6 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Tonya's avatar

I thought it was already confirmed that the products released were not the same ones approved, based on differences in the manufacturing process.

But I see that the adulteration issue is an even stronger indicator that the manufacturers committed fraud.

Expand full comment
rolandttg's avatar

I don't understand why they can't be sued for saying the jabs had been approved by the FDA when it was only Cominarty, and that was Never made available in the US. That's how they finally made the military mandate happen, and it was all a complete lie. No one in this country has ever received a jab approved by the FDA.

Expand full comment
devoalan's avatar

Yeah, being able to sue is like being allowed one snowball in a snowball fight. How about being allowed to overthrow the governments of multiple countries, but the USA specifically, for issuing an eua knowing full well the manufacturers were NOT providing the product that was granted that authorization. This whole thing is sickening, and maddening. How do we fight complete government collusion and corruption?

Expand full comment
rolandttg's avatar

One small step at a time. Spread the word. Resist. Say NO to all illegal mandates. Never compromise. Pay cash. Get off the technical electronic prison system of smart phones, social media, smart appliances and doorbells. Stop supporting Walmart and Amazon. Support local businesses. Grow your own food. There are lots of ways, little by little.

Expand full comment
Roger Beal's avatar

2A, "if you can keep it".

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

That is true

Expand full comment