☕️ Coffee & Covid ☙ Monday, May 2, 2022 ☙ HARMS ROUNDUP 🦠
A roundup of the latest theories on the mechanisms of jab injury.
Happy Monday, C&Cers, and welcome to May! Today I’m doing something a little different: I am summarizing what we know about the mechanisms of covid vaccine injury, along with lots of links, so you have it all in one place. This area is developing fast, and I haven’t seen anyone try to bring it together yet. Hopefully this is interesting and helpful.
I’m a little late this morning because of the length. I linked my post from Facebook instead posting right in Facebook, because I can’t stand how Facebook formats (or doesn’t format) the links. It’s just for today.
🗞*COVID NEWS AND COMMENTARY* 🗞
🔥 Yesterday, on The Epoch Times I listened to a long-form interview with Dr. Richard Urso, who is becoming one of the leading voices of pandemic-response reason along with Dr. Peter McCullough. The (real) science is slowly but surely beginning to accumulate and reveal the mechanisms of injury caused by the artificial spike protein injections. I thought I’d write up a quick summary of what we know so far. With links!
SPIKE PROTEIN IS HARMFUL
The first building block is understanding that the spike protein — whether natural or jab-induced — is harmful all by itself. It’s puzzling that Pfizer and Moderna chose this nasty bit of the Wuhan virus to provoke the immune response to their novel vaccines. Researchers keep finding more ways that spike protein is bad for the body.
So, while there must have been a good engineering reason why Pfizer and Modern chose to use a very harmful part of the Wuhan virus in their mRNA drug, in hindsight it seems like they could have made a better choice. Hey geniuses, why not use a HARMLESS part of the virus instead? Oh well, it’s too late now, we’re already off and running on the grand experiment to see how much spike protein the human body can tolerate.
Vaccine defenders point out that the risk from spike protein injury is the same between natural spike or vaccine spike.* Even if this were true, the risks from the vaccines are still much higher, at least because the vaccine-induced spike protein hangs around in the body a lot longer than natural spike, which usually clears after a few days.
(* Some twitter posters defending the jabs online argue that the vaccine spike was somehow “deactivated” in its design, but there is zero data supporting this argument.)
THE MRNA PERSISTENCE PROBLEM
The next problem is that the drugmakers thought, or at least told everybody in the entire world, that the mRNA particles in the drug would quickly dissolve after doing their job in a matter of hours. This turned out to be false. They have found mRNA persisting in the body up to TWO MONTHS following the jab. Worse, the two months was when they ended the study. So we still don’t know the outer limits.
The mRNA is the active element that, virus-like, infects cells and turns them into little spike-producing factories. So mRNA persistence naturally leads to spike persistence. Studies have found spike present in the bodies of vaccine recipients four months post-injection. Again, this was at the outer limits of the study, so we don’t know exactly when it stops.
Again, we DO NOT KNOW when the mRNA finally disappears and the spike clears from the body. Nobody’s discovered that yet or even studied it. You have to take the jabs to find out how long. Still, two common-sense things appear to be certain: first, the body’s immune system should eventually clear the spike; we just don’t know how long it will take. Second, constantly re-loading mRNA by obsessively boosting practically ensures that the harmful spike will never clear the body. So.
Why are the mRNA and spike proteins so much more persistent than the drugmakers claimed? It looks like they were over-engineered. Lab mRNA is known to be unstable, so getting mRNA vaccine technology to work was challenging. It’s very easy to package mRNA into a vaccine and inject it into an animal, but the mRNA will be degraded by enzymes before any protein production can occur.
Pfizer and Moderna solved the mRNA stability problem, in part, by making a subtle tweak to the spike protein’s mRNA code. They swapped one of the standard letters in the RNA code, the “U” (for uridine), for a slightly different molecule called N1-Methylpseudouridine. Using artificial pseudouridine instead of natural uridine stabilizes the mRNA so that it won’t immediately degrade when it’s injected into an animal.
In other words, using psuedouridine in the mRNA molecule was a good engineering fix to stop rapid decay, but it looks like it made the mRNA molecules TOO stable and make TOO MUCH spike protein for TOO LONG.
If you want to dig deeper into this problem, here’s a good stack: Pseudouridine, mRNA Vaccines & Spike Protein Persistence.
Dr. Malone briefly explains how psuedouridine preserves the vaccine mRNA:
THE LNP MIGRATION PROBLEM
In the drugs, the microscopic mRNA particles are embedded in “lipid nanoparticles” (LNPs), teeny-tiny globs of artificial fat that help stabilize and hold the mRNA, and help the mRNA get into your cells so it can start making spike protein. Pfizer and Moderna originally said that LNPs would stay in the shoulder at the injection site and would NOT migrate into other places in the body.
But Dr. Urso, who has a background in drug design and has previously worked with lipid nanoparticles in other drugs, said it was well-known that LNPs “go everywhere” in the body. He uses a “cooking with garlic” metaphor, like how the smell of garlic goes all through the house when you sauté some crushed cloves and everybody knows you ate it for hours afterwards. It’s like that. It gets everywhere.
And a FOIA request from Japan found that Pfizer did at least one study on “biodistribution:” they used radioactive particles in rat injections to track where the LNPs migrated. The result? They went everywhere. Pfizer knew.
Here’s a recent thread explaining what we know now about how the LNPs migrate:
Because LNPs can infect nearly every type of cell, the jabs are categorically worse than natural covid infection, because unlike the jab’s LNPs, covid can only infect CERTAIN TYPES of cells. The immune system has to destroy LNP-infected cells just like it must destroy covid-infected cells. With the LNPs, the body has a much bigger job of identifying and killing nearly every kind of cell imaginable than it has with clearing covid.
Plus, injection gives the vaccines a big initial advantage over the virus, which has to survive the immune-system’s defensive gauntlet in the mucosal linings before entering the lungs. The vaccines go right into your body cavity, and sometimes veins, if an inexperienced nurse forgets to aspirate the needle before injection.*
Forget about the spike, LNPs themselves can cause injury:
In the study linked above, the researchers said in their summary:
We show that in mice, intradermal, intramuscular, or intranasal delivery of LNPs used in preclinical studies triggers inflammation characterized by leukocytic infiltration, activation of different inflammatory pathways, and secretion of a diverse pool of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. Thus, the inflammatory milieu induced by the LNPs could be partially responsible for reported side effects of mRNA-LNP-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in humans and are possibly contributory to their reported high potency for eliciting antibody responses.
Some folks are beginning to suspect that the puzzlingly wide variety of vaccine-induced injury is related to the LNP migration problem. The injuries depend on where it migrates and in which type of cells the LNP winds up infecting. Since this can be random (“stochastic”) between different people depending on their individual biologies, the adverse side effects are also highly diverse.
(* Aspirating the needle means sticking the needle in but then drawing out a little fluid before injecting. If the fluid is red, you’re in a vein and need to start over.)
It is now well-known and uncontroversial that the vaccines can produce serious cardiac injuries like myocarditis. The only argument at this point is how rare or commonplace these types of injuries are.
Tragically, the risks of vaccine-induced cardiac injury appear greatest for young people and children, who have the LEAST risk from the natural virus. It’s looking like a pretty bad deal for them.
Vaccine defenders argue that, like the vaccines, the natural virus spike protein can also cause cardiac injury, which is true. But there are at least two ways that the vaccines are worse: first, because the mRNA spike persists in the body much longer, the risk window is much greater with the jabs. Second, unlike natural covid spike, the LNP particles can infect heart cells, and that infection itself creates inflammation and a need for the body to destroy cardiac tissue to clear the mRNA-infected heart cells. So that’s an extra way that the jabs harm the heart that is not a risk from the virus.
So it is becoming more clear that the risks of vaccine-induced cardiac injury are higher, maybe much higher, than from natural covid infection.
CLOTS AND ENDOTHELIAL INJURIES
One of the places that the mRNA-carrying LNP particles can get into is the body’s endothelial cells. These important cells line your veins and arteries. When that happens, the mRNA-loaded endothelial cells start making spike, which causes inflammation, and make the infected cells targets for destruction by the body’s immune system. The result: blood clots and other serious problems.
Damage to the endothelium can also cause other unexpected types of injuries, such as corneal transplant rejection, as described in this paper:
An under-appreciated study from last May concluded, “The response of innate immune cells to TLR4 and TLR7/8 ligands was lower after BNT162b2 vaccination, while fungi-induced cytokine responses were stronger.”
The study suggests a mechanism by which the immune response itself is damaged by the mRNA jabs. But another mechanism could be that the vaccine LNPs can find their way into immune cells, when then start producing spike, which causes the body to have to attack its own immune system to clear the misbehaving immune cells. Hence “auto-immune” or self-attacking.
We’re seeing anecdotal reports of autoimmune problems following the jabs appearing in the literature:
IMMUNE SUPPRESSION INJURIES
The greatest long-term risk we are now aware of is the vaccine’s potential ability to damage, or “suppress,” the body’s immune system. A suppressed immune system leaves the body vulnerable to all kinds of random nasty outcomes like breakthroughs, repeat covid infections, cancer, and increased susceptibility to common bugs like shingles, HPV, and measles. In the words of one recent study, elevated post-vaccine risks include neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, impaired DNA damage response and tumorigenesis.
A suppressed immune system is the same effect produced by the AIDS virus, which is why you see a lot of chatter about “VAIDS,” or vaccine-induced acquired immune deficiency syndrome.
Here’s a very recent study describing the problem:
In the paper linked above, the researchers conclude:
We present evidence that mRNA vaccines induce a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health … The mRNA vaccines likely cause increased risk to infectious diseases and cancer.
In fact there are any number of anecdotal reports by practitioners seeing a substantial uptick in post-vaccination aggressive cancers:
Same with shingles:
If these anecdotal upticks are signals, they tend to confirm that the vaccinated are experiencing immune system suppression. We have also seen that triple-boosted folks are now more likely to test positive for covid than any other cohort, which is consistent with an immune-suppression hypothesis.
As they keep reminding me, I’m not a doctor, I’m only a lawyer. Therefore, I present this roundup not as “proof” of anything but as “evidence.” I included links to the studies and sources for your reference and as written “expert witnesses” for the claims. In a jury trial, if one side produces evidence, any evidence at all, and the other side produces nothing, then the side producing evidence wins by default.
In a case like that, they say “the evidence was unrebutted."
The public health establishment has a duty to produce evidence that the jabs are safe and effective, as they claim. Exactly how long does the enhanced mRNA stay in the body making spike protein? Exactly where can the LNPs go? Do the jabs damage the body’s immune response? If so, to what extent? And for exactly how long?
The good news is, the more we understand about HOW the vaccines cause injury, the easier it will be to treat or even reverse these types of injuries. So, we’re making progress, and I expect this trend will only accelerate. But the best news is that the secret embargo on vaccine-injury studies appears to have now been lifted, so we can at least talk about it and the researchers can learn from each other.
Let me know in the comments if I missed any important studies and I’ll add them.
Finally, sorry about the length. I tried to keep it as concise as I could while still making it all understandable.
Have a magnificent Monday! I’ll be back tomorrow with a normal news roundup for you.
You can help get the truth out and spread optimism and hope: https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/-learn-how-to-get-involved-
C&C Swag! www.shopcoffeeandcovid.com