116 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Yuri Bezmenov's avatar

Pray for peace. Americans, Russians, and Ukrainians want to end the bloodshed. But our regime wants world war 3.

National Securiry Advisor commissar Jake Sullivan has blood on his hands and his wife Maggie Goodlander just carpetbagged a Congressional seat: https://yuribezmenov.substack.com/p/maggie-goodlander-jake-sullivan-commissar-couple

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

I was reading a historical book about Appalachian people last night and the chapter was about Colonel Jackson who was Christian. The time frame was the Civil War. This campaign involved destroying the B&O railroad. He wrote to his wife and told her how his heart broke when he thought about how much money was wasted on his recent military campaign that could have been used to share the gospel and rather than on destruction.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Nov 18
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Vida Galore's avatar

Jesus did actually clean some of that up as well.

Expand full comment
Dave aka Geezermann's avatar

Overturning the scam vendors tables in the Temple, for one, yes.

Expand full comment
Jamie's avatar

Please elaborate on this comment?

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

Read what Jesus said in the Gospels about the religious leadership and what was coming.

Expand full comment
shayne's avatar

President Trump will be having back-channel conversations with President Putin. And Putin is no dummy. He knows how to read the tea leaves.

Expand full comment
Vida Galore's avatar

Putin's even more clever and a better chess player than Trump, IMHO.

Expand full comment
Diana's avatar

Putin is more honest and savvy than Biden. I hope they give Ukraine to Russia. Honestly tired of hearing about this war and clearly the Ukrainians cannot rule themselves best to give them back to the place where they came from Russia. This will ruin Biden family business and stop the ridiculous war the U.S. should have never started. I blame Harris she met with Putin and five days later Putin invaded Ukraine.

Expand full comment
shayne's avatar

He certainly has a different world view. Did you watch Tucker interview Putin? It was a real eye-opener. Putin came across as firm but reasonable and in some ways quite likeable.

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

Count on it. The back channels have to pretty busy right now.

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

Putin is quite an idiot. Remember, he started this entire war that was supposed to be over in days. We are now going on the 3rd year.

Expand full comment
Dan (100% All in MAGA)'s avatar

No, actually biden started it, and then has used billions and billions of our tax dollars to arm them thru the military industrial complex (with him and his cronies getting rich in kickbacks), killling both thousands and thousands of Russians and Ukranians.

So the idiot is actually benjaimn.

Luckily, Trump & Putin will stop it.

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

Never entertain fools or abuse children. In this case, both applies. Just saying.

He loves having a platform even if he looks like a fool.

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

As much as I’d like to believe you I haven’t been able to find the American armies invading Ukraine or starting the war. I did find Americans in Ukraine approved by trump, however

Expand full comment
daverkb's avatar

Bennie 2 Noodles -- if you stopped ingesting the disinformation tablets the eyes would open. Or alternatively, time travel back to Ukraine in the year 2014. And by the way, what's the new Victory Plan?

Expand full comment
Carol M's avatar

You truly need to inform yourself on the history of this proxy war…..

https://youtu.be/IsjKZstp-XU?si=zZDSJ-jNDfFHQ_6F

Expand full comment
Dan (100% All in MAGA)'s avatar

You Bnn, as a delusional fool, will now only get one responsive post per day from me, go back and read it above.

Expand full comment
Vida Galore's avatar

Good lord. You know absolutely nothing. Please just stop making declarative statements on something you know nothing about. It makes you look like a liberal.

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

OMG, you are too kind.

Expand full comment
shayne's avatar

LOL

Expand full comment
Dan (100% All in MAGA)'s avatar

Wow Vida, that is a huge, and well deserved slam dunk: "It makes you look like a liberal."

Expand full comment
Jamie's avatar

I believe he is in the military. I find it interesting that he has dug his heels in and not budged on this topic. Very interesting.

Expand full comment
Dan (100% All in MAGA)'s avatar

It's possible, he claims to have been assigned to an Armor Battalion sent over there to train Uks on employing the Abrams M1 tank - which might also explain why the Uks had to pull them off the battlefield before they were all destroyed. He can send me his DD-214 and I can confirm it. I can also see how he was discharged.... which might be enlightening...

It's also possible he is a Ukrainian and a penis pianist (zelensky) supporter posting propaganda.

Expand full comment
Dave aka Geezermann's avatar

Is it just me, but when I read 2N's comments followed by the terse and apt replies I am actually laughing out loud.

Expand full comment
Dan (100% All in MAGA)'s avatar

It is pretty funny!

Do you think it is a strange/weird form of happy self flagellation for Bnn? He's got to know it is coming.

Or, it could simply be he is brain dead.

I'm open to both options!

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

The Ukrainians are still using the Abrams tanks today-see below.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fxH7TpuTvcg&pp=ygUSYWJyYW1zIHRhbmtzIGt1cnNr

So much for them "all being destroyed".

If you're in global by all means look me up. I'm in there.

Expand full comment
Dan (100% All in MAGA)'s avatar

I didn't say they were all destroyed bnn - like cnn only worse in disseminating bovine excrement. As usual you fail to read with precision. Which explains a lot. Go look again, its 3 messages above yours.

I don't have your last name to look you up. If you are still active I will be happy to look you up. But if you are now out and a contractor or DA Civilian, I'd rather just see your DD-214 which you should be more than willing to provide.

Expand full comment
Fred's avatar

The West and NATO are the idiots. If we hadn’t pushed to violate the longstanding treaty that prevented Ukraine from ever joining NATO, the war would have never started.

Expand full comment
Peter GL's avatar

the problem is that was a "gentleman's agreement" between the US and Russia. Problem is the US, through their infinite wisdom (!) were planning to break this agreement and accept Ukraine in NATO. With that they could station material and soldiers right at Moscow's doorstep, also guaranteeing Ukraine from any hostile action, while the Ukraine was free to attack Russians in Ukraine. Russia was forced to act fast and stop this nonsense. Besides, who was spreading all the Russia collusion malarkey during Trump's first term?

Expand full comment
shayne's avatar

Absolutely, Fred. I have always said, treaties are not worth the paper they're written on.

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

When did Ukraine join nato?

What treaty documents this?

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

There is a treaty that prevented Ukraine from ever joining NATO, this is what Russia is trying to defend. This administration and the warmongers of America have been trying to violate that treaty. That’s what started the war. He didn’t say it was successful ur that Ukraine joined NATO. They haven’t yet. Russia wants to prevent it because if they do their entire country will be surrounded by NATO on all sides. They have a right to try to prevent that. NATO has become evil.

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

Where is this treaty? Can you name it and show where it says that?

Expand full comment
TheJokeIsOnUs's avatar

It’s called The Minsk Agreement - look it up!

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

Also NATO has a rule which prevents membership if there is an ongoing conflict, because this would require all other members to join in the conflict.

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

Which mean Ukraine couldn't join nato in 2014 and Putin's entire war is a farce?

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

Minsk contains nothing about that. Please show this treaty and the language.

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

Oooh yes! Sorry still crawling through my saved links at what led me to my understanding.

Also “In 2010, the [Ukraine’s] parliament passed a law banning Ukraine from joining any military bloc, effectively banning it from entering NATO though maintaining opportunities for cooperation.” While they have more public support today as polls show I can’t find evidence of that law being overturned. Has it?

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

They'd happily join Nato today because it means nobody is going to invade them.

That law is no longer applicable as Russia has invaded multiple times.

Reminder: Russia agreed to not invade Ukraine multiple times..and still did.

A Ukraine in Nato ensures peace. Had it been able to join in 2014 there'd be no war today.

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

the “North Atlantic Treaty”

A good explanation by foreign policy .com: “[This trraty] does not give any country the right to join if it meets certain criteria. Article 10 merely says that “the Parties may, by unanimous agreement, invite any other European State in a position to further the principles of this Treaty and to contribute to the security of the North Atlantic area to accede to this Treaty.” NATO’s current “open door” policy is a more recent development. It is sometimes viewed as a formal commitment that any aspiring country can join once it meets NATO’s membership criteria. In effect, the open door policy subtly shifts agency from NATO to aspiring members; it tells the latter that “the door is open and you’re free to walk in once you’ve met our standards.” The original treaty implies something slightly different, however: It says the door is closed until the existing members collectively agree that bringing in a new member will “further the principles of the treaty and … contribute to the security of the North Atlantic area.” At that point the members can decide to open the door and issue an invitation. The distinction is an important one, insofar as the original treaty creates no presumption that the alliance is actively committed to expanding. Hungary’s recent campaign to delay Sweden’s entry into NATO for several years reminds us how this process really works in practice: Sweden had no “right” to join until all the other members agreed.”

“[Ukraine] doesn’t meet the membership criteria. Ukraine is still a fragile democracy at best. Corruption is still endemic, elections have been suspended since the beginning of the war, and there are still influential elements in Ukrainian society whose commitment to democratic norms is questionable. For these and other reasons, the Economist Democracy Index rated the country a “hybrid regime” last year. Moreover, Ukraine has not yet met the conditions of the standard NATO Membership Action Plan. Recognizing that fact, NATO agreed to waive this criterion at its annual summit last summer, in effect changing Ukraine’s membership process from “a two-step process to a one-step process.” By watering down the standards for joining the alliance, this decision set a potentially bad precedent for the future.”

“It is not clear that NATO would honor its Article V commitments. As I’ve noted before, Article V of the North Atlantic Treaty is not a tripwire that commits members to fight in the event another member is attacked. At U.S. insistence, Article V only commits a member state to regard an attack on one as an attack on all, and then to take “such actions as it deems necessary.”

“ NATO membership is not a magic shield. The main rationale for bringing in Ukraine sooner rather than later is that doing so would discourage Russia from resuming the war at a later date. One can easily understand why Kyiv would like additional protection, but this argument assumes that being in NATO is a magic shield that will reliably deter Russian military action under nearly all circumstances.”

“ Membership now will only prolong the war. If I’m correct that Moscow attacked in good part to prevent Kyiv from joining NATO, then bringing Ukraine in now will simply prolong a war that the country is presently losing.”

“ Neutrality may not be that bad. Given the history of Russian-Ukrainian relations (including the events of the past 10 years), one can understand why many Ukrainians do not want to accept a position of neutrality. But neutrality is not always a bad thing, even for states in close proximity to Russia. Finland fought a costly and ultimately unsuccessful war against the Soviet Union between 1939 and 1940, and eventually had to cede about nine percent of its prewar territory. But like Ukraine today, the Finns had fought heroically and made the much larger Soviet Union pay a large price for its victory. The result was that then-Soviet leader Joseph Stalin did not incorporate Finland into the USSR or force it to join the Warsaw Pact after World War II. Instead, Finland remained a neutral country and a democracy, with a market economy that traded with both the USSR and the West.”

Excerpts I just happened to agree with, from:

https://foreignpolicy.com/2024/03/05/nato-ukraine-membership-russia-war-west/

Expand full comment
ViaVeritasVita's avatar

Victoria Nuland? 2014?

Expand full comment
Dan (100% All in MAGA)'s avatar

Warmongers in "NATO Alliance" making MASSIVELY big bucks, killing kids everywhere, all in the name of imposing their "NWO" on the world and making all of us their subjects.

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

You might want to avoid asking who is making Russian weapons.

Nobody is forced to join Nato. People beg to get in. As a reminder because of Putin's latest war Nato grew the largest in decades with the former empire land, also known as finland, joining.

Expand full comment
On an island's avatar

Putin may be an A-hole, but he's no idiot. If you have any doubt, go back and listen to the lengthy Tucker Carlson interview with Putin where he demonstrated his deep historical knowledge and love of country.

Also, he has been quite direct about us NOT admitting Ukraine into NATO, and NOT using US missiles inside of Russia. Our gov't seems to be the one that is dense and unable to read the tea leaves.

Expand full comment
Vida Galore's avatar

He's not even an a-hole. He has managed to avert WWIII no matter how much the US and NATO have baited him. He has outsmarted them at every turn.

Expand full comment
Dan (100% All in MAGA)'s avatar

OUTSTANDINGLY YES!!! ^^^^

Although it is actually the neocons who stole the 2020 election, not really the "US" but I understand and agree with your point Vida. Let's recall, had they not stolen the election, the war would have never begun.

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

He's placing 2nd in the Ukraine-Russia war.

His troops can't even push Ukraine out of Kursk and he's begging for North korean soldiers and weapons.

Expand full comment
Dan (100% All in MAGA)'s avatar

I don't think Putin is an A-hole either, but the globalists and their "NATO Alliance", mil industrial complex, deep state, uniparty, and the NWO media - not to mention fools like Bnn - have certainly done everything they can possibly do to make us believe he is. I believe he and Trump have a very good understanding of who the real problems are in the world and NATO is certainly one of them now.

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

Trump killed hundreds of Putin's soldiers in Syria and put Americans, AKA ME, on Russia's border and also had us training Ukrainians inside Ukraine.

He also reversed the Biden ban on lethal aid.

People are awfully hypocritical and forget history a lot

Expand full comment
Robyn Welch's avatar

How did trump reverse a biden ban on lethal aid? Trump isn't in office yet...

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

In 2014 when Russia first invaded Biden and Obama refused to send lethal aid. They sent unarmored hmmwvs, blankets, and body armor. Hardly useful.

Trump reversed that and sent Javelins in his first term and had Americans inside Ukraine training their tankers and pilots and also put an armored brigade on Russia's border.

Those Javelins were absolutely instrumental in repelling the Russian assaults on Kyiv and Hostomel. They had no clue where the javelins came from because they are fire and forget and had no counter to them.

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

Putin invaded Ukraine twice-any word from him is worthless.

Being non Nato led to Ukraine being invaded. Any peace deal will have to have Ukraine's nato membership codified because without that the war starts again in a few years.

Expand full comment
ThreeArchBay's avatar

You are either grossly uninformed... or a certifiable imbecile.

Expand full comment
CHop's avatar

...Or "punchin in on the clock"

Expand full comment
ThreeArchBay's avatar

Yep... Pee Wee is gettin' in a little trollin' in between giving Soros his oral "massages"...

Expand full comment
Beckadee's avatar

So everybody in your book ie Putin and Trump are idiots and the only smart ones are you and Zelensky. Oh lort.

Expand full comment
Vida Galore's avatar

Let's play "Spot the liberal" - lol.

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

🤣

Expand full comment
Vida Galore's avatar

Please look up the Maidan revolution at least - I am staggered by your ignorance. Look up Valerie "Cookies' Nuland's role, also Joe Biden on video bragging about bribing Ukraine officials... I don't even know where to start.

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

I know multiple people who were apart of the 2014 revolution.

Russia sent thousands of soldiers, Nuland send cookies. Clearly the Ukrainians were forced to overthrow their benevolent Russian masters (Who used secret police to shoot and kill protestors)

Expand full comment
Vida Galore's avatar

Ummmm... nope. You understand nothing. The US together with Ukraine Azov Nazis started the war in 2014 and dared Putin to do something about it. He finally did when they went too far.

Expand full comment
Jamie's avatar

I don’t think Putin is an idiot. I think he is very committed to his beliefs about his country and his role, Misguided as they may be.

Expand full comment
Rosalind McGill's avatar

How about idiot savant?

Expand full comment
Carolyn's avatar

He didn't start anything. Read your history and do your research. 2014 is a clue. Victoria Nuland is another. Obama, Graham and McCain are a few more. Add the CIA

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

You never cease to sound not just stupid, but idiotic.

Expand full comment
Roman S Shapoval's avatar

Amen. The best way toward peace is with everyone shutting off their TV and the nightly news.

Expand full comment
Sunnydaze's avatar

Even though their “viewership numbers” have tanked -I’m AMAZED and disgusted at how many still tune in and believe their lies. Makes me want to vomit.

Expand full comment
Annie Today and Tomorrow's avatar

Just think, if big pharma advertising to the public was made illegal, legacy media would die a quick death. 🤗

Expand full comment
Lisa Ca's avatar

Lol

Expand full comment
Janet's avatar

Those who still venerate NPR, that den of liars with snooty voices and heart, need to be slapped up the head. Figuratively speaking of course.

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

Had a woman questioning why her daughter was so far left and I told her she probably watches MSM. She answered me and said her daughter didn't watch mainstream media she watched NPR! I quickly informed her that NPR was as bad if not worse.

Expand full comment
Janet's avatar

Yeah. Their soothing snoot tones grab them by the part of the brain easily influenced. Probably the organ that’s been damaged by the clot shots. Begins with “A”. Autocorrect is not helping here.

Expand full comment
Lisa Ca's avatar

definitely worse. Its where all the libtards and elites go. Think university professors etc.

Expand full comment
Robin Greer's avatar

Good to see you Kathleen Janoski

Expand full comment
Bryan Dair's avatar

I hate how NPR can not mention RFK Jr. without prefacing

his name with 'Anti-vaxxer Conspiracy Theorist' who spouts

debunked misinformation...

I would like to see them put him on the air with anyone they

choose and let him debate his debunked conspiracy theories.

They can't do it.

Expand full comment
MaryAnn's avatar

I don’t listen to NPR but my liberal friend on the ledge of RFK hysteria does. Now I know where she hears that nonsense. She certainly has not heard one word uttered directly from his mouth.

Expand full comment
Connie Lemmincakes's avatar

Those still tuned in are addicts. I know a few, and they even broadcast from their phones in their pockets when they leave home.

Expand full comment
Roman S Shapoval's avatar

Yes addicts to blue light- which spikes dopamine. Do you know about the addictive aspects of blue light?

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Nov 18
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Roman S Shapoval's avatar

Hi Lizzi - here's an excerpt from an article I wrote on neuroscience:

https://romanshapoval.substack.com/i/142250902/digital-sorcery

Here's the main article:

https://romanshapoval.substack.com/p/children

I will be exploring this topic in depth, and also creating a children's book on blue light, so stay tuned!

Thank you for asking - also, for your paid support! It really goes a long way for us...so thank you.

Expand full comment
Ministry of Truth's avatar

The numbers for television aren't real anyways, they only count a small subset of people who own televisions then multiply it by all the households.

Expand full comment
Emumundo's avatar

I was picked to be a Neilson household but I kept throwing away the unopened envelopes. One day I opened the envelope and there was $1.00 in it pleading with me to fill out their survey. After I made $2.00 I wrote them and said I don’t even have a television, save your money. I made another $3.00 and then they took me off the mailing list. If you get a Neilson envelope, open it, it’s your lucky day.

Expand full comment
Roman S Shapoval's avatar

People are addicted to complacency and distractions - why do you think they still tune in?

Expand full comment
Connie Lemmincakes's avatar

I think they get hits of dopamine from their hatred of Trump. When they keep hearing it repeated over and over, it’s just hit after hit.

Expand full comment
AngelaK's avatar

OAN is wonderful IF you want a little of the cable TV news type buzz.

They are independently owned and quite conservative. They have been removed from many cable providers. They have asked people to ask their providers for them. Thankfully, they are on my provider here in Florida.

Expand full comment
Fred's avatar

We get 0AN on our “rabbit ears,” but the programs are about a week old. ???

Expand full comment
Mrs. Mantle's avatar

Roku has the OAN app

Expand full comment
Lisa Ca's avatar

❤️

Expand full comment
LauraJ's avatar

Absolutely. I did that 20 years ago, and have never regretted it.

Expand full comment
Roman S Shapoval's avatar

WOW! You're way ahead of the curve. What made you ditch the TV?

Expand full comment
Fre'd Bennett, MAHA's avatar

The overwhelming persistent feeling that I was being programmed did it for me.

Plus I felt like I lost a couple IQ points per hour.

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

🤣 I love this community Lolol

Expand full comment
LauraJ's avatar

The news either made me too angry or too sad. I knew it was bad for me, so I just quit it.

Expand full comment
LamedVav disavows all vaxes.'s avatar

Me too, since 1996 about.

Expand full comment
Pat Wetzel's avatar

People still watch this drivel?

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

No TV here, haven’t ever owned one. And glad of it!

Expand full comment
Colby's avatar

Same. Not since 2000, when I got married to someone for which no tv was non negotiable. Best decision ever

Expand full comment
Jpeach's avatar

Praying is all we can do at this point. The D.S. let the evil Genie is out of the bottle right on queue.

Expand full comment
Jack Bergeron's avatar

The deep state actors have been poking the Russian bear for way too long. Putin has been very patient. Now they just kicked the bear in his testicles. We need to send these imbeciles to the front lines in Ukraine.

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

The bear has been getting kicked in the balls for a while after they fled the battle of Kyiv.

Why aren’t you heading to the front lines to help Russia?

Expand full comment
rolandttg's avatar

Thanks for that information. Zero doubt both the House and Senate had serious theft issues again.

Expand full comment
ThreeArchBay's avatar

I hope good man Putin can hold on until Trump is inaugurated... another great leader like Trump, endlessly harassed and provoked by the US/NATO Deep State warmonger scum.

And I hope he turns Ukraine into WWII Dresden.

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

He’s on year 3 of the 2 day war. Why aren’t you at the front lines helping Putin?

Expand full comment
Paul Ashley's avatar

Sadly, Goodlander (Badlander?) defeated the fantastic Lily Tang Williams to get her chance to further destroy New Hampshire residents' lives.

Expand full comment
BKG's avatar

Praying

Expand full comment
Marc Palasciano's avatar

You’re a plant. I’m tired of anonymous accounts like you.

Expand full comment
Bandit's avatar

Yuri? A plant?!

I'm tired of sanctimonious people that don't understand the internet.

Expand full comment
AngelaK's avatar

Who??

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

🤣🤣🤣 Yuri is far from an “anonymous account” lmaooo. Maybe you meant that to be a reply to a different post? Because there ARE a couple here that would qualify for troll trophies …

Expand full comment
Beckadee's avatar

So your previous 'strategy' to attack Jeff didn't go as planned and now in your infinite wisdom you go after long time commenters on Jeff's stack, in the process alienating thousand + people. All the while you are trying to build up your social media/substack attempting to bring in some $$? How is that working out for you?

Expand full comment
Benjamin Two N's's avatar

Who?

I point out hypocrisy.

There's been zero mention of North Koreans having to defend Russia (because they can't).

Jeff made previous claims about how 100-200 top Ukrainian and nato generals were killed in some mysterious Russian missile strike yet nearly 2 years later we don't know who.

Expand full comment
Beckadee's avatar

I replied to Marc. Or thought I did.

Expand full comment