3 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Dan (100% All in MAGA)'s avatar

The problem is with programmable machines, and these machines are connected to the network, or which can bridge the air gap with thumb drives, can give you any outcome you want. So maybe for the Mayor of Tulsa, they ran the system with no algorithms, ran it straight and clean, in order to create a sense within the electorate the machines can be trusted for other more important elections like this one coming up. As long as they are programmable as all these are, you must never assume that because one election was clean, therefore all elections are. You just can't do that, that's why the machines must go, mail in ballots must go and everything returned to a certifiable and verifiable process.

Expand full comment
Fre'd Bennett, MAHA's avatar

The Tulsa mayoral race was just the most recent example. But I completely agree. If we’re gonna use electronic tabulator machines, there must be strict manual auditing built in to the process.

Anything else leaves the question in the voters’ minds, and destroys the trust that a one-man-one-vote system requires.

As I said elsewhere yesterday, we absolutely need a constitutional amendment coupled with federal legislation that spells out the minimum actions necessary for a state to effect these goals.

Expand full comment
Dan (100% All in MAGA)'s avatar

Agreed.

But what did the "feds" give us instead? The HAVA act and the Federal Post Card Voter Registration Application which does not require documentary proof of citizenship, you simply check the box to state you are a citizen.

And they gave us the J6 fauxsurrection and conducted a coup d'etat, not only against Trump but the American people.

The entire fed government must be dismantled, including not on the executive branch and deep state, but the Legislative branch which no longer represents the people and the Judiciary, which includes weaponized lawfare at every level.

Expand full comment
ErrorError