You are so correct about the pharma messaging to fight any efforts. We need to make parents aware that if they were truly “safe and effective” that they wouldn’t need the liability shield. They have the shield because they are “unavoidably unsafe.” At a minimum, a parent should have the right to choose if they want to use the product ba…
You are so correct about the pharma messaging to fight any efforts. We need to make parents aware that if they were truly “safe and effective” that they wouldn’t need the liability shield. They have the shield because they are “unavoidably unsafe.” At a minimum, a parent should have the right to choose if they want to use the product based on a real risk-benefit analysis using what skimpy evidence of safety they have from limited testing.
You are so correct about the pharma messaging to fight any efforts. We need to make parents aware that if they were truly “safe and effective” that they wouldn’t need the liability shield. They have the shield because they are “unavoidably unsafe.” At a minimum, a parent should have the right to choose if they want to use the product based on a real risk-benefit analysis using what skimpy evidence of safety they have from limited testing.
Yes!