Maybe it's not the most common cancer progression, but even before the vax there have often been highly virulent cancers which have killed people quickly. It's one of the problems with the idea of early detection. People can develop cancer and die from it in between their cancer testing. It's certainly possibl…
Maybe it's not the most common cancer progression, but even before the vax there have often been highly virulent cancers which have killed people quickly. It's one of the problems with the idea of early detection. People can develop cancer and die from it in between their cancer testing. It's certainly possible that the cancers caused by the vax are more virulent than the average.
During the Summit yesterday, renowned pathologist, Dr. Ryan Cole, said this about the spike protein…… “Cells don’t lie”. Picture worth a thousand words.
To further nuance the situation, every doctor I talk to tells me that cancer rates in their client base are going through the roof - especially if the doc is an oncologist, his load is more than he can handle. I went to see my dermatologist surgeon who is now booked out 3 months in advance. He is now getting referrals all the time to do cancer surgeries and spends more time in the hospital than in his own clinic. None of this can be considered normal. Deductive logic alone based on all this anecdotal evidence is enough. We don't need a gold plated mega study to conclude the vaxx is killing people. This is insanity. I'm not sure where these insane people will end up leading us.
Nobody wants to get cancer. But early screening is one of many medical practices of rather limited value. This is one of many such covered in Malcolm Kendrick's "Doctoring Data: How to sort out medical advice from medical nonsense." "Survival" in cancer treatment is defined as at least five years remission. To exaggerate the benefit of screening, it relies on the fact the many cancers are very slow growing. So if (say) prostate cancer is detected early, happily for the medical business, it can be "treated" with drugs and surgery. Yes, it's likely the treated patient will still be alive in 5 years. But it's almost as likely that he would have been, even if he'd never been tested.
None of the above is to say that screening, or of course that all medical treatment is useless. But it's a "dirty little secret" that many drugs/treatments are at best of limited value and often have undisclosed (or unknown) downsides. Already on my list of suspects are: statins, flu and pneumonia vaccines and ... well, there's a lot to investigate.
Like it or not,t hey are in business to make money first. The patient's health is incidental.
Yes, I read H. Gilbert Welch's book on cancer testing which has similar information as Kendrick's. (I didn't know Kendrick had such a book. I know about his books on statins). That kind of thing upset the medical hierarchy so much that they forced him out at Dartmouth for supposed plagiarism.
Yes. I was going to say that this has always happened to some degree. But, the big difference I am seeing now is how absolutely commonplace this has become! I see examples in the news or hear of them from people in my circle almost every day.
Condolences to your friend.
Maybe it's not the most common cancer progression, but even before the vax there have often been highly virulent cancers which have killed people quickly. It's one of the problems with the idea of early detection. People can develop cancer and die from it in between their cancer testing. It's certainly possible that the cancers caused by the vax are more virulent than the average.
During the Summit yesterday, renowned pathologist, Dr. Ryan Cole, said this about the spike protein…… “Cells don’t lie”. Picture worth a thousand words.
I saw an interview of Dr Cole in an airport and I suspect he was heading to or from the Summit.
Were you there in person or did you watch via the livestream?
In person with my husband.
Excellent! Me, too -- minus my husband! 😊
To further nuance the situation, every doctor I talk to tells me that cancer rates in their client base are going through the roof - especially if the doc is an oncologist, his load is more than he can handle. I went to see my dermatologist surgeon who is now booked out 3 months in advance. He is now getting referrals all the time to do cancer surgeries and spends more time in the hospital than in his own clinic. None of this can be considered normal. Deductive logic alone based on all this anecdotal evidence is enough. We don't need a gold plated mega study to conclude the vaxx is killing people. This is insanity. I'm not sure where these insane people will end up leading us.
Nobody wants to get cancer. But early screening is one of many medical practices of rather limited value. This is one of many such covered in Malcolm Kendrick's "Doctoring Data: How to sort out medical advice from medical nonsense." "Survival" in cancer treatment is defined as at least five years remission. To exaggerate the benefit of screening, it relies on the fact the many cancers are very slow growing. So if (say) prostate cancer is detected early, happily for the medical business, it can be "treated" with drugs and surgery. Yes, it's likely the treated patient will still be alive in 5 years. But it's almost as likely that he would have been, even if he'd never been tested.
None of the above is to say that screening, or of course that all medical treatment is useless. But it's a "dirty little secret" that many drugs/treatments are at best of limited value and often have undisclosed (or unknown) downsides. Already on my list of suspects are: statins, flu and pneumonia vaccines and ... well, there's a lot to investigate.
Like it or not,t hey are in business to make money first. The patient's health is incidental.
Yes, I read H. Gilbert Welch's book on cancer testing which has similar information as Kendrick's. (I didn't know Kendrick had such a book. I know about his books on statins). That kind of thing upset the medical hierarchy so much that they forced him out at Dartmouth for supposed plagiarism.
Yes. I was going to say that this has always happened to some degree. But, the big difference I am seeing now is how absolutely commonplace this has become! I see examples in the news or hear of them from people in my circle almost every day.