Jan 8, 2022·edited Jan 8, 2022Liked by Jeff Childers
If Sotomayor can be a Supreme Court Justice then I can be a 4 Star General. How can someone in such a high position be so misinformed? I question whether or not she's even human. "Spewing a virus?" I guess we know what she's doing in her chambers. Additionally, if she can be permitted to haphazardly throw around terms like "spewing a virus", than we should be able to use terms like "toxic vaccine reactions."
I really appreciate your take on this, Jeff. But I am still concerned that counsel for the petitioners made no attempt to clarify the gross misrepresentation of facts. While I understand the need to argue law, the facts matter. Perhaps not to the inevitable pre-ordained outcome, but for the record. A well-prepared attorney should have had those facts ready to assert, and then quickly pivot back to the legal argument.
I also don't understand why the fact that there is no fully-approved vaccine on the market was not brought up. Comirnaty is not available. They are all under EUA. Per federal statute, consent must be informed and not coerced for EUA products. Seems like a simple argument to make - that federal law is itself being violated.
Despite my exasperation with the argument, I just hope and pray these mandates fail and the ripple effect will impact all areas of vaccine worship craziness.
Jan 8, 2022·edited Jan 8, 2022Liked by Jeff Childers
Jeff, I cannot thank you enough. I listened to about an hour of the oral arguments yesterday and couldn't stomach continuing. Your comments today completely exceeded my expectations. It is really stressful waiting to know how these decisions will turn out knowing they directly impact my ability and many of my coworkers ability to keep our jobs, but you help lessen the stress by sharing your knowledge. I am really glad I found your blog and that you are on our side in this battle.
Lawyer here. What I saw from liberal SCOTUS justices yesterday was panic. They know where the decision lies- against the mandates. During a deposition, if a lawyer has a shitty case, he'll bang his fists on the table for dramatic effect. That's the shit we saw yesterday from the left.
I know of a nurse who circumvented a flu vaccine mandate from a hospital. She stated
1.) This was not in the contract she originally signed with them. She was abiding by the original.
2.) She would reconsider, though, as a gesture of good will, with one condition. Since the shot was now mandated as a condition of the workplace, she would comply if the " product" would be fully and completely removed from her at the end of each work day and at the end of her employment with the hospital.
I would still like to know why no one ever seems to mention that these are experimental drugs and that by mandating them they are forcing the American people to participate in a human trial without informed consent.
As a healthcare professional I feel hopeless and discouraged. Looks like we gonna be thrown under the bus as a sacrifice, being punished for all we did from the beginning of the pandemic... You say hospital had flu vaccine mandates before with liberal exemptions. Well, these exemptions are not liberal anymore, and this vaccine is not like flu vaccine at all. They can update the mandate with endless boosters. And I don't see if these mandates have any timeframe limitations, so they can stay indefinitely.
Why didn’t any of the lawyers bring up the fact that all the available vaccines are still under EUA and a person can’t be forced to take an experimental treatment? One of the justices (I forget which one) said that the vaccines are FDA approved. They are not! The lawyer let that slide. This is not an irrelevant fact. We can’t allow citizens to be coerced into a medical experiment through misinformation.
I think it is not wise for an emperor, or a king, or a president, to come down into the boxing ring, so to speak, and lower the dignity of his office by meddling in the small affairs of private citizens.
“First, the case has to be decided on the LEGAL issues at this stage. So it doesn’t matter how dangerous or harmless Covid is right now. They didn’t waste their limited time arguing about that.”
In theory that’s correct. In practice it is not. And we know this simply by reference to the contemptible, ignorant performances by Breyer, Kagan, and the Moronic Puerto Rican (I can say that, because I’m Boricua by choice, and my wife is Puerto Rican).
IMO, it mattered immensely for the Justices’ patently false statements of danger to be debunked publicly and persistently (though respectfully, so as not to give the squishes on the Court any reason to waver).
Not because it would change the corrupt Lib Justices’ already-made-up, politically-driven minds, but because they need to be exposed beyond any shadow of a doubt for the garbage, dishonest Justices they really are.
Thank-you for pulling on my coattails to try and remove me from the ledge. I'm sorry I can't come all the way down yet, but at least now I'm sitting, instead of standing. I pray your opinion is correct, that the mandates will be overturned.
"Somebody should let Justice Sotomayor know so that she doesn’t worry."
I realize this line was snark, but truly, Sotomayor doesn't worry. Well at least not for the children. Were she concerned, she would have the correct numbers from personal research. Her sole concern is for government power.
If Sotomayor can be a Supreme Court Justice then I can be a 4 Star General. How can someone in such a high position be so misinformed? I question whether or not she's even human. "Spewing a virus?" I guess we know what she's doing in her chambers. Additionally, if she can be permitted to haphazardly throw around terms like "spewing a virus", than we should be able to use terms like "toxic vaccine reactions."
I really appreciate your take on this, Jeff. But I am still concerned that counsel for the petitioners made no attempt to clarify the gross misrepresentation of facts. While I understand the need to argue law, the facts matter. Perhaps not to the inevitable pre-ordained outcome, but for the record. A well-prepared attorney should have had those facts ready to assert, and then quickly pivot back to the legal argument.
I also don't understand why the fact that there is no fully-approved vaccine on the market was not brought up. Comirnaty is not available. They are all under EUA. Per federal statute, consent must be informed and not coerced for EUA products. Seems like a simple argument to make - that federal law is itself being violated.
Despite my exasperation with the argument, I just hope and pray these mandates fail and the ripple effect will impact all areas of vaccine worship craziness.
Jeff, I cannot thank you enough. I listened to about an hour of the oral arguments yesterday and couldn't stomach continuing. Your comments today completely exceeded my expectations. It is really stressful waiting to know how these decisions will turn out knowing they directly impact my ability and many of my coworkers ability to keep our jobs, but you help lessen the stress by sharing your knowledge. I am really glad I found your blog and that you are on our side in this battle.
Sincerely,
Aaron Gonzalez
Lawyer here. What I saw from liberal SCOTUS justices yesterday was panic. They know where the decision lies- against the mandates. During a deposition, if a lawyer has a shitty case, he'll bang his fists on the table for dramatic effect. That's the shit we saw yesterday from the left.
Remember the Obama care decision? Good times, uh? I have zero confidence in the robes. Just an unemployed nurse here.
I know of a nurse who circumvented a flu vaccine mandate from a hospital. She stated
1.) This was not in the contract she originally signed with them. She was abiding by the original.
2.) She would reconsider, though, as a gesture of good will, with one condition. Since the shot was now mandated as a condition of the workplace, she would comply if the " product" would be fully and completely removed from her at the end of each work day and at the end of her employment with the hospital.
I would still like to know why no one ever seems to mention that these are experimental drugs and that by mandating them they are forcing the American people to participate in a human trial without informed consent.
As a healthcare professional I feel hopeless and discouraged. Looks like we gonna be thrown under the bus as a sacrifice, being punished for all we did from the beginning of the pandemic... You say hospital had flu vaccine mandates before with liberal exemptions. Well, these exemptions are not liberal anymore, and this vaccine is not like flu vaccine at all. They can update the mandate with endless boosters. And I don't see if these mandates have any timeframe limitations, so they can stay indefinitely.
Why didn’t any of the lawyers bring up the fact that all the available vaccines are still under EUA and a person can’t be forced to take an experimental treatment? One of the justices (I forget which one) said that the vaccines are FDA approved. They are not! The lawyer let that slide. This is not an irrelevant fact. We can’t allow citizens to be coerced into a medical experiment through misinformation.
I think it is not wise for an emperor, or a king, or a president, to come down into the boxing ring, so to speak, and lower the dignity of his office by meddling in the small affairs of private citizens.
- Mark Twain
There is no scientific or medical justification to mandate this shot for anyone , anywhere period
Man, I needed to hear your perspective! Thanks, Jeff, for interpreting things for us. How I pray that truth and the Constitution triumphs!
“First, the case has to be decided on the LEGAL issues at this stage. So it doesn’t matter how dangerous or harmless Covid is right now. They didn’t waste their limited time arguing about that.”
In theory that’s correct. In practice it is not. And we know this simply by reference to the contemptible, ignorant performances by Breyer, Kagan, and the Moronic Puerto Rican (I can say that, because I’m Boricua by choice, and my wife is Puerto Rican).
IMO, it mattered immensely for the Justices’ patently false statements of danger to be debunked publicly and persistently (though respectfully, so as not to give the squishes on the Court any reason to waver).
Not because it would change the corrupt Lib Justices’ already-made-up, politically-driven minds, but because they need to be exposed beyond any shadow of a doubt for the garbage, dishonest Justices they really are.
Thank-you for pulling on my coattails to try and remove me from the ledge. I'm sorry I can't come all the way down yet, but at least now I'm sitting, instead of standing. I pray your opinion is correct, that the mandates will be overturned.
"Somebody should let Justice Sotomayor know so that she doesn’t worry."
I realize this line was snark, but truly, Sotomayor doesn't worry. Well at least not for the children. Were she concerned, she would have the correct numbers from personal research. Her sole concern is for government power.
I was discouraged & outraged at the liberal judge's out-of-touch with reality spew of stats so yea thank you for your take on things