Legal analysis of Does v. Mills; Richard Corcoran throws the glove down on rebellious counties; Florida’s hospitalizations hit record lows while Colorado nationalizes its healthcare system...
The Gorsuch dissent is great, and he referred to the Maine vaccine mandate as irrational. He asks, how does firing doctors preserve the health care system? How would people with a religious accommodation spread the disease more than than people with a "medical accommodation?" And he also says that this "emergency" can't go on forever.
I was very interested in your take on the Supreme Court - you really are a perennial optimist! I sure hope you're right admit not giving up hope on them blocking the mandates at some point.
Question: I am healthy and just tried to get a prescription for ivermectin refilled at my local CVS pharmacy, and was told that as of September 1 the CDC has "put a stop on" filling prescriptions for ivermectin, so if my doctor wants me to take it, she will have to enroll me in a clinical trial. The pharmacist refused to give me her surname and license number, so I asked to talk with the store manager, who, in turn, told me that the directive not to fill ivermectin prescriptions had come from corporate management. I've checked the CDC website (in which I have pitifully little confidence), and don't see the prohibition that CVS claims exists. Anyone know whether out "public health" bureaucracy has in fact prohibited use of ivermectin for preventing and treating Covid? and if so, what legal support, if any, exists for doing this? Does anyone know of any national chains that have not caved to Biden administration pressure on this issue? If anyone can send me leads/links, I can look stuff up.
The elements of MASS FORMATION were described by David Reisman's (a liberal) landmark book published in 1950: "The lonely Crowd. A Study of the Changing American Character ".
The book was required reading in high schools and colleges. Looking back it may have been a tool of "predictive programming" by regarding middle-class society in pigeon-holed as "tradition-directed", "inner-directed", and "other-directed". Today, the traditional-directed (conservative) has been made the political enemy of the remaining two, who - through creeping socialist corporocracy - have been whipped into the helter-skelter of Mass Formation.
Saw Jeff's recommended video in fast mode during lunch. Very helpful! Also, one general tip on health insurance. My wife & I ditched the health insurance 'system' years ago, like we've tried to ditch other 'systems' to be in the world but not of the world. We've been very impressed with Christian Healthcare Ministries. No vested interest other than to keep sharing successful things, as many of us hopefully create a parallel society. Remember the 7 main 'systems' are: food, health, media, school, religion, banks, military. :)
"the Court needs to WAIT until it gets the 'right' case. It can only hear a few dozen cases a year. If the facts aren’t just right, the Court may not get another chance to do what it needs to do. This case only included healthcare workers and was based on religious exemptions; maybe it isn’t the case the Court is looking for to deal with injection mandates."
"THE right case"? The court takes 70-80 cases a year, closer to 100 than a few dozen. There need not be one perfect case. There will be lots of cases to choose from. The court can invite cases. If it "may not get another chance" for the perfect case it's because the court doesn't want another chance or ANY chance. Much like CO's gov blaming hospital shortages on "covid", not his own actions.
We're looking at medical tyranny that affects MILLIONS. Millions forced to choose between jobs or what may be lethal injection. The court can prioritize and take more than one case if this one doesn't have everything they want wrapped in a bow. "Only" dealing with no religious exemption isn't a negative. It needs to be dealt with. Those folks need relief, immediately. Just because it's healthcare workers doesn't mean the decision can't apply to other industries. And so what if the court only decides to apply it to healthcare workers? They can take another case, or two or three.
Liberty Counsel thought it was "the" (A) right case.
Thomas & Alito thought it was the right case, and that's enough for me knowing the others' various past betrayals. Why assume they're acting in good faith, waiting for the perfect case to do the right thing? Reminds me of the excuses we used to see a decade ago for Bush hack John Obamacare Roberts. "Roberts is playing 3D chess. You'll see! Patience! Trust the Plan!"
Is the court still waiting for the "right" case to reverse the coup d'etat & put Pres Trump in the WH? The great Amy & the other new "Federalist" Society "Justices" claimed a state like Texas doesn't have "standing" when other states disenfranchise their own voters & Tx voters & all the other states to steal the presidency.
"We’re in a war. There will be some casualties and lost battles before we win."
Well, someone should tell the "Federalist" Society Justices who clearly don't see it as a war. For them it's business as usual, lame callous excuses to shirk oath & duty. "There will be some casualties" is slim comfort for MILLIONS who now lose jobs, health, lives, homes, friends, family etc.
Just found you on the AFLDS website and your interview with Stew Peters! Wow! Thank-you! My son is a student at a private university in Texas where, though a majority of students are vaccinated, they still make all students wear masks and have discriminatory testing based on vaccination status. There is absolutely no scientific sense for their policies at this point, but after reading the article below it all makes sense. I'm playing catch up here...but am looking for the cases you are aware of that would be the most relevant in regard to this in order to push back. I suspect they know they are in the wrong and will back down if challenged. Please advise.
Interesting video. He makes so much sense, especially when he relayed that once people are in mass formation they all become equally stupid... no matter their intelligence level. Also, his answer to the last question around 4:10...sad but believable. Thank you Jeff.
Max Blumenthal has an interview with Mattias Desmet that is great quality. Max has done some great reporting around the vaccines and mandates despite his overall focus on foreign policy.
The Gorsuch dissent is great, and he referred to the Maine vaccine mandate as irrational. He asks, how does firing doctors preserve the health care system? How would people with a religious accommodation spread the disease more than than people with a "medical accommodation?" And he also says that this "emergency" can't go on forever.
I was forced to deploy one of my favorite arguments on a member of the vaccine sheeple the other day. The brief conversation went something like this:
Me: Have you ever used an umbrella?
Sheep: Yes
Me: Why did you use it?
Sheep: To keep from getting wet from the rain.
Me: I see.......Did it work?
Sheep: Yes
Me: So your umbrella protected you all on its own? You didn't need someone else to come out with their umbrella to make sure you didn't get wet?
Sheep: No, that's ridiculous.
Me:.............................(Waiting for the light bulb to go off.................................Nope.)
Me: So you've taken the shot. Are you protected or not?
Sheep: Yes
Me: So what difference does it make to you whether someone else takes the shot?
Sheep:
I was very interested in your take on the Supreme Court - you really are a perennial optimist! I sure hope you're right admit not giving up hope on them blocking the mandates at some point.
Thank you for the wake up for this day. All kinds of hope-filled news, I mean the absurdity, it HAS to get better!?!
I lol-ed in some places of the reading.
Grasshopper Polis!!!! I luv it!!! So true, he’s an embarrassment to Co. ❤️🤷♀️
Thank you for your explanation of the SCOTUS landing in regard to Maine. Much appreciated.
Question: I am healthy and just tried to get a prescription for ivermectin refilled at my local CVS pharmacy, and was told that as of September 1 the CDC has "put a stop on" filling prescriptions for ivermectin, so if my doctor wants me to take it, she will have to enroll me in a clinical trial. The pharmacist refused to give me her surname and license number, so I asked to talk with the store manager, who, in turn, told me that the directive not to fill ivermectin prescriptions had come from corporate management. I've checked the CDC website (in which I have pitifully little confidence), and don't see the prohibition that CVS claims exists. Anyone know whether out "public health" bureaucracy has in fact prohibited use of ivermectin for preventing and treating Covid? and if so, what legal support, if any, exists for doing this? Does anyone know of any national chains that have not caved to Biden administration pressure on this issue? If anyone can send me leads/links, I can look stuff up.
The elements of MASS FORMATION were described by David Reisman's (a liberal) landmark book published in 1950: "The lonely Crowd. A Study of the Changing American Character ".
The book was required reading in high schools and colleges. Looking back it may have been a tool of "predictive programming" by regarding middle-class society in pigeon-holed as "tradition-directed", "inner-directed", and "other-directed". Today, the traditional-directed (conservative) has been made the political enemy of the remaining two, who - through creeping socialist corporocracy - have been whipped into the helter-skelter of Mass Formation.
Saw Jeff's recommended video in fast mode during lunch. Very helpful! Also, one general tip on health insurance. My wife & I ditched the health insurance 'system' years ago, like we've tried to ditch other 'systems' to be in the world but not of the world. We've been very impressed with Christian Healthcare Ministries. No vested interest other than to keep sharing successful things, as many of us hopefully create a parallel society. Remember the 7 main 'systems' are: food, health, media, school, religion, banks, military. :)
"the Court needs to WAIT until it gets the 'right' case. It can only hear a few dozen cases a year. If the facts aren’t just right, the Court may not get another chance to do what it needs to do. This case only included healthcare workers and was based on religious exemptions; maybe it isn’t the case the Court is looking for to deal with injection mandates."
"THE right case"? The court takes 70-80 cases a year, closer to 100 than a few dozen. There need not be one perfect case. There will be lots of cases to choose from. The court can invite cases. If it "may not get another chance" for the perfect case it's because the court doesn't want another chance or ANY chance. Much like CO's gov blaming hospital shortages on "covid", not his own actions.
We're looking at medical tyranny that affects MILLIONS. Millions forced to choose between jobs or what may be lethal injection. The court can prioritize and take more than one case if this one doesn't have everything they want wrapped in a bow. "Only" dealing with no religious exemption isn't a negative. It needs to be dealt with. Those folks need relief, immediately. Just because it's healthcare workers doesn't mean the decision can't apply to other industries. And so what if the court only decides to apply it to healthcare workers? They can take another case, or two or three.
Liberty Counsel thought it was "the" (A) right case.
Thomas & Alito thought it was the right case, and that's enough for me knowing the others' various past betrayals. Why assume they're acting in good faith, waiting for the perfect case to do the right thing? Reminds me of the excuses we used to see a decade ago for Bush hack John Obamacare Roberts. "Roberts is playing 3D chess. You'll see! Patience! Trust the Plan!"
Is the court still waiting for the "right" case to reverse the coup d'etat & put Pres Trump in the WH? The great Amy & the other new "Federalist" Society "Justices" claimed a state like Texas doesn't have "standing" when other states disenfranchise their own voters & Tx voters & all the other states to steal the presidency.
"We’re in a war. There will be some casualties and lost battles before we win."
Well, someone should tell the "Federalist" Society Justices who clearly don't see it as a war. For them it's business as usual, lame callous excuses to shirk oath & duty. "There will be some casualties" is slim comfort for MILLIONS who now lose jobs, health, lives, homes, friends, family etc.
Marsha Blackburn Promotes Anti-Vaccine Mandate Bill -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-9SOaT3alg
Can anyone recommend any good podcasts on this side of the insanity? I can't find any, no surprise there.
Hi Jeff,
Just found you on the AFLDS website and your interview with Stew Peters! Wow! Thank-you! My son is a student at a private university in Texas where, though a majority of students are vaccinated, they still make all students wear masks and have discriminatory testing based on vaccination status. There is absolutely no scientific sense for their policies at this point, but after reading the article below it all makes sense. I'm playing catch up here...but am looking for the cases you are aware of that would be the most relevant in regard to this in order to push back. I suspect they know they are in the wrong and will back down if challenged. Please advise.
Thank you and God bless you!
https://media.mercola.com/ImageServer/Public/2021/November/PDF/colleges-conditioning-students-surveillance-bureaucracy-pdf.pdf
Rand Paul - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFYDGKN7HuQ
Interesting video. He makes so much sense, especially when he relayed that once people are in mass formation they all become equally stupid... no matter their intelligence level. Also, his answer to the last question around 4:10...sad but believable. Thank you Jeff.
Max Blumenthal has an interview with Mattias Desmet that is great quality. Max has done some great reporting around the vaccines and mandates despite his overall focus on foreign policy.
https://rokfin.com/stream/9705/Foreign-Agents-10--Covid-and-Mass-Hypnosis