"U.S. District Judge Robert L. Hinkle ruled the ban is unconstitutional at least in part because it applies even when gender-affirming care for minors is “medically appropriate,” according to the judgment."
"Hinkle said in the ruling that “gender identity is real”—something he has emphasized in at least one past ruling—and the gender-affirming care the state sought to ban is often recognized as “proper treatment” for people suffering gender dysphoria due to their identity not matching their sex at birth."
"Lawyers for the plaintiffs argued that there was no medical basis for the ban or restrictions, it limited their parental rights to make medical decisions for their children and that the state enacted the law out of discrimination and animus—and Hinkle seemingly agreed, writing “it is clear that anti-transgender animus motivated bill sponsors and at least a significant number of legislators.”"
I did read in one report that he actually left in place the ban on surgery for minors.
Minors.... children have no idea what being the opposite sex actually means! NO adult should EVER suggest to a child that they might have been born in the wrong body! This is INSANE!
"U.S. District Judge Robert L. Hinkle ruled the ban is unconstitutional at least in part because it applies even when gender-affirming care for minors is “medically appropriate,” according to the judgment."
"Hinkle said in the ruling that “gender identity is real”—something he has emphasized in at least one past ruling—and the gender-affirming care the state sought to ban is often recognized as “proper treatment” for people suffering gender dysphoria due to their identity not matching their sex at birth."
"Lawyers for the plaintiffs argued that there was no medical basis for the ban or restrictions, it limited their parental rights to make medical decisions for their children and that the state enacted the law out of discrimination and animus—and Hinkle seemingly agreed, writing “it is clear that anti-transgender animus motivated bill sponsors and at least a significant number of legislators.”"
I did read in one report that he actually left in place the ban on surgery for minors.
Ugh 😕 I wonder whet the supposed reasoning was?
Maybe it will take massive lawsuits to doctors and hospitals by kids who’ve been permanently altered and regret it as adults to change this 😕
"U.S. District Judge Robert L. Hinkle ruled the ban is unconstitutional at least in part because it applies even when gender-affirming care for minors is “medically appropriate,” according to the judgment."
"Hinkle said in the ruling that “gender identity is real”—something he has emphasized in at least one past ruling—and the gender-affirming care the state sought to ban is often recognized as “proper treatment” for people suffering gender dysphoria due to their identity not matching their sex at birth."
"Lawyers for the plaintiffs argued that there was no medical basis for the ban or restrictions, it limited their parental rights to make medical decisions for their children and that the state enacted the law out of discrimination and animus—and Hinkle seemingly agreed, writing “it is clear that anti-transgender animus motivated bill sponsors and at least a significant number of legislators.”"
I did read in one report that he actually left in place the ban on surgery for minors.
Minors.... children have no idea what being the opposite sex actually means! NO adult should EVER suggest to a child that they might have been born in the wrong body! This is INSANE!
agree totally-NUTZ
"U.S. District Judge Robert L. Hinkle ruled the ban is unconstitutional at least in part because it applies even when gender-affirming care for minors is “medically appropriate,” according to the judgment."
"Hinkle said in the ruling that “gender identity is real”—something he has emphasized in at least one past ruling—and the gender-affirming care the state sought to ban is often recognized as “proper treatment” for people suffering gender dysphoria due to their identity not matching their sex at birth."
"Lawyers for the plaintiffs argued that there was no medical basis for the ban or restrictions, it limited their parental rights to make medical decisions for their children and that the state enacted the law out of discrimination and animus—and Hinkle seemingly agreed, writing “it is clear that anti-transgender animus motivated bill sponsors and at least a significant number of legislators.”"
I did read in one report that he actually left in place the ban on surgery for minors.