On 21Dec2023, the Department of Health and Human Services and FDA issued a final ruling to amend a provision of the 21st Century Cures Act to allow:
...an exception from the requirement to obtain informed consent when a clinical investigation poses no more than a minimal risk to the human subject...
On 21Dec2023, the Department of Health and Human Services and FDA issued a final ruling to amend a provision of the 21st Century Cures Act to allow:
...an exception from the requirement to obtain informed consent when a clinical investigation poses no more than a minimal risk to the human subject...
This ruling went into effect 22Jan2024.
Note that there's zero definition of "minimal risk!”
I’ll add that the Covid shots are still being called S&E!
Minimal risk with no benefit is still unacceptable. I am the judge of risk and benefit when it concerns my own safety. I am under no obligation to accept the arrogation of this authority by anyone at all.
Furthermore, HHS and FDA are taking a position for which we hanged people at Nuremberg.
Don't get your hopes up. "Advisers to the president-elect questioned whether Mr Kennedy would make it through a security check for a cabinet position." Unfortunately, we may see a bait & switch here.
I did not think that RFK, Jr was up for a cabinet seat from the beginning? I thought it was something altogether different though I don't recall what it was described as.
If someone wouldn't pass a security check for a cabinet position, would he not also fail the security check to be president had the country voted him in?
Or is this media states just more woke bovine excrement?
There would have to be, at minimum (since they like that word so much), some reasonable standard SET OUT IN THE ENABLING RULING (sounds doubtful that it's there) in order for such a broad AND vague exception to withstand judicial review. Sorry (Not sorry).
Informed consent is no more:
On 21Dec2023, the Department of Health and Human Services and FDA issued a final ruling to amend a provision of the 21st Century Cures Act to allow:
...an exception from the requirement to obtain informed consent when a clinical investigation poses no more than a minimal risk to the human subject...
This ruling went into effect 22Jan2024.
Note that there's zero definition of "minimal risk!”
I’ll add that the Covid shots are still being called S&E!
Jeff???? 🙏🏻❤️🙏🏻❤️🙏🏻
Minimal risk with no benefit is still unacceptable. I am the judge of risk and benefit when it concerns my own safety. I am under no obligation to accept the arrogation of this authority by anyone at all.
Furthermore, HHS and FDA are taking a position for which we hanged people at Nuremberg.
Yes, arrogation is well used.
Can Kennedy change this?
I think RFK Jr will need a huge team of 'boots on the ground'.
https://open.substack.com/pub/petermcculloughmd/p/a-call-to-ban-gain-of-function-research?r=15eyho&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Don't get your hopes up. "Advisers to the president-elect questioned whether Mr Kennedy would make it through a security check for a cabinet position." Unfortunately, we may see a bait & switch here.
I don’t know who said this, but if they try this, we, the people will be hitting the streets!!
"Mr Trump’s camp is now questioning whether Mr Kennedy could get confirmed for a cabinet-level position by the Senate, obtain security clearance"
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/politics/2024/11/07/trump-campaign-quietly-distances-rfk-jr-vaccines/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
I saw that, but don't trust that paper, so...
Agree. Stop listening to propaganda media.
Yes—consider the source!
I did not think that RFK, Jr was up for a cabinet seat from the beginning? I thought it was something altogether different though I don't recall what it was described as.
If someone wouldn't pass a security check for a cabinet position, would he not also fail the security check to be president had the country voted him in?
Or is this media states just more woke bovine excrement?
There would have to be, at minimum (since they like that word so much), some reasonable standard SET OUT IN THE ENABLING RULING (sounds doubtful that it's there) in order for such a broad AND vague exception to withstand judicial review. Sorry (Not sorry).
Yikes!