491 Comments
Sep 13, 2022Liked by Jeff Childers

Today is the en banc hearing for the Feds 4 Medical Freedom (F4MF). The full panel of judges in the 5th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals will hear arguments in our suit against the mandates.

Expand full comment

As usual, Brandon is confused. He meant the mRNA shots can be used to *cause*—not cure—cancer, hence the warp-speeded turbo cancers we are now enjoying worldwide!

https://etana.substack.com/p/turbo-cancer

Expand full comment

Anyone else notice Biden's cancer moonshot tweet has a goal to "turn more cancers from death sentences into chronic conditions people can live with"?

What kind of a goal is that, how about freaking curing them? The only people that welcome "chronic conditions" are the medical industry and pharma as it's their bread and butter.

Expand full comment

Through You we will push back our adversaries;

Through Your name we will trample down those who rise up against us.

For I will not trust in my bow,

Nor will my sword save me.

But You have saved us from our adversaries,

And You have put to shame those who hate us.

In God we have boasted all day long,

And we will give thanks to Your name forever. Selah.

— Psalm 44:5-8 NAAB1995

Expand full comment
Sep 13, 2022Liked by Jeff Childers

Globaganda!

“We need a new word to describe this kind of seemingly coordinated, completely unhinged, global propaganda.”

Expand full comment
Sep 13, 2022Liked by Jeff Childers

We've discovered a new mental disorder: PDS, or Putin Derangement Syndrome. Likely as severe and uncurable as is its predecessor, Trump Derangement Syndrome.

I wonder if Fauci boosted his fellow TDS sufferers, and PDS is the resulting mutation of the virus ...

Expand full comment

RE: the university vax mandates. Why aren’t more lawyers taking up lawsuits against schools? My husband was recently denied access to his final year in a certificate program at university of Washington (it would have been only two weeks on campus). The program blames it on the school and the school claimed their policy was backed by the governor.

Expand full comment
Sep 13, 2022·edited Sep 13, 2022Liked by Jeff Childers

"Hey, Numbnut... are you going to get that new "anti-cancer shot?"

Numbnut: "Of course. Who wouldn't?"

"Have you done any research on it?"

Numbnut: "I don't need to do any research."

"Interesting.......How many other things do you believe in without doing any research or investigation?"

Expand full comment
Sep 13, 2022Liked by Jeff Childers

It will cut rates by 50% after they explode 100% from baseline!!!

Expand full comment

So let me guess, if you refuse the " cancer shot" , insurance won't cover you if you get cancer? I wouldn't doubt it. Insurance is a scam anyway . All in bed with CMS and big pharma anyway, they get away with not paying for even basic claims . From medical to home to car insurance, they randomly set narrow parameters that are very difficult to stay within and then cancel you if they decide you've made too many claims . It's robbery at this point.

Expand full comment
Sep 13, 2022Liked by Jeff Childers

Were are already in a cancer moon shot started by Nixon (the war on cancer) about 50 years ago. The results have been dismal. This new moon shot is another giant money helicopter that will dump billions of dollars into big pharma coffers once again with little or no progress. Big pharma drugs are not the answer for curing cancer. There are numerous natural cures for many cancers that have been buried by big pharma or censored by the mainstream medical community.

Expand full comment

A couple thoughts.

First, the cancer moonshot will take twenty five years? I'm sure there's a way to speed it up by waving billions of dollars under the noses of big pharma. Maybe we can reduce regulatory oversight too. It'll need a catchy name too--like Mission Quick Pace or Rapid Paced Efforting. I dunno.

Second, what has amazed me over the past couple years is how the executive branch at seemingly every level of government can declare an emergency and then renew that emergency ad infinitum. Why isn't the executive-level state of emergency limited to something like 30 days? After that, the legislature would be required to renew it. That seems to make a lot more sense and is consistent with the separation of powers that is fundamental to our republic.

Expand full comment
Sep 13, 2022Liked by Jeff Childers

"BEFORE the newest joker was added Biden’s deck of bureaucratic wild cards, ..." my favorite this morning!

Expand full comment
Sep 13, 2022Liked by Jeff Childers

Anyone see “I am Legend”? there will never be a cure for cancer because “they” make too much 💴 from it😢😢😢

Expand full comment
Sep 13, 2022Liked by Jeff Childers

Yesterday must’ve been the new Global Social Media Propaganda Day. I saw that Peter McCullough’s accounts were attacked by tens of thousands of bots claiming the accounts were fake.

The cancer talk is ludicrous for anyone who cares to pause for half a minute. First, why no talk of prevention. That’s infinitely better than cure. Lots of things we could do to prevent but most of those would require major gov backpedaling re dietary advice, vitamin D exposure, weather manipulation, 5G towers, and injectable products of various sorts including but not limited to the current One.

Second, plenty of cures available for many via well-formulated ketogenic diet (Thomas Seyfried, if I recall correctly), repurposed meds including the horse one, and other natural remedies.

Third, if the mR N A platform is so safe and effective, why do we have to wait for 25 years for this amazing development? Can’t we skip the animal trials and reproductive toxicity trials and long term safety studies and just get on with the thing? I mean, for the people who actually HAVE cancer, it kind of feels like an EMERGENCY.

Hopefully his 25 year timeline allows enough time for this to become unfounded and just go away.

Government needs to recuse itself from all involvement in such personal decisions as our health and well being. Plus, it’s not in the Constitution anyway. It’s all illegal.

Expand full comment

Neither the federal legislature (Congress) nor the executive branch of our federal government have the power to legislate, regulate or order health mandates. The United States Constitution granted and enumerated very limited powers to the federal government. Health and education, along with many other subjects, are not within the purview of the feds.

Expand full comment