I did a little research too and came to the same conclusion as your wife. Of course the pediatrician gave me a little pamphlet to read, printed by the pharmaceutical company, touting how wonderful and safe this vaccine was. Riiiigghhhttt... Yeah, no thanks. I'll read non-biased information on it.
I did a little research too and came to the same conclusion as your wife. Of course the pediatrician gave me a little pamphlet to read, printed by the pharmaceutical company, touting how wonderful and safe this vaccine was. Riiiigghhhttt... Yeah, no thanks. I'll read non-biased information on it.
The placebos for newer versions HPV are the old versions. This is common for most vaccine trials. No saline. Placebos loaded with adjuvants to hide damages.
I am saying this from the Big Pharma researcher's perspective. When they compare two dangerous shots that are approximately equally dangerous, they can say the new one is safe, because it doesn't have any more adverse effects than the old one, which the FDA already declared to be safe enough to approve.
I did a little research too and came to the same conclusion as your wife. Of course the pediatrician gave me a little pamphlet to read, printed by the pharmaceutical company, touting how wonderful and safe this vaccine was. Riiiigghhhttt... Yeah, no thanks. I'll read non-biased information on it.
The placebos for newer versions HPV are the old versions. This is common for most vaccine trials. No saline. Placebos loaded with adjuvants to hide damages.
Yep. Compared to a harmful shot, this one is not significantly more harmful.
Not understanding. The HPV not harmful? Even the placebos can show harm.
I am saying this from the Big Pharma researcher's perspective. When they compare two dangerous shots that are approximately equally dangerous, they can say the new one is safe, because it doesn't have any more adverse effects than the old one, which the FDA already declared to be safe enough to approve.