of ours, developed an aggressive leukemia and died 10 months after his two jabs. We are in our early 60s. We have never had this many friends die of CANCER so quickly and so consecutively in our entire lives. Three. Oh and the neighbor across the street developed autoimmune hemolytic anemia the summer after his two jab series. My friend’s partner developed severe trigeminal neuralgia after his two jabs (the “suicide disease as it is nicknamed). My elderly mom, who was fine before the jabs, went downhill fast with a raging dementia and died within 5 months of her jabs. Something is going on alright. And they know it. And you know what else? “They” don’t give a damn! Hard not to loathe these merchants of death and disease. I’ve given up trying to wake people up though. They just don’t want to know.

Expand full comment
Alison Smith's avatar

I agree- I have one colleague who developed a lymph mass that had to be removed, and another colleague who was pro shot, pro booster who developed a very rare cancer surrounding his heart. It's fatal. Oh, and my mother now has a cancerous breast lump. She is in her 80's.

Expand full comment
Mel's avatar

I am sorry you’ve had such bad experiences with people in your life too, Alison.

Expand full comment
Verve's avatar

I’m so sorry for the loss of your mother, Mel! 🙏🏻

Expand full comment
Mel's avatar

Thank you, Veronica. It was a terrible death, too. Thank you for your kindheartedness.

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

It's not that they don't give a damn. This was their intent all along. My cousin suddenly contracted cancer after the shot and her partner suddenly had cardio-vascular issues. Very liberal mindset...couldn't be related to the shot. A former co-worker (federal gov't employee) got the shot and double or triple boosted. Had previously had a clean cancer screen report. Suddenly develops aggressive cancer in several places in his body. He went from perfectly healthy to dead in three months! Wife intends to use the life insurance to sue the Gov't for the mandates. Doctors mystified...as usual.

Expand full comment
Mel's avatar

You’re right. It has to be intentional. I remember reading something about oncogenic inserts. They tinkered with the virus until they got it just right to cause the maximum amount of harm they could hide for most people, before their untimely deaths. Some unfortunates died within a day or a week or two. Kirsch says many die within 5 months. Any lawyer that tried to sue over the mandates has my respect and I am not too keen on most lawyers. Or doctors. Shameful the ways we have all been treated.

Expand full comment
Sydney Seppo's avatar

Sorry for your loss. Your quick cancer stories remind of the 31 year old Australian YouTuber getting a leftover vaccine in Korea and dying a year later.

Her video of how she got the vaccine and how happy they are haunted me for a bit.

https://youtu.be/rjjyjyuDSA0

Expand full comment
JR for Liberty's avatar

Russia and China edging us closer to WW3 and, yet, our DoD continues to separate experienced service members for not taking the ineffective, dangerous SADS-shots while syphoning off critical weapons and material to corruptocrats in 🇺🇦. You could not choreograph America’s downfall any better.

Expand full comment
John Raymond's avatar

I don't like Putin, but NATO had no right to keep inching up To Russia border

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

Are you saying Russia can control what another country does? Finland and

Sweden both joined nato because Russia keeps invading non aligned nations. There’s a reason ukriane tried joining. Russia invaded them

First just like Georgia and Moldova

Expand full comment
John Raymond's avatar

Lota good NATO did. These bastards don't care about kids...

2. Cuban Missile Crisis

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

Sweden and Finland are in Nato and won’t get invaded.

As a nato bro we do care about kids.

So John, can someone else control what you do with your body? Why can Russia control Ukraine? Russia murdered millions of Ukrainians during a genocide called the holodmor. They don’t want anything to do with Russia.

Expand full comment
John Raymond's avatar

In a world of ethical, decent leaders... You are correct of course.

But we are not... 5African leaders/Caribbean bucked NWO And got dead.

We have very few decent leaders.

A leader must always assess chance of winning and cost to citizens. Zelensky is scum ... He's on a power trip and Ukraine's children are dying. He has no chance of winning.

NATO and Ukraine should categorically say Ukraine doesn't want membership in nato

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

Zelensky is what we would be lucky to have. On the same day he told Biden No and Putin No too. Instead of fleeing, like Pushilin did, he stayed.

Who is killing Ukrainian children? Russian missiles.

Maybe Russia can stop being a bully to their neighbors. There's a reason every single one joined nato to become safe from Russian aggression.

Expand full comment
John Raymond's avatar

Russia, China, US are superpowers. (well,car were until biden) ... There is a reality to that.

What about Cuban Missile Crisis.

China went too far with Pelosi (except...) But there's limits to what people can do with Taiwan...

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

We are still a super power. Even at our weakened state right now Russia would be destroyed in weeks.

We are not the same. That implies moral equivelance which is not happening here.

Expand full comment
Tory's avatar

With Trump, we would have been far more stable.

Expand full comment
Karen Bandy's avatar

Just reading an Imprimus article Hillsdale college, about our woke military. Trump reversed all of Obama’s woke ideology early on, but Biden reversed that his first day in office.

Expand full comment
CaliforniaLost's avatar

If this were titled as a movie sequel:

Cancer Moon Shot 2: Grifter's Paradise

Expand full comment
Doug Young's avatar

Love how, in the 2 separate studies, cervical cancer rates are elevated by both blackness & whiteness. If you actually want to figure out what's going on, you can compare populations of the same ethnic background that live in the original ancestral homeland & in the more modern west, where a certain product has a much higher uptake.

Expand full comment
Linda Sartain's avatar

Flu shots. I took the shot first in 2012 because I would be caring for my grandson, born late that year. By 2015 I was diagnosed with a stage 2 cancer that nobody in my family had experienced. I realized by 2018 what may have been the cause , dna based flu shots. So I don't take the shot anymore.

I'm cancer free but it was a 5 year road to normal. Also, I've always been a healthy person. I do attribute the cancer to the flu shots.

Expand full comment
AngelaK's avatar

Every time someone asks if I have had my flu shot, I have an outer body experience! And as for the covid vaccines, I just bite my tongue and grin, or I would have no friends or family. My immediate family are with me..hubby, adult children, elderly mom. No covid vaccine! ( Although my son eventually caved in to getting the J and J in order to travel to NYC and elsewhere for his job at the time). Can you imagine that NYC didnt allow you into even a museum without proof of one vaccine! Crazy when I think about it.

Expand full comment
Tory's avatar

My take is a quiet: No… no vaccines shingles only. Just vacationed in Orange County, CA. No mask on Delta and none on Pacific Coast or the large theatre production in

Laguna Beach. NY is NY. I live w many in Florida.

Expand full comment
Elaine H's avatar

Tory what made you decide on shingles?

Expand full comment
Tory's avatar

Good question. Three yrs prior, I got shingles so fierce with the already autoimmune lupus, it was a full body onslaught of lesions and neuropathy in lower extremity. Unfortunately, it went post hepatic, and that meant working from home for 9 months. This was prior to the Covid world.

I Don’t take vaccines but indeed, I signed up for this one. I still have neuropathy in lower legs.

But no flu, nothing. No jab.

Expand full comment