131 Comments

I am, by self admission, rather a simple person. I till my land, fish our waters, hunt the mighty elk, build shelter for mother and baby, and revel in a simple morning cup of finely ground Kenya Blend. Well, actually I only do one of those. Nevertheless…..

Somebody please correct me if I’m wrong here: Is it accurate to say that the Supreme Court is going to be looking at constitutional considerations and effectiveness data (none) regarding these injections but will NOT be looking at any safety data whatsoever? Is this information off limits?.....out of bounds?......unimportant?....too controversial?

For the love of God, we could fill a stadium full of parents, relatives and loved ones who have experienced unimaginable suffering because of these worthless and totally unnecessary injections. Moreover, there’s got to be dozens….HUNDREDS?….of qualified professionals that can sufficiently present enough compelling evidence to drag this vaccine garbage back into the primordial sludge from whence it wriggled. How do we do this? What’s the process? IS there a process? Is there a particular court that will even consider this? How do the Nuremberg Trials fit in? DO they fit in?

How many poor souls have dispensed with their mortal coils? Conservatively….. thousands?....tens of thousands? Serious, life changing adverse toxic reactions…..? Hey, it’s anybody’s guess. But don’t be alarmed, everything’s fine. According to the good folks at Hallmark, I mean the CDC, “The number of deaths and injuries are within acceptable limits.”........ Wheewww! Thank goodness…..I thought I was losing it! I feel like singing……🎵There’s a comfort in acceptable death and destruction of innocent human beings that I’ve never known before🎶………..Hmmm?......it’s not exactly “Bridge Over Troubled Water”, but I’ll fudge with it.

Expand full comment

You wrote "Is it accurate to say that the Supreme Court is going to be looking at constitutional considerations and effectiveness data..." I hope the Supreme Court only considers Constitutionality of the mandate and not the effectiveness of the vaccine. Because if it rules the vaccine is not effective and therefore government can't mandate the vaccine then that would open the door for mandating vaccines that *are* effective. No one should be forced to take a drug, or any medical treatment, by rule of government or employer, effective or ineffective. Being forced to undergo a medical treatment or drug (consumed or injected or skin patch, whatever) should be the only item the Supreme Court should consider.

Expand full comment

The fact that the highest court in the land has to weigh in on something my 15 year old daughter has figured out in the time it takes to prepare her morning cup of tea - before adding sugar - is a bit disconcerting. The point being, safety data absolutely needs to be part of the equation through some official means. If not SCOTUS, fine and in retrospect, would agree with you. That's why I ask the questions. Who? What? Nuremberg 2.0?

Expand full comment

That’s a good point. But if they start with the assumption of “safe and effective” then we risk the precedent of mandatory vaccination by lower courts prevailing. No vaccine ought to be mandatory on principle but the constitutional principle has been overruled in the past. If I were a betting woman, I would bet that these mandates will be upheld. It will be an irreversible tragedy. Not a bet I want to win……

Expand full comment

So you think there is no chance for mandates to be lifted by SC in the current situation?

Expand full comment

I wouldn’t say no chance, just that it’s unlikely. The supremes are almost all beltway folks, deeply entrenched in deep state culture. It would take a tremendous amount of personal courage to go against their peers. Even allegedly conservative judges end up compromising their supposed values once they arrive on that Court. But I am a cynic by nature. I hope I’m proved wrong.

Expand full comment

This will be over in a whim if everyone refuses to vaxx. Then all these bosses that require them can do like the airlines, that had to cancel so many flights because they had no crew to fly. When you are a boss but have no workers, good luck.

Expand full comment

That last sentence made me smile. "When you are a boss but have no workers, good luck." A picture flashed in my head of all the bosses actually having to do the work of the peons that they have so much hatred for. 😊 The world would end. 🤣

Expand full comment

That same picture came to mind when I wrote it LOL. We the underdogs will see the former bosses crawl on hands and knees in their Armani suits cleaning the floors Whoa ! LOL

Expand full comment

IKR?! That mind pic = the gift that keeps on giving. 🤗

Expand full comment

No, the bosses will be given emergency authorizations to hire undocumented, non-citizens who have not been jabbed to do the work at less cost than the non-compliant workers.

Expand full comment

Yes, that is how it has always been. And the immigrants get the Ivermectin tablets that we have a hard time finding !

Expand full comment

Can't let anyone have a dream, huh? And for the jobs, that at least, I'm talking about, how many of those illegals have a college degree?

Expand full comment

Why do you need a Vaccine if the virus doesn't exist? The Virus theory is dying on the vine, This knowledge will be the ultimate defeat for the Vaxx Cabal -- https://groups.google.com/g/town-square-news/c/bhXfK-Gtr4Y/m/iI5jFpdrCAAJ

Expand full comment

Eric...I read the comment sections on many blogs. I am amazed by the sheer number of people stating they've been injured by the covid shot or that they have friends, family members and/or coworkers that have been injured or died from the shots. So many have not reported their injuries to VAERS. There are many reasons given.

1. If the family says it's from covid shot the deceased life insurance won't pay because taking the covid shot is considered unauthorized participation in a medical trial. (I've seen this one many times. Not sure if that's really true).

2.No one listens. So what's the point? (Aaggghhh! This is the same as saying, my vote doesn't matter, so why vote?)

3.Didn't know they could file a VAERS. Thought only a doctor can do that. (Well, the problem with this is many medical professionals are not filing. Maybe because of time...takes about 30 minutes to file a report not including follow-up, or because their administrators have told them not to file, or because they don't know about VAERS, etc)

4.Their medical provider told them their myocarditis or other condition after the shot is unrelated to the covid shot. (And I wonder, how can they be sure of that statement? Based on what long term studies? I believe each individual knows their own body and how they feel. The covid shots should be considered guilty until proven innocent. They sure as heck didn't have a problem considering nearly every death in 2020 and 2021 as from covid. If someone has an adverse effect after the shot, it should be filed).

5. The VAERS system keeps dropping me while I'm inputting my data. (I know 2 people that have tried numerous times to submit their own VAERS report and keep getting dropped, etc)

I'm my opinion, people need to insure their claim is properly documented. Insure a VAERS report was filed on their behalf. If not, do it themselves or on behalf of their family member. Share story everywhere....sites like nomoresilence.world and realnotrare.com, anywhere they can share story. Contact state and federal representatives of covid shot adverse effects and keep on them. If these representatives are flooded with true stories it's hard for them to ignore.

Expand full comment

My sister’s mother had a cerebral thrombosis the day after getting boosted; she stroked out during surgery, leaving her without much speech and weakness in her right side. And she’s now living with my sister and her husband.

No fewer than three (and as many as six) doctors in the hospital were told about the booster; at least three conceded that the vax might’ve done it, “…but we have no way of knowing,” said all.

Not one of the doctors reported to VAERS, so my sister did it. WE know what caused it.

Expand full comment

You've earned the right to be a official anti-vaxxer

Expand full comment

Out of curiosity, I contacted a licensed life insurance agent at Select Quote (1-877-427-6579). I told him of rumors about people claiming that life insurance won't pay if someone dies from covid or that if someone dies from the covid shot that the deceased's life insurance won't pay because taking the covid shot is considered unauthorized participation in a medical trial. He told me that neither of those things is true. He said the only filing that would nullify payment of a life insurance claim is SUICIDE WITHIN THE FIRST TWO YEARS that someone has a policy. He stated that some people may be thinking about accidental death insurance. If someone dies from covid or from the covid shot that is NOT an accidental death. An example of an accidental death is dying because of a car accident. He encourages people to contact their life insurance company if they have a question about this. Do not believe the rumors.

Expand full comment

SCOTUS is only supposed to consider rule of law. Nothing beyond the law.

Expand full comment

...but it would help if a few of SCOTUS justices had to fill out their own VAERS vaccine injury reports

Expand full comment

Loved your post, especially the first paragraph.

Expand full comment

Here's part of the answer but local news - who are supposed to care about your community - will never run a story about how to get help for a vaccine injured relative -- COVID-19 PANIC CAUSED HUGE INCREASE IN DEATH FROM DRUG OVERDOSES

https://tucson.com/news/state-and-regional/fentanyl-covid-19-help-drive-overdose-deaths-to-record-12-month-high/article_14200a4f-6752-50ae-8382-035bb4c71413.html

Expand full comment

Local news is awful. They report about every person that might (and mostly not) have died from covid, but they don't say a word about all the people that are sick or die from the shots.

Expand full comment

Yep...they stick with the fake PCR test to define "cases"

Expand full comment

Medical science has made such tremendous progress that there is hardly a healthy human left. - Aldous Huxley

Expand full comment

Is anyone fighting what is happening at the college level? My daughter's private college now requires boosters and I can see this becoming a six-month requirement before the beginning of each semester, especially likely given The Netherlands new plan.

I am not looking to get an exemption, but to rescind the policy altogether. I will be speaking to the dean to try to convince them to rethink this, though I know this will be a futile effort.

In the .0001% chance I might be successful, would love any ideas on the most effective strategies. Have any schools changed their policy? I know there have been lawsuits, but don't know of any successes (except the law professor at George Mason University - Todd Zywicki who was able to get a natural immunity exemption). Any info on this greatly appreciated!

Expand full comment
Jan 3, 2022Liked by Jeff Childers

Leila,

You and your daughter are in a difficult situation, not unlike MILLIONS of other families and students in College.

We're going to have to find a Dean of a College/University (Many Actually) that didn't get their Master's Degree in "Butt-Licking" and Brown-Nosing" to qualify them as "Dean".

I'd suggest starting with doing some research into the 13 States that no longer have Mandates (even masks).

They have Colleges/Universities that don't require boosters for students/staff/faculty/etc.

Another direction you might choose is to "show them the facts" that vaccines are a complete FAILURE and they actually drive viral activity into the population of the vaccinated.

See this very well written article by Ian at UNMASKED that not only exposes the corruption of the MSM but puts out there the clear data showing the failures, not only in the USA but abroad.

https://ianmsc.substack.com/p/the-media-and-the-experts-are-purposefully

Well worth the read.

Next option: (One thing College should teach is that there are ALWAYS options) Consider a transfer to one of the state Colleges/Universities where mandates are not enforced/have been blocked. I understand that a majority of the reason your daughter (and likely most students) are going to/attending advanced studies is to actually (Also) raise their social skills and outlets for future contacts/friendships/job opps/etc. in life.

These are all "likely" friends/contacts for a "reason" or a "season" and likely not friends/contacts for a lifetime. So embracing change might be an intelligent move in the long haul (as others have already commented).

Best to you and yours.

PS: End of the day, all you can really do is love them and accept them for who they are and the decisions they make in life, regardless of the outcomes.

Keep the faith.....................some days it's all we have.

Expand full comment

Thanks for the ideas, Greg. Transferring is out of the question for my daughter. I care way more about this issue than she does. As far as changing school policy, it seems that as long as they are doing what everyone else is doing and it aligns with the CDC, they don't care about the facts. Ethics, facts, and even the laws don't seem to matter when everyone is a violator. But I will do my best, just so I can find my peace in knowing that at least I tried.

Keep waiting for the house of cards to fall, and wondering what it will take. Really hoping for a good decision from the Supreme Court that might trickle into all areas of these insane mandates.

Expand full comment

Your daughter could take a gap year or gap semester until this blows over. Or you could cheat. Cheating on rules that are immoral is not immoral. It’s just evasion of an immoral mandate which would be immoral to subject your child to. Personally I think it’s a great time to take a gap year and have her get some real world experience. College isn’t worth what it used to be.

Expand full comment

I would love that, but she is 100% committed to staying and is just going to get the booster unless I can get school to drop the mandate entirely. She sees the downside of not complying greater than health risks. Was hoping someone on here might know of a successful case or argument. In the meantime, I have researched and spent over $200 on supplements for spike protein detox as I doubt I will get them to change their minds.

Expand full comment

I know this will not sway your daughter's opinion, but my niece, healthy and 26, received the vaccine, developed headaches and had a stroke. At 26!

The school I was attending went remote, and if you were to go to campus, had to be tested 2x that week. And they paid for it. And this was a religious school, so ironically enough, was able to obtain a religious accommodation. I don't know of anyone yet who has been successful at fighting the mandates at colleges yet, despite the recent failure at Cornell. Gotta love this quote ""Virtually every case of the Omicron variant to date has been found in fully vaccinated students, a portion of whom had also received a booster shot," said Vice President for University Relations Joel Malina in a statement."

Expand full comment

I am so sorry, Renee. That is awful. My heart aches for these vaccine victims. To suffer physically and be ignored by the healthcare community and our public health officials. Just sickening. I hope your niece is doing ok.

Thanks for sharing the Cornell quote. I missed that one. I think that is a perfect example of the insanity of these school policies. I will incorporate it in my letter. Thanks!

Expand full comment

You may want to remind her that the more spike protein introduced into her body through boosters, the more likely she will have an immediate life-altering consequence or forfeit future fertility. College is not worth it but at least it will be her decision and your conscience will be clear. I wish you and her the best.

Expand full comment

Yes, I've explained the spike protein dangers to her. But she has the mindset of an invincible 20-year old, which I also had at her age. She sees the immediate consequences of social ostracism greater than medical harm. It's maddening. I agree college is not worth it. I view the college experience as a means to an end and would be happy for her to work and take classes part-time online. So I am doing what I can, knowing it will probably culminate in having to accept this is one of many choices she will make for herself that I don't agree with. Just wish the stakes were not so high.

Expand full comment

Is there any way you can find other parents who also see this insanity? Probably the only way to stop it is to have a large group that refuses to pay the college until this experiment is stopped.....Good luck trying to get that group together - I'm sure it wouldn't be easy!!

Expand full comment

I don't know any of the other parents at her school, so I am fighting this as a lone wolf.

Expand full comment

In the same boat here and just hoping the policy is changed before the very last day (when 2nd term starts). in our case I know the school itself is not for it (they initially said they would NOT require) but they are unfortunately within a larger system so the decision was taken from them. all I can do is make sure my younger kid avoids any state/school system that showed themselves to be anti-human during this insanity.

Expand full comment

Recently discovered your blog. Love your angle—because it’s truth. -Janice

Expand full comment
Jan 3, 2022·edited Jan 3, 2022

I think the shift in the cloth mask narrative is to prepare us for a N95 only mask requirement in the future. Meanwhile the allowance of Monoclonal treatment could also be in preparation for the Administration's narrative for "treatment of covid" since Joe gave up on defeating COVID with vaccine mandates. This new treatment path I predict could also lead to no more vaccine requirements. And in addition to no vaccine requirement then Big Pharma will be off the hook for liability because if no vaccine is available then no Emergency Use Authorization is necessary. Therefore Fauci The Jackass and his buddies at Pfizer and J&J and Moderna are protected from lawsuit. Big Pharma keeps it's profits while thousands of families lost loved ones.

I don't think the Administration is waking up to what we in the C&C family knew last year, I think it is moving to protect itself and it's buddies from vaccine liability lawsuit while setting up the narrative for a specific mask type in the future. 2022 will be the year of treating COVID and no more vaccines.

Expand full comment

And those N95’s will tear down our immune systems if we wear them all the time. They actually do work and they actually block the virus, among other things. Our immune system needs a little taste of germs and viruses in order to learn how to build up a defense against them. If we block that out, once the masks come off, people will get a lot sicker from a lot less. So I stand on my refusal to wear any mask. The ones that don’t work, or the ones that do.

Pass the omicron please…

Expand full comment

All for the love of money. But they can not take it with them into the grave. Fauxi is 80 or somewhere thereabouts, Schwab is older. Do they think they will live forever? They should have let doctors use Ivermectin and HQC and there would have been a whole lot less deaths to be mourned, and no jabs, that would have saved the sports world a lot of good young men.

Expand full comment

Old, super rich, people live long lives, because they can afford the "real" treatments for diseases. In the case of those 2, are you really sure they're humans? Maybe aliens? Cyborgs? 😉

Expand full comment

Sympathy and empathy are not in the playbook.

Expand full comment

Fauci will recommend whatever mask kills you faster --

Study: Effects of wearing N95 and surgical facemasks on heart rate, thermal stress and subjective sensations (2005)

Significant differences were observed between N95 and surgical masks. Mean heart rate, microclimate temperature, humidity and skin temperature inside the facemask, together with perceived humidity, heat, breathing resistance in the facemask, and itchiness, fatigue and overall discomfort, were significantly (P<0.01) higher for N95 masks than for surgical masks. In other words, the subjective perception of breathing difficulty and discomfort increased significantly with increasing thermal stress.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7087880/

Expand full comment

Maybe, but the mandated vaccines are the gateway to absolute control through digital identity so I don’t see them willing to give it up. Look at Europe. They are doubling down on the insanity. If the Supreme Court upholds mandatory vaccination we will follow suit.

Expand full comment

Some European countries have just gone nazi. Austria, Germany, Netherlands, Belgium soon to follow. The only one I heard say something else is the President of Croatia.

Expand full comment

Sadly you are correct. i am already seeing people cry for n95 masks on twitter.

Expand full comment

"...treating COVID and no more vaccines." From your lips to God's ears. 🙏 --- Aren't N95 masks one use like the little blue ones the Drs give you for use in their offices?

Expand full comment

No, those are surgical masks. N95 masks are generally white. A true N95 doesn't have ear loops either; it has elastic straps that go around the back of your head to produce a very tight fit to your face and is very uncomfortable to wear for any length of time.

Expand full comment

I know the difference between masks. N95 masks look like duck bills, or chicken beaks. Are they one use? If not how do you clean them? If so, they cost too much to keep buying them, and are just another way for the government to take our money.

Expand full comment

I just saw pics of people fishing these paper surgical masks out of the ocean. Where is that Greta girl now? At the WEF ?

Expand full comment

🙌

Expand full comment

N95 are designed to be disposable. I just read the FDA guidelines for N95, due to limitations of use by certain people, I retract my earlier statement of N95 being potentially required in the future in place of cloth masks. So maybe a new type of mask is being developed that will be required instead of cloth masks. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/personal-protective-equipment-infection-control/n95-respirators-surgical-masks-face-masks-and-barrier-face-coverings

Expand full comment

Oh, great, respirators. Ugh! Even more expensive. Real ones have to be professionally fitted to you and must be, at least, checked yearly. 🙄

Expand full comment

An N95 is considered a respirator. When I worked for the government I had to be fit-tested annually and go through training on doffing and donning, ie, proper use of the one-time only mask, proper disposal, etc. This was one of the major things that prevented me from drinking the kool-aid back in March 2020. The narrative had completely flipped. Something didn’t smell good and boy was I right!

Expand full comment

Some look like duck bills. I have some that don’t look anything like duck bills. And they are blue. They fit tight and have 2 elastic straps; one over your head and one around your neck. And they say, “N95” on the box.

I use them when I’m working in my attic to keep the fiberglass and other toxic stuff out of my lungs.

Expand full comment

Maintaining sufficiently oxygenated blood on a commercial flight is tricky for many even without a mask - especially for those with already diagnosed with breathing difficulties like asthma, COPD and other problems. ... Flight attendants who force masks will never warn you that the cabin pressure where you breathe, is maintained at oxygen starvation levels at up to 9,0000 feet above sea level where the available oxygen is reduced from 20.9% (at sea level) to only 14.8% at flight level. Add a MANDATED N95 mask to low oxygen in the cabin and see what happens to older and less healthy passengers where no emergency services are available.

https://hypoxico.com/pages/altitude-to-oxygen-chart

Expand full comment

N95 masks are tight-fitting masks. N95 users are supposed to be fit-tested yearly. Also, to properly wear an N95 mask you cannot have facial hair. That means no beards, no mustaches, no sideburns. I'm always amazed by those walking around with a bushy beard wearing a cloth mask.

https://abcnews.go.com/Health/beards-n95-face-masks/story?id=69916196

Expand full comment

Study: Effects of wearing N95 and surgical facemasks on heart rate, thermal stress and subjective sensations (2005)

"Significant differences were observed between N95 and surgical masks. Mean heart rate, microclimate temperature, humidity and skin temperature inside the facemask, together with perceived humidity, heat, breathing resistance in the facemask, and itchiness, fatigue and overall discomfort, were significantly (P<0.01) higher for N95 masks than for surgical masks. In other words, the subjective perception of breathing difficulty and discomfort increased significantly with increasing thermal stress."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7087880/

Expand full comment

I think the CDC finally made a right decision. Open ALL businesses, everyone unmasked, everyone free to go wherever, let us all catch omicron and we will be rid of the whole misery ! How hard can it be to survive a cold for god's sake?

Expand full comment

"It’s nice when you are completely unaccountable and can change the rules whenever you want."

Only they're guidelines, not rules - much less laws - and no one need follow them.

Expand full comment

You may not yet have seen last evenings covid news. Apparently an insurance guy sent Dr Malone an email & an article was published in alt media, stating that his company has seen a 40% increase in deaths & big increase in both short & long term disability claims among *working age people* compared to pre-pandemic. And he's hearing similar from others in the industry.

Even Dr Malone is starting to to take the 1st steps toward turning "conspiracy theorist."

Expand full comment

Monoclonal bullshit. Why isn't Florida bringing ivermectin and hcq to the stage?

I don't trust any of these politicians. They're all dirty brown nosers. That's how they get their jobs.

On the other hand, regular civil service people are honest and competent. Not these politicians, judges, and lawyers though

Expand full comment

Critically thinking a bit here. Pfizer and Moderna target a single spike protein. It’s likely this provides minimal protection if any as Omicron evidently has far fewer of that protein making these vaccinated vulnerable. However, the unvaxxed likely have a very high level of natural immunity by this point. Since natural (recovered) immunity would be sensitive to many more of the likely common components of the virus this seems to make logical sense. Why on earth do so few of our medical “intellectual betters” seem to be so lacking in basic critical thinking?

Of course it would help if any of our institutions were actually tracking data in research-grade detail; as it is I’m unconvinced the data we have is high enough quality to root out the variances enough to draw truly accurate conclusions let alone correlations from the data.

Expand full comment

Yes, that is Dr. Robert Malone's take on this. And mind-boggling the ignorance of our "best and brightest" scientific minds. They are either willfully ignorant, intentionally lying, or just plain stupid. Not sure which answer is the most unsettling.

Expand full comment

I was at the Mayo Clinic three times in 2021, and the level of covid insanity from those minds that are supposed to be smarter than mine is astounding. Pushing the vaccines, constantly sending texts that tell me “vaccines are safe and effective,” requiring brain swabs within 48 hours of any procedure…somehow the scientists have forgotten how to “science.” Just maddening…and disturbing!

Expand full comment

I thought that was settled: "Follow the money." Beware the medical-industrial complex.

Expand full comment

Same at UCLA Medical Center. 🤢

Expand full comment

It makes you wonder if you should trust anything they say! I mean, is it possible to completely lose your reason in one area and still be able to perform medical procedures for which you trained and specialize in? Hmmm...

Expand full comment

I have lost all faith in the entire medical community thanks to COVID. But it hasn't been all bad. I now know what a sham most of oncology is, the truth about Lyme Disease and mammograms, orthodontia, and so much more. Once you see this in one medical specialty, you see it in all. The last place I will ever go for medical help (which I will try to avoid at all cost) is a prestigious institution corrupted by pharma money

I would never have gone down the rabbit hole of challenging western medicine had it not been for COVID. Thanks, COVID!

Expand full comment

I am very grateful for my independent Christian doc who is the real deal. Refusing to get the vaccine even though he loses his hospital “privileges,” has treated many, many covid patients and kept them out of the hospital and ALIVE. His first allegiance is to Jesus Christ, and that is what makes him bold and different!

Expand full comment

"Why on earth do so few of our medical “intellectual betters” seem to be so lacking in basic critical thinking?"

Because their livelihoods depend on supporting the narrative AND that is more important than ethics. I remember seeing papers cautioning against using the spike protein as the basis for a vaccine, but the Medical Industrial Complex was gonna do what it had planned, no matter what.

Expand full comment

Hand in hand with the WEF & Klaus

Expand full comment

Its even less than that. They target only one Subunit of the 2-Subunit spike protein. And it is the "dangerous" subunit that causes the damage.

Expand full comment

And the toxic one is the one our bodies make because of the mRNA injection...

Expand full comment

I am so glad that a friend pointed me to your posts, they are the highlight of my morning. Thank you for your candor and sarcasm!

Both my husband and I were infected with omicron by a vaccinated health care worker who decided that, despite being sick, they needed to visit their physical therapist. Vaccinated health care worker to physical therapist to my husband to me.

I work for a federal contractor and would not have gone in to work - since I have symptoms of being ill! - but decided to test anyways. (Testing is part of my religious accommodation from my company.) At least the symptoms are mild, and my husband and I are both unvaccinated.

Expand full comment

Renee can you tell me how you provided them with how they can accommodate you? What resources did you use? I’m about to submit my Religious Exemption myself. Pray for me 🙏🏻

Expand full comment

My wife crafted one of these and got it approved by her very leftist college employer. Some suggestions:

1) keep it entirely in the religious sphere. Don’t talk about science, effectiveness, or adverse events.

2)keep it short

3) leave no room for compromise

4) it’s a statement by you that you are intending to NOT comply with the vax mandate because of your religious beliefs. This is not an “application” to be approved. It’s a firm statement that your religion prevents you from even considering the vax.

Expand full comment

They sent me a form and with required signature it’s got four questions that seem to be repeating themselves. What do I put here though: “When is the accomodation needed? How frequently? These are so weird because I work from home pre-pandemic

Expand full comment

The accommodation is that you’ll be working remotely. Or that you’ll be unable to attend in person meetings. Or perhaps get a negative test before attending such meetings.

In my wife’s case, that was her accommodation. They were going to make her test every week, but dropped it because she scheduled herself to teach all online courses.

Expand full comment
Jan 3, 2022·edited Jan 3, 2022

First and foremost, i did not ask for a religious exemption, but a religious accommodation as an exemption to the vaccine mandate. See C&C, Oct 11th and Oct 20th. Great blogs around those dates on this topic.

Are you asking for what ‘evidence’ I supplied to be granted the accommodation, or what workplace changes were made for my accommodation to be granted?

Expand full comment
Jan 3, 2022·edited Jan 3, 2022

What workplace changes. Here is the thing I am a remote worker BEFORE the pandemic. “Please identify any accommodation you feel could be provided to resolve the conflict between your belief for which you are requesting accommodation and your ability to perform your duties.”

Expand full comment

You could write "Since I am remote, there are no accommodations needed at this time. But, my employer could require the following accommodations anytime that I will travel to a work site, or be with other employees, or a federal workplace or......" fill it in with whatever you need. These accommodations could include testing, masking, social distancing, etc. But start with minimal accommodations and see what they reply with. Interesting question coming from the employer, since they are supposed to set the accommodations and decide what is an 'undue hardship' on their part.

Expand full comment
Jan 3, 2022·edited Jan 3, 2022

Thank you. Yes they even split the category to request the RA due to unable to vaccinate or just simply RA. I don’t know why. She said that process is different.

Expand full comment

Peggy from The Healthy American has some great advice and resources.

Thehealthyamerican.org

Expand full comment

Just wish the site did not call it a 'religious exemption'. I realize that is what Biden, the DoD and everyone else calls it, but that is not the EEOC wording, and they are the agency that 'manages' this type of discrimination.

Expand full comment

So, call them on it.

Expand full comment

I do correct everyone who calls it a religious exemption, every chance I get!

Expand full comment

"a cloth mask is not going to protect you from a virus that spreads through airborne transmission.” -Scott Gottlieb

Did the Politburo bounce him off Twitter yet?

The implication is that the only protection is experimental vaccines and expensive new drugs, especially those sold by Pfizer. $$$,$$$,$$$,$$$

Expand full comment

Perhaps Gottleib has stock in a N95 company...

Expand full comment

Maybe that too.

Expand full comment

Validity - determines the ACCURACY of a measure: do the results represent what they are supposed to measure?

Reliability - determines the CONSISTENCY of a measure: can the results be reproduced under the same condition?

A scientific, analytical approach requires both of these. If they do not both exist, incorrect conclusions are reached.

Thus, if a test does not meet both of these, we have a problem with the results.

Why after almost 2 years do we sunset the test that we have used to validate COVID-19?

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/01/no_author/bombshell-cdc-no-longer-recognizes-the-pcr-test-as-a-valid-method-for-detecting-confirmed-covid-19-cases/?fbclid=IwAR158SBN8Hwd_4-vMoI6SDXSD0xbDqDwzcocYHpGL5qZyIcmtzyqj1YTf7o

Expand full comment

oh man, I had forgotten what the CDC had said about the pcr test ending on 12/31/21 as not a valid way to detect covid cases.

and was it last week? wallensky said that that a pcr test can still show positive 12 weeks post a positive infection? yet everyone else listening to the other side already knows that the tests can also pick up 'dead residual' cov virus in the system. so imagine the number of extra cases from people that had nothing but had to get tested for work or because they had a sniffle....got tested and *bam* detected old dead cov in their system. what a smoke and mirror show they have been putting on.

Expand full comment

It was last week. If we have invalid tests, how do we have a pandemic? We need to stop testing. If you do not have a fever, move forward with life…

Expand full comment

Bingo!

Expand full comment

I gotta say Jeff....I missed this newsletter more than I do my espresso in the morning!

I like how you ended today with the comparison of cases, I think it would be a good visual to somehow include that in your infographic in the beginning....even though things are looking scary (for the doomers out there) that compared to last summer the numbers are actually good in comparison.

And as usual thanks for the info breakdown!

Expand full comment

How come nobody is talking about a corona virus is not new and pretty much were we are at now (a cold) .. why are we still calling it “covid 19” .. wasn’t that the alpha strain, possibly even Delta ?

Expand full comment

But... but... it says here the light-hearted VOW float merely aims to promote sharing of vaccines and technology to the desperate deprived South.

https://www.aidshealth.org/2021/12/ahfs-2022-rose-parade-float-says-vaccinate-our-world/

Expand full comment

thanks for the pic. Even more bizarre than Jeff described on last night’s call! Probably funded by one of fauxi’s back door organizations.

Expand full comment

The link: WOW! Power heave!

Expand full comment