My unjabbed family member had sense of smell loss that returned 9 months later after infection. There are long Covid symptoms in both jabbed and unjabbed. I am seeing lasting brain fog in many unjabbed friends too. I would really like to see honest studies on all of this. I do believe the jabs have produced the worst symptoms of all.…
My unjabbed family member had sense of smell loss that returned 9 months later after infection. There are long Covid symptoms in both jabbed and unjabbed. I am seeing lasting brain fog in many unjabbed friends too. I would really like to see honest studies on all of this. I do believe the jabs have produced the worst symptoms of all. Certainly there is evidence that each additional jab causes more health problems. That’s the message we need to share with any friends who have not yet caught on. Thankfully, it seems most are not still taking the boosters. Paxlovid is not the answer.
Wow - As an unjabbed, but living only with another unjabbed, I'm wondering if the other unjabbed (is there a better adjective?) are suffering from this 'shedding' thing? I've never fully understood or believed it, but watching Darkhorse private Q&A they hypothesized maybe those jabbed immune systems are desperately trying to remove the spike protein. And maybe it's through coughing or sneezine too. When I was at my parents house, 3 people there are jabbed. I got sick! Not sure from what but after a while I was better. Home I've been fine.
I'm not a medical researcher, but a "talented amateur" who reads a lot....you make a good point about honest studies. Even in normal times, they would be quite rare. The vast majority of (drug) studies are funded by Pharma, done by PI (principal investigator). There are many, many impediments to get an "honest" answer. Probably the most potent are money: Pharma spends millions, hoping to make billions. The PIs, the research unit at the university, the private corporation, etc. all depend upon and hope for a future flow of funds from government (NIH) or Pharma. Thus there is an understandable bias to find the "right" answer, that is, the one that makes the payer look good. Of course, outright fraud happens too. Even if all intents were pure, finally there are inevitable limits to what data can be collected, trials run, etc.
My unjabbed family member had sense of smell loss that returned 9 months later after infection. There are long Covid symptoms in both jabbed and unjabbed. I am seeing lasting brain fog in many unjabbed friends too. I would really like to see honest studies on all of this. I do believe the jabs have produced the worst symptoms of all. Certainly there is evidence that each additional jab causes more health problems. That’s the message we need to share with any friends who have not yet caught on. Thankfully, it seems most are not still taking the boosters. Paxlovid is not the answer.
Wow - As an unjabbed, but living only with another unjabbed, I'm wondering if the other unjabbed (is there a better adjective?) are suffering from this 'shedding' thing? I've never fully understood or believed it, but watching Darkhorse private Q&A they hypothesized maybe those jabbed immune systems are desperately trying to remove the spike protein. And maybe it's through coughing or sneezine too. When I was at my parents house, 3 people there are jabbed. I got sick! Not sure from what but after a while I was better. Home I've been fine.
I'm not a medical researcher, but a "talented amateur" who reads a lot....you make a good point about honest studies. Even in normal times, they would be quite rare. The vast majority of (drug) studies are funded by Pharma, done by PI (principal investigator). There are many, many impediments to get an "honest" answer. Probably the most potent are money: Pharma spends millions, hoping to make billions. The PIs, the research unit at the university, the private corporation, etc. all depend upon and hope for a future flow of funds from government (NIH) or Pharma. Thus there is an understandable bias to find the "right" answer, that is, the one that makes the payer look good. Of course, outright fraud happens too. Even if all intents were pure, finally there are inevitable limits to what data can be collected, trials run, etc.
Follow the $$$!! Lustig does a great job of exposing all these twisted relationships in his well -researched book Metabolical!
Agree L1 …like we’ve heard our friend say… “wouldn’t it be nice if some health agency did some studies on this or something “ 🤣