This is a completely ridiculous policy with zero scientific justification. In my town you can’t go in the senior center without proof of vaccination. Sounds vaguely reasonable except in several recent studies the vaccine has “negative efficacy” which means the vaccinated are more likely to test positive than the unvaccinated. So shouldn’…
This is a completely ridiculous policy with zero scientific justification. In my town you can’t go in the senior center without proof of vaccination. Sounds vaguely reasonable except in several recent studies the vaccine has “negative efficacy” which means the vaccinated are more likely to test positive than the unvaccinated. So shouldn’t the senior center check the vaccine cards and tell the vaccinated to hit the road?
But if the vaccine works to prevent spread, then the vaccinated should have zero worries about getting infected. And if an unv person wants to accept any risk of exposure, that is up to them. I mean, we don’t {yet} police other health decisions people make.
This is a completely ridiculous policy with zero scientific justification. In my town you can’t go in the senior center without proof of vaccination. Sounds vaguely reasonable except in several recent studies the vaccine has “negative efficacy” which means the vaccinated are more likely to test positive than the unvaccinated. So shouldn’t the senior center check the vaccine cards and tell the vaccinated to hit the road?
But if the vaccine works to prevent spread, then the vaccinated should have zero worries about getting infected. And if an unv person wants to accept any risk of exposure, that is up to them. I mean, we don’t {yet} police other health decisions people make.