867 Comments
User's avatar
Based Florida Man's avatar

Russia banning trans-maniancs:

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russian-bill-banning-gender-change-surgery-clears-second-reading-2023-07-13/

- bans gender-change surgeries

- prohibits changing gender on official identity documents

- prohibits transgenders from adopting children.

Last December, President Vladimir Putin signed a law expanding restrictions on the promotion of "LGBT propaganda," effectively banning any public expression of their lifestyle by lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transgender people in Russia. Putin has portrayed LGBT rights as evidence of moral decay in Western countries.

(compare to the leader of NATO, Joe Biden, who had naked trans-crossdressers at a White House celebration, with the Gay Flag level with the USA Flag.)

Expand full comment
FourWinds's avatar

I'm sure someone will bash me, but my hat is off to Putin and Russia for this move and for noticing that the alphabet movement is eating western countries alive.

Expand full comment
Anthony's avatar

I knew we were living in Bizzarro World when I had more respect for Putin than Biden.

And note to the trolls, you can respect your enemy and be disgusted by your supposed President.

Expand full comment
AngelaK's avatar

Is he really 'our' enemy? Think about it. That has been media propaganda for years.

Expand full comment
devoalan's avatar

Imagine, the largest, whitest, most Christian nation on earth, is our sworn enemy. Even after the fall of the Soviet Union, these government fuckers can't seem to realize Russia would, could, and should be our greatest ally.

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

Yes, if America had a government representative of America. We don't, anymore than the Russians had a gov't in the USSR representative of them. The NeoCon USG needed to keep Russia as an enemy in order to continue to milk the American people of their wealth to support a perpetual state of war.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jul 22, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
BuelahMan's Revolt's avatar

Including Russia, where it has obviously hoodwinked anyone clamoring for either "side" in that apparent white genocide operation that Putin is in on up to his eyeballs.

Expand full comment
Gaye's avatar

Right now Biden’s administration is looking like the enemy, so if “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” then… (But must remember Putin is a still a communist.)

Expand full comment
Credenda's avatar

This idea that Putin is a communist is a ploy to keep Americans fired up and ready to support the neocon foreverwar dream. It’s a lie but it works. Putin unveiled a memorial statue of Solzhenitsyn a few years ago. (Solzhenitsyn was an anti communist) He had deep sympathy with the western liberal tradition and wanted to join the European community. However, the British and Americans had other plans for the dismantling of Russia and Putin stood in their way. He is not a communist. Those who swallow this baloney are the equivalent of those who believe the vaccines are “safe and effective”. They simply believe what the government tells them.

Expand full comment
Gaye's avatar

I’ll refer you to a geopolitical expert on Soviet policy. Putin is weakened but the show goes on. One article is from 2017, the Solzhenitsyn statue was unveiled in 2018, and the second article is very recent.

http://www.jrnyquist.com/is-putin-a-communist.html

https://jrnyquist.blog/2023/06/24/the-mutiny-in-russia/#more-11453

Sharpen your tools. We’re going to need them.

Expand full comment
AngelaK's avatar

Putin is not communist! He restored religion and rebuilt churches all over Russia. Russia ceased being a communist country in 1991.

The 1993 constitution declares Russia a democratic, federative, law-based state with a republican form of government.

Expand full comment
Fre'd Bennett, MAHA's avatar

Where in the hell did you get the idea Putin is communist? Do you for some reason think Russia is communist? It isn't and hasn't been for decades.

Do try to keep up.

Expand full comment
Gaye's avatar

You’re not paying attention at all. Read Nyquist’s articles I shared.

Expand full comment
CaplT's avatar

Yes he is.

So is Zelensky.

Expand full comment
AngelaK's avatar

We CHOSE to make him an enemy. He wanted good relations. We lied, undermined and maligned him in everything...primarily because Soros hates him for not allowing his influence money to 'f' up their country too, and for also outright banning him. The US liberal demoncrat gvt hates him for not having wanted gay propaganda infront of children at the Olympic games in Sotchi in 2014.

Our msm and gvt hate intensified after that. I have been following it since then.

Expand full comment
JimB's avatar

I was on a cruise ship trans Atlantic some years back,,,,,, 1200-1500 of the passengers were Russian and I found them to be friendly polite and overall positive.

The same can be said of the Chinese , it is incredibly evil and tragic that nations are pitted against each other by diabolical forces. Some day it will end.

Isaiah 2: 1 ¶ The word that Isaiah the son of Amoz saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem.

2 And it shall come to pass in the last days, that the mountain of the LORD'S house shall be established in the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow unto it.

3 And many people shall go and say, Come ye, and let us go up to the mountain of the LORD, to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths: for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the LORD from Jerusalem.

4 And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.

Maranatha

Expand full comment
Willing Spirit's avatar

When as an American you find a temptation for ‘rootin’ for Putin’….

Expand full comment
Kathleen Janoski's avatar

Putin loves his country.

Expand full comment
AngelaK's avatar

Indeed! He saved Russia financially and spiritually.

As evil as the Soviet ideological indoctrination against religion and God was, I believe that the evil we are indoctrinating may be slightly worse. I believe it was Putin who commented some years ago how shocked he was at what was happening to the US because he respected our Judeo-Christian values.

Expand full comment
Peter GL's avatar

we have the indoctrination of the weird and satanical "religion" of the abnormal, which like Igor (in Young Frankenstein) took it as "A.B. Normal"

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Love the Young Frankenstein reference 😁

Expand full comment
Cheryl Caraglior's avatar

Right, Kathleen. Often during Obama/Biden and Biden/Harris, I have wished for a President who loves America as much as Putin loves Russia.

Expand full comment
GenEarly's avatar

you/me/we Had such a President from 2017 to 2020

Expand full comment
devoalan's avatar

Yes, we did.

Expand full comment
Peter GL's avatar

They are of the party whose religious leader claimed "God damn America"

Expand full comment
Credenda's avatar

Me too Cheryl and at first it made me feel uneasy because communism is truly evil. But as time passed I learned more about Russia TODAY, about their government, their desperate situation in the 90’s. I read Putin’s writings and listened to some of his speeches. I saw the rebirth of the Orthodox faith there. So I think history will eventually acknowledge Putin as a true Russian statesman. Actually, most of the non-Western world already regards him as such.

Expand full comment
Cyn's avatar

As he should; not our business, but then that went out the window eons ago.

Expand full comment
Cornwall Marc's avatar

Fourwinds, Unfortunately in Russia this repression extends to normal gays and lesbians too. (In Iran gays are offered gender reassignment. If they refuse they hang them from cranes or throw them off buildings - not much of a choice...)

But I fully agree, it's all gone too far and very evil in our western countries. It breaks my heart to see so many poor young vulnerable souls exploited and GROOMED!! So many live to regret it. And the groomers always use the suicide card: 'Do you want a daughter or a dead son?' Disgusting!

Expand full comment
Based Florida Man's avatar

"Normal gays"... the camel's nose that led to all this other nonsense.

For all time homosexuality has been viewed as degenerate. I'm still shocked at people here who support gays adopting children.

Expand full comment
Gigi Gummerson's avatar

Honestly, I have many gay friends, some have been together 20-30 years. Believe it or not many are Republican, just want a stable life. My woman friends have children, were married before, my guy friends have always been gay but never felt the need for children. Anyway, don’t discount all gays like their sexual deviants, I mean look at Hunter 🙄

Expand full comment
Jeff C's avatar

The sin is "sexual immorality" as defined in the Bible. This includes lots of behavior beyond homosexuality, such as fornication, adultery, polygamy, pornography, etc.

However, we don't get to excuse one by pointing to the existence of the others. It's all condemned and sinful. As as BFM rightly pointed out, accepting homosexuality as "normal" and even to be celebrated led to the slippery slope where now ever sort of deviancy is paraded about.

Expand full comment
Freebird's avatar

I never see a reference to the fact that the normalization of homosexuality was a huge factor in the fall of the Roman Empire.

Expand full comment
David A's avatar

Bingo, and yes, I do not hate folk for their flaws, which are as harmful to themselves as others. However I certainly do not support error that is so often a cause of misery. We all fail, as a saint said, "Those of us to good for this world are adorning some other."

Which is a path to this comment by Jeff,

"Personally, I do not believe in UFO’s for religious reasons, but also for the scientific reason that fine tuning suggests it’s nearly impossible for there to be any other life in the Universe."

Curious to me, as I do not know the religious reasons, and as to "fine tunning" while some of that is earth specific, the vast majority, with by far the greatest odds, is universal, and so would support other life.

Expand full comment
Nikki (Gayle) Nicholson's avatar

Yes, and since we are all sinners, we try to justify some sins as ok. They are not. Only through God's gift of repenting, changing our sinful ways, & accepting Jesus as our savior, are we forgiven. John 3:16.

Expand full comment
Niki Stone's avatar

Nobody has a right to tell others who they get love and support from. A large number of trans are reporting that the felt they had to transition so Christians wouldn't abuse them for loving the same sex, therefore I blame this attitude on why so many people have mental health problems.

Expand full comment
Cornwall Marc's avatar

We are all so much more than our sexual preferences. It really doesn't matter. And as for Hunter...

Expand full comment
Credenda's avatar

Hmm……..there are many wonderfully nice pedos. They are so much more than their lust for sex with children. It really doesn’t matter……./sarc

Expand full comment
David A's avatar

"It doesn't matter."

There are many that think it does. They reason that a strong family makes a strong culture, and that they did not create themselves, or place themselves in a male or female body. Not being the author of life, they reason that their life had a deeper purpose, and a plan. They reason that a child does best when leaning both postive masculin and feminen qualities. They understand that men and women have both, but certain positive qualties are more manifest in a man, and others in a woman, and that this blanced nurturing produces the healthiest child and culture. They think that this balanceing of postive masvulin and feminin qualties to their children is the ideal, and necessary for a healthy culture.

They also understand that a very high percentage of "gay" folk, come from sexually abusive relationships, and are deeply unhappy. They know that gay men, even considerably more then straight men, are extremely promiscues and addicted to sex. They also know that many lesbian relationships have a psycologically unhealthy "dominant, or "butch"

As such they feel and think that it should not be promoted as healthy, or as an equal to marriage relationship by society. This does not mean they hate, or refuse to have business with, or discriminate against gays, except when it comes to equating a gay union as culturally equal to married man and woman. This does no mean they cannot feel compassion for a gay person, striving with desires they do not face. (There are many stories of "gays" that are now happily hetrosexuall, and AFAIK, nothing has been found physiologically that makes one gay.)

While it is a grave error (sin) to hate and stone or jali, or condem a person as worthless for being gay, it is also wrong to criminalize the above perspective that a gay relationship is not equal to a hetrosexual relationship, everything else being equal.

I am very confident that a kind LOYAL gay couple living a good honest life of service, is far closer to God then an abusive cheating man or woman. The "everything else being equall" state above, being a very important qualifier.

Expand full comment
devoalan's avatar

That's the thing that kills me about qweers. Can't spell it properly, algorithms don't ya know. The only thing you ever truly know about them is their sexuality. It's pasted on their forehead like a fucking neon sign. " I am special because I'm queer"! No, your aberrant sexual requirements make you odd,not special. And also make you a one trick pony. It's all they have. It's pretty sickening.

Expand full comment
My Favorite Things's avatar

Amen! Homosexuality is disgusting.

Expand full comment
Cornwall Marc's avatar

Gosh! Really? In 2023. I am shocked...

Expand full comment
My Favorite Things's avatar

Just because we’re being taught to accept homosexuality, it doesn’t make it honorable behavior. Some people still haven’t been brainwashed by the homosexual activists. The thought of two men buttfu**ing or performing oral sex on each other is repulsive to me. Lesbians are just as weird. Why is it you can look at so many and just see their weirdness?

Expand full comment
Cornwall Marc's avatar

BFM, I gotta say, normally I agree with you but sorry not on this one. Nowadays families come in all shapes and sizes and many children are brought up in split homes and challenging circumstances.

The orphanages are full of thousands of unwanted children. Who are any of us to deny them the chance of a loving home? Many parents are secretly or openly gay - what about them? Should their children be removed? And as for the risk of child abuse, it is very rare; where as most child abuse is within the natural or wider family. There is good and bad to found everywhere and gay people are perfectly able to provide a nurturing environment for children who desperately need one. Best wishes.

Expand full comment
Cornwall Marc's avatar

To all of you securely living in your heterosexuality I say congratulations - and thank your lucky stars for it. For a minority of people this is not their truth or their normal; they happen to love in a different way - through no fault or wish of their own. It's so easy to be self-righteous when you are not in the other side of the equation.

Expand full comment
GoodGrief-239's avatar

We were all born into sin, they just manifest differently in different people. But all still need to be repented of, turned from, fought against. Not be a slave to sin, but to righteousness.

Expand full comment
Pluto’s aura's avatar

Yessss

Expand full comment
CStone's avatar

Homosexuality, as much as you may want it to be, is NOT normal.

Expand full comment
Jeff C's avatar

Taken to it's extreme the species would be extinct so clearly it's not preferred behavior. Yet we aren't even allowed to state this obvious fact.

Expand full comment
Cornwall Marc's avatar

Come on Jeff, It's a small minority!

Mind you, we wouldn't be having all this climate hysteria if there weren't eight billion of us running around on the planet.

Do we actually need more gays?

Expand full comment
David A's avatar

It has zero to do with population being a real problem. We are not running out of energy or "stuff" If you want to lower population, give that culture inexpensive abundant energy. https://open.substack.com/pub/anderdaa7/p/global-warming?r=slvym&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Expand full comment
NoWay's avatar

No it is not normal or biologically preferred. But it does exist, it has always existed in some small percentage. I also know regular gay people, not activists. Functioning regular people, conservative! who have monogamous long term relationships just like me. They don’t broadcast their lifestyle or try to convert people. I don’t have a problem with that. I understand others might.

It undeniably exists.

Expand full comment
Cornwall Marc's avatar

Sorry, it is for lots of people.

Granted, it is not the majority - but that doesn't make it deviant.

Expand full comment
David A's avatar

It is a very small minority. Addiction to sexuality comes in many forms, it is just one.

Expand full comment
Cornwall Marc's avatar

You are SO right! Promiscuity, Swinging - many partners, Dogging - exhibitionism, S&M, Beastiality, Necrophilia etc - and that is just the 'Straights'!!

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jul 22, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Cornwall Marc's avatar

Kokanee, people so often get caught up with the physical, sexual expression of homosexuality. It is SO much more than that!!

Expand full comment
Credenda's avatar

Ah, the beautiful aesthetics of homosexual love argument. That was the Roman view. And curiously, the view of a sizable segment of the Nazi elite. They idealized the powerfully masculine Teutonic male as a model for the ubermensch and consorted with each other without shame. The homosexuals who were despised were the effeminate ones. I do have compassion for those caught in this life. There is abundant forgiveness from Jesus if they would desire it. But few seek it and instead, they justify themselves. The Door of Life is open but they won’t step through.

Expand full comment
Daily Growler's avatar

Could you please give some examples of the repression of normal gays and lesbians in Russia? This is a sincere question. I have not been to Russia, but I recently talked at length with a gay person who visited some of the major cities, e.g., Moscow, St. Petersburg, Yekaterinburg, and he said that although homosexuality is "illegal" there, there are gay bars and even gay parks in many major cities, people know about them, and gay people freely associate with each other and the rest of society. According to the person I spoke with, the uncrossable red line for the Russians is proselytizing LGBTQ+ ideology to children. They see where tolerance and legalizing certain behaviors between adults has taken the West, they don't want to go there, so they're fine with having only unofficial tolerance. I don't know if this person's perceptions were accurate, and so, if anyone has credible evidence of something different I sincerely would like to hear it.

Expand full comment
Peter GL's avatar

PROSELYTIZING: very powerful word, much like "grooming" which we seem to encourage here

Expand full comment
Cornwall Marc's avatar

Hi Growler, I'm not much help I'm afraid, Just impressions from various documentaries and News clips. I recently saw one where an attempt at a Pride match was brutally crushed. And as for the clubs etc; the authorities know where everyone is when they want them...

Expand full comment
FourWinds's avatar

Me too, I want to know this as well.

Expand full comment
Grandma Bear's avatar

How bad is that repression, really? I honestly don't know. I just know that some years ago, when we were hearing terrible things about how gays were being treated in Russia, a very gay friend mentioned that his friend (also gay and whom I had met briefly) who had immigrated from Russia had decided to return to Russia because he was having trouble adjusting to the US's culture. I expressed concern for him based on what I had heard but my friend basically dismissed it as propaganda. I'm sure gay people in Russia don't have a pride month, but are they actually persecuted and oppressed to the degree we hear?

Expand full comment
Credenda's avatar

No, they are not persecuted unless there is any attempt at proselytizing others and especially children. Putin said something to the effect that “we do not go into the bedroom in this country”. A pride parade is certainly proselytizing. It brings to mind the history of Great Britain during much of the 20th century. There, it was practiced discretely. There were homosexual couples in most villages and they were not discriminated against but tolerated. It was closeted but accepted to a degree. No one raised an objection to them serving as teachers or headmasters but then, there wasn’t the out and proud recruitment phenomenon we see today. They were just ordinary people, considered quirky but they were a part of the community. But they wanted more and here we are.

Expand full comment
Cornwall Marc's avatar

Credenda, Your bucolic description of days of yore in the UK is very different to my understanding.

Whilst lesbians were often tolerated (after all, there were far more women than men post-war) and were not illegal

(Queen Victoria didn't believe they existed), it was very different for men.

Look up the life of Alan Turin for starters. He's the guy who broke the Nazi code and helped end the war. For his troubles he was incarcerated and chemically castrated, I think electrocuted as well. He committed suicide, as many did.

Gay men were persecuted, hunted down by the police, beaten up and murdered, blackmailed and they lived in terror of being found out. And the law wasn't changed to make homosexuality legal until 1967. Happy days.

Expand full comment
David A's avatar

Marc, whom I have debated with on this quite a bit, is quite correct here.

Expand full comment
Willing Spirit's avatar

Gays and lesbians are not normal.

Expand full comment
Cornwall Marc's avatar

Sorry, but I think they would disagree: they are normal to themselves and many people would agree, including me.

Expand full comment
Willing Spirit's avatar

Sorry, but God is the final arbiter. He will judge in the end.

Expand full comment
Cornwall Marc's avatar

Well that's okay then. All sins forgiven - for Christians! (That's Why Jesus died on the cross).

It's pretty cruel to deny people the chance of happiness in this life - through no fault of their own. We're all sinners it's just that some are more visible than others...

Expand full comment
David A's avatar

It is not a question of "normal". It is a question of long term happiness. And the answer to that is far longer then a blog comment can say.

Expand full comment
Willing Spirit's avatar

Eternity is as long term as it gets. At age 72, I have to agree with Bill Clinton (😖), who supposedly said, “It doesn’t take long to live a life.” Then comes forever with or without God.

Expand full comment
Cornwall Marc's avatar

You are right and right. But many gays do find acceptance, love and happiness within their tribe, although some do not and enter a destructive lifestyle and behaviours.

But not everyone is the same, just like straights. Ultimately it is not a choice whether to be gay or not, and why would most choose it; it's not an easy life for many.

As for long-term happiness, I think that is as equally mercurial for all of us.

Expand full comment
Patricia Woodard's avatar

All reasons to go with God's plan.

Expand full comment
daiva's avatar

[On the first count] Where's our Ben 2N's when we need him most‽ 🙃

Expand full comment
FourWinds's avatar

That thought crossed my mind but didn't want to stir a hornet's nest as a I have a literal hornet's nest by my house I'm trying to get rid of.

Expand full comment
daiva's avatar

One nest at a time, very understandable sound tactics 🙂

Good luck in persuading 'em the grass is greener yonder!

Expand full comment
Sharon's avatar

I have one as well, getting ready to spray it today!

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

Thinking the same but thought I might rock the boat.

Expand full comment
daiva's avatar

Some boats need rockin' 😁 Much more than others 😉

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

Agreed.

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

Really? You guys are gluttons for punishment.

Expand full comment
FourWinds's avatar

No one here has said the word for the country that begins with U yet.... maybe?

Expand full comment
daiva's avatar

The one that rhymes with grain mayhaps? Runners-up would include UK and USA. Uganda Uruguay Uzbekistan lag pitifully behind, with UAE comfortably somewhere in the middle 🤸

PS Fun factoid: Uzbekistan is one of only two doubly landlocked countries, the other being Liechtenstein 🙂

Expand full comment
sean anderson's avatar

More like rhymes with “your pain!”

Expand full comment
daiva's avatar

Paint me in on this one.

Expand full comment
Cornwall Marc's avatar

I have actually had good 'chats' with BenN recently. We had a really good time. Come on BenN - where are you?

Expand full comment
devoalan's avatar

I got thinking,there is a whole bunch of "not hate" here for Russia. Maybe it's too much for him. Nah.

Expand full comment
daiva's avatar

Hate is one of those easily weaponized concepts rendered nebulous by wokeists, along with assorted -isms & -phobias 🤷

Expand full comment
devoalan's avatar

I didn't want to come out and say love for Russia, so not hate was my go to. 1984ish.

Expand full comment
daiva's avatar

'Tis quite a challenge to navigate post-modern(ish) linguistic labyrinths erected in Kafkaesque style with a dash of Orwellian finish, innit? 🤭

Expand full comment
Principled Pragmatist's avatar

Who’s Ben 2N?

Expand full comment
sean anderson's avatar

A guy who shills for Ukraine. Maybe really just a troll who likes to stir up a hornets’ nest.

Expand full comment
Elaine H's avatar

Besides what it says on his substack, he has also been a PITA here towards Jeff and others.

Expand full comment
Wheaton's avatar

He will be on later with comments. He’s a fan of Jeff but has opposing russia Ukraine beliefs. he said he works a lot and is busy. Benjamin with 2N

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

Who is not living under a dictatorial regime today? Not us.

Putin must view the American people as naive. The Russian people lived under one of history's most repressive Communist regimes in history for 70 years. And they have NO desire to go back. And what are American's doing? We are allowing Marxism to creep into the entire fabric of our society and we have allowed a Communist regime to take over the USG. And we point to the Russian gov't as "Putin: Bad dictator!"

Really?? When the USSR imploded and the Politburo fled, Russian society descended into complete chaos. There was no food, no services, nothing. The people were crying out for anyone to bring back order to society and they didn't care how it was done. Times were desperate. There were only two organizations still standing that could step into the gap. The remnants of the KGB and the Russian mafia got together to establish a semblance of government and bring order back to Russian society. This is where Putin came from and from the Russian people's point of view, I would say he has done an admirable job. Shops are booming and the people are prosperous as they never were under the yoke of the USSR.

And I would add, no thanks to the USG whose only help was to try and push socialist economic policies on the newly formed Russian gov't. Policies which failed miserably. Thanks to our NeoCon USG, the American people missed an opportunity to cultivate a friend and trading partner with which we have much in common. But the Neocons needed to maintain an enemy to fund their perpetual war machine. And now the Neocons have managed to draw us into a kinetic war with an "enemy" who does not threaten us but now feels threatened by us.

Putin has no desire to ever go back to Communism and the Russian people understand that. They've been there, done that. We are about to learn the lessons they have already suffered. And the shills among us who scream Putin wants to re-establish the USSR are liars and warmongers.

Expand full comment
Ellen Komorowski's avatar

I agree with you. As I have said many times, he might be a dictator, but he is a dictator with standards! He has also said that anyone who is guilty of genetically modifying food would be considered a terrorist (or something to that affect!)

Expand full comment
Credenda's avatar

He’s more like a Tzar. He has a lot of power but he can be voted out. He is considered a moderate and he has many hardliners opposed to him in the Duma.

Expand full comment
Brad's avatar

Meanwhile, here in the U.S. we've reached the point where neither surgery nor a diagnosis of gender dysphoria is required for someone to be trans. The entire sex category has been opened to any male who says he’s female. We are erasing the sex-based protections of women. It's an assault on their dignity and autonomy.

https://euphoricrecall.substack.com/p/the-erasure-of-women

Expand full comment
Freebird's avatar

Brad, you’re absolutely right. All that’s required is some makeup and a name change as in Wil to Lia, with all of his male attributes in place, and you’ve transformed yourself into a champion swimmer. What insanity!

Expand full comment
Johnny Be Real's avatar

Ironically “gender identity” is innate and ineffable—a “sexed soul.” This is exactly the opposite of what Jesus said. He said in heaven there is no male or female.

The ability to twist the truth is amazing. A skill that must be honed.

Expand full comment
Daithi's avatar

That is not what Christ said. What He actually said in response to a trick question that was asked by some religious leaders of the day was that in the resurrection there is neither marriage or being given in marriage but the risen believers are like the angels of God in heaven. He was looking ahead to the future life of resurrected believers. I refer you to Matthew 22 v 29 - 33.

Expand full comment
Johnny Be Real's avatar

Thank you. I didn’t intend to quote or mis interpret. I suppose the part about us being like angels in heaven makes me think that male and female are not distinct. It’s always fascinated me that father and son are used as reference for God and Jesus but no mother is mentioned. It’s difficult to understand.

Expand full comment
David A's avatar

There is room for the Divine feminin within the bible as some have studied it. It is a long time since I read about this, yet I think certain language points to the Holy Ghost aspect of the trinity as referencing this.

Expand full comment
Johnny Be Real's avatar

I am content now to let some things rest as a mystery and be OK with it. The Trinity concept is also difficult to understand. Do I need to understand? No. I need to have faith.

Expand full comment
Daithi's avatar

I think it means that there is no procreation in heaven. When some of the angels fell with Satan they seem to have mated with human females. See Genesis 6. Satan's sin was pride. He wanted to be God. At the resurrection we will be raised up in a physical body just as Christ was and we will be recognizable to those who knew us before just as He was to His disciples.

Expand full comment
Johnny Be Real's avatar

Each point can be reasonably argued. Take “changing gender on official identity documents.” Government ID with incorrect sex is falsification no

matter what drugs or surgeries are involved.

If I wear a Bill Clinton Halloween mask and identify as Bill, will the government go along with me?

There must be boundaries.

Expand full comment
FourWinds's avatar

Is that like if I dress up as Hunter Biden so I can get away with anything?

Really, you nailed it.

Expand full comment
Credenda's avatar

If I steal a couple billion like Samuel Banks-Friedman can I continue to live outrageously?

Expand full comment
Peace's avatar

Speaking of SBF - don't hear much about him lately.

Expand full comment
AngelaK's avatar

Good for Russia! 🙏🙏👍👏

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

I agree. 💯

Expand full comment
Austin's avatar

For all his faults, Putin seems to have some redeeming qualities.

Expand full comment
daverkb's avatar

Putin is largely responsible for modern post-Soviet Russia. You can think of it as a consistently MRGA policy which thwarted the Western take-over from within through infiltrating and taking over control of key sectors of the economy, and from without by economic and military warfare. That Russia IS NOT a wreckage of broken up Woke Five Eyes Empire controlled client states is largely the work of Valdimir Putin. This makes Putin one of the greatest figures in Russian history.

Compare prosperous Russia today with Woke partially de-industrailized America which cannot produce enough arms to supply its current client proxy state, and it's night and day comparison. Talk about historical inversion and it takes one's breath away.

Expand full comment
devoalan's avatar

I am lambasted regularly for pointing out how Russia hasn't done bad by earth since Afghanistan, and that's their territory. And how many countries has the us "saved"? Russia has mostly kept to itself, and here we are, trying to poke him. That's one reason putin wouldn't mess with Ukraine when PDT was president. He was gonna clean it out of Obeyme's poisoned factories, and nato wouldn't have touched it if he was still in. I'm thinking if trump had four years more he was elected to,we'd have seen the end of nato, possibly the end of the UN. That would be a joyous day.

Expand full comment
Credenda's avatar

💯

Expand full comment
Maureen ODH's avatar

🙌🎯🎯🎯🎯👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

Expand full comment
Freebird's avatar

I believe Putin is a ruthless man, capable of who knows what sort of evil. But he is the leader of Russia and intends to remain so, therefore he does what is necessary to keep Russia strong. All of this sexual confusion weakens a country at it’s core, and especially among the ranks of the military where REAL men are crucial, not some buffed YMCA pretender, or trannie. If our military was seriously about the defense of the nation, none of that nonsense would have ever been allowed.

Expand full comment
Lew's avatar

bans gender-change surgeries -- before activists this was "sex-change"

- prohibits changing gender on official identity documents -- before activists this was "changing sex"

- prohibits transgenders from adopting children. -- before activists this was "transsexuals"

Even Russia has been swayed into using activist terms.

I wonder why the bisexuals haven't been converted to "bi-genders".

And don't forget that "gay" was co-opted to mean "homosexual".

Expand full comment
Gabriele Fernhout Schwimmer's avatar

How do you know that Russia has been swayed into using activist terms? Have you seen these points in their original language? It is much more likely that this is a deliberate activist version by the translater. Unfortunately, I have witnesse this too many times.

Expand full comment
Renie's avatar

I read a few of these comments to my husband and he said, "Putin is the smartest leader on the planet. He's a strategic thinker and he knows what's going on."

Expand full comment
Steph D's avatar

Not that I think we should be giving props to the communist/ authoritarian regimes in China, North Korea, Middle Eastern countries, like Russia.

A commonality is that they all have disdain for the alphabet ideology and behavior. My husband has a good friend who is a native of China, who said that he knew people who flirted with those behaviors and then suddenly and unexpectedly got disappeared.

They don’t degrade their cultures in that respect.

We are a laughing stock to those nations I’m sure.

Expand full comment
Janice P - Words Beyond Me's avatar

“‘Ah Lord God! Behold, You have made the heavens and the earth by Your great power and by Your outstretched arm! Nothing is too difficult for You, who shows lovingkindness to thousands, but repays the iniquity of fathers into the bosom of their children after them, O great and mighty God. The Lord of hosts is His name; great in counsel and mighty in deed, whose eyes are open to all the ways of the sons of men, giving to everyone according to his ways and according to the fruit of his deeds[.]’”

— Jeremiah 32:17-19 NASB1995

Expand full comment
daiva's avatar

🗨 For the eyes of the Lord are on the righteous, and his ears are open to their prayer. But the face of the Lord is against those who do evil. ~~1 Peter 3:12

Expand full comment
Willing Spirit's avatar

Yes, Lord! Let us see that you are angry with the wicked every day! Psalm 7:11

We need that encouragement.

Expand full comment
Corkey's avatar

I have noticed that despite the increase in depravity and the greater efforts to lie and censor, everything is still being covered and made available for all to see. There is also a greater effort to justify the depravity and that is failing too. Just an observation and wondering if you also see it Janice.

Expand full comment
Temcol's avatar

As long as the Church is on earth, there will be pushback against all things evil. Imagine what it will be like when the Church is gone. There will be depravity like we have never seen before and 0 accountability and harnessing of evil actions. Mayhem is the best word I can come up with. Praise God for containing it to the degree he is for now. We still can have hope that things will improve.

Expand full comment
JimB's avatar

2 Thessalonians 2: 5 ¶ Don’t you remember that when I was still with you I used to tell you about this?

6 And you know what currently restrains him, so that he will be revealed in his time.

7 For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work, but the one now restraining will do so until he is out of the way,

8 and then the lawless one will be revealed. The Lord Jesus will destroy him with the breath of his mouth and will bring him to nothing at the appearance of his coming.

9 The coming of the lawless one is based on Satan’s working, with all kinds of false miracles, signs, and wonders,

10 and with every wicked deception among those who are perishing. They perish because they did not accept the love of the truth and so be saved.

Expand full comment
Kay L Martin's avatar

There's no FIX...THE LORD IS the TRUE Christian Believers (Rapture). Judgment is on its way. NO ONE is avoiding Eternal Judgment. Only One Man hung on The Cross taking upon Himself the sin of the World...yours and mine. TIME is running out. Judgment begins with The Church.

Expand full comment
Corkey's avatar

God can indeed hold it back as long as it pleases him to achieve His purpose while protecting whomever he so desires. I pray every day that He continues to protect us because without that we are all physically and spiritually doomed. The world seems to be in a stage of total madness and increasingly so on a daily basis.

Expand full comment
Janet's avatar

He will need many to minister and offer succor to the afflicted, truth to the deceived, healing to the hurt and the love of Jesus Christ to all. Of course He is protecting and preparing many of his children to be these ministers. To pull others out of the madness and ruins. There is a plan. Perhaps substack is part of His plan. Stay open and strong. ❤️

Expand full comment
Kay L Martin's avatar

8, Corkey: Biblically HE's given us warnings for 5k years...and Prophets that are being ignored even today. Revelation is Father God's FINAL Word. HE is Patient and Kind to us each who bow out knees/OBEY. Our Nation was a HUGE Gift to THOSE who were being run out of nations turned to idols. America is running out of time as our ancestorial lands are. HE loves and died for ALL who believe, repent and Follow HIM.

Expand full comment
Kay L Martin's avatar

TRUE. Sooo many Christians believe (unBiblically) America will come out of the present (hell). Even The original True Christian Believers (Peter was one) Jesus Christ wouldn't need to die on The Cross. The Apostle John was the ONLY one that lived until very aged... suffering even too.. *All knowing church leaders are wrong. Will we avoid The Cross? No!.. Take up our CROSS and follow Him.

Expand full comment
CaplT's avatar

Everyone should daily pray that

“all deeds done or planned in darkness be brought to the Light for His justice and mercy to prevail.”

We should not be discouraged when evil upon evil is exposed, because we are helping spiritually to expose evil.

We should be encouraged. It has been festering a long time and needs to be excised and cauterized.

We should also be acting practically. Donate, spread the word, show up.

Expand full comment
daverkb's avatar

It is easier to hide little crimes than big ones. And once government becomes a franchise to stealing, it's rather hard to not to notice.

Expand full comment
Corkey's avatar

The message I am getting is for the connected, The Rules Are Now, There Are No Rules.

Expand full comment
daverkb's avatar

Currently it is indeed a case that The Rule Is There Are No Rules. And yet those inside The Beltway carry as though US power can go on forever ... even in a state in utter chaos, and with the state divided against itself. Furthermore, 'they' the wanna be rulers just make up the most ridiculously atrocious of unbelievable stories. Meanwhile the world at large and presumably the apex Western money elite (central bankers, central banker controlled Wall Street/City of London) see the West unravelling. Reality has set in, and it appears there is now a pivot away from Woke ... and also, 'they' will have to deal with a failed fiat currency banking establishment.

The crises is so large that it makes it difficult to project out in time. Immediately, I wonder what kind of crises is in the wings as to monetary restructure? And what comes next after a Ukraine settlement? It looks like a complex multifaceted plan is being rolled out.

The Biden stuff just coming out after years of the FBI sitting on it. Really? By accident? Ahead of the primaries? And Biden unwilling to debate? Well then ... I have to ask, what kind of set-up is this? It is starting to get interesting.

And by the way, Blackrock just abandoned ESG? Yes, interesting!

Expand full comment
Janet's avatar

Vanguard didn’t go along either I read. That whole thing will collapse eventually.

Expand full comment
daverkb's avatar

I keep seeing signs of a big reversal of Woke Crazy Marxism. Dropping ESG is just another such sign. I assume that this is a top down pivot decision from the very top (wherever that is). And I am assuming that some very high apex people are in a panic. They see things going down the drain, and they are losing control of the masses. The move to BRICS and countries just plain out ignoring the Americans is too in their face center stage to be discounted, lightly written off. Whoever is the power behind the curtain has to do something and fast. I am just watching this situation developing and seeing where it goes. Who knows?

Expand full comment
John Pullen's avatar

Jeff, can you tell me why state (presumably red states) AGs have not filed charges against the Biden Crime Family under state RICO laws in conjunction with state UCC statutes? After all, the BCF has unjustly enriched itself to the detriment and at the expense of citizens of every state.

Expand full comment
Charlotte's avatar

Well, I guess that explains why they are trying to get rid of that fabulous Texas AG Ken Paxton, he would completely file a RICO case. But Abbott is not surprisingly, silent, and that indicates loud and clear that the RNC and McConnell are still protecting the Biden- they will only expose so much. This is officially a DNC/Obama purge operation of the Biden from the running in2024, so they can insert Newsom/Susan Rice and they are going to let the DNC lead.

Expand full comment
Julie Ann B's avatar

Our AG Andrew Bailey (in the state of MO.) is going after Biden and this is his first year as AG. Put pressure on your AG’s!

Expand full comment
Willing Spirit's avatar

Yay! First I’m hearing of this. My advice to new politicians; never attend a party. Never accept food or drink that doesn’t come from your own home.

Expand full comment
Julie Ann B's avatar

Excellent advice.

Expand full comment
Julie Ann B's avatar

Do you live in MO.?

Expand full comment
Willing Spirit's avatar

No. Native Floridian.

Expand full comment
Julie Ann B's avatar

👍The sunshine state!

Expand full comment
Temcol's avatar

Dear God, a Newsom/Rice ticket would finish off our country. They will be partying up at the French Laundry when the first nuke hits the US. The People will be living in someone else’s home, living off Government electronic funds with restricted water and electricity use and cooking on their electric stove, unable to charge their car to go anywhere like work. We will have to share/live with illegals, drug addicts, and the mentally ill. Sounds like the Nirvana Newsom and his cronies are aiming for.

Expand full comment
MaryAnn's avatar

Your comment brings to mind the scene from Dr. Zhivago, (yes, I am that old) when he comes home from work to find his house occupied.

Expand full comment
Susan Stephens's avatar

That scene in Zhivago is burned in my memory. Seems I also recall a woman coming out of his home w/ a beautiful silver candelabra, & says to him in passing “everything belongs to the people.”

(or “to us”). Chilling...

Expand full comment
Susan Clack's avatar

I saw that movie when I was a kid...I’m 63. Saw it again on the “telly”!a few years back and when that scene came along, I went “BING!” HELLLLLOOOO! Welcome to the Dhimmicrat Party!!! Thanks for bringing this up!!

Expand full comment
Sherry 1's avatar

You just described mayhem. Let’s stop Newsom in his tracks but as for Susan Rice she is probably the one running the Country with an assist from Obama. Vote them out.

Expand full comment
Bitesandpieces's avatar

And if you include food scarcity in that ugly scenario, you’ll have the makings of Soylent Green II.

Expand full comment
WP William's avatar

Hey, that is HOMOPHOBIA to Not include Jerod Polis by adding Rice instead!

Clean-Hands Jer is ready to ColoFornize/CaliForadoize the Nation

Expand full comment
Karen's avatar

Yes! That's the first thing I thought of when I read the comment about "red state AGs". Shame on our Texas rinos for going along with this. Texas is not as red as people think.

Expand full comment
Willing Spirit's avatar

I get that. The state where police officers stood idle while school children were shot dead.

Not very red.

Expand full comment
Reasonable Horses's avatar

Point taken, but that disaster wasn’t exactly a city-sanctioned antifa riot, and neither political party has a copyright on incompetence and cowardice.

Expand full comment
Fla Mom's avatar

Nor is Florida. I'm waiting to see who our next Governor is (and praying it's not former Senate President and current Ag Commissioner Wilton Simpson). Things could go off-the-track here, compared to Gov. DeSantis, very quickly.

Expand full comment
none none's avatar

They (s)elected a demoncrat mayor in Jacksonville, where it's mostly conservative. Wonder how long it'll take her to destroy the area.

Expand full comment
Willing Spirit's avatar

With the Republican candidate being endorsed by the not very well liked DeSantis.

The Republican was an obvious squish, selected by the powerful but very corrupt establishment and the people said, “We’re done with the ‘you have to hold your nose and vote for who we give you’ game.”

Expand full comment
Fla Mom's avatar

It's this involvement of the Republican Swamp, with their PAC shell game, in primary elections that makes people so angry that they'll choose to sit an election out or something rather than vote for such people.

Expand full comment
Tonya McKinney's avatar

I don’t get it! I love everything DeSantis has done!

Expand full comment
Susan Stephens's avatar

I hope they are planning on such as a Newsom/Rice ticket as opposed to Michelle O & whomever. Some are speculating that move. Since it seems reasonable to assume O himself & Rice are running the WH puppet show, how seamless to insert their own for 2024.

Expand full comment
Charlotte's avatar

I think they like Susan Rice because she is like a Valerie Jarrett- a virtual extension to Obama himself. Don’t forget her role in the FISA wiretap cases on the Trump administration, she was instrumental, and even wrote herself a get out of jail free email on her last day of work in the Obama Administration. If Michelle O runs, I have a sneaking suspicion they wont be able to stop the innumerable crotch photo shots that people will take and the theories will run amok ;)

Expand full comment
devoalan's avatar

Jarrett is running this show, from her room at the mansion. What couple of sick fucks.

Expand full comment
Maggie Think of Me's avatar

And there you go again... Please consider using strong, acceptable words rather than resorting to profanity. I'm not perfect and I'm not a prude. But, I despise having filthy language pushed as normal conversational words...

Expand full comment
WP William's avatar

Fking right, i'm trying to clean up my disparaging curse words for these traitors as well.

Expand full comment
Maggie Think of Me's avatar

Appreciate the minimal effort... Do better...😉

Expand full comment
Susan Stephens's avatar

I’m with you; liberals seem to use such words bc they can’t make a valid argument.

Conservatives can make our cases without resorting to profanity.

I well up in fury at what these leftists say & do; it’s enough to curse....

Expand full comment
Tonya McKinney's avatar

I think maybe they will insert Michelle Obama.

Expand full comment
Willing Spirit's avatar

That is a very valid question. I remember some hopeful talk about that some months ago. Then nothing came of it.

Like the question; why did no Republican senator call for a senate recess during the Trump administration so that he could go around McConnell’s blocks of his cabinet picks?

Are they all compromised? Every single one of them?

Expand full comment
devoalan's avatar

Almost all the "Republican" senators are rinos, and obviously all the democrats are communists. Almost all the reps in congress are rinos, with the exception of about ten. And all the democrats are communists. It's easy.

Expand full comment
FourWinds's avatar

Yes, these doctors that cut off kid's parts need to go through the same thing with the drugs and hormones, too, then tell us how (non) reversible it is.

"It was just becoming this caricature of a woman..." Wow, that kid nailed it. That's all these people are - caricatures of the opposite sex. No matter how much they cut off or cut out, no matter how many hormones, no matter how they look, or no matter how much they whine, cry, protest and demand we "accept them", they will NEVER be the opposite sex. Ever.

I'd love to see the Bud Light nonsense continue to hurt the company. I feel bad for the employees, of course, but not the rich ones running the joint. And good news that Disney is hurting. They deserve it.

Expand full comment
ViaVeritasVita's avatar

Possibly the AB employees can search for other jobs--I see 'Help wanted' 'We're hiring' signs all around.

Expand full comment
Butterfly2510's avatar

I’ve always thought as it relates to mammograms that men Drs should get to have this procedure done on their testicles. Maybe that’s the only way new technology will be developed that’s not painful or humiliating and without lots of false positives.

Expand full comment
Karen Bandy's avatar

Yes, why isn’t Thermography widely available?

Expand full comment
Ellen Komorowski's avatar

Because insurance companies are not paying for anything that isn't mainstream medicine. They are pushing mammograms as the gold standard which is much more unhealthy for you. Go figure!

Expand full comment
FH's avatar

I think insurers probably greatly influence what is considered mainstream medicine (another MSM!) both by using actuaries to determine risk - since insurers are publicly traded they must pursue profit; and some insurers have teams of physicians and graduate-degreed nurses to evaluate “evidence-based medical care”.

As for mammograms: never again!

Documentary (where to watch is limited) https://www.imdb.com/title/tt13223020/

Interview with documentarian (this was what convinced me): https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/full-measure-after-hours/id1463725769?i=1000527542937

Expand full comment
Karen Bandy's avatar

Yep

Expand full comment
CaliforniaLost's avatar

When management decides that the workers at the factory and the delivery guys can be tossed aside for a woke agenda, they are showing that not only should the be fired for failing in their fiduciary responsibilities, but shunned for being devoid of a moral compass.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Agree, well said!

Expand full comment
Jpeach's avatar

Jamie Foxx is a key influencer. He could have blown the lid off the mRNA vaccine “ safe and effective” narrative. He could have saved 100’s of millions of people globally, from going thru his “hell and back” experience. But, Jamie, with a little help from the Vax Cabal, posted his entertaining cover up video.

Expand full comment
Based Florida Man's avatar

Look at what they're doing to a big name like Robert Kennedy Jr. Cancelling, censoring, deplatforming, and badgering him with the lowest slurs. So anyone who goes against The Narrative will have to be ready to run the gauntlet.

It's a shame, although understandable, that Foxx won't make a stand.

Expand full comment
WP William's avatar

RFK Jr. is worse in their eyes than Trump (a lifelong Dem. who also bucked them... NOT a fiscal conservative, nor Religious Right Republican at all). RFK Jr. could be a quirky kook and a (not dead) Kennedy as long as he was their Kook and kept out of the way their big narrative shift. Lefties were ALWAYS the Anti-Pharma, Anti-Vaxxers before the CoVid Bioweapon was unleased; with some shifting previously to a Pro-Big Pharma push under Hillary Care and Obombya Care and the previous BioWeapon releases performed pre-2019. Isn't Private-Public Partnership work so rewarding and welcoming?

Expand full comment
JimB's avatar

What is baffling to me is how all the ‘antiestablishment’ 60’s hippie types are all in with the PIC= Pharmaceutical Industrial Complex. Remember the phrase ‘big pharma’ was a commonly used phrase you rarely hear anymore even among the cannabis devotees.

Expand full comment
PermieGeek's avatar

I’m Gen X from left and I am as baffled as you. Lots of people I knew who should have known better totally fell for this nonsense. I think it may be Trump derangement syndrome. Things I loved the most about the left like farmers markets, plant nurseries etc were some of most authoritarian about Covid nonsense. I spent a lot of time trying to figure it out. Best I came to is using little red riding hood as an analogy. Seems like majority of left can’t tell difference between grandma and a wolf dressed in grandma’s clothes. Very depressing. Glad to see right stepping up and fighting for things left used to- like FBI corruption etc

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

I am not baffled by it. The fact that they changed so easily means it was always fake, posturing, part of a persona, and not actually based on deeply held principles. If people change like that, it’s because they only “believed” those things to go along with the crowd, to fit in, and not because of their real values .

Expand full comment
WP William's avatar

yes and here in Color-High-O they want organic soymilk and non GMO small batch whiskey at every convenience store and every day of the week; but they sure love their GMO-TURBO-BIOengineered-THC products that take them to a new and Higher High. And now the "studies" trickle in about long term problems blah blah now chronic stoners will need care for the damage done to them, the product makers will be blamed for making product too appealing (addictive) and then the publicized payout for damages which just launders part of the $ Cycle (insurance money figured into the deal from the beginning) back to lawyers, politicians, programs, victims, and more progressivism.

Expand full comment
randall stoehr's avatar

His role in life as a CELEBRITY will never be tarnished by the anti-vaxx people.

Expand full comment
T Diesel's avatar

The critics of RFK JR should just “Chappa-quit-it!”

Expand full comment
Austin's avatar

Ya think Mr. Foxx will refuse the next mandated v@x? 😒

Expand full comment
Based Florida Man's avatar

The next time they start forcing Jabs again, it's going to be quite interesting.

Expand full comment
Niki Stone's avatar

Id like to think they learned their lesson but something tells me they haven't. They will have to kill me if they think I will take any of their medicine not just the vaccines.

Expand full comment
Heather LibertyCricket's avatar

he will pay for a fake card/computer entry next time.

Expand full comment
FourWinds's avatar

Sad, sad, sad. I am waiting for one of these 'famous' people to grow a set and say yep, the vax messed me up.

Expand full comment
Big E's avatar

One celebrity who has stood up for the truth after vax injury is Jessica Sutta of The Pussycat Dolls. See her interview on The Highwire at https://thehighwire.com/ark-videos/jessica-sutta-a-voice-for-the-voiceless/

Expand full comment
Freebird's avatar

A few celebrities have done so. Eric Clapton came out early and stated that he was injured by the jab. He was excoriated by his fellow celebrities and everyone else of course. I remember that he was the first person that I’d heard refer to it as a jab.

Expand full comment
FourWinds's avatar

Of course. I forgot about him, thank you. He also said he believed subliminals were being used to influence the masses during the scamdemic. I agree with him.

Expand full comment
CaplT's avatar

I first heard “jab” by an Aussie vlogger outing mandates generally about 2 years ago.

It caught on here when people realized that is not a vacc and also to avoid search algorithms tracking searchers.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

And censorship on social media.

Expand full comment
Austin's avatar

How about Eric Clapton? Even his family excoriated him for speaking out!

Expand full comment
FourWinds's avatar

Yep, I forgot about him... thanks for the reminder. Lots of respect for him.

Expand full comment
JSR's avatar

They sold their souls to be famous, they aren’t allowed to tell the truth..

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

If a celebrity or their family can't speak the truth after what happened then I wash my hands of them. I don't care anymore and I won't waste my time on them or their falsehood. I can only recommend them to Our Lord.

Expand full comment
Johnny Be Real's avatar

Yes. Have to assume a near death experience takes priority. Hopefully these famous people recover and investigate the cause of their sicknesses. At this point we can’t assume the health issues will not return or never completely stop once they’ve started.

Expand full comment
Horizons's avatar

Yes, I know someone who had a heart attack after the shots. After they semi-recovered, the first turbo cancer kicked in. Then as that was being treated a second turbo cancer showed up. The second cancer seems in remisssion but they had to give up treating the first. Nothing was working; staying on chemo until the chemo kills you isn’t much of an option. Still alive but ZERO quality of life. My prayer list continues to grow….

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

😞

Expand full comment
ConcernedGrammy's avatar

Maybe, he's AI. You cannot believe what you see anymore.

Expand full comment
Formerly_Known_As_Someone's avatar

There is a photo of him with Dr. McCullough from before the vaxxident.

Expand full comment
Sunlover's avatar

Those were my thoughts as well. He actually said nothing and he doesn’t look well. He made fun of one “conspiracy theory”, but never mentioned anything about the other giant elephant in the room. I wish him health but will not be supporting any more of his movies.

Expand full comment
WP William's avatar

He Knows who his Massa is. We all know.

Expand full comment
Bostonian91's avatar

Great opening remarks by Bobby. Those shills at the Congressional hearing, especially the whacky psychotic looking Wasserman, are coward arrogant despicable shills. Let’s speak with our money and take Disney and all other woke companies out of business.

Expand full comment
nt's avatar

I so agree ! Unfortunately I know a pastor and worship leader who went to Disneyland with their families… I just don’t understand it .

Expand full comment
Maggie Think of Me's avatar

We have the same.... their photo on FB and Insta have the entire family dressed in disney regalia in front of the magic kingdom... Speaks volumes.

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

Coffee clutch churches.

Expand full comment
PamelaZelie's avatar

We call them Cafeteria Catholics.

Expand full comment
John Pullen's avatar

CINO: Catholics In Name Only!

Expand full comment
WP William's avatar

Above Reproach conformists who honor Caesar at the expense of honoring God. Loveable Lord Lovers who Live Laugh, Learn, Lie, Lounge, Linger, and Languish for the Lord and change the solid term Baptist to something like "Valley Life"--what the heck? like Valley (of the Shadow of Death)??? why not Greener Pastures Church to bring church-hoppers in by the droves (like famished locusts), at least for a short time. Look around at just the name changing churches it's more Laughable than Loving

Expand full comment
Maggie Think of Me's avatar

Not quite...the congregants are catching on... It is terribly hard to dispel the Disney conglomerate cartel.... But, those of us who are more than aware, do indeed question their blindness

Expand full comment
PermieGeek's avatar

I quit Disney many years ago. I really hated the afterschool content targeting pre teen girls grooming them to be mean girls, superficial, and horrible to boys.

Expand full comment
Ellen Komorowski's avatar

I saw that Chris Tomlin (Christian singer) and his family went to Disney. I was so saddened by that!

Expand full comment
ConcernedGrammy's avatar

For the people who watch The Chosen: I got an email from Dallas Jenkins, going on about the CW picking up The Chosen on Sunday nights. In this letter, he asked people to write or call the big advertisers who "support" the show to "thank them". One this list of huge corporate conglomerates and big pharma companies...there it was -> DISNEY+. WHAAATTT?!? Dallas wants people to thank a company that has moved to normalize pedophilia and "queerness" in society through the children?? Does Dallas not KNOW, or is he more concerned about putting money into his pocket? After the Pride flag thing in June, I'm having a real difficult time continuing to supporting the show. Anyone else get this email? I can copy/paste the body of the email if need be.

Expand full comment
Lincoln's avatar

I don’t know about Dallas Jenkins’ ties to Disney, but I do firmly believe in the truth and beauty of The Chosen. That series has probably opened the spiritual eyes and hearts of more people than any thing in years past. It is a beautiful portrayal of our blessed Jesus, and I will continue to financially support it. The devil tries to turn us against all good things. I pray we Christians don’t throw out the baby with the bath water.

Expand full comment
Heather LibertyCricket's avatar

This show is reaching the masses in ways the church is not. Disney may have a lot of bad, but making the Chosen available through that venue for the masses of kids who NEED to watch it can only be a good thing, no? The kids are watching Disney anyway. They stumble on this show and decide to watch when they otherwise would not have seen it. They were going to see the awful commercials anyway. Now, if having this on Disney plush only makes it so it is no longer available on other platforms, then I disagree wholeheartedly with this decision.

Expand full comment
ConcernedGrammy's avatar

The Chosen is playing on Sunday nights on The CW, but Dallas wants us to personally thank these companies for choosing to advertise during the show.

Here’s that list of companies:

Airbnb

Arby's

Biohaven

Boehringer Ingelheim

Boost Mobile

Church & Dwight

Colgate Palmolive

Credit Karma

Disney+

Domino's Pizza

Fresh Pet

General Mills Corp.

Glaxo Smith Kline

Johnson And Johnson

Kimberly Clark

Kohls

Liberty Mutual Insurance

Luxottica

P&G - Carat

P&G - Omd

Panera Bread

Progressive Insurance

Sc Johnson

Sephora

Skechers

Taco Bell

Unilever

Walgreens

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

Yes! Go woke go broke!

Expand full comment
Lincoln's avatar

I don’t know about Dallas Jenkins’ ties to Disney, but I do firmly believe in the truth and beauty of The Chosen. That series has probably opened the spiritual eyes and hearts of more people than any thing in years past. It is a beautiful portrayal of our blessed Jesus, and I will continue to financially support it. The devil tries to turn us against all good things. I pray we Christians don’t throw out the baby with the bath water.

Expand full comment
Kim's avatar

“the Biden Bribery case seems to be more like Schroedinger’s Cat than Zlochevsky’s dog, because corporate media seems to think it only exists if someone becomes aware of it.”

Excellent. 🏆

Expand full comment
Johnny Be Real's avatar

Forget about morals and law. Just don’t get caught. There is no right and wrong to them.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Or if you are caught, make sure you control the system so you never get prosecuted 😑

Expand full comment
Big E's avatar

It doesn’t even matter if they get caught! If they are on the right side of the “spectrum,” they get away with it.

Expand full comment
Peter GL's avatar

You mean the "LEFT" side of the spectrum

Expand full comment
Peter GL's avatar

actually I think to them whatever they do is right, whatever the "deplorables" do is wrong.

Expand full comment
Tonya McKinney's avatar

Agree!!

Expand full comment
Unsteady's avatar

Things are so bad that Joe Biden could admit taking a five million dollar bribe and not paying tax on it and the mass media wouldn’t even run the story - it’s hard to understand what happened, unless it’s all just about TDS.

Expand full comment
Fre'd Bennett, MAHA's avatar

It's because our Intel has purchased the major media lock, stock and barrel. The newspapers and other news media is careful not to offend their spook masters.

Pravda had nothing on our current "mainstream" media.

Expand full comment
AnnR's avatar

"Playing the suicide card". It's a horrible ruse for adults to teach (groom) children to do that - first of all because it's fake, it really undermines legitimate teen depression and suicidal tendencies. Second, I have never understood how a parent would fall for that ruse - so many kids act sad or depressed if they don't get their way on something that they "I'll absolutely DIE if I don't get that" kind of thing, like I don't know, going to a friend's house when the parents aren't home but ALL THE KIDS ARE GOING TO BE THERE!!!, or maybe, "if I can't get that car, I'm just going to die", or ANY number of "must haves or I'm going to die" teen angst. All a parent has to do is say "when you are 18 years old and living independently from me, you can decide to do whatever you want, there will be plenty of time for you to live with your decision".

Expand full comment
Sunnydaze's avatar

They started grooming our kids in grade school a decade ago of how to be played against their parents. call DHS! Call CPS! My friend has a son who tried that. They got investigated up the wazzoo for NOTHING! And the investigation led them to be patted on the back for good parenting!! Go figure! Where did their son Learn this? The education system. 🤮

And this wasn’t trans related. Just a pissed off young man who couldn’t do whatever he wanted, whenever he wanted.

Expand full comment
Emumundo's avatar

One of my kids threatened to call DCF on me when they were a preteen. I said- Go ahead, here’s what will happen. They will take you out of your home while they investigate the accusation. You will be put into another temporary home. And if you think those people are going to put up with the s#@t that you give us you’ve got another think coming. Never heard another peep about calling DCF.

Expand full comment
space's avatar

Same! When my daughter was 10 she threatened to call DCF. I said "OK", and started loading clothes, toothbrush, etc., into a suitcase. When she asked what I was doing, I informed her that DCF was going to remove her from our home and place her somewhere. Her voice quavered as she asked "Where?" I said "Who knows? It could be better than you think you have it here, or it could be worse. Coin toss!" I picked up the phone pretending to be ready to dial DCF's number and she burst into tears, begging me not to. I'm sure some parents would think I psychologically traumatized her, but we never had that problem ever again.

Expand full comment
Katrina the Hurricane's avatar

I remember telling my mom, when I was mad at her about something that I can’t even remember now, that I was going to run away, she too asked if she could help me pack my suitcase. 😂 I straightened up pretty fast.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

I actually talked myself out of it once. I guess I am too much of a “thinker” and planner. I started considering where I would go, where I would sleep, how I’d get food, then thought about how upset and worried my parents would be and promptly abandoned the idea 😆

Expand full comment
space's avatar

I bet!

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Tough love!! 😁 They have to know and understand the consequences! Good for you!

Expand full comment
AnnR's avatar

These kids should see some of the horror shows of foster homes. There are many wonderful foster parents and then there are just as many who do it only for the money and they live in horrible conditions.

Expand full comment
Sunnydaze's avatar

💪🏻 💪🏻 Parents need to take back their kids! Good job.

Expand full comment
Dee's avatar

Over a decade ago. In the ‘90s, my stepson, throwing a hissy fit because he was told No, threatened to call DYFS, as it was called in that time and place. My husband handed him the phone and said, Go ahead. Called the kid’s bluff.

Expand full comment
Sunnydaze's avatar

Nice! 💪🏻 Parental authority.

Expand full comment
Bitesandpieces's avatar

That was a brave move on your husband’s part. Kudos to him. He was definitely in charge in that house and I’m sure his son got the message. BTW, I like your name Icon. Fear DOES sell.

Expand full comment
Cornwall Marc's avatar

Same thing happened to me for absolutely no reason when anorexia came to our door via the internet and a school friend.

Trouble is, social workers are damned if they do and damned if they don't investigate... And the kids know all the tricks!!

Expand full comment
Austin's avatar

I knew someone whose kid "claimed" suicidal thoughts. CPS got involved. Put the parents through the ringer. Even though it was unfounded, the information remains in the database. The parents now walk on eggshells.

Expand full comment
CarO Lyn's avatar

My 41yo daughter tried a similar tactic when she was a preteen - “I’ll call social services on you”. My answer was to go ahead, but I bet in foster care she wouldn’t get to have any more English riding lessons (that she loved). That shut her down pretty quickly.

Expand full comment
Cyn's avatar

Good for you; I believe they call that “parenting”. A lost art.

Expand full comment
Zelkova's avatar

My 38 year old daughter did the same, that is what they were being taught in school at the time. I explained to her that she'd be taken from our home, put in foster care with strangers, and there was no guarantee that she would be brought back. She never used that threat again.

My ex and I thought we did a good job at countering what our kids were being indoctrinated with at school, but we failed in the end. Our youngest joined the Democratic Socialist party, which is a laugh because she grew up upper-middle class. After she graduated college she began using the threat of suicide. It had me in knots, I imagine my ex felt the same. Until he spoke to our daughter's therapist who assured him that our daughter was using it as a manipulation tactic. The therapist crossed the patient confidentiality rules, I'm sure, but she probably wanted to stop our suffering. Using suicide as a manipulation tool is emotional and psychological torture (and blackmail) for the target(s) of the manipulation.

Expand full comment
space's avatar

Thank goodness for that therapist. That must have helped ease your mind somewhat.

Expand full comment
Zelkova's avatar

Yes, but now I have an underlying fear that she will do it. Scars of abuse take a long time to heal, if they ever do.

Expand full comment
space's avatar

😢

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

There are lots of young people (and older ones) who are drawn to socialism because of guilt at their good fortune or blessing of being in a comfortable socioeconomic class. They somehow feel as if they have to make up for, or even atone for, their status. Aligning with the people who are supposedly going to “make things right” is a way of assuaging their guilt. Also I think there is often (separately or in conjunction with the guilty feelings) a bit of a superiority complex—those poor downtrodden people, they’re too incapable of helping themselves so I must go rescue them.

Expand full comment
Bitesandpieces's avatar

LOL. It was a similar tactic that many of us used in our time as the dictators of our homes.

Expand full comment
Fla Mom's avatar

It is so evil, what those people are doing to those young people.

I asked my father one time if I could get a motorcycle, and he said, "Yes, sure you can." I was amazed! Years before, it was so hard to convince him about the horse, but the motorcycle - instant agreement! Until he said, "All you have to do is move out, get a job, save up, and buy one." Lol. I'm so glad I was raised by my parents.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

😆 love this 😁

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

💯 correct. There are plenty of " parents in name only."

Expand full comment
RJ Rambler's avatar

🙋‍♀️

Expand full comment
ConcernedGrammy's avatar

My daughter attempted suicide at 15. There were no "warning" signs besides she was "not happy" as a lot of teenagers can be with a new school, difficulty making friends, etc. She was also deep into computer "bulletin boards", the precursor to social media. What sent her over the edge (apparenetly) was my ex's cold-hearted reaction to the death of a beloved pet. It changed the entire lives of the whole family and the way I dealt with her for many years. I was scared to death, literally, she'd try again and be successful. The docs just put her on zoloft and other antidepressants, which made her even more unstable. It was the worst times of my life, I can understand how powerful the threat would be.

Expand full comment
AnnR's avatar

How horrible for you and your family. I hope she has found some serenity as she's gotten older? And your comment is part of my point - there is authentic teen depression that must be taken seriously but these games that the trans movement is playing (although it's not a game to them, it's a serious business), undermine that.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Yes and using these threats as a tool to manipulate the parents into going along with the drugs and surgeries is evil!

Expand full comment
Jenn's avatar

Good morning! Glad you are feeling back to almost 100%! Quick question: With all of this information that Grassley has released, when will they start the impeachment process? Or is the committee he sits on for informational purposes only?

Expand full comment
Sunnydaze's avatar

Impeachment does nothing. Prosecution and tried for treason is the real outcome necessary….until then….blah blah blah.

Expand full comment
Jenn's avatar

But there appears to be no one available to begin the prosecution proceedings. So. Weird.

Expand full comment
Credenda's avatar

Uniparty.

Expand full comment
Sunnydaze's avatar

Ya go figure! 🤦🏼‍♀️

Expand full comment
Peter GL's avatar

Do you truly want to impeach Brandon? You will be saddled with president Harris! A fate worse than Brandon

Expand full comment
Sunnydaze's avatar

I want him prosecuted and in prison. Although I know impeachment comes first and no we’ll be no better off with that because we know he doesn’t pull the stings or make any decisions about anything. Cackling camel toe? 🤦🏼‍♀️

We are basically in the crapper until 2024 and even then who know since our votes don’t count. Idk what the answer is. But there would be some satisfaction at seeing him prosecuted for treason and all those that participated too. He was corrupt long before he got Alzheimer’s.

Expand full comment
Bitesandpieces's avatar

It seems so, but I think, in reality, Biden is being lead by Obama-in-the-basement as we speak. So, nothing would change with the Cackler in place.

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

Is there a difference?

Expand full comment
Peter GL's avatar

He has handlers telling him what to do - even though he frequently tries to adlib with disastrous effect, whereas she is just a cackling fool selected just to be the “first female VP of color” and not for her merit. Effectively she was chosen as security “against” impeachment

Expand full comment
WP William's avatar

she would have the same result; force the DNC to jettison or euthanize the old crook first, Crooked Joe has Got to Go.

Expand full comment
Peter GL's avatar

Just like how the dems went after Agnew before they went after Nixon. Get rid of Cameltoe Harris first then throw Brandon off the train

Expand full comment
Bitesandpieces's avatar

Yes, yes. Oh Heart Be Still!

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

Republican'ts.

Expand full comment
Neil Kellen's avatar

Republicans will do nothing other than ask the Dems to spank them again, pretty please.

Expand full comment
devoalan's avatar

Impeachment won't do effall, due to the democrats and rinos being in Uncle joeys pocket. He needs to be vaporized, preferably by the hand of God himself!

Expand full comment
¡Andrew the Great!'s avatar

"I’d like to modestly propose that any doctor providing children ‘safe and effective’ affirming treatments should be first required to undergo the exact same treatments themselves."

My proposal for what should be done to those doctors is far less modest…

Expand full comment
TR's avatar

My voter registration card reads “unaffiliated”…did that 20 years ago. Politically, I’ve always been “center-right”. Today, I find myself intrigued and curious about RFK. I listened to the 3 hour Joe Rogan podcast. Couldn’t stop. He is authentic and reasonable.

Expand full comment
Big E's avatar

When switching from Independent to an official party for the Primary and then switching back for the General, please double-check the state and party laws / rules.

Democrats have been party switching for primaries in Red states to water down the conservative candidates and literally destroy the states.

I hope all of us will be logical -- and as non-emotional as possible -- about party registration and vote for people who truly support our own views and their party’s platform.

All voters must try to either meet candidates IN PERSON or listen to many full speeches and videos before voting. Get educated and learn about the issues. Avoid listening to second-hand information, media, or sneakily edited clips.

Expand full comment
Copernicus's avatar

I agree with you about his authenticity and reasonableness. His campaign is bringing into the light some important issues that need to be discussed.

Unfortunately, looking at his campaign website, he does not state his opposition to abortion, which seems to mean his is okay with it. 😔. And he recently lamented the overturn of affirmative action policies for universities. Which seems weird, given his reasonable views elsewhere.

I do so enjoy hearing him speak.

Expand full comment
devoalan's avatar

Abortion has been turned back to the states. It has no place in the president's campaign. If you want to create babies and kill them, you will have to move to a blue state. It will only get worse for them. But they won't. It's not the issue that everyone makes it out to be.the supremes made it moot. I don't agree with it, but it's not in the feds hands, and shouldn't be.

Expand full comment
Natalie's avatar

Yes...it's bavk to the states...but the president appoints people based on their alignment his values...a proportion or pro choice president appoints pro choice pro abortion people. We don't need more people in power fighting against the RIGHT TO LIFE.

Expand full comment
WP William's avatar

yes, kicking the can of personhood down to st(H)ates, acknowledging after 50 years that the court and its decision literally SUCKED and was asinine and corrupted. Baby Butchering Business is tremendous in Colo-mRNA-do. Vacation with a uterine evacuation stay in a nice room and have some drinks and some THC gummies to celebrate your non-reproductive decision. C'mon Man, we can handle what Alabama refuses to do, come to Colorful (like a Rainbow) Colorado!

Expand full comment
devoalan's avatar

Let the turn to shit. They will get nothing but shitier.

Expand full comment
WP William's avatar

Yes the Federal Experiment of State ""laboratories" as i've heard some liken it to; so now we'll have states like ColorHateO subverting laws from Alabama in Dred Scott fashion, and should pre-birth personhood be enacted (and even if not) then the governor and legislators and justices from my state may (and should) be charged with conspiracy to murder by Alabama DA. Travelling through AL? prepared to be arrested mother-Fkrs.

Then the marketing push using state dollars and resources to bring in customers to kill their offspring in part also subsidized by a glut of hedonist groups, "lawfully" using harvested baby tissues for whatever purpose; an embryo-acai smoothie might be to their taste in the descent into barbarism and mire (shittyness).

Expand full comment
TR's avatar

Yes right, I’m not with him on those issues. His desire to take a meat cleaver to the incestuous government-media-tech-pharma cabal is what initially grabbed me.

Expand full comment
Natalie's avatar

That is my hang up on him...I like a lot of what his Children's health defense says and does and makes available to parents wanting to do their own research...but in the end I am a single issue voter and LIFE is that issue.

I do think I may switch for primaries and I'd vote for him in the primary ...I don't think president trump needs my vote there...

Expand full comment
Fla Mom's avatar

He was replying to a question in a video I watched, and though he gets 'regulatory capture' and corruption in the medical world, his recommendation for the environment, after saying that freer markets would be helpful, was more, or better, regulation. He talks about freedom and the Constitution, which makes him a rarity among candidates of any party, but virtually none of them ever says something like, "There's actually no delegated power or authority in the Constitution for the federal government (or the Executive) to do that." Has Vivek Ramaswamy said something like that yet? Sometimes he gets close.

Expand full comment
Jasmine's avatar

He addressed abortion in a recent appearance. I don't want to put words in his mouth but it was something about bodily autonomy (making him one of the very rare ones on the left who is at least consistent about that).

In the same talk he made some points about 2A and gun control that I wish more Dems would listen to.

Expand full comment
Copernicus's avatar

Well, bodily autonomy is definitely an important matter. So, what about the right to bodily autonomy of the human living, for the moment, inside his mom? That person has no voice, yet.

That is the crux of the matter with abortion - there are TWO bodies involved, and only one has any decision making power.

Expand full comment
Susan Stephens's avatar

And one dies

Expand full comment
Fla Mom's avatar

This. He's not consistent, because he doesn't recognize the other person as a person who also has a right to bodily autonomy (otherwise known as the right to the property of one's own body, which is foundational to our criticism of slavery).

Expand full comment
TR's avatar

Yes, and here’s my thought on that, tell me what you think. I’m Pro-Life and we have had success on many fronts (Courts) and there is more work to do, no question. But right now there is a dragon rising fast on our flank…the beast of the government-media-tech-pharma cabal that is a clear and present danger. At the risk of engaging in the abhorrent practice of using people, even at the ballot box, I’m convinced RFK is absolutely committed to thrusting a dagger into that beast.

Expand full comment
Fla Mom's avatar

I'm very happy that he's running. I think he brings *a lot* to the table. I hope many Democrats support him and that they vote for him in the primary. I wish the Democrats would have a debate, but they won't (nor would Republicans, with a sitting President). I'd be happy if he were in the Republican debates (but he won't be, because of the party rules). I'm not sure he fully understands the beast, but he's head and shoulders above most recent candidates and elected officials.

Expand full comment
Peter GL's avatar

amazing how the libs will call abortion "bodily autonomy", and then force mass "(unsafe and totally ineffective) vaccine mandates" upon all, and the sheeple accept it without a peep

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

Inescapable fact: Bodily autonomy begins at conception when life begins. Anything else is just being politically arbitrary.

The only relevant perspective here is God's perspective as the Author of life. Man's perspective is inherently narcissistic. Man proposes but God disposes.

Expand full comment
WP William's avatar

then what IS the LINE he draws? When exactly IS the baby (non-person human tissue like a tumor) given legal autonomy worthy of state protections? C'mon man every loser Dumbocrat and rePublican needs to man up and answer what the line is -dodging with "Oh that's above my paygrade", Roe v Wade made it so clear but now..., God is ok with some abortions and miscarriages, it's science so keep religion out of it", privacy of a woman's personal Choice made with a licensed "doctor" is never to be questioned, etc all dodges and not at all helpful cliches from whatever side are empty. Bodily Autonomy is RFK'd Jr.'s dodge, next question, next topic.

Expand full comment
Fre'd Bennett, MAHA's avatar

Yep; ordered my RFK Jr. bumper sticker 10-pack yesterday. My eldest son has already spoken for one of them.

Expand full comment
Peter GL's avatar

Sort of like the democrats of yesteryear. His problem is while he has held to his positions, the party was usurped by the squad and moved towards the deep end

Expand full comment
Tonya McKinney's avatar

He’s not a good person ...just has some good ideas. He’s not the leader we need.

Expand full comment
none none's avatar

Bothers me that Joe Rogan wouldn't allow Tucker to have his interview...

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jul 22, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
space's avatar

Same.

Expand full comment
T Diesel's avatar

Zlochevsky’s Dog. Ring the bell and Hunter salivates for cocaine and hookers. 🐾

Expand full comment
Johnny Be Real's avatar

A company board of two people. $M salary. Complete sham. Fraud. Corporations do not provide protection for fraud. Pierce the corporate vail.

Expand full comment
Kathleen Janoski's avatar

Ukraine is full of trafficked women.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Yeah you wonder about the motivations of certain people who are so enthusiastically pro Ukraine.

Expand full comment
T Diesel's avatar

A money laundromat without the Bounce sheets.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Yeah nothing can hide that stink 😝

Expand full comment
T Diesel's avatar

TruDat!

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

😆

Expand full comment
T Diesel's avatar

Unelected Government Officials are more of a concern than UFO’s.

Expand full comment
Fla Mom's avatar

Exactly. If it's real and has been going on a long time, then I must say I haven't noticed any problems. It's my own government that concerns me.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

💯

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

That poor trans kid. 1st - his parents should have monitored his media usage better. They might have realized he was getting groomed. Instead they reluctantly gave in to societal pressure and let their child be mutilated. I am surrounded by these same type of parents. God forbid they exert themselves. Most can't be bothered. They are compliant. After all if the school and doctors say it is okay , who are we to disagree. You are the parents. That is your child. Suicide card my *ss! That kid was left to his own devices long before all the tranny crap came up. 🤨

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

I think it’s really horrible though how manipulative doctors and counselors can be, to use that kind of emotional blackmail. It’s disgusting.

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

I would have told them all to go screw themselves. Not quite that nicely but you get my meaning.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

😆

Maybe they’d take you up on it though 🤔

Expand full comment
WP William's avatar

We Can't have Back-Alley Transition Affirmation Care Surgeries!!! We can't and won't go Back! we need a Roe-V-Wade decision to federalize the legal surgical genital repair since Nature and God can't be trusted to do the job right. Legalize ALL Medical Care NOW!!!

Expand full comment
Charlotte's avatar

Well, every time Debbie “Washing Machine” Schultz (from the Awan brothers and computer fiasco) rears her ugly head, you know there is something the DNC wants to bleach clean from history!

And as for dem UFO’s, the moment I saw Obama, about 2 years ago, supporting the UFO story, I knew, all the sightings are of experimental USA military aircraft and the whole storyline is propaganda to distract from something else.

Expand full comment
Cynthia Ford's avatar

It is as thick and byzantine as the January 6 narrative, which appeared every day in the Guardian, like a dark spirited angelus bell, so my thought, based on Childhood's End by Arthur C. Clarke, is that the globalist ecohealth corporate religion leviathan intends to try and take out Judeo-Christianity by having the CGI hologram aliens announce that there is no God. I heard a cosmologist say that you either have to have a multiverse or a god to explain fine-tuning, but that just applies to life forms like those on earth and to our universe. Who is to say there aren't non-carbon based life forms or quantum beings or something imaginable only to the Japanese, who still read science fiction and innovate and are creative, while our woke universities gag and destroy all innovation and creativity. No soul, no god, that's what Klaus the hideous and his henchpeople, like Welby in his dolphin hat, and Kendi and D'Angelo of wokedom and that creepy Vlad the Impaler guy at Oxford who who wrote Amoral Emotional Egoism is WEF, want to impose. Only gender and transhumanism. It is Faust on steroids. Or else we are living in a simulation. My friend says the insect apocalypse might be that the teenage hacker programmer in 2223 helping create the simulation thought his boss meant computer bugs not actual insects. Seriously though, their weakness is that they don't believe there is divinity and don't believe in their own souls. That is a spiritual weapon for us, I'd say.

Expand full comment