What else could we expect? They sat on their hands for 2 years as literally every amendment was neutered.
They're simply not following the constitution and The Framers most important warning:
NEVER trade freedom for safety.
They should've "looked" for cases to curtail the tyranny...but they didn't out of FEAR itself, FEAR of social tyranny and FEAR of public opinion repercussions.
That is weak sauce...they were derelict when We The People needed them most.
Is it too banal to think their position was also influenced by their age? I.e., a bunch of hypochondriac oldsters frightened for their health and more than willing to burden those younger to protect it?
i agree. which proves my point; the highest court in the land could not be bothered to uphold the constitution despite our Founders grave warnings about trading freedom for safety.
Just as (or so it was claimed) Saddam Hussein used children as human shields, so were our children used and abused by the injection madness. Recall the experts shrieking about how no one be safe until every one is forced to be injected, including the children, even though children are generally not susceptible to significant adverse outcomes from the virus that was created by our tax dollars.
I’m no spring chicken myself, but I’ve never forgiven the old coots in my condo building for insisting on closing the amenities level to everyone rather than simply avoiding it themselves. Same vibe as sending fresh faced young men off to the Flanders fields, imo.
Sort of. Since the death rate for healthy children - from the disease - is statistically zero (single digits / million) AND natural immunity is superior to whatever the shots temporarily provide - minus the horrendous side effects - there is no reason to jab children. So why the push? Lots of possibilities: stoke fear, force compliance, damage immune and reproductive systems, create an add'l dependent - on jabs but also damaged - population. But if most zero to eleven year-olds had natural immunity ....
No. The push to jab kids was for one reason and one reason only. To get immunity down the road by paving the way to put it on the childhood vaccine schedule. that's the key to any jab/
Had to read that twice to agree. Yes, had to be on the schedule for the pharms to be granted immunity. Knew that at the time, but didn’t think they’d actually give them, esp after the Pfz FOIA docs proved that MIS-C could be caused by the shots. 🤬
"Congressman Massie just revealed that 3 of the top FDA vaccine experts were fired after requesting more time to study side effects of the Covid-19 shots in children and young adults" https://x.com/TexasLindsay_/status/1805978400575676742
Why do they want this? For the immunity to repercussions all the other shots have! BINGO!!
If Ford/CHEVY were suddenly
granted absolute immunity for bad outcomes and adverse events due to malfunctioning airbags, they’d stop making good ones, shove a balloon into the glove box and call
depopulation agenda, same as the current "every child is trans " fad. all engineered by DOD and Gates and other Eugenicists, and whoever (ROthschild, Rockefeller, Morgan) is pulling his strings and those of WEF/Davos.
it aint commies I'll tell you that. Try ROBBER BARONS.
I'm pretty sure Epstein or someone like him has something on John Roberts and maybe a few of the others. Either that or there is something hallucinogenic in the water that diluted their conservative ideologies.
There’s a picture of Justice Roberts frolicking in the ocean at Epstein Island with Bill Clinton and a few other notables. Also, it’s reported that Roberts adopted two children with Epstein’s connections and help. From Britain, as I recall.
Yes, Roberts is dirty. They’re all dirty. Even the ones acting conservative right now have been complicit with horrible atrocities and crimes.
This is a spiritual war, and all of this world’s heroes are actually monsters.
I don't think that's the case. I could be wrong, but I believe that Justice Thomas wanted to take some of the cases that were rejected by the rest of the court. And I think he's the oldest justice.
After the ‘threats’ they received for ruling against Roe, they know only the fanatics would threaten their safety.
They may surprise me, though. As black-pulled as I am, I do still have hope. But that hope is in Jesus alone, not this country and definitely not this wicked government.
The courts, even the highest court in the land do not adhere to the US Constitution. They constantly reinterpret it to mean whatever the power center wants it to mean. While the Originalists stay closer to the Founder's intent than the Living Constitution Textualists, they do not interpret and never have interpreted it to mean what it says in the plain language it was written. And they became even further removed from faithfully interpreting the Constitution when they moved from the Natural Law jurisprudence it was written under to the Positive Law jurisprudence that insinuated itself and prevailed in the last century.
The very first Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court John Jay wrote in one of his early opinions, "The People Who Own the Country Ought to Govern It."
And this paper, albeit written by someone on the left lamenting failings they perceive, tells a harsh truth, which is that the jurists who interpret the constitution are little more than "high priests in black robes." Doing the bidding of those who really own this country:
The Supreme Court, hegemony, and Its Consequences
Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality, December, 1987
The combination of forces at work to neuter the US Constitution, particularly the Bill of Rights the elitists in the Founders never really liked or wanted, have succeeded in reinterpreting Freedom to mean Slavery, Ignorance to mean Stength, War to mean Peace. Linguistics. Clever linguistics have made us a post-constitutional republic. Without a bullet fired.
What else could we expect? They sat on their hands for 2 years as literally every amendment was neutered.
They're simply not following the constitution and The Framers most important warning:
NEVER trade freedom for safety.
They should've "looked" for cases to curtail the tyranny...but they didn't out of FEAR itself, FEAR of social tyranny and FEAR of public opinion repercussions.
That is weak sauce...they were derelict when We The People needed them most.
Is it too banal to think their position was also influenced by their age? I.e., a bunch of hypochondriac oldsters frightened for their health and more than willing to burden those younger to protect it?
i agree. which proves my point; the highest court in the land could not be bothered to uphold the constitution despite our Founders grave warnings about trading freedom for safety.
Unacceptable.
This surgery essential to our freedom: https://share.icloud.com/photos/08fxORi51EU0t2P_OmNyAog1Q
Just as (or so it was claimed) Saddam Hussein used children as human shields, so were our children used and abused by the injection madness. Recall the experts shrieking about how no one be safe until every one is forced to be injected, including the children, even though children are generally not susceptible to significant adverse outcomes from the virus that was created by our tax dollars.
I’m no spring chicken myself, but I’ve never forgiven the old coots in my condo building for insisting on closing the amenities level to everyone rather than simply avoiding it themselves. Same vibe as sending fresh faced young men off to the Flanders fields, imo.
courage grows in inverse proportion to distance from the front. A quote.
Sort of. Since the death rate for healthy children - from the disease - is statistically zero (single digits / million) AND natural immunity is superior to whatever the shots temporarily provide - minus the horrendous side effects - there is no reason to jab children. So why the push? Lots of possibilities: stoke fear, force compliance, damage immune and reproductive systems, create an add'l dependent - on jabs but also damaged - population. But if most zero to eleven year-olds had natural immunity ....
No. The push to jab kids was for one reason and one reason only. To get immunity down the road by paving the way to put it on the childhood vaccine schedule. that's the key to any jab/
Had to read that twice to agree. Yes, had to be on the schedule for the pharms to be granted immunity. Knew that at the time, but didn’t think they’d actually give them, esp after the Pfz FOIA docs proved that MIS-C could be caused by the shots. 🤬
For a sec, I read kid’s immunity; then I saw who posted… Sorry! 😁
I had the same initial reaction, Fred. Until I saw your clarification.
Appreciate the explanation! I was not getting "immunity" for pharm.
Just glad that so many parents are opting out of jabs for their kids.
rolandttg - you nailed it!
"Congressman Massie just revealed that 3 of the top FDA vaccine experts were fired after requesting more time to study side effects of the Covid-19 shots in children and young adults" https://x.com/TexasLindsay_/status/1805978400575676742
You are CORRECT!
Why do they want this? For the immunity to repercussions all the other shots have! BINGO!!
If Ford/CHEVY were suddenly
granted absolute immunity for bad outcomes and adverse events due to malfunctioning airbags, they’d stop making good ones, shove a balloon into the glove box and call
it an airbag.
BINGO
they want LESS of us because that way we the servants of the "elite" are more easily controlled by our Oligarch Overlords.
depopulation agenda, same as the current "every child is trans " fad. all engineered by DOD and Gates and other Eugenicists, and whoever (ROthschild, Rockefeller, Morgan) is pulling his strings and those of WEF/Davos.
it aint commies I'll tell you that. Try ROBBER BARONS.
And they are embarrassed and humiliated for not having had the sense to say NO to the poison jabs themselves.
I’m not so sure that most of their families had the “real” shot. The useful idiots, (like Hollywood fools) they did
From what I understand, Alyssa Milano pushed it, but had fake vaccine cards. I’m thinking this is probably true for a lot of the stars who pushed it.
Perhaps, but they weren’t mandated. Wonder how many of their families succumbed.
Never saw that point made, thanks for making it.
I'm pretty sure Epstein or someone like him has something on John Roberts and maybe a few of the others. Either that or there is something hallucinogenic in the water that diluted their conservative ideologies.
Agree, from the Roberts led decision regarding obummer care…I’ve said they have something on this guy.
i wouldn't even give him that much credit.
methinks he's just a wussy who's afraid of his own shadow.
There’s a picture of Justice Roberts frolicking in the ocean at Epstein Island with Bill Clinton and a few other notables. Also, it’s reported that Roberts adopted two children with Epstein’s connections and help. From Britain, as I recall.
Yes, Roberts is dirty. They’re all dirty. Even the ones acting conservative right now have been complicit with horrible atrocities and crimes.
This is a spiritual war, and all of this world’s heroes are actually monsters.
I read where he got the kids from Ireland, which is illegal.
I don't think that's the case. I could be wrong, but I believe that Justice Thomas wanted to take some of the cases that were rejected by the rest of the court. And I think he's the oldest justice.
Him and Alito are the only two with cojones
Maybe we are witnessing the impact that the Pharma Cartel has on the Supreme Court like a John Grisham novel.
Not banal at all.
They are lulled into a false sense of security that they have some sort of force field of safety around them for making wimpy decisions.
After the ‘threats’ they received for ruling against Roe, they know only the fanatics would threaten their safety.
They may surprise me, though. As black-pulled as I am, I do still have hope. But that hope is in Jesus alone, not this country and definitely not this wicked government.
Well, this is how I feel.
If they aren't willing to stick their neck out from time to time, they are in the wrong job.
Yes.
❤️❤️❤️
Amen Ryan!
AMEN! Exactly right.
Amen, brother! That'll preach!
Mrs. "the Knife"
Well, since a good many of the framers were farmers, it works either way! 😂
Mrs. "the Knife"
The courts, even the highest court in the land do not adhere to the US Constitution. They constantly reinterpret it to mean whatever the power center wants it to mean. While the Originalists stay closer to the Founder's intent than the Living Constitution Textualists, they do not interpret and never have interpreted it to mean what it says in the plain language it was written. And they became even further removed from faithfully interpreting the Constitution when they moved from the Natural Law jurisprudence it was written under to the Positive Law jurisprudence that insinuated itself and prevailed in the last century.
The very first Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court John Jay wrote in one of his early opinions, "The People Who Own the Country Ought to Govern It."
And this paper, albeit written by someone on the left lamenting failings they perceive, tells a harsh truth, which is that the jurists who interpret the constitution are little more than "high priests in black robes." Doing the bidding of those who really own this country:
The Supreme Court, hegemony, and Its Consequences
Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality, December, 1987
https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1371&context=lawineq
The combination of forces at work to neuter the US Constitution, particularly the Bill of Rights the elitists in the Founders never really liked or wanted, have succeeded in reinterpreting Freedom to mean Slavery, Ignorance to mean Stength, War to mean Peace. Linguistics. Clever linguistics have made us a post-constitutional republic. Without a bullet fired.
very well said. thanks for this post
Pretty much true. And Cincinnatus was the first.
"I swear...I thought turkeys could fly!"
Top ten moment in all of sitcom history.
Lolol