HHS hands the Senate Fauci's phone and promises millions more pages; declassified memos show the FBI opened a case on whether the sitting President was a Russian asset β and misspelled it; more.
At this point anyone with an IQ over 50 can figure out what a lying deceiving murderous charlatan Anthony Fauci is. RFK Jrβs interview with Dana Bash puts her well below the 50 IQ range. It wonβt be very eye opening when we see all of the democrats vote to let the mass murderer off the hook today, placing all of them in the 1-49 IQ range.
Fauci is the perfect example of why America should never again hand an unelected faceless bureaucrat the power to do what Fauci did to this country and the world.
Fauci was not a lone ranger. He had massive amounts of institutional help, from both public and private sectors. Taking down Fauci and leaving his support system intact is kinda like snipping off the head of one dandelion and expecting all the dandelions in your lawn to perish.
"My friends, this culture of swampy government-by-fiat is the real threat to our democracy. Itβs nitwits! The nitwits are killing us." Well the nitwits at the IACC (INTERAGENCY AUTISM COORDINATING COMMITTEE) couldn't tell us what is sickening our babies and children. A 336 page strategic plan and the word "vaccine" was NEVER MENTIONED!!
He helped keep me alive during the lockdown, as I have 5 arthritises and am immune compromised bigly. He, Dr. Robert Malone and Dr. Robert Yoho, their substacks. A Midwesten Doctor is awesome!
I listened to an interview with a historian a few years ago, and she was talking about the difference in researching before and after Reagan.
Presidents used to preserve all their papers for the public record. A researcher could go to the National Archive or the presidential library, and get access and insight to whatever they were working on.
But from Reagan on, the massive secrecy and classification of everything went wild, and trying to research a president's term became very difficult.
We're used to the obsessive secrecy now, and think it's normal, but it isn't. It's just part of the process of the government becoming more secretive, marching along in process with them spying on us more and more.
Humans can get used to anything, and we are living proof.
It's mind boggling, isn't it? The years I spent trying to wake people up about 9-11 are now being matched by trying to get people to realize the truth about covid and Fauci. There is a certain percentage of the population that clings to the comforting myth, no matter what facts are presented.
I actually do believe it. However that was not the point of my comment. The point was that the old version of America was indeed destroyed. Much of it at the hands of our own federal govdenment. But I consider it tremendously foolhardy to ignore the Muslim role.
"...the Muslim 9/11 terrorists did destroy the America we knew..."
Sorry Lynne, but just like there never was a deadly virus, no planes hit the World Trade Center on 9/11. Its all fake.
And you can see it for yourself Lynne. Just watch the videos and you will see the perfectly executed controlled demolition of high-rise buildings, falling down into their own footprint, and dustification (Dustification is the end result of a successful demolition.)
Then ask the question 'What would happen if planes had hit the Towers?'
Answer; It would have sprayed twisted steel, death, destruction, and body parts all over Lower Manhattan.
Mercifully that did not happen.
Because no planes hit the Towers on 9/11.
And all it took was a handful of staged videos of Crisis.Actors crying "I saw the plane hit the Tower", and a fake video of a plane hitting a building playing CONTINUOUSLY for 72hrs to make millions of people believe that planes had hit the World Trade Center on 9/11.
We are victims of big, massive, traumatizing global psyops.
You are full of it. I have friends who were at the World Trade Center on 9/11 and got covered in dust from the collapse. I saw the plane hit the Pentagon. I have friends who were inside the building that day who barely got out with their lives.
While there is some (small) chance that the towers were brought down by explosive demolition charges, Occam's Razor says that's not the case.
The WT Towers were not the typically structures that rely on exterior walls and fireproofed structural steel like found in the vast majority of NYC skyscrapers. Many, with fire engineering training and exposure, criticized the architecture that employed glass walls without any inherent structural strength when the buildings were proposed and long after they were built. Fire resistance ratings are based on degree of temperature and length of exposure. As an engineer with wide construction experience, Bin Laden must have known that and probably chose the towers because of that knowledge. The fuel in large airliners make very effective fire bombs when the intentions of pilots choose to use them.
I want to know why no intelligence official - at any level, much less those in charge of the IC agencies - was ever fired or reprimanded. That, for me, is more proof of a conspiracy than putative explosive demolition. Any conspiracy to place explosives would have to have involved far too many people to continue to be a secret; there were few enough IC agency heads in positions to suppress knowledge about muslim hijackers that the secrets could be kept.
You cannot understand, unless you are an architect or structural engineer, why the buildings pancaked as they did and why they were designed like that. It was a relatively new constructio/design, that allowed for open floors with few if any columns or other structure to interfere with the open floor plan. There was a core that contained stairs, elevators, utilities etc in the middle and the outside wall was the other part that held up the floors. Once that outside wall was breached, and the heat from the jet fuel burning began to weaken the structure... each floor "pancaked" onto the one below, starting at near the top.
My husband is an architect/builder and was a big fan of the towers. He had been in there many times.
Even if I believed your psyop conspiracy, which I do not, it does not explain the Pentagon planes or the Pennsylvania planes. Nor does it in any way explain or justify the decades long history of Muslim nations/entities repeatedly attacking Americans and American interests. While the USA is not perfect (no one and no thing on this earth are) we haven't as a nation or even a national ideology beheaded anyone. Your ignorance is showing; you ought to tuck it in.
And who was behind the useful idiots (Muslims?) I seen the pictures of the main supports that were cutβ¦ The thermite that was found at the site that would make the jet fuel burn so much hotter, etcβ¦
Hmmm. Let me see? Who followed Reagan as POTUS? Wasn't he a former director of the CIA and skull and bones member?
Does it surprise you that the govt became the exclusive enclave of our spook agencies, despite an national elections, and resulted in increased secrecy wrt to record keeping? Come, come.
Not only can humans become used to anything, our entire culture is built around suspension of disbelief. All our fiction and entertainment reinforces that trait. We should demand better, and by that, I mean mocking the suspension of disbelief and the elevation of critical thinking. Of course, that would be the end of Hollywood and corporate media entertainment.
Oh, So Very True. "A Hard Truth." All governments throughout recorded history, every one of them, sooner or later go rouge and begin to harm their people. It's that governments represent power and those that lust for power cannot resist being in government so they can get and flaunt that power. It's as sure to happen as the Sun rising in the east and setting in the west. Our Founding Fathers were well aware of that truth because they knew the history, unlike many of us that don't know that today. The Founding Fathers did the best men can do to install into the Constitution and Bill of Rights protections for the people. Most or many of those protections have been ignored, lost or stolen. Trump is the man that is actually trying to bring back the power of government into the hands of the people. We are in the fight for our lives and our country.
Ever since that 6.5 Carcano ong gun accompished a number o very impossibe shots, we've been ied to. And the one who repaced the victim that day was and remains at the centre o much that has happened since.
Today's revelations are hopephully the beginning o a wholesale rout o the long train o lies.
I think it somehow right and just that some o the relatives o the victim that day in Texas are now at the core o the "housecleaning"party
this sounds right, but isn't. Fauci will be the scapegoat used to make people think there was some accountability. And even he won't serve time or minimal time at most. Let's wait and see what happens...
Red State AGβs need to coordinate on how to hold the COVID Plandemic Cabal accountable. The Feds have too many Deep State disrupters to get any meaningful accountability accomplished. Red States need to form an alliance, much like the 13 colonies did during the Revolution.
Unfortunately Oregon is completely controlled. We were asleep at the wheel in the 90's and now our state is burning again! We need the red states' to form that alliance to stop what's happened to Oregon!
Oregon has such beautiful land, resources and weather. Mountains or beach, all in 1 day. Which makes it all the more sad how blue captured it is. Ellen Rosenblum (Oregon State AG, 2012-2024) and Mike Schmidt (PDX DA 2020-2024) have special reservations in Danteβs 8th & 9th Circles.
That will little matter. He has few years left to live. He has lived a life of wealth and privilege. Nature will deprive him of the only true wealth which is a sound mind and body.
That's not to say that he isn't deserving of those any other losses society can impose.
I want to see Barric a Daszak brought before Paul's committee and grilled as aggressively and thoroughly as they deserve to be. They have no immunity and are likely to follow the fauci ferret's example and take the 5th; but the MUST BE PUT ON RECORD.
Nothing will happen. Republicans want the same protections for their peccadillos. Itβs why no one is challenging the obviously invalid blanket pardons; they want the same protections when their turn comes.
Agreed- starting with Deborah Birk who is now trying to backpedal her involvement with the team response! These deep state players have no remorse for their actions and roles!!
Well, Rex had my interest at the "death of Freddie Mercury", since very few people seem to remember that Fauci completely screwed up the AIDs epidemic, pushed AZT as the only viable treatment solution, and caused an enormous numbers of deaths from AZT itself. (Some of you may remember men protesting in Washington with signs that read "Dr Fauci, you're killing us".)
After reading todayβs revelations of the existential threat βsecretlyβ created by our βleadership classβ in Trump 1.0, I was truly reeling. What else donβt we know? How do we stop this from ever happening againβ¦etc.? After a few deep breaths and reminded by my spouse that He is in control..not me..not themβ¦.This verse came to mind and stopped my free fall.
Proverbs 19:21 β "Many are the plans in a personβs heart, but it is the Lordβs purpose that prevails."
DOGE made significant inroads. The executive branch is releasing the info. Congress is making baby steps. (Or at least some in Congress.) Way too much of the judiciary is captured, at least for now. So the 2026 midterms are imperative. From what I am reading the chance of the Blue Wave is collapsing because the USAID to NGO pipeline has dried up and the donkeys can no longer pay their political hacks and ballot harvesters. Everybody concerned about the election should volunteer. Either as poll workers or poll watchers. There is still time to be trained.
Electing JD Vance in 2028 is imperative to continue the dismantling of the Woodrow Wilson / FDR enabled un-Constitutional bureaucratic federal apparatus - that rules citizens lives by unelected regulation.
I learned a new reason why people might register opposite their political affiliation: so one can transport ballots to the election office with someone of the same political party.
I'm an election worker here in the deep blue outpost of Lawrence, KS. Kansas has a law that two people of different political affiliations, must drive the ballots from the precinct to the election office at the end of the election day.
Makes sense, right? It helps reduce the chance that the two people will throw out some of the ballots on the way back.
The problem is, almost half of voters claim to be "unaffiliated" these days, and that counts as a different political affiliation for the purpose of running ballots back. It's easy to imagine an "unaffiliated" voter is really conservative or liberal in reality.
During chatting after the training, the guy doing the training was talking about this, and he mentioned, casually, that he knows at least one person is actually a Democrat that registered as Republican so they can help run the ballots back to the election office.
This is in a county that has about twice as many declared D's as declared R's, with a perhaps 40% of voters nominally unaffiliated, in a red state. There are counties that lean much further to the left.
We have the two person transport requirement in Texas too. But I don't think unaffiliated works, strictly R or D. ICBW but I think the really kinky stuff involves either mailed in ballots or harvested ballots that are dropped off where that is legal.
You're exactly right. Volunteer to WORK at the polls through you local election officer, ESPECIALLY if you live in an urban area. Its much harder to cheat in rural areas... everyone knows each other or where people live etc.
I would suggest watching ONLY IF you actually know the procedures and regulations. If you don't know this information, you're wasting your time as you dont really know what to look for.
What I find slightly terrifying is that, pretty close to this exact thing could also have been said after the AIDS crisis.
At the time, I wasnβt concerned abt any of it, (too young, dumb/naive) but my parents sure were. I was away in college, living in a dorm. I became concerned when a fellow classmate, a hemophiliac, received tainted blood. His dad called to tell him NOT to get his transfusion but he didnβt get the message in time. He was a senior, engaged to be married. Her parents went berserk. It was a huge thing.
At that point, I became curious abt gays on TV saying Fauci was killing them with AZT. I noticed as soon as men began being treated, their condition seemed to exponentially worsen.
Reading RFKβs The Real Anthony Fauci really brought it ALL that to light, including him using orphans as lab mice. He literally experimented on kids who had no advocate. Kids were telling other kids NOT to βlet them make you take that medicine. It HURTS.β
So yeah, calling Fauci a human cockroach is being far too kind.
All that to say, he really shouldβve been drawn and quartered after β or during β his FIRST βcrisisβ.
I do hope that what you are calling for happens. Iβm just so disappointed it didnβt happen the first time around.
"Inventing the Aids Virus" by Peter Duesberg offered early insight into Fauci's mendacity and wickedness. It also demonstrates that the "Aids virus", was simply the presence of antibodies in conjunction with several illnesses common in the homosexual community and drug users.
This is taken from a comment on a recent James Delingpole substack.
"... I mean if AIDS was never real - and it wasnβt; and if the repurposed, insta-kill, failed-cancer-cure death drug AZT was what really finished off all those supposed AIDS victims - and it was," you are reinforcing the common yet FALSE view that AZT is the true killer. Let me explain the TIMELINE about which you seem unaware, and have overlooked:
Regarding the experimental Hep B vaccine campaign as the cause of "A.I.D.S." in the United States (and then later in the whole world), the key is the TIME relationship between (1) the experimental shots in 1979, (2) followed immediately by the massive die-off from "AIDS" starting in 1980, and then followed YEARS later by (3) the oft-blamed "red herring" of AZT prescriptions beginning in approx 1984-85.
99% of discussions of the origins of "A.I.D.S." blame the mass die-off of gay men in America on either (a) the behavior of promiscuous gay men, and/or (b) poisoning with overdoses of AZT. The same 99% of "A.I.D.S." researchers/journos do not wish to spotlight the elephant in the room, which is the experimental Hep B vaccine campaign using exclusively promiscuous gay men as lab rats in half a dozen or so very large U.S. cities, including New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and a few more. The topic makes them extremely uncomfortable, so the vast majority will never mention the topic! (James, you also seem to have missed the import of these experimental shots.) The "castle keep" strategy with "AIDS"/"HIV" = one must NEVER blame the experimental Hep B vaccine programs (sponsored by N.I.H.).
Gay behavior? To deflect blame from the vaccines, many researchers/journos in "Tier-1" and "Tier-2" will try to blame (a) the [unhealthy] behavior of promiscuous gay men. ["castle keep" strategy = blame anything but the vaccines.] This is not persuasive, because the behavior of gay men did NOT suddenly change in 1979. Behavior was the same in 1979 as it was in the decade of the 1970s before the experimental shots, with many gay men druggin' and drinkin' and screwin' around with multiple partners, while many other gay men did not do these things. Therefore one cannot blame cases of "AIDS" on a change in behavior, drug use, poppers, or overuse of antibiotics.
AZT/Retrovir/zidovudine/azidothymidine? To deflect blame away from the vaccines, many other researchers/journos in "Tier-1" and "Tier-2" will say that the mass die-off of gay men was due to (b) poisoning them with massive amounts of AZT ["castle keep" strategy = blame anything but the vaccines]. This is also not persuasive, because AZT/Retrovir/zidovudine/azidothymidine (which DID INDEED cause/contribute to numerous "AIDS" deaths *AFTER* 1985) was ***NOT PRESCRIBED until about 1984/1985*** at the earliest [and I quote]:
"In June 1984, Burroughs-Wellcome virologist Marty St. Clair set up a program to discover drugs with the potential to inhibit HIV replication. ... In February 1985, the NCI scientists found that AZT had potent efficacy in vitro.[38][55] Several months later, a phase 1 clinical trial of AZT at the NCI was initiated at the NCI and Duke University.[39][44][64]"
Therefore, James, one MUST ASK: What then caused the thousands of "AIDS" deaths in the years from 1980 to 1985? The deaths weren't caused by AZT, as AZT would NOT be available until 1985.
>> What was truly NEW in 1979 was THE SHOTS! The massive die-off began within a matter of MERE MONTHS after the 1978-79 *experimental* Hepatitis B vaccine program, sponsored by N.I.H. in America's cities, which used EXCLUSIVELY promiscuous gay men as its lab rats. Monogamous/celibate volunteers were rejected.
++Within months, the EXACT same demographic (promiscuous gay men in U.S. cities) began dropping dead like flies in 1980.++ The media at the time in 1981 and thereafter NEVER raised the possibility that the experimental Hep B shots might be involved, though the media covered "AIDS" extensively and scared everyone half-to-death. Their refusal to even consider the experimental vaccine was quite suspicious and imo indicative even then of the power of the government to conceal malfeasance/mass murders through control of the Mockingbird media.
A second TIMELINE point: European gays eventually did get sick with AIDS but not at first because they did NOT take the contaminated experimental Hep B shots. The shots were only given to gay men *in the USA.* European gays got sick LATER. << Timing is once again key here. The so-called gay "lifestyle," while not healthy, was NOT the cause of the mass deaths from 1980 to 1984/5. The gay male population was given experimental vaccines just prior to the mass deaths from "AIDS."
Experimental shots were the cause of the mass deaths then in the 1980s, much as experimental "Covid" shots are the cause today in 2021-2025. "Castle keep" strategy = Vaccines are NEVER to be blamed for mass deaths.
βHistory doesn't repeat itself but it often rhymes.β ~Mark Twain (attributed)
This is very eye openingβ and thatβs coming from a person who read The Real Anthony Fauciβ twice.
I donβt think RFK mentioned the HepB shot having anything to do with gay men dying in droves BUT it is a very dangerous shot, (πgiven to newbornsβ literally DAY 1, within hours of birth πππππππππππππ proving we canβt possibly have enough disdain and hatred for Big pHARMa) π.
The rest fits as well. Fauci and friends def experimented with gays and orphans as well as Roma/Gypsiesβ with several
meds and βcuresβ.
The castle thing also fits. As with every other horrid vaccine, (and theyβre all horridβ even if RFK DID say parents should get their kids the measles vax!) they protect that castle. They always say they have NO clue what causes SIDS, but they sure as fire know it wasnβt vaccines.
I had no idea that another medical kill shot (unintentional gallows humor sorry) preceeded AZT. Same bottom line though. Lies upon liesβ¦deadly lies. Thanks for the info and work. We should have stopped blindly βtrusting the scienceβ a long long time ago. Now however the sheep being lead to the slaughter have no excuse. Thatβs why itβs called WILLFUL blindness I suppose.
There's a lot of evidence that the AIDS virus is a real virus, and the cause of AIDS.
There was an extremely well researched book titled "The River" which documented how the AIDS virus got into the human population via a polio vaccine program run in Africa by Dr. Hilary Koprowski in the 1950s in the Belgian Congo.
Does "The River" reference any studies which prove that the "AIDS virus" caused AIDS, using Koch's postulates? If not, I'll stick with either the HPV theory, or Duesburg's.
I have to admit I haven't read the full book. It's over 1000 pages.
Rolling Stone (of all things) did long form article of the topic largely based on the book back in 1999, when it was a vibrant magazine, and not just another corrupted mouthpiece for pharma.
I've looked into the topic in other ways since then, and all the objections to the hypothesis fall flat. And there is evidence that first people afflicted with AIDS came from the areas where these vaccination programs were held.
As for your Koch's postulates: I've run across this argument before and understood a lot of what's wrong with it, but I couldn't articulate it very. So I turned to an AI for help. Here's what it said:
Kochβs postulates were never intended as an absolute, universal test that every pathogen must pass, and they were formulated for bacteria long before viruses were understood. Claiming viruses βarenβt realβ because they donβt fully satisfy the original 19th-century criteria is a misunderstanding of both the history of microbiology and how causation is established today. What Kochβs postulates actually are Robert Koch developed them in the 1880s primarily for culturable bacteria:
The organism is found in every case of the disease (and not in healthy hosts).
It can be isolated and grown in pure culture.
Inoculating a pure culture into a healthy host produces the disease.
The same organism can be re-isolated from the newly diseased host.
These were useful guidelines, not rigid laws. Even Koch recognized limitations (e.g., asymptomatic carriers, organisms that couldnβt be cultured easily). Many well-accepted bacterial pathogens have exceptions to one or more of the original postulates.
Why viruses donβt fit the original postulates perfectly β and why that doesnβt matter
Viruses are obligate intracellular parasites. They cannot replicate or be grown in pure (cell-free) culture the way bacteria can; they require living host cells. This was known early on and is why the postulates needed adaptation.
Thomas Rivers published modified criteria specifically for viruses in 1937 (βRiversβ postulatesβ). Modern virology further relies on:
Isolation and purification of viral particles.
Visualization by electron microscopy.
Sequencing of complete genomes.
Detection of specific viral nucleic acids and proteins in diseased tissue.
Animal models and controlled challenge experiments that reproduce disease.
Epidemiological patterns that match transmission and control measures (e.g., vaccines that prevent the specific disease).
These lines of evidence collectively demonstrate causation far more rigorously than the original bacterial criteria alone.
Practical reality check
If viruses were not real, the following would be inexplicable:
Electron micrographs and purified viral particles that consistently match genetic sequences recovered from patients.
Successful vaccines that work by targeting specific viral antigens.
Antiviral drugs that inhibit specific viral enzymes or entry mechanisms and produce measurable clinical benefit.
Laboratory reconstruction of viruses from sequence data that then cause the expected disease in models.
Consistent isolation of the same agents from outbreaks across continents and decades, with genetic evolution that tracks transmission chains.
Disease causation is established by the totality of evidence, not by whether a 140-year-old set of bacterial guidelines is met in every detail. The same logic applies to many non-cultivable pathogens and to genetic or environmental causes of disease.
Your observation should underscore the need to limit the terms in office of senior bureaucrat managers. Fauci's tenure gave him more power; there is very little in the way of checks and balances on bureaucratic power. Term limits would be at least a start at imposing some.
After J. E. Hoover, the congress woke up to the immense power he held (probably because he let each of them know the power he had to blackmail them). They acted to impose term limits on the FBI. If there is valid reason for that principle with one federal agency, isn't it likely that those same reasons apply across the board?
I would have the limits placed not only on their terms in management positions but their terms overall. A system whereby employment in non-managerial positions would reduce tenure in executive positions would be beneficial.
The bureaucracy and all in it are the worst blight on our imperfect constitution.
True! I think Tony, that human cockroach (yes, Iβm copying our fave attorney) rose in the ranks so it may not have helped, but anything at all that might, Iβm all
100%...I knew a hemophiliac in college who was HIV positive from a transfusion. They are doing the same thing now ignoring spike tainted blood. However, this time around, there are 2 organizations working to provide safe blood.
Hubris vs Humility. In human nature and in politics. In the effort to connect the dots in my own mind -I asked Grok to distill Jeffβs excellent post even further for me:
Hubris (from Greek) is excessive pride or overconfidence that overreaches limits and invites downfall. Humility (from Latin humus, βearthβ) is a grounded, modest awareness of oneβs limits and fallibility. In human nature, hubris blinds people to risks and feedback; humility enables learning, realism, and cooperation. In politics, hubristic leaders overreach with disastrous plans or unchecked power, while humility supports better judgment through restraint, evidence, and institutional checks.
Surely ancient wisdom informed the founders toward our still imperfect Constitution. I hope we can keep it.
If our rulers continue with their hubris, instead of humility, they are inviting nemesis, the downfall that follows excessive pride and arrogance.
Perhaps we should reflect on the widespread hubris that leads Americans into thinking they can go 7,000 miles away, and take over and use other peoples' territory for their own benefit.
Your phrase, "still imperfect Constitution" is, perhaps, a more apt description than intended. I think you meant in the sense that no human device can ever be perfect; however, I think a more accurate assessment is that, while it can never be perfect as a human endeavor, it can be made to more closely approach perfection through amendment. Naturally, those efforts logically would increase control over the federal government. Sadly, as a people, we have only ever been allowed, by congress, to choose what improvement or changes we want. We badly need to use the Art. V Convention of States process to propose amendments. Even if the process only resulted in a bland homily, establishing the path and setting the parameters in which such conventions could operate would establish the legitimacy of that path; and, with God's help, lead to making a 'more perfect union'.
Thank you for the definition of hubris v humility. I am also wondering about the legal definition of βarticulable.β To me it means, I could make a case, out loud, for this thesis. But is there something different about it as a legal term?
Articulable facts are what you need for βreasonable suspicionβ as in the need to pat frisk a suspect a cop would remove from a motor vehicle. Thatβs whatβs needed -stronger than a hunch, but less than probable cause. Itβs a low threshold. However, it requires that the cop be able to articulate his reasons for the suspicion in court, before a judge or magistrate. An example would be a furtive gesture made by the suspect, or that heβd encountered the suspect before and known him to carry a weapon, or just that the cop was alone and didnβt know the suspect and a check for weapons before continuing his investigation was prudent. It requires verbalization.
Oh yes, let us go after her hard. Imagine what she has done to the FOIA docs such as redaction, disposing of certain docs, prolonging answering requests and more. Yes, her neck is a perfect size for a noose.
I wonder if the DOGE guysβyoung geniusesβthought it would be fun to mine Fauciβs phone records. I am certain we will never know but I like thinking that they used it as a βwhat the hell/why notβ moment. To think Dr The Science was taken down by some whippersnappers gives me a huge smile.
Now, now, James! Don't be too harsh on Dana. After all, having an IQ below that of an idiot is a requirement for being a corporate media talking head. : )
I wondered, at first, why RFK, Jr. deigned to appear on CNN but was delighted to see that he had the nerve to take on the 'Bashing' and did it so aggressively and so well despite his lack of physical vocal clarity.
So if we can 'go after' Fauci (which we should), with all this detailed doc dumping, why is it we just got one limited hangout Epstein 'binder' given to mostly bought-and-paid-for conservative "influencers" (who have shown the curiosity of Joe Biden on a weed bender when it comes to all the irregularities with the Charlie Kirk assassination)?
Fauci gets an Autopen pardon, but we still continue forward for 'public accountability'. Yet Epstein-ers can't get the same treatment, even if the statute of limitations have passed? (Although that didn't stop state legislatures from amending those limitation timeframes to go after the pervy priests. Congress could do the same nationally.)
This all feels a little 'theatrical' at this point with mid-terms so close and so many in the base revolting at the revolting behavior of our Republican congressional leaders who won't do anything about the revolting Epstein List people's behavior.
Dana Bash is a mouthpiece for CNN. CNN and all the news companies get a LARGE percentage of their ad revenue from pharma.
Ever wonder why pharma puts out well produced, catchy ads for conditions you have never heard of, and can't imagine many people suffer from? It's just money thrown at the networks, so they get a lot of clout.
Most people in institutional positions are sticking with Fauci because they know they CAN'T tell the truth if they want to keep their job.
So that's group one of the Fauci defenders.
Group two are the ordinary people that don't want to admit they were lied to, that they had a poison injected into their arms. I'm sure there's an evolutionary benefit to having most people in a population have an inertia in their mindset. But the kind of "let's keep going" behavior that helped over the last 100,000 years is a problem right now.
βIn a sweeping nationwide criminal-accountability campaign, criminal referral requests have been sent to the attorneys general of all 50 states seeking investigations and prosecutions of Anthony Fauci and other top public-health officials for their roles in the βCOVID Criminal Enterprise.β
This is an opportunity to make our voices heard.Β I encourage everyone to submit a request to your stateβs Attorney General. Implore them to investigate this request.
Note: I watched the βshowβ live but gutted it out to hear they voted Fauci in contempt. It was painful to listen to the dems continue with their bulls*%#
Nonetheless, I say do it. Get it on record that you did it.
I have to think of it this way: Given the chance, if I couldnβt hide jews in my attic, or somehow damage the Nazi plan, would I at the very least want it on record that I spoke up?
Nonetheless, I say do it. Get it on record that you did it.
I have to think of it this way: Given the chance, if I couldnβt hide jews in my attic, or somehow damage the Nazi plan, would I at the very least want it on record that I spoke up?
Nonetheless, I say do it. Get it on record that you did it.
I have to think of it this way: Given the chance, if I couldnβt hide jews in my attic, or somehow damage the Nazi plan, would I at the very least want it on record that I spoke up?
I just wrote an email to Attorney General Nessel asking her to investigate and prosecute Anthony Fauci and all the health officials that inflicted so much suffering on our state.
I don't know why they ever let Danang Dick speak. Absolutely incinerated his credibility by lying about his military service. Thanks for watching so the rest of us didn't have to!
I read Nick's article, agree it's good news and appreciated the article. But IMO it fell short. Am I the only one whose biggest questions are "what is the likelihood any state AGs will take aggressive action?" "If any do, what is the likelihood of convictions?" "If any convictions, how high up will they reach?" Nobody knows for sure the answers to any of those questions. But I bet Nick has access to legal professionals he has respect for. I wish he would have asked them and given us a clue. Big difference between submitting requests likely to be ignored, and submitting requests likely to get results.
I agree it's important we speak up. Which is why I liked the article and said it's good news. But results matter. Incentives matter. Unless bad behavior is disincentivized by consequences, it never stops. One of the commenters to Nick's article said "the process is the punishment". Two problems with that idea. One is convictions are a far more effective punishment. Secondly, unless any AGs take action, there won't even be a process that punishes.
I refuse to just sing louder as the train rolls by.
Iβm not attached to the outcome because all of these evil people will have to stand before our almighty God one day. Judgement is mine, says the Lord.
That's probably a wise position. Isn't it said Satan rules on earth, God rules in heaven? We seem to get beaten over the head every day to convince us the part about Satan is true.
yes, like the guy that started the fires, and others in the past, Jail????? really. Give them a small bottle of water, a "fire swatter" and put them in front of the fire!!!
Thanks, that's good to hear. Some of us no longer get excited about performative stuff that never goes anywhere. I don't think this group would be intentionally performative, as we often see, but still.
Back when the Russiagate investigations first started, some clever internet users figured out that Comey and the Gang were purposely misspelling important words and names in order to throw off the search engine and FOIA requests. This came to light when someone realized that they were spelling Comey as Corny so the r and the n would look like an m but be distinct enough to not show up on searches. "Oxferd" was another one.
Yeah. Cockroaches. That's about the nicest I've got.
Not just to throw off FOIA searches, but they can easily use those weirdly named two-word operations for search engine analysis to see who else was aware of the names and what they were looking for. And if anything had leaked.
I have questions. Jeff included a graphic of βa declassified 2019 memo, Oxferd Comma began on May 16, 2016.β It looks like the top half of an old sheet of paper, yellowed and ragged around the edges with the bottom half torn off. The date is redacted, part of one sentence is highlighted, and a bold line is under the text. Below that and off the page, it says, βWhite House declassified FBI documents Aug, 5, 2026.β
Seriously? Iβm supposed to think that little scrap of paper actually exists? Iβm into verisimilitude as much as the next guy, but weβre talking about national security here. This is hardly the time to mock up the evidence.
The FBI needs to be completely destroyed. Burned to the ground and a totally new organization built in its place. One that is honest and committed to blind justice. Anyone in the old FBI with whom we have the slightest doubt has no place in the new organization. At this point, there is no difference between our FBI and the FSB, GRU, or old East German Stassi. Rebuilding the FBI must be the this generationβs Manhattan Project. We canβt hate what it is right now enough.
Never forget that the Shrub (really, his father through Cheney) recruited Marcus Wolfe as a lead consultant when Homeland Security was formed. Wolfe's former job was head of the Stasi. I'll never forget returning to Dulles Airport after a trip and seeing signs that said "if you see something, say something". I stopped and stared I was so stunned. That was take straight from the Stasi.
Agree. They actually do a LOT of good when focusing on what they are supposed to do. Like getting rid of child traffickers, terror cells, international crimes, or enforcing federal laws that cross state lines, etc etc. It relieves local state police and municipalities from those duties so that they can better focus on the needs of their locality, cooperating with federal when needed. If we are a nation of laws, and some of those laws are at the federal level, they need an enforcement arm at that level. Unfortunately the deep state co-opted and adulterated the FBI decades ago when they captured the CIA. Both need to be revamped and returned to initial purposes.
Good point. Everything in our government is thoroughly corrupt. What makes sense is eliminating what we don't need, like the FBI, DOE, most or all of HHS, and so on. Then focus on trying to fix the ones we do need, that are just as corrupt and dysfunctional. For example, we need a military and a weapons procurement system. But the MIC is all about expensive weapons that make money, battlefield effectiveness is not a priority.
There may not be a lot of time left. And regardless, this information is not getting out to the masses because MSM barely covers any of it. Real journalism is dead.
Well, it is in everything. Remember years ago when the IRS put out the 1-800-snitch deal where if you turned in someone and they had not "paid up" you got a reward. What is the difference, it is all the same as the ones you listed above. Parents, schools, churches, etc need to start teaching honesty, integrity, and consequences from infancy. This culture can't change in a short period of time. Most laws are outlines with loop holes to let criminals know what they can get away with.
In the same vein of stassi crap happening here, this is pure gold - a citizen at a council meeting proposes the same flock type safety for our politicians:
The CongressCritters are the weakest link. They are thoroughly unrepresentative of the American people. They avoid their real duties. And they create the "laws" to give themselves as close to jobs-for-life as they can manage.
There is a real sickness at the heart of US government. It is hard to see how we ever fix this -- short of collapse.
Yes, we need a step change that strips them of their ability to control funding (all they should be able to do is propose spending), limits their time in Congress, forces them to not engage in any investments while in office (and 5 years after too), stops all lobbying.
Eliminate all the perks and retirement benefits. It's only supposed to be a limited office anyway. And they should have to abide by all the laws imposed on citizens.
As I understand it, the limits of federal government ARE already well defined, we have just ignored them and grown a cancerous beast that needs surgery.
Martin Armstrong speculates that we will divide into regional entities, at least for governance. Personally I think that makes sense. What does someone in
ID have in common with someone in NYC? For me, this couldn't happen fast enough. I'm tired of funding this government, watching what my hard earned tax dollars fund. Enough!
Some people might read your comment as βblack pillingβ but itβs true. Iβm in my 50βs and Iβve never had a government of and for the people. Itβs a giant grift.
Are there some good people in government? Sure. But the whole of it is corrupt well beyond repair. I think we need a Pinochet style dictatorship for a decade or two and then try to start over.
There are many flavors of "democracy". I would like to go back to something like the Ancient Greek version, where public service in the equivalent of Congress was more like jury service is today -- individuals randomly selected from the citizen roll for a limited period of time, with precautions against corruption. That way, the legislative body would actually be representative of the people -- which it clearly is not today.
Of course, before implementing that, we would need to make citizenship something more than the accident of location of birth.
Thatβs a good thought. Of course Greece at that time was an ethnostate and that makes a difference. Your point about citizenship is a good one but I think weβd need to go a bit further than that and get back to more of an early 1900βs demographic at the very least.
Growing up, the incompetents and lazy sought government jobs. (I'm 69). Now we're stuck with them and their overpriced retirements and benefits. And salaries.
According to John Adamsβs writings, about 1/3 of Americans were patriots for the Cause, about 1/3 Americans were fence sitters and about 1/3 were loyalists to King George.
That matches up to Solomon Aschβs Conformity Experiment where over 70% are afraid to buck the system and less than 25% are courageous and unafraid to speak up, proving the results of the global experiment that covid was.
But, if even half of the fence sitters can gather the courage to speak up and educate the next generation, will we have a chance to survive?
I don't understand the lack of voting. I've voted since I was first eligible. And I still go to church. Never found anything that precludes doing one's civic duty.
That was the strategy behind hammering home βseparation of church and stateβ into our heads all these years, so that the Christian church would be too averse to intruding into politics, while all the other faiths continued to do so.
Many Christian churches do as well. It isn't isolated to a few religious sects unfortunately. I'm sure there are plenty of pastors currently telling their flock to support the zionist wars.
It reminds me of hypnosis. Around 25% of the population are immune to hypnosis. 50% are suggestible. The last 25% can be fully hypnotized, without of course knowing they are.
Not if we unquestionably assume 'technocracy' ... always sold to us as The Answerβ’ ... ("Let's just make it better, more transparent, etc.") ... to be God's Definitive Plan for Man.
"They got comfortable. They got lazy. They installed gatekeepers who βhate FOIAβ in charge of FOIA responses. They didnβt expect that any change in administration βDemocrat to Republican to Democrat to Republicanβ would make any difference in transparency at all. They never believed the fetid swamp water they paddle around in could ever be drained this low. Instead, they believed in the permanent government so completely that they left a permanent record."
Let's all make a concerted effort to use the word HUBRIS more often π
Iβll take another Trump term myself. The reason they hate him so much is because slowly but surely he is exposing All their dirty little secrets. More please!
"Why is federal information about the most important project in modern history sequestered and secreted?", asks Attorney Childers.
Simple answer: Because that information reveals that the federal government, certain of its letter agencies, certain "world governance" bureaus, and certain preferred pharmaceutical vendors are 100% the cause and beneficiaries of the entire Covid/vaccine operation.
I donβt know if you saw the above comment, but it was something Iβd not considered.
It also gave them the ability to monitor searches, so they could know if word got out and they needed to quickly cover their tracks. They could know their secret was holding.
While we are distracted by the ridiculous domestic circus we call politics and the soul-numbing carnage of two foreign wars that just won't end, the deep state is closing in on one of the last remaining pieces for the control grid enslavement of America... Water.
The World Economic Forum has openly proclaimed 2026 the βYear of Waterβ and has introduced what it calls βBlue Davos,β bringing freshwater, ocean policy, food security, investment, and the so-called blue economy together beneath one institutional umbrella. The Forum states that its annual meeting will concentrate on βfreshwater access and management, blue food security and ocean protection.β ...
...The water wars will not necessarily begin with soldiers marching toward a river. They will begin through permits, compulsory meters, emergency declarations, tiered pricing, groundwater restrictions, digital monitoring, and public-private agreements that few citizens will ever read. They will appear as administrative decisions made by experts who insist that no alternative exists, while governments blame climate change, corporations blame AI, and international organizations demand that authority be centralized before the crisis becomes worse.
The shift from green to blue is not merely a change in environmental branding. It represents the movement of political attention and investment capital toward the most indispensable resource on Earth. Once water becomes fully financialized and access is integrated into centralized systems of permission, the government will no longer need to confiscate property directly because it will possess something far more powerfulβthe ability to determine whether that property may receive water.
The next great struggle will be presented as conservation against waste, science against ignorance, and collective survival against selfish individual use. Yet beneath the slogans will remain the oldest political question in civilization: who decides? If the public waits until that decision has been transferred permanently to an alliance of bureaucrats, financiers, and multinational corporations, the water wars will already have been lost before most people even realized they had begun.
There are no riparian water rights west of the Mississippi that I know of. Nor rights to any of the rainwater that falls on your property, so even cisterns can be dismantled. That's why we are easterners.
Spot on PolPhi. "While we are distracted by the ridiculous domestic circus we call politics". The uni-party has constructed quite the impressive deception. The public at large, despite decades of political lies, appear to be incapable of critical thinking. These are the typicals, who ran for the vax lines and subsequent Dante's first circle of limbo: boosters.
Maybe we should ask Trump's spiritual advisor, Paula White, to pray for us. I think she only charges $1000/prayer.
And shocker, the alleged water system hacks are being blamed on Iran.
Regarding the Fauci side show, as someone commented on the below article, which was well written and lays compelling evidence as to why this is going nowhere, Fauci is giving us Orwell's Two Minutes of Hate for the masses.
If anyone is serious about prosecuting the human cockroach(es), theyβll file RICO charges against Fauci, (and Birx), for starters.
I expect most of the Fauci show is just a distraction to keep people from looking behind the curtain and seeing what the D.C. scum are doing to us now.
Perhaps going after Deborah Birx, who has no immunity, might uncover more information about Fauci and his corruption schemes, by her throwing him under the bus trying to save her own skin???? Just a thought.
Fauci has no immunity.that pardon by cabbage head isnβt worth the piece of paper itβs printed on. You canβt pardon an unconvicted, not sentenced criminal. If they are not convicted, what do you pardon? The dictionary alone gives enough evidence to my point. Look up βpardonβ.
Put RICO charges on them, and they will be extremely uncomfortable, no matter how long it takes to get to court. And Iβll bet there would be plenty to discover about the entire ordeal.
This level of cynicism is disheartening. It shows just how badly our trust in those we elect has fallen. Iβm a bit more optimistic. Never expect moral purity, thatβs naive. But this administration appears to be delivering on transparency more than any other. After all, look at all the stuff we HAVE seen from the fraud, the waste, the Russia Gate, the UFO files, the Epstein stuffβ¦. And more. Trust BUT VERIFY. Donβt just throw in the towel. That accomplishes nothing.
I agree with you, Barbara. It is so easy to become discouraged because what has been uncovered by the current administration. We are thankful for these revelations but at the same time concerned about how to fix the depth of the corruption that has been uncovered. I do not think that at this time there is anyone within congress or any of the alphabet agencies that should not be fired! If anyone was working for our government prior to the current administration, they should be held accountable... even if for no other reason than turning a blind eye. Absolutely disgusting!!!!!
I agree. There will never be any accountability if we don't even know what they are up to.
That is why transparency is so important. As I said, this excessive secrecy started 40 years ago.
By 2008, Americans back then were so aggravated by the change that when Obama came along and promised the most transparent presidency ever, people voted for him.
Here we are, 18 years later, and the Americans of today are so beaten down they have no hope of improvement. It turns out that it isn't true that morale will improve with more beatings, as the saying goes.
Anyway, truth and honesty are an important start to bringing back public awareness and involvement. You can't have a democracy without it.
Birx was right there alongside Fauci. She actively worked against the presidentβs instructions, meeting with governors across the country. She wrote a book that I wonβt read but probably contains information that incriminates her. She recently was on a Fauci apology tour ( Fox Business) spinning lies, obviously believing sheβs untouchable. Thereβs never just one cockroach.
No doubt I got the actual number wrong, I just know it's way up there!!
And yes, each indictment - multiple names.
And if ANY name is any other lawsuit or case being tried, that name stays sealed until "case closed" whereupon that name either moves forward or gets taken off.
Re: "They got comfortable. They got lazy." with all do respect to the author, I think Gov workers know and think about FOIA a lot. What we see is just the tip of the iceberg of their recorded decisions, but not all the discussions that lead up to them so we are not getting the full story about their intent. What don't we see? Not a comforting thought while @Jeff Childers seems like he's trying to comfort us with his optimism.
At this point anyone with an IQ over 50 can figure out what a lying deceiving murderous charlatan Anthony Fauci is. RFK Jrβs interview with Dana Bash puts her well below the 50 IQ range. It wonβt be very eye opening when we see all of the democrats vote to let the mass murderer off the hook today, placing all of them in the 1-49 IQ range.
Fauci is the perfect example of why America should never again hand an unelected faceless bureaucrat the power to do what Fauci did to this country and the world.
Fauci was not a lone ranger. He had massive amounts of institutional help, from both public and private sectors. Taking down Fauci and leaving his support system intact is kinda like snipping off the head of one dandelion and expecting all the dandelions in your lawn to perish.
Agree! Hunt down every one of them and START with the FOIA lady, whatβs her name, Marg Moore.
The entire "public health" system needs to evaporate. There's clearly nothing public nor healthy about it.
"My friends, this culture of swampy government-by-fiat is the real threat to our democracy. Itβs nitwits! The nitwits are killing us." Well the nitwits at the IACC (INTERAGENCY AUTISM COORDINATING COMMITTEE) couldn't tell us what is sickening our babies and children. A 336 page strategic plan and the word "vaccine" was NEVER MENTIONED!!
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/the-interagency-autism-coordinating
π―
A Midwestern Doctor explains the fraudulent system in detail:
https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-the-war-on-chlorine-dioxide
He helped keep me alive during the lockdown, as I have 5 arthritises and am immune compromised bigly. He, Dr. Robert Malone and Dr. Robert Yoho, their substacks. A Midwesten Doctor is awesome!
Have you tried the CD protocol for your 5 arthritises?
LOVE Midwestern Doc!
Me, too!
Life changing information.
exactly right.
I listened to an interview with a historian a few years ago, and she was talking about the difference in researching before and after Reagan.
Presidents used to preserve all their papers for the public record. A researcher could go to the National Archive or the presidential library, and get access and insight to whatever they were working on.
But from Reagan on, the massive secrecy and classification of everything went wild, and trying to research a president's term became very difficult.
We're used to the obsessive secrecy now, and think it's normal, but it isn't. It's just part of the process of the government becoming more secretive, marching along in process with them spying on us more and more.
Humans can get used to anything, and we are living proof.
"Papers, please".
Mrs. RW
I think it got considerably worse after 9/11 too. In a way the Muslim 9/11 terrorists did destroy the America we knew and loved.
The Patriot Act was already written (thanks, Joe Biden), and on the shelf, ready to roll out after the towers were destroyed.
And bioweaponized anthrax was ready to send to the two Congress members reluctant to destroy the Constitution.
Coincidence? I think not.
Mrs. RW
Strange, isn't it, that no one in the government was fired or in any way held to account for the intelligence failures?
The Patriot Act must be repealed. Instead of constraining citizens' liberties, the governments failures must be punished.
Hmmm, the senators who received the anthrax letters were Patrick Leahy and Tom Daschleβnot exactly good guys
exactly right.
Muslim 9/11 terrorists? Surely no one still believes this? Just like the release of a bioweapon, by our own is hard to swallow.
It's mind boggling, isn't it? The years I spent trying to wake people up about 9-11 are now being matched by trying to get people to realize the truth about covid and Fauci. There is a certain percentage of the population that clings to the comforting myth, no matter what facts are presented.
Sigh.
Mrs. RW
I actually do believe it. However that was not the point of my comment. The point was that the old version of America was indeed destroyed. Much of it at the hands of our own federal govdenment. But I consider it tremendously foolhardy to ignore the Muslim role.
"...the Muslim 9/11 terrorists did destroy the America we knew..."
Sorry Lynne, but just like there never was a deadly virus, no planes hit the World Trade Center on 9/11. Its all fake.
And you can see it for yourself Lynne. Just watch the videos and you will see the perfectly executed controlled demolition of high-rise buildings, falling down into their own footprint, and dustification (Dustification is the end result of a successful demolition.)
Then ask the question 'What would happen if planes had hit the Towers?'
Answer; It would have sprayed twisted steel, death, destruction, and body parts all over Lower Manhattan.
Mercifully that did not happen.
Because no planes hit the Towers on 9/11.
And all it took was a handful of staged videos of Crisis.Actors crying "I saw the plane hit the Tower", and a fake video of a plane hitting a building playing CONTINUOUSLY for 72hrs to make millions of people believe that planes had hit the World Trade Center on 9/11.
We are victims of big, massive, traumatizing global psyops.
You are full of it. I have friends who were at the World Trade Center on 9/11 and got covered in dust from the collapse. I saw the plane hit the Pentagon. I have friends who were inside the building that day who barely got out with their lives.
Have you interviewed the New York first responders by any chance?
While there is some (small) chance that the towers were brought down by explosive demolition charges, Occam's Razor says that's not the case.
The WT Towers were not the typically structures that rely on exterior walls and fireproofed structural steel like found in the vast majority of NYC skyscrapers. Many, with fire engineering training and exposure, criticized the architecture that employed glass walls without any inherent structural strength when the buildings were proposed and long after they were built. Fire resistance ratings are based on degree of temperature and length of exposure. As an engineer with wide construction experience, Bin Laden must have known that and probably chose the towers because of that knowledge. The fuel in large airliners make very effective fire bombs when the intentions of pilots choose to use them.
I want to know why no intelligence official - at any level, much less those in charge of the IC agencies - was ever fired or reprimanded. That, for me, is more proof of a conspiracy than putative explosive demolition. Any conspiracy to place explosives would have to have involved far too many people to continue to be a secret; there were few enough IC agency heads in positions to suppress knowledge about muslim hijackers that the secrets could be kept.
Occam's Razor!
You cannot understand, unless you are an architect or structural engineer, why the buildings pancaked as they did and why they were designed like that. It was a relatively new constructio/design, that allowed for open floors with few if any columns or other structure to interfere with the open floor plan. There was a core that contained stairs, elevators, utilities etc in the middle and the outside wall was the other part that held up the floors. Once that outside wall was breached, and the heat from the jet fuel burning began to weaken the structure... each floor "pancaked" onto the one below, starting at near the top.
My husband is an architect/builder and was a big fan of the towers. He had been in there many times.
Even if I believed your psyop conspiracy, which I do not, it does not explain the Pentagon planes or the Pennsylvania planes. Nor does it in any way explain or justify the decades long history of Muslim nations/entities repeatedly attacking Americans and American interests. While the USA is not perfect (no one and no thing on this earth are) we haven't as a nation or even a national ideology beheaded anyone. Your ignorance is showing; you ought to tuck it in.
Silliest post of the day.
Hmmm. Let me see. Wasn't the POTUS at the time of 9/11 the son of a b, no son of that former CIA director and skull and bones brother.
As Gomer would say: SUHPRIZE! SUHPRIZE!
I'm ashamed to admit that I voted for both of them, but my excuse is that they were - or so I thought at the time - the lesser of evils presented.
And who was behind the useful idiots (Muslims?) I seen the pictures of the main supports that were cutβ¦ The thermite that was found at the site that would make the jet fuel burn so much hotter, etcβ¦
No doubt
Hmmm. Let me see? Who followed Reagan as POTUS? Wasn't he a former director of the CIA and skull and bones member?
Does it surprise you that the govt became the exclusive enclave of our spook agencies, despite an national elections, and resulted in increased secrecy wrt to record keeping? Come, come.
Not only can humans become used to anything, our entire culture is built around suspension of disbelief. All our fiction and entertainment reinforces that trait. We should demand better, and by that, I mean mocking the suspension of disbelief and the elevation of critical thinking. Of course, that would be the end of Hollywood and corporate media entertainment.
I am okay with the end of Hollywood and corporate media.
βDemocracy dies in darknessββ¦ or something like thatβ¦
Yes, the slogans tell more truth than the media or the government does.
Mrs. RW
Oh, So Very True. "A Hard Truth." All governments throughout recorded history, every one of them, sooner or later go rouge and begin to harm their people. It's that governments represent power and those that lust for power cannot resist being in government so they can get and flaunt that power. It's as sure to happen as the Sun rising in the east and setting in the west. Our Founding Fathers were well aware of that truth because they knew the history, unlike many of us that don't know that today. The Founding Fathers did the best men can do to install into the Constitution and Bill of Rights protections for the people. Most or many of those protections have been ignored, lost or stolen. Trump is the man that is actually trying to bring back the power of government into the hands of the people. We are in the fight for our lives and our country.
Soon...
reagan? ae but wecome to the party.
Ever since that 6.5 Carcano ong gun accompished a number o very impossibe shots, we've been ied to. And the one who repaced the victim that day was and remains at the centre o much that has happened since.
Today's revelations are hopephully the beginning o a wholesale rout o the long train o lies.
I think it somehow right and just that some o the relatives o the victim that day in Texas are now at the core o the "housecleaning"party
Is there ANY truth to the rumor that she is 'Large Marge'? π€
I suspect that taking down Fauci might be a necessary prelude to taking down the rest of them, and they don't have pardons.
Get Bill Gates for his involvement!
We need to stop Bill Gates before he kills again!
Fauci is retired, but Gates is out there right now, weaponizing ticks and mosquitoes, buying up farmland, and paying for more "vaccines".
He needs to be stopped.
Mrs. RW
How about DARPA and BARDA? not going to happen.
Deep involvement
I read that one of faucis top aides is turning over evidence.
Whereβd you read that?
Itβs former senior Fauci adviser, David Morens, but I canβt remember where I read it! It was this week.
At the top my list, after fauci-the-ferret, are Ralph Baric and Peter Daszak. Water board them to learn the other conspirators names.
The blanket pardons should be disallowed, for multiple reasons.
this sounds right, but isn't. Fauci will be the scapegoat used to make people think there was some accountability. And even he won't serve time or minimal time at most. Let's wait and see what happens...
I could only wish that those who bandy 'scape goat' understood what it meant.
Look it up.
don't need to, I already know
Amen to that!
https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-the-war-on-chlorine-dioxide
Exposing medical corruption.
Red State AGβs need to coordinate on how to hold the COVID Plandemic Cabal accountable. The Feds have too many Deep State disrupters to get any meaningful accountability accomplished. Red States need to form an alliance, much like the 13 colonies did during the Revolution.
Unfortunately Oregon is completely controlled. We were asleep at the wheel in the 90's and now our state is burning again! We need the red states' to form that alliance to stop what's happened to Oregon!
Oregon has such beautiful land, resources and weather. Mountains or beach, all in 1 day. Which makes it all the more sad how blue captured it is. Ellen Rosenblum (Oregon State AG, 2012-2024) and Mike Schmidt (PDX DA 2020-2024) have special reservations in Danteβs 8th & 9th Circles.
Similar to California. Sad.
Washington state, too. What happened?
Iβm in Maryland. No accountability from our AG.
Amen, Ceashel!
We have a useless Democrat AG (and governor) in North Carolina.
As well in Connecticut
I believe the red states should just go ahead and secede....
Agree!!!
Fauci is a great start though. Iβll take it for now!!
Fauci will be a pauper when all this is over
We can hope so.
If not a pauper, then have substantially less money than he thought he would have - and good!
That will little matter. He has few years left to live. He has lived a life of wealth and privilege. Nature will deprive him of the only true wealth which is a sound mind and body.
That's not to say that he isn't deserving of those any other losses society can impose.
I want to see Barric a Daszak brought before Paul's committee and grilled as aggressively and thoroughly as they deserve to be. They have no immunity and are likely to follow the fauci ferret's example and take the 5th; but the MUST BE PUT ON RECORD.
just the fact that they haven't been called is the tell that nothing is really going to happen.
Nothing will happen. Republicans want the same protections for their peccadillos. Itβs why no one is challenging the obviously invalid blanket pardons; they want the same protections when their turn comes.
so true about the pardons, what a joke
Agreed- starting with Deborah Birk who is now trying to backpedal her involvement with the team response! These deep state players have no remorse for their actions and roles!!
For anyone with Facebook, this guy's rant about that is pretty good.
https://www.facebook.com/reel/1784214202606676
Mrs. RW
Well, Rex had my interest at the "death of Freddie Mercury", since very few people seem to remember that Fauci completely screwed up the AIDs epidemic, pushed AZT as the only viable treatment solution, and caused an enormous numbers of deaths from AZT itself. (Some of you may remember men protesting in Washington with signs that read "Dr Fauci, you're killing us".)
Medical corruption exposed:
https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-the-war-on-chlorine-dioxide
Audio on that FB reel seems to be muted ... ??
There is a sound button on the upper left hand corner in my version.
Maybe Facebook mutes all their reels to protect people watching at work?
Mrs. RW
Tried that, to no avail. Oh, well ....
Worked for me... I bought what he said until the last couple of minutes! The 'humanrevival.org' he promoted looked rather spacey to me...
yes, he's being used as a scapegoat now to protect the rest of them.
And well-stated to you as well Mr. Beal.
Debbie Birx⦠I see you
Roger, that's an apt description of the depth and breadth of the number of people involved in this un-American behavior.
He knew how the"machine" works and how to use it
After reading todayβs revelations of the existential threat βsecretlyβ created by our βleadership classβ in Trump 1.0, I was truly reeling. What else donβt we know? How do we stop this from ever happening againβ¦etc.? After a few deep breaths and reminded by my spouse that He is in control..not me..not themβ¦.This verse came to mind and stopped my free fall.
Proverbs 19:21 β "Many are the plans in a personβs heart, but it is the Lordβs purpose that prevails."
DOGE made significant inroads. The executive branch is releasing the info. Congress is making baby steps. (Or at least some in Congress.) Way too much of the judiciary is captured, at least for now. So the 2026 midterms are imperative. From what I am reading the chance of the Blue Wave is collapsing because the USAID to NGO pipeline has dried up and the donkeys can no longer pay their political hacks and ballot harvesters. Everybody concerned about the election should volunteer. Either as poll workers or poll watchers. There is still time to be trained.
Electing JD Vance in 2028 is imperative to continue the dismantling of the Woodrow Wilson / FDR enabled un-Constitutional bureaucratic federal apparatus - that rules citizens lives by unelected regulation.
I learned a new reason why people might register opposite their political affiliation: so one can transport ballots to the election office with someone of the same political party.
I'm an election worker here in the deep blue outpost of Lawrence, KS. Kansas has a law that two people of different political affiliations, must drive the ballots from the precinct to the election office at the end of the election day.
Makes sense, right? It helps reduce the chance that the two people will throw out some of the ballots on the way back.
The problem is, almost half of voters claim to be "unaffiliated" these days, and that counts as a different political affiliation for the purpose of running ballots back. It's easy to imagine an "unaffiliated" voter is really conservative or liberal in reality.
During chatting after the training, the guy doing the training was talking about this, and he mentioned, casually, that he knows at least one person is actually a Democrat that registered as Republican so they can help run the ballots back to the election office.
This is in a county that has about twice as many declared D's as declared R's, with a perhaps 40% of voters nominally unaffiliated, in a red state. There are counties that lean much further to the left.
We have the two person transport requirement in Texas too. But I don't think unaffiliated works, strictly R or D. ICBW but I think the really kinky stuff involves either mailed in ballots or harvested ballots that are dropped off where that is legal.
Wow
π―!!!
You're exactly right. Volunteer to WORK at the polls through you local election officer, ESPECIALLY if you live in an urban area. Its much harder to cheat in rural areas... everyone knows each other or where people live etc.
I would suggest watching ONLY IF you actually know the procedures and regulations. If you don't know this information, you're wasting your time as you dont really know what to look for.
Mensch tracht, gott lacht!
Man plans. God laughs!
AMEN!
Amen.
As Jeff would write, GAW!
Amen brother Matt!
Amen π
What I find slightly terrifying is that, pretty close to this exact thing could also have been said after the AIDS crisis.
At the time, I wasnβt concerned abt any of it, (too young, dumb/naive) but my parents sure were. I was away in college, living in a dorm. I became concerned when a fellow classmate, a hemophiliac, received tainted blood. His dad called to tell him NOT to get his transfusion but he didnβt get the message in time. He was a senior, engaged to be married. Her parents went berserk. It was a huge thing.
At that point, I became curious abt gays on TV saying Fauci was killing them with AZT. I noticed as soon as men began being treated, their condition seemed to exponentially worsen.
Reading RFKβs The Real Anthony Fauci really brought it ALL that to light, including him using orphans as lab mice. He literally experimented on kids who had no advocate. Kids were telling other kids NOT to βlet them make you take that medicine. It HURTS.β
So yeah, calling Fauci a human cockroach is being far too kind.
All that to say, he really shouldβve been drawn and quartered after β or during β his FIRST βcrisisβ.
I do hope that what you are calling for happens. Iβm just so disappointed it didnβt happen the first time around.
"Inventing the Aids Virus" by Peter Duesberg offered early insight into Fauci's mendacity and wickedness. It also demonstrates that the "Aids virus", was simply the presence of antibodies in conjunction with several illnesses common in the homosexual community and drug users.
A fascinating read, even 30 years later!
This is taken from a comment on a recent James Delingpole substack.
"... I mean if AIDS was never real - and it wasnβt; and if the repurposed, insta-kill, failed-cancer-cure death drug AZT was what really finished off all those supposed AIDS victims - and it was," you are reinforcing the common yet FALSE view that AZT is the true killer. Let me explain the TIMELINE about which you seem unaware, and have overlooked:
Regarding the experimental Hep B vaccine campaign as the cause of "A.I.D.S." in the United States (and then later in the whole world), the key is the TIME relationship between (1) the experimental shots in 1979, (2) followed immediately by the massive die-off from "AIDS" starting in 1980, and then followed YEARS later by (3) the oft-blamed "red herring" of AZT prescriptions beginning in approx 1984-85.
99% of discussions of the origins of "A.I.D.S." blame the mass die-off of gay men in America on either (a) the behavior of promiscuous gay men, and/or (b) poisoning with overdoses of AZT. The same 99% of "A.I.D.S." researchers/journos do not wish to spotlight the elephant in the room, which is the experimental Hep B vaccine campaign using exclusively promiscuous gay men as lab rats in half a dozen or so very large U.S. cities, including New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and a few more. The topic makes them extremely uncomfortable, so the vast majority will never mention the topic! (James, you also seem to have missed the import of these experimental shots.) The "castle keep" strategy with "AIDS"/"HIV" = one must NEVER blame the experimental Hep B vaccine programs (sponsored by N.I.H.).
Gay behavior? To deflect blame from the vaccines, many researchers/journos in "Tier-1" and "Tier-2" will try to blame (a) the [unhealthy] behavior of promiscuous gay men. ["castle keep" strategy = blame anything but the vaccines.] This is not persuasive, because the behavior of gay men did NOT suddenly change in 1979. Behavior was the same in 1979 as it was in the decade of the 1970s before the experimental shots, with many gay men druggin' and drinkin' and screwin' around with multiple partners, while many other gay men did not do these things. Therefore one cannot blame cases of "AIDS" on a change in behavior, drug use, poppers, or overuse of antibiotics.
AZT/Retrovir/zidovudine/azidothymidine? To deflect blame away from the vaccines, many other researchers/journos in "Tier-1" and "Tier-2" will say that the mass die-off of gay men was due to (b) poisoning them with massive amounts of AZT ["castle keep" strategy = blame anything but the vaccines]. This is also not persuasive, because AZT/Retrovir/zidovudine/azidothymidine (which DID INDEED cause/contribute to numerous "AIDS" deaths *AFTER* 1985) was ***NOT PRESCRIBED until about 1984/1985*** at the earliest [and I quote]:
"In June 1984, Burroughs-Wellcome virologist Marty St. Clair set up a program to discover drugs with the potential to inhibit HIV replication. ... In February 1985, the NCI scientists found that AZT had potent efficacy in vitro.[38][55] Several months later, a phase 1 clinical trial of AZT at the NCI was initiated at the NCI and Duke University.[39][44][64]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zidovudine#HIV/AIDS_research
Therefore, James, one MUST ASK: What then caused the thousands of "AIDS" deaths in the years from 1980 to 1985? The deaths weren't caused by AZT, as AZT would NOT be available until 1985.
>> What was truly NEW in 1979 was THE SHOTS! The massive die-off began within a matter of MERE MONTHS after the 1978-79 *experimental* Hepatitis B vaccine program, sponsored by N.I.H. in America's cities, which used EXCLUSIVELY promiscuous gay men as its lab rats. Monogamous/celibate volunteers were rejected.
++Within months, the EXACT same demographic (promiscuous gay men in U.S. cities) began dropping dead like flies in 1980.++ The media at the time in 1981 and thereafter NEVER raised the possibility that the experimental Hep B shots might be involved, though the media covered "AIDS" extensively and scared everyone half-to-death. Their refusal to even consider the experimental vaccine was quite suspicious and imo indicative even then of the power of the government to conceal malfeasance/mass murders through control of the Mockingbird media.
A second TIMELINE point: European gays eventually did get sick with AIDS but not at first because they did NOT take the contaminated experimental Hep B shots. The shots were only given to gay men *in the USA.* European gays got sick LATER. << Timing is once again key here. The so-called gay "lifestyle," while not healthy, was NOT the cause of the mass deaths from 1980 to 1984/5. The gay male population was given experimental vaccines just prior to the mass deaths from "AIDS."
Experimental shots were the cause of the mass deaths then in the 1980s, much as experimental "Covid" shots are the cause today in 2021-2025. "Castle keep" strategy = Vaccines are NEVER to be blamed for mass deaths.
βHistory doesn't repeat itself but it often rhymes.β ~Mark Twain (attributed)
This is very eye openingβ and thatβs coming from a person who read The Real Anthony Fauciβ twice.
I donβt think RFK mentioned the HepB shot having anything to do with gay men dying in droves BUT it is a very dangerous shot, (πgiven to newbornsβ literally DAY 1, within hours of birth πππππππππππππ proving we canβt possibly have enough disdain and hatred for Big pHARMa) π.
The rest fits as well. Fauci and friends def experimented with gays and orphans as well as Roma/Gypsiesβ with several
meds and βcuresβ.
The castle thing also fits. As with every other horrid vaccine, (and theyβre all horridβ even if RFK DID say parents should get their kids the measles vax!) they protect that castle. They always say they have NO clue what causes SIDS, but they sure as fire know it wasnβt vaccines.
Nazi tactics, to target marginal groups.
Medical corruption exposed:
https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-the-war-on-chlorine-dioxide
I had no idea that another medical kill shot (unintentional gallows humor sorry) preceeded AZT. Same bottom line though. Lies upon liesβ¦deadly lies. Thanks for the info and work. We should have stopped blindly βtrusting the scienceβ a long long time ago. Now however the sheep being lead to the slaughter have no excuse. Thatβs why itβs called WILLFUL blindness I suppose.
I have never heard about the hepB vaccine as a cause before.....I had a friend who died in NYC in 80's of 'aids'.
https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-the-war-on-chlorine-dioxide
There's a lot of evidence that the AIDS virus is a real virus, and the cause of AIDS.
There was an extremely well researched book titled "The River" which documented how the AIDS virus got into the human population via a polio vaccine program run in Africa by Dr. Hilary Koprowski in the 1950s in the Belgian Congo.
https://www.amazon.com/River-Journey-Source-HIV-AIDS/dp/0316372617/ref=sr_1_1
I mightβve guessed it would trace back to a vaccine program in Africa. SMHβ¦
Chimpanzee kidney cells containing white blood cells with SIV.
Does "The River" reference any studies which prove that the "AIDS virus" caused AIDS, using Koch's postulates? If not, I'll stick with either the HPV theory, or Duesburg's.
I have to admit I haven't read the full book. It's over 1000 pages.
Rolling Stone (of all things) did long form article of the topic largely based on the book back in 1999, when it was a vibrant magazine, and not just another corrupted mouthpiece for pharma.
I've looked into the topic in other ways since then, and all the objections to the hypothesis fall flat. And there is evidence that first people afflicted with AIDS came from the areas where these vaccination programs were held.
As for your Koch's postulates: I've run across this argument before and understood a lot of what's wrong with it, but I couldn't articulate it very. So I turned to an AI for help. Here's what it said:
Kochβs postulates were never intended as an absolute, universal test that every pathogen must pass, and they were formulated for bacteria long before viruses were understood. Claiming viruses βarenβt realβ because they donβt fully satisfy the original 19th-century criteria is a misunderstanding of both the history of microbiology and how causation is established today. What Kochβs postulates actually are Robert Koch developed them in the 1880s primarily for culturable bacteria:
The organism is found in every case of the disease (and not in healthy hosts).
It can be isolated and grown in pure culture.
Inoculating a pure culture into a healthy host produces the disease.
The same organism can be re-isolated from the newly diseased host.
These were useful guidelines, not rigid laws. Even Koch recognized limitations (e.g., asymptomatic carriers, organisms that couldnβt be cultured easily). Many well-accepted bacterial pathogens have exceptions to one or more of the original postulates.
Why viruses donβt fit the original postulates perfectly β and why that doesnβt matter
Viruses are obligate intracellular parasites. They cannot replicate or be grown in pure (cell-free) culture the way bacteria can; they require living host cells. This was known early on and is why the postulates needed adaptation.
Thomas Rivers published modified criteria specifically for viruses in 1937 (βRiversβ postulatesβ). Modern virology further relies on:
Isolation and purification of viral particles.
Visualization by electron microscopy.
Sequencing of complete genomes.
Detection of specific viral nucleic acids and proteins in diseased tissue.
Serological responses (antibodies, T-cell responses).
Animal models and controlled challenge experiments that reproduce disease.
Epidemiological patterns that match transmission and control measures (e.g., vaccines that prevent the specific disease).
These lines of evidence collectively demonstrate causation far more rigorously than the original bacterial criteria alone.
Practical reality check
If viruses were not real, the following would be inexplicable:
Electron micrographs and purified viral particles that consistently match genetic sequences recovered from patients.
Successful vaccines that work by targeting specific viral antigens.
Antiviral drugs that inhibit specific viral enzymes or entry mechanisms and produce measurable clinical benefit.
Laboratory reconstruction of viruses from sequence data that then cause the expected disease in models.
Consistent isolation of the same agents from outbreaks across continents and decades, with genetic evolution that tracks transmission chains.
Disease causation is established by the totality of evidence, not by whether a 140-year-old set of bacterial guidelines is met in every detail. The same logic applies to many non-cultivable pathogens and to genetic or environmental causes of disease.
https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-the-war-on-chlorine-dioxide
Your observation should underscore the need to limit the terms in office of senior bureaucrat managers. Fauci's tenure gave him more power; there is very little in the way of checks and balances on bureaucratic power. Term limits would be at least a start at imposing some.
After J. E. Hoover, the congress woke up to the immense power he held (probably because he let each of them know the power he had to blackmail them). They acted to impose term limits on the FBI. If there is valid reason for that principle with one federal agency, isn't it likely that those same reasons apply across the board?
I would have the limits placed not only on their terms in management positions but their terms overall. A system whereby employment in non-managerial positions would reduce tenure in executive positions would be beneficial.
The bureaucracy and all in it are the worst blight on our imperfect constitution.
True! I think Tony, that human cockroach (yes, Iβm copying our fave attorney) rose in the ranks so it may not have helped, but anything at all that might, Iβm all
for.
Instead he was rewarded for his bad behavior.
100%...I knew a hemophiliac in college who was HIV positive from a transfusion. They are doing the same thing now ignoring spike tainted blood. However, this time around, there are 2 organizations working to provide safe blood.
Check this out CHop Fauciβs been murdering people for decades as you know!
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1WLt5BtuS4/?mibextid=wwXIfr
Dr. Wilber calls out Fauci
Medical corruption exposed:
https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-the-war-on-chlorine-dioxide
He would have got in well at one of the concentration camps working with Mengala.
Hubris vs Humility. In human nature and in politics. In the effort to connect the dots in my own mind -I asked Grok to distill Jeffβs excellent post even further for me:
Hubris (from Greek) is excessive pride or overconfidence that overreaches limits and invites downfall. Humility (from Latin humus, βearthβ) is a grounded, modest awareness of oneβs limits and fallibility. In human nature, hubris blinds people to risks and feedback; humility enables learning, realism, and cooperation. In politics, hubristic leaders overreach with disastrous plans or unchecked power, while humility supports better judgment through restraint, evidence, and institutional checks.
Surely ancient wisdom informed the founders toward our still imperfect Constitution. I hope we can keep it.
The founders were educated. Unlike the disinformation system euphemistically called the "education system" today.
If our rulers continue with their hubris, instead of humility, they are inviting nemesis, the downfall that follows excessive pride and arrogance.
Perhaps we should reflect on the widespread hubris that leads Americans into thinking they can go 7,000 miles away, and take over and use other peoples' territory for their own benefit.
Mrs. RW
Your phrase, "still imperfect Constitution" is, perhaps, a more apt description than intended. I think you meant in the sense that no human device can ever be perfect; however, I think a more accurate assessment is that, while it can never be perfect as a human endeavor, it can be made to more closely approach perfection through amendment. Naturally, those efforts logically would increase control over the federal government. Sadly, as a people, we have only ever been allowed, by congress, to choose what improvement or changes we want. We badly need to use the Art. V Convention of States process to propose amendments. Even if the process only resulted in a bland homily, establishing the path and setting the parameters in which such conventions could operate would establish the legitimacy of that path; and, with God's help, lead to making a 'more perfect union'.
Thank you for the definition of hubris v humility. I am also wondering about the legal definition of βarticulable.β To me it means, I could make a case, out loud, for this thesis. But is there something different about it as a legal term?
Articulable facts are what you need for βreasonable suspicionβ as in the need to pat frisk a suspect a cop would remove from a motor vehicle. Thatβs whatβs needed -stronger than a hunch, but less than probable cause. Itβs a low threshold. However, it requires that the cop be able to articulate his reasons for the suspicion in court, before a judge or magistrate. An example would be a furtive gesture made by the suspect, or that heβd encountered the suspect before and known him to carry a weapon, or just that the cop was alone and didnβt know the suspect and a check for weapons before continuing his investigation was prudent. It requires verbalization.
Thank you!
Agree! Hunt down every one of them and START with the FOIA lady, whatβs her name, Marg Moore.
Oh yes, let us go after her hard. Imagine what she has done to the FOIA docs such as redaction, disposing of certain docs, prolonging answering requests and more. Yes, her neck is a perfect size for a noose.
I wonder if the DOGE guysβyoung geniusesβthought it would be fun to mine Fauciβs phone records. I am certain we will never know but I like thinking that they used it as a βwhat the hell/why notβ moment. To think Dr The Science was taken down by some whippersnappers gives me a huge smile.
IQ over 50? Well. You just left out all the mask-wearing Fauci-ites⦠LOL.
Now, now, James! Don't be too harsh on Dana. After all, having an IQ below that of an idiot is a requirement for being a corporate media talking head. : )
I wondered, at first, why RFK, Jr. deigned to appear on CNN but was delighted to see that he had the nerve to take on the 'Bashing' and did it so aggressively and so well despite his lack of physical vocal clarity.
So if we can 'go after' Fauci (which we should), with all this detailed doc dumping, why is it we just got one limited hangout Epstein 'binder' given to mostly bought-and-paid-for conservative "influencers" (who have shown the curiosity of Joe Biden on a weed bender when it comes to all the irregularities with the Charlie Kirk assassination)?
Fauci gets an Autopen pardon, but we still continue forward for 'public accountability'. Yet Epstein-ers can't get the same treatment, even if the statute of limitations have passed? (Although that didn't stop state legislatures from amending those limitation timeframes to go after the pervy priests. Congress could do the same nationally.)
This all feels a little 'theatrical' at this point with mid-terms so close and so many in the base revolting at the revolting behavior of our Republican congressional leaders who won't do anything about the revolting Epstein List people's behavior.
It's all revolting.
Well stated Mr. Goodrich.
Dana Bash is a mouthpiece for CNN. CNN and all the news companies get a LARGE percentage of their ad revenue from pharma.
Ever wonder why pharma puts out well produced, catchy ads for conditions you have never heard of, and can't imagine many people suffer from? It's just money thrown at the networks, so they get a lot of clout.
Most people in institutional positions are sticking with Fauci because they know they CAN'T tell the truth if they want to keep their job.
So that's group one of the Fauci defenders.
Group two are the ordinary people that don't want to admit they were lied to, that they had a poison injected into their arms. I'm sure there's an evolutionary benefit to having most people in a population have an inertia in their mindset. But the kind of "let's keep going" behavior that helped over the last 100,000 years is a problem right now.
Effective treatments suppressed to enhance profits - the last ~150 years of medicine:
https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-the-war-on-chlorine-dioxide
What do you think of the new chick theyβve picked to head the CDC?
I donβt know if sheβs really dumb or possibly trained to just stay on topic OR ELSE- her ex husband was very high up in Bidens CIA.
I mean, Rand Paul voted to confirm a jab pusher lol. it's all theatre. MAHA is on life support.
Not stupid. Garden variety liars and traitors.
Ameruca didn't....the WEF/Transnational gangsters did.
C&C Family:
Nicolas Hulscher posted this stack yesterday:
https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-criminal-referral-requests-c3f
From the post:
βIn a sweeping nationwide criminal-accountability campaign, criminal referral requests have been sent to the attorneys general of all 50 states seeking investigations and prosecutions of Anthony Fauci and other top public-health officials for their roles in the βCOVID Criminal Enterprise.β
This is an opportunity to make our voices heard.Β I encourage everyone to submit a request to your stateβs Attorney General. Implore them to investigate this request.
Note: I watched the βshowβ live but gutted it out to hear they voted Fauci in contempt. It was painful to listen to the dems continue with their bulls*%#
Sending a request to our corrupt AG(Michigan ) will fall on deaf ears .
I also watched the βshowβand yes the BS was painful.
The ears may well be deaf, but you will have the receipt showing that you asked. Might be useful in future.
VVV - absolutely!
I got a receipt number when I submitted mine.
Excellent point.
This!
Ditto CT. Our AG is an angry Leftist. More concerned about ICE at polling places.
Nonetheless, I say do it. Get it on record that you did it.
I have to think of it this way: Given the chance, if I couldnβt hide jews in my attic, or somehow damage the Nazi plan, would I at the very least want it on record that I spoke up?
Hard yes.
Same here in communist Washington state, sadly.
Nonetheless, I say do it. Get it on record that you did it.
I have to think of it this way: Given the chance, if I couldnβt hide jews in my attic, or somehow damage the Nazi plan, would I at the very least want it on record that I spoke up?
Hard yes.
Hawaii - the same BS.
Nonetheless, I say do it. Get it on record that you did it.
I have to think of it this way: Given the chance, if I couldnβt hide jews in my attic, or somehow damage the Nazi plan, would I at the very least want it on record that I spoke up?
Hard yes.
I usually end up calling. Hope is eternal
Indeed it is!!
I just wrote an email to Attorney General Nessel asking her to investigate and prosecute Anthony Fauci and all the health officials that inflicted so much suffering on our state.
It was not hard to do. Her email is miag@michigan.gov
Thanks S.D. Iβll send one alsoβ¦we can go down as anarchists together.π
Nessel in Mi. Will happily add our names to her βlistβ of anarchists. It would be risky business to appeal to her for justice.
I don't know why they ever let Danang Dick speak. Absolutely incinerated his credibility by lying about his military service. Thanks for watching so the rest of us didn't have to!
My hat goes off to all the wonderful people, who could stomach the treason. I salute you, for being able to watch the bulls*%#
Laura, did you hear that Fetterman voted NO today on holding Fauci in contempt? I am so disgusted by that. A libtard to the end he is.
I heard it live, Lori. π‘π‘π‘
Ugh:{
I just submitted :-)
I read Nick's article, agree it's good news and appreciated the article. But IMO it fell short. Am I the only one whose biggest questions are "what is the likelihood any state AGs will take aggressive action?" "If any do, what is the likelihood of convictions?" "If any convictions, how high up will they reach?" Nobody knows for sure the answers to any of those questions. But I bet Nick has access to legal professionals he has respect for. I wish he would have asked them and given us a clue. Big difference between submitting requests likely to be ignored, and submitting requests likely to get results.
Itβs doesnβt matter the results SteelJ. What matters is that We The People speak up. Even if it falls on deaf ears.
I agree it's important we speak up. Which is why I liked the article and said it's good news. But results matter. Incentives matter. Unless bad behavior is disincentivized by consequences, it never stops. One of the commenters to Nick's article said "the process is the punishment". Two problems with that idea. One is convictions are a far more effective punishment. Secondly, unless any AGs take action, there won't even be a process that punishes.
I refuse to just sing louder as the train rolls by.
Iβm not attached to the outcome because all of these evil people will have to stand before our almighty God one day. Judgement is mine, says the Lord.
That's probably a wise position. Isn't it said Satan rules on earth, God rules in heaven? We seem to get beaten over the head every day to convince us the part about Satan is true.
Indeed SteelJ
yes, like the guy that started the fires, and others in the past, Jail????? really. Give them a small bottle of water, a "fire swatter" and put them in front of the fire!!!
The mic is on but ain't nobody listenin.
I understand Florida, West Virginia and Louisiana are moving forward.
Thanks, that's good to hear. Some of us no longer get excited about performative stuff that never goes anywhere. I don't think this group would be intentionally performative, as we often see, but still.
Unreal!!!
Our idiot AG in VA wouldnt have a clue how to handle this... he's so dumb, he's scary. π
Back when the Russiagate investigations first started, some clever internet users figured out that Comey and the Gang were purposely misspelling important words and names in order to throw off the search engine and FOIA requests. This came to light when someone realized that they were spelling Comey as Corny so the r and the n would look like an m but be distinct enough to not show up on searches. "Oxferd" was another one.
Yeah. Cockroaches. That's about the nicest I've got.
Not just to throw off FOIA searches, but they can easily use those weirdly named two-word operations for search engine analysis to see who else was aware of the names and what they were looking for. And if anything had leaked.
I had not thought of that or seen it anywhere, but it makes a great deal of sense.
Discovered the cockroach emoji during the Senate hearings. And have used it relentlessly sinceβ¦
πͺ³πͺ³πͺ³πͺ³πͺ³πͺ³πͺ³πͺ³πͺ³πͺ³πͺ³πͺ³
Yep, just what I was going to say Corny! Not their first rodeo!
only one way I ever spelled this putrid alumni of ours: Commie
slimey basterds
Basturds, that is.
They are hiding behind bad kerning / keming.
Yes. Spelling Oxford as 0xferd is deliberate to foil searches. No doubt.
I have questions. Jeff included a graphic of βa declassified 2019 memo, Oxferd Comma began on May 16, 2016.β It looks like the top half of an old sheet of paper, yellowed and ragged around the edges with the bottom half torn off. The date is redacted, part of one sentence is highlighted, and a bold line is under the text. Below that and off the page, it says, βWhite House declassified FBI documents Aug, 5, 2026.β
Seriously? Iβm supposed to think that little scrap of paper actually exists? Iβm into verisimilitude as much as the next guy, but weβre talking about national security here. This is hardly the time to mock up the evidence.
It was a facsimile. Not supposed to be a copy of the original
Clearly. Just saying the content speaks for itself. Dressing it up looks like hype.
βοΈβοΈβοΈ
We have thought on Your lovingkindness, O God,
In the midst of Your temple.
As is Your name, O God,
So is Your praise to the ends of the earth;
Your right hand is full of righteousness.
β Psalm 48:9-10 LSB
βοΈβοΈβοΈ
Nothing really important to say but to repeat God's ever loving Word every day all day. Thank you Sister
Nothing really important to say but to repeat God's ever loving Word every day all day. Thank you Sister
The FBI needs to be completely destroyed. Burned to the ground and a totally new organization built in its place. One that is honest and committed to blind justice. Anyone in the old FBI with whom we have the slightest doubt has no place in the new organization. At this point, there is no difference between our FBI and the FSB, GRU, or old East German Stassi. Rebuilding the FBI must be the this generationβs Manhattan Project. We canβt hate what it is right now enough.
Never forget that the Shrub (really, his father through Cheney) recruited Marcus Wolfe as a lead consultant when Homeland Security was formed. Wolfe's former job was head of the Stasi. I'll never forget returning to Dulles Airport after a trip and seeing signs that said "if you see something, say something". I stopped and stared I was so stunned. That was take straight from the Stasi.
Why would you want to replace an old cancer with a new one? When you extinguish a fire, what do you replace it with?
Exactly what I was thinking. Dismantle it completely and donβt build another. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
I think we need federal law enforcement for crimes that cross state lines, though. Wasnβt that the justification for having the FBI?
FBI, like the IRS , is an illegal corporation incorporated in Puerto Rico
Probably you arenβt aware of the legitimate things they do. I personally want THAT FBI alive and healthy!
Agree. They actually do a LOT of good when focusing on what they are supposed to do. Like getting rid of child traffickers, terror cells, international crimes, or enforcing federal laws that cross state lines, etc etc. It relieves local state police and municipalities from those duties so that they can better focus on the needs of their locality, cooperating with federal when needed. If we are a nation of laws, and some of those laws are at the federal level, they need an enforcement arm at that level. Unfortunately the deep state co-opted and adulterated the FBI decades ago when they captured the CIA. Both need to be revamped and returned to initial purposes.
Good point. Everything in our government is thoroughly corrupt. What makes sense is eliminating what we don't need, like the FBI, DOE, most or all of HHS, and so on. Then focus on trying to fix the ones we do need, that are just as corrupt and dysfunctional. For example, we need a military and a weapons procurement system. But the MIC is all about expensive weapons that make money, battlefield effectiveness is not a priority.
That is what Kash Patel is doing. Investigating, exposing and taking out the trash. Give him time.
There may not be a lot of time left. And regardless, this information is not getting out to the masses because MSM barely covers any of it. Real journalism is dead.
The MSM needs to be the next target to be called in for the Senate to investigate and questionβ¦. They have NO PARDONS!!!πΊπΈ
Well, it is in everything. Remember years ago when the IRS put out the 1-800-snitch deal where if you turned in someone and they had not "paid up" you got a reward. What is the difference, it is all the same as the ones you listed above. Parents, schools, churches, etc need to start teaching honesty, integrity, and consequences from infancy. This culture can't change in a short period of time. Most laws are outlines with loop holes to let criminals know what they can get away with.
In the same vein of stassi crap happening here, this is pure gold - a citizen at a council meeting proposes the same flock type safety for our politicians:
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/kNr5d89L88o
If evidence can be found of who directed the "Oxferd Comma" operation, they should be charged with treason.
I'm really interested in seeing what the "investigation" found.
And again -- Where is Congress?
The CongressCritters are the weakest link. They are thoroughly unrepresentative of the American people. They avoid their real duties. And they create the "laws" to give themselves as close to jobs-for-life as they can manage.
There is a real sickness at the heart of US government. It is hard to see how we ever fix this -- short of collapse.
Maybe names will turn up in Fauci's phone dump. Congressional names.
Yes, we need a step change that strips them of their ability to control funding (all they should be able to do is propose spending), limits their time in Congress, forces them to not engage in any investments while in office (and 5 years after too), stops all lobbying.
Eliminate all the perks and retirement benefits. It's only supposed to be a limited office anyway. And they should have to abide by all the laws imposed on citizens.
π―!!!
We need to totally rewrite the reach and definition of government.
As I understand it, the limits of federal government ARE already well defined, we have just ignored them and grown a cancerous beast that needs surgery.
Like all the "agencies". If only we honored the original document!
Correct!!
Everyone said it couldn't happen in the USSR. Are we really any different?
And the USSR eventually fell. May the evil doers be caught in their own snares.
Martin Armstrong speculates that we will divide into regional entities, at least for governance. Personally I think that makes sense. What does someone in
ID have in common with someone in NYC? For me, this couldn't happen fast enough. I'm tired of funding this government, watching what my hard earned tax dollars fund. Enough!
Some people might read your comment as βblack pillingβ but itβs true. Iβm in my 50βs and Iβve never had a government of and for the people. Itβs a giant grift.
Are there some good people in government? Sure. But the whole of it is corrupt well beyond repair. I think we need a Pinochet style dictatorship for a decade or two and then try to start over.
There are many flavors of "democracy". I would like to go back to something like the Ancient Greek version, where public service in the equivalent of Congress was more like jury service is today -- individuals randomly selected from the citizen roll for a limited period of time, with precautions against corruption. That way, the legislative body would actually be representative of the people -- which it clearly is not today.
Of course, before implementing that, we would need to make citizenship something more than the accident of location of birth.
Thatβs a good thought. Of course Greece at that time was an ethnostate and that makes a difference. Your point about citizenship is a good one but I think weβd need to go a bit further than that and get back to more of an early 1900βs demographic at the very least.
Growing up, the incompetents and lazy sought government jobs. (I'm 69). Now we're stuck with them and their overpriced retirements and benefits. And salaries.
According to John Adamsβs writings, about 1/3 of Americans were patriots for the Cause, about 1/3 Americans were fence sitters and about 1/3 were loyalists to King George.
That matches up to Solomon Aschβs Conformity Experiment where over 70% are afraid to buck the system and less than 25% are courageous and unafraid to speak up, proving the results of the global experiment that covid was.
But, if even half of the fence sitters can gather the courage to speak up and educate the next generation, will we have a chance to survive?
Jeremiah 32:17: βAh, Sovereign Lord, you have made the heavens and the earth by your great powerβ¦ Nothing is too hard for youβ
If we could get half of the Christians to vote, things would be a lot better!!!!
I don't understand the lack of voting. I've voted since I was first eligible. And I still go to church. Never found anything that precludes doing one's civic duty.
Black churches often politicize the pulpit. And so do Muslim mosques. We need a strong Christian movement at the polls.
That was the strategy behind hammering home βseparation of church and stateβ into our heads all these years, so that the Christian church would be too averse to intruding into politics, while all the other faiths continued to do so.
We have a recent court ruling that says churches can take a stand and keep their nonprofit tax status.
Many Christian churches do as well. It isn't isolated to a few religious sects unfortunately. I'm sure there are plenty of pastors currently telling their flock to support the zionist wars.
Absolutely important. If people dont vote, someone is voting for them.
It reminds me of hypnosis. Around 25% of the population are immune to hypnosis. 50% are suggestible. The last 25% can be fully hypnotized, without of course knowing they are.
Not if we unquestionably assume 'technocracy' ... always sold to us as The Answerβ’ ... ("Let's just make it better, more transparent, etc.") ... to be God's Definitive Plan for Man.
"They got comfortable. They got lazy. They installed gatekeepers who βhate FOIAβ in charge of FOIA responses. They didnβt expect that any change in administration βDemocrat to Republican to Democrat to Republicanβ would make any difference in transparency at all. They never believed the fetid swamp water they paddle around in could ever be drained this low. Instead, they believed in the permanent government so completely that they left a permanent record."
Let's all make a concerted effort to use the word HUBRIS more often π
Iβll take another Trump term myself. The reason they hate him so much is because slowly but surely he is exposing All their dirty little secrets. More please!
And gutting their office staff. Go Trump! Fire AT WILL!
Yep, I think the whites of their eyes are in full view!
like man can control the climate
Years ago I tried to figure out what SMH stood for, and by context clues guessed βso much hubrisβ. My teenage daughter set me straight. ;-D
HILARIOUS π€£
"Why is federal information about the most important project in modern history sequestered and secreted?", asks Attorney Childers.
Simple answer: Because that information reveals that the federal government, certain of its letter agencies, certain "world governance" bureaus, and certain preferred pharmaceutical vendors are 100% the cause and beneficiaries of the entire Covid/vaccine operation.
You left out the democrat deep state, allowed to steal an obvious landslide election, to install a barely functioning puppet.
They're not that smart. I think they were just opportunist beneficiaries.
I took it as a rhetorical question...
Roger, π―
Re "Oxferd C0mma:" These intentional misspellings were ABSOLUTELY done to obfuscate search results.
Hereβs how I avoid censorship and FOIA requests: ΓxfΓͺΕΔ CΓΈmmΓ₯
I donβt know if you saw the above comment, but it was something Iβd not considered.
It also gave them the ability to monitor searches, so they could know if word got out and they needed to quickly cover their tracks. They could know their secret was holding.
It just keeps getting better. Arrest the human cockroach!
Salt gun!
πͺ³
While we are distracted by the ridiculous domestic circus we call politics and the soul-numbing carnage of two foreign wars that just won't end, the deep state is closing in on one of the last remaining pieces for the control grid enslavement of America... Water.
......................................................................................................................
THE WATER WARS HAVE BEGUN
The World Economic Forum has openly proclaimed 2026 the βYear of Waterβ and has introduced what it calls βBlue Davos,β bringing freshwater, ocean policy, food security, investment, and the so-called blue economy together beneath one institutional umbrella. The Forum states that its annual meeting will concentrate on βfreshwater access and management, blue food security and ocean protection.β ...
...The water wars will not necessarily begin with soldiers marching toward a river. They will begin through permits, compulsory meters, emergency declarations, tiered pricing, groundwater restrictions, digital monitoring, and public-private agreements that few citizens will ever read. They will appear as administrative decisions made by experts who insist that no alternative exists, while governments blame climate change, corporations blame AI, and international organizations demand that authority be centralized before the crisis becomes worse.
The shift from green to blue is not merely a change in environmental branding. It represents the movement of political attention and investment capital toward the most indispensable resource on Earth. Once water becomes fully financialized and access is integrated into centralized systems of permission, the government will no longer need to confiscate property directly because it will possess something far more powerfulβthe ability to determine whether that property may receive water.
The next great struggle will be presented as conservation against waste, science against ignorance, and collective survival against selfish individual use. Yet beneath the slogans will remain the oldest political question in civilization: who decides? If the public waits until that decision has been transferred permanently to an alliance of bureaucrats, financiers, and multinational corporations, the water wars will already have been lost before most people even realized they had begun.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/corruption/the-water-wars-have-begun/
There are no riparian water rights west of the Mississippi that I know of. Nor rights to any of the rainwater that falls on your property, so even cisterns can be dismantled. That's why we are easterners.
Had to look up "riparian water rights." I learn something new every day here.
You can collect rainwater in AZ
And in Texas.
glad there is sanity somewhere out west
A regular know it all on these threads responded once to an Armstrong article I posted saying "Who cares what Martin Armstrong has to say."
Well smarty, he has advised administrations for 4 decades, including Trump. So yeah, you just might want to pay attention to what he has to say.
Saw this this morning. It's chilling and coming our way.
Spot on PolPhi. "While we are distracted by the ridiculous domestic circus we call politics". The uni-party has constructed quite the impressive deception. The public at large, despite decades of political lies, appear to be incapable of critical thinking. These are the typicals, who ran for the vax lines and subsequent Dante's first circle of limbo: boosters.
Maybe we should ask Trump's spiritual advisor, Paula White, to pray for us. I think she only charges $1000/prayer.
The Technocratic Plot to Steal America and Everything You Own β¦ Wake Up!!
Your Digital Prison Is Ready. Here's How.
https://maninamerica.substack.com/p/the-technocratic-plot-to-steal-america
And shocker, the alleged water system hacks are being blamed on Iran.
Regarding the Fauci side show, as someone commented on the below article, which was well written and lays compelling evidence as to why this is going nowhere, Fauci is giving us Orwell's Two Minutes of Hate for the masses.
https://reinettesenumsfoghornexpress.substack.com/p/no-fauci-has-not-been-indicted/comment/309643764
If anyone is serious about prosecuting the human cockroach(es), theyβll file RICO charges against Fauci, (and Birx), for starters.
I expect most of the Fauci show is just a distraction to keep people from looking behind the curtain and seeing what the D.C. scum are doing to us now.
Perhaps going after Deborah Birx, who has no immunity, might uncover more information about Fauci and his corruption schemes, by her throwing him under the bus trying to save her own skin???? Just a thought.
Fauci has no immunity.that pardon by cabbage head isnβt worth the piece of paper itβs printed on. You canβt pardon an unconvicted, not sentenced criminal. If they are not convicted, what do you pardon? The dictionary alone gives enough evidence to my point. Look up βpardonβ.
Either way, Brix should be included because she was up to her neck scarf in this evil corruption, deception, and cover up.
And even wrote a book about it.
Put RICO charges on them, and they will be extremely uncomfortable, no matter how long it takes to get to court. And Iβll bet there would be plenty to discover about the entire ordeal.
This level of cynicism is disheartening. It shows just how badly our trust in those we elect has fallen. Iβm a bit more optimistic. Never expect moral purity, thatβs naive. But this administration appears to be delivering on transparency more than any other. After all, look at all the stuff we HAVE seen from the fraud, the waste, the Russia Gate, the UFO files, the Epstein stuffβ¦. And more. Trust BUT VERIFY. Donβt just throw in the towel. That accomplishes nothing.
I agree with you, Barbara. It is so easy to become discouraged because what has been uncovered by the current administration. We are thankful for these revelations but at the same time concerned about how to fix the depth of the corruption that has been uncovered. I do not think that at this time there is anyone within congress or any of the alphabet agencies that should not be fired! If anyone was working for our government prior to the current administration, they should be held accountable... even if for no other reason than turning a blind eye. Absolutely disgusting!!!!!
I assume every government employee is guilty until proven innocent.
They are literally breaking the law in refusing to release millions of pages of Epstein files. Not exactly the definition of transparency.
I agree. There will never be any accountability if we don't even know what they are up to.
That is why transparency is so important. As I said, this excessive secrecy started 40 years ago.
By 2008, Americans back then were so aggravated by the change that when Obama came along and promised the most transparent presidency ever, people voted for him.
Here we are, 18 years later, and the Americans of today are so beaten down they have no hope of improvement. It turns out that it isn't true that morale will improve with more beatings, as the saying goes.
Anyway, truth and honesty are an important start to bringing back public awareness and involvement. You can't have a democracy without it.
Mrs. RW
Learned (or forced?) helplessness is a powerful tool.
Birx was right there alongside Fauci. She actively worked against the presidentβs instructions, meeting with governors across the country. She wrote a book that I wonβt read but probably contains information that incriminates her. She recently was on a Fauci apology tour ( Fox Business) spinning lies, obviously believing sheβs untouchable. Thereβs never just one cockroach.
I watch Newsmax and I am so disgusted that they have had Birx on as a commentator π€―
Wonder what's in those over 6,000 still sealed indictments?
Each indictment can have multiple names.
Sounds like RICO to me.
Juan O Savin just said the # is over half a million, and each one can hold up to 99 names.
No doubt I got the actual number wrong, I just know it's way up there!!
And yes, each indictment - multiple names.
And if ANY name is any other lawsuit or case being tried, that name stays sealed until "case closed" whereupon that name either moves forward or gets taken off.
Good morning C&C. Have a blessed day everyone
Happy sunny Thursday all! π»ππ»
Now add the mail in ballot piece of the puzzle.
Morning Karmy!
Morning Shayne!!
Iβd be looking into Marg Moore, who heads FOIA and hates FOIA. How many of those types need to be fired?
All of them.
Re: "They got comfortable. They got lazy." with all do respect to the author, I think Gov workers know and think about FOIA a lot. What we see is just the tip of the iceberg of their recorded decisions, but not all the discussions that lead up to them so we are not getting the full story about their intent. What don't we see? Not a comforting thought while @Jeff Childers seems like he's trying to comfort us with his optimism.
Love the smell of deep state frying in the morning! And the delicate taste of C&C
but no mention of Obama who no doubt was the instigator of all of this - perhaps the next dump
He was installed by foreign insects from the Middle East.
lol that is awesome Christoper
ππππ. Love it!!
That's the smell of the deep state frying the American people, sans the illegal invaders, as we scurry to leap out of the frying pan into the fire.