Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Eric's avatar

If Sotomayor can be a Supreme Court Justice then I can be a 4 Star General. How can someone in such a high position be so misinformed? I question whether or not she's even human. "Spewing a virus?" I guess we know what she's doing in her chambers. Additionally, if she can be permitted to haphazardly throw around terms like "spewing a virus", than we should be able to use terms like "toxic vaccine reactions."

Expand full comment
Alex Baden's avatar

I really appreciate your take on this, Jeff. But I am still concerned that counsel for the petitioners made no attempt to clarify the gross misrepresentation of facts. While I understand the need to argue law, the facts matter. Perhaps not to the inevitable pre-ordained outcome, but for the record. A well-prepared attorney should have had those facts ready to assert, and then quickly pivot back to the legal argument.

I also don't understand why the fact that there is no fully-approved vaccine on the market was not brought up. Comirnaty is not available. They are all under EUA. Per federal statute, consent must be informed and not coerced for EUA products. Seems like a simple argument to make - that federal law is itself being violated.

Despite my exasperation with the argument, I just hope and pray these mandates fail and the ripple effect will impact all areas of vaccine worship craziness.

Expand full comment
235 more comments...

No posts