45 Comments
Nov 11, 2021Liked by Jeff Childers

I copied and pasted the quote from the Washington Post Times about the pandemic being over and sent it to our governor here in North Carolina. I write him at least once a week and have “shared” your wisdom with him several times. I also told him that, as a leader it is especially evil to promote fear in your constituents. I never get a reply from governor Cooper’s office but I’m not giving up!

Expand full comment

Well I can't say the powers of the State Health Officer have never been used in some onerous ways. As the pastor of a church in Putnam County, we had the very first case in the county occur in a lady from our church. Although she had not been to church in over 3 weeks, and had attended the Azalea Festival about a week prior to symptoms, the county health department head (under the instruction and threat of the State Health Officer) call me demanding I turn over our entire membership list for contact tracing. When I refused I was threatened with arrest with power granted by the state. It all worked out in the end, but I really didn't like the local health department head having that much power.

Expand full comment

STUDY FINDS NO EVIDENCE OF a PANDEMIC IN THE US - EXCESS DEATHS CAN BE ATTRIBUTED TO COVID POLICIES AND CLIMATIC IMPACTS (Denis Rancourt)

CONCLUSION: By examining the socio-jurisdictional and temporal structure of the ACM/w data, and by comparing to socio-geo-economic and climatic data, we conclude that the massive above-trend COVID-era mortality in the USA is not the result of a pandemic, but instead is caused by the large-scale medical and government responses, which transformed the domestic economy and living conditions, and the associated long-term chronic psychological stress effects on the most vulnerable populations (regarding poverty and obesity), in a context of ordinary seasonal respiratory diseases and typical summer heat-wave climatic effects.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/nature-covid-era-public-health-disaster-usa-all-cause-mortality-socio-geo-economic-climatic-data/5759567

Expand full comment

Well, one thing has become abundantly clear: I NEVER would have made it as a lawyer. I came into all this mess thinking that this is gonna be a slam dunk. How in the hell, I thought, can anyone force another person to inject something into their body that can potentially kill them or leave them in a permanent debilitated state? This needs to settled in the courts? Seriously?! I suppose this makes me a bit of a simpleton.

Expand full comment

ANSWER THIS - Why do Chinese get a choice of 2 traditional, old-fashioned antigen "vaccines" while Americans have to choose between 3 choices of mRNA spike proteins? --- The Chinese use their own "Sinopharm" and "Sinovac" brands which are traditional vaccines that work by using killed viral particles as the antigen to expose the body's immune system to the virus without risking a serious disease response. All the contents of this vaccine are presumed to remain local to the injection site in the shoulder with no evidence of traveling systemically to damage the brain, liver, ovaries, uterus and other vital organs as do the mRNA and spike protein "clot shots"..... Could it be that China wants to protect their workforce from death and disabilities that could put Chinese exports to the US and EU at risk?

Expand full comment
Nov 11, 2021Liked by Jeff Childers

Has everyone here read That Hideous Strength (cs lewis)? I'm in the middle of it and it has eery overlays with today.

Really helps me see that the totalitarianism being pushed today was tried all throughout the 20th century.

Expand full comment
Nov 11, 2021Liked by Jeff Childers

Why are we still calling the Injection a vaccine, when it clearly isn't a vaccine?

Expand full comment
Nov 11, 2021Liked by Jeff Childers

Hi Jeff, awesome, awesome awesome. I am a federal employee. The OSG (surgeon general) admitted to us that the purpose of the vaccine is not to prevent transmission. We have a video. What is the purpose of the mandate? Is it personal health? No, they can not force you to take treatment for personal health (if I have cancer, they can not force me to take chemo). Is it for communal health? Yes, that is the purpose that a court would consider forcing a vaccine. But, wait, health officials and now a court recognizes that the vaccine can't fulfill that obligation of the mandate. Why can't attorney's argue this?

Expand full comment

Dr. Chris Martenson does a deep dive on why "Mandates" have nothing to do with pubic health - https://youtu.be/gnB8Tep92Us

Expand full comment

"The federal district Court also courageously found that on the undisputed evidence we’d proved that the injections don’t stop Covid from spreading; injected people likely spread Covid MORE than uninjected people; and the shots are the most dangerous vaccines ever made."

KUDOS. That should help with lobbying Florida to end ALL discrimination against The Unvaxed, which for starters means ALL employees get tested, or NONE. Actually, looks like the real science says if anyone should be singled out for testing, it's The Vaxed.

It's a great special session package even without it, but Gov DeSantis likes real science, so why not embrace the real science & go for it? If any pol has the courage & eloquence to do it, it's DeSantis.

“Biden team won’t admit it, but the COVID-19 pandemic is over.” -WA Times

Sadly, the WA Times won't admit it, but that has nothing to do with vaccination rates. Everyone pushing the "safe & effective" falsehood is engaged in grossly negligent unintentional homicide/manslaughter at a minimum, including WA Times, Trump & Pacific Legal Foundation. Those who *know* it's a lie & still push it, or who censor the truth and intimidate truth tellers, are accomplices to mass murder who should be on trial at The Hague.

Also, by leaving the unvaxed in a diminishing vulnerable minority, the lie paves the way for vax tyranny, even when repeated those who claim to oppose vax tyranny. Unfortunate, too common psychology is refuse to admit a mistake, which is compounded by the dread of admitting that the mistake you made could still injure or kill you and others. Also:

"I took it, nothing happened to me or anyone I know who took it, so why shouldn't you take it?"

"I don't like mandates, but Trump says it's safe, so no real harm done, so I won't fight it."

Remember the part in Huckleberry Finn when the 'Shakespearean' con artist 'actors' ('The Duke & The Dauphin') convince the audience they just conned that the audience will look like fools unless they con their neighbors and tell them how 'great' the play was. No one wants to admit they're part of a small group that's been had, so they double down and become part of the big con themselves. Eventually, once the entire town's been had, they tar and feather the con artists and ride them out of town on a rail.

Hopefully that's how the covid hysteria ends.

Expand full comment

Today's Highwire at 2PM ET deals with "WINNING" Vaxx injury lawsuits, home-schooling options, The JAXEN report and more

https://www.brighteon.com/43de07a6-2b63-48ad-8333-ae64187ab1aa

Livestream at 2PM Here:

https://thehighwire.com/watch/

Expand full comment
Nov 11, 2021Liked by Jeff Childers

Please speak to the Nov 4 Interim Final Rule (IFR) by the Centers for Medicaid & Medicare Services to mandate the vax for ALL staff who are employed by medical providers who care for Medicaid/Medicare patients and subsequently receive reimbursement from them. This will impact almost every hospital in the country and their employees. So even if the employer does not require the vax, they will likely now have to require of their staff in order to keep their CMS cert status. NO HOSPITAL in the country can afford not to comply - for most, at least 50%+ of their patients are medicare/medicaid insured.

Expand full comment

Truth will win out. The Math+ Protocol had been in use in Virginia for almost a year until the Authoritarian Medical Dictatorship blocked it. Why have Doctors been turned into Mindless Robot Dictators? Because Doctors can't think for themselves and question what they are being told to do. You have to find a Doctor who is able to do this and the only one is Dr Littell in Ocala. He put on the Conference at the Equestrian Center last Saturday.

https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/FLCCC-Marik-Case-Release-FINAL-Nov-9.pdf

Expand full comment

I recently, yesterday in fact, learned of this site and I want to thank you for everything you are doing! Hoping you can help with a question... if a FL headquartered, worldwide company, is mandating vaccines (for US colleagues only) on the merit of "companies with covered federal government contracts," will any of this state legislature or OSHA withdrawal help employees? Would the federal level win in this case and employees of said employers should seek accommodation if applicable?

Expand full comment

Here's a thought.... How should employers compensate employees for submitting to the risk of a 24/7 VAxx Mandate when they only work an 8 hour shift?. When the JAB clots your arteries after you punch out for the day, how is the employer off the hook for mandating a JAB that has 24 hour a day risks of adverse reactions and/or sudden death?

Expand full comment

Hey Jeff, thanks for that super informative breakdown - it gives me hope that I don't have to subject myself to the 2nd jab after being forced by private employer.

My concern is discrimination when it comes to limiting employees free movement when not vaccinated. For example I would be limited to my office area and unable to move freely around the rest of the 90-95% of the building which is required as part of my job duties. You mention about encouraging lawmakers to include protection against discrimination so I wonder if that would be in there. Then the law expires on June 1st 2023, meaning that the employer can hang onto me until then and then say "we're tired of your crap - you're fired". I still can't believe what this virus has done to common sense.

Final comment is the Lancet article you mention - I am no scientist nor I play one on TV, but you quoted the Interpretation (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanwpc/article/PIIS2666-6065(21)00208-X/fulltext#:~:text=RCI%200.38%E2%80%931.40).-,Interpretation,-Increased%20risk%20of):

"Increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 Delta acquisition compared with other variants was reduced with vaccination. Close-contacts of vaccinated Delta-infected indexes did not have statistically significant reduced risk of acquisition compared with unvaccinated Delta-infected indexes."

But their conclusion contradicts their interpretation stating the following:

"Individuals exposed to the Delta variant have an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 acquisition compared to those exposed to other variants. This risk is reduced by 55% among vaccinated individuals, which shows the importance of high vaccination coverage to increase population-level immunity...."

Link to Conclusion (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanwpc/article/PIIS2666-6065(21)00208-X/fulltext#:~:text=5.-,CONCLUSION,-Individuals%20exposed%20to).

So it seems that at the end they're still suggesting the garbage vaccine. Again, I am no scientist but thought this difference was important to bring up. If there are fellow C&C'ers that can fully interpret the Lancet article it would be GREATLY AND AWESOMELY appreciated :)

Expand full comment