Same! The people that I know say they KNEW they would have it worse without “ the thing”. Knew how?? What do they base their conclusion on?? Taking into consideration they are generally healthy and IFR is under 1% ( according to WHO for people younger than70 years old, the infection fatality rate of CO- VID-19 across 40 locations with avail- able data ranged from 0.00% to 0.31% (median 0.05%); the corrected values were similar.) they base their conclusion on propaganda.
Yes I agree. There is no way to really prove a “would have” in these cases. All I need to do is look at the people I know who have been jabbed who had Covid and the ones who didn’t get the jab who had it, and it seems pretty clear that the unjabbed fared no worse, and in many cases better, than the jabbed.
Same! The people that I know say they KNEW they would have it worse without “ the thing”. Knew how?? What do they base their conclusion on?? Taking into consideration they are generally healthy and IFR is under 1% ( according to WHO for people younger than70 years old, the infection fatality rate of CO- VID-19 across 40 locations with avail- able data ranged from 0.00% to 0.31% (median 0.05%); the corrected values were similar.) they base their conclusion on propaganda.
Yes I agree. There is no way to really prove a “would have” in these cases. All I need to do is look at the people I know who have been jabbed who had Covid and the ones who didn’t get the jab who had it, and it seems pretty clear that the unjabbed fared no worse, and in many cases better, than the jabbed.