Thank you for understanding the intent, Dr. Linda. I realize it is difficult for some people to distinguish the spirit behind particular actions if they are viewing it from a place of cynicism or bitterness.
I know I find tremendous value in the contributions of other Substackers and am grateful when they share resources that have the potential to aid with our mutual goals of awakening minds, saving lives, and reversing totalitarianism, and I feel it is my duty to share in kind as together we work toward a deeper understanding of what is being inflicted upon the world and how to stop it.
What I create is offered in a spirit of love and passion for humanity, truth, liberty, and justice, and I feel it would be remiss not to share it if it is relevant to the discussion. Those who do not wish to avail themselves of this information are free to ignore it, but the hundreds of thousands of people who do feel it is of value can use it to advance the deepest aims that drive most of us in this space.
Math doesn’t project negative ulterior motives. Perhaps you’ve never created something you and others feel can be used to potentially red-pill the sleeping, combat tyranny, and save lives. Since I specifically write content to advance those goals, sharing it with those who have expressed interest in the topics I cover is a crucial part of building a community of people armed with the resources to help fulfill that mission.
You clearly don’t want to be part of that community, and that is completely your prerogative.
I look forward to whatever positive contributions you choose to make.
This is clearly a pet peeve of yours, and you don’t seem to get the difference between self-promotion and sharing relevant content that people have expressed profound appreciation for. You’re missing out on a lot of valuable information by assuming everyone who shares links to their content is doing it for self-serving reasons rather than out of a desire to share hard-won research, offer opportunities to take meaningful action, and help others. But that’s your choice, and you have every right to pass over those comments.
I have no idea what you’re talking about regarding shunning anyone who criticizes or critiques my posting. If you’re referring to yourself, I have attempted to engage in a civil discussion with you, but you have made it evident that you will continue to harbor your unfounded assumptions regardless of what I say, so there is no point in continuing.
It is a shame because you have made comments I have found funny and informative, and my assumption is that you also care about resisting totalitarianism and saving lives. We clearly have different views of how to approach the problems in the world, and that’s fine.
I wish you well and hope you will share your own valuable content should you decide to produce any in furtherance of your own goals and values.
Wow! I get the sense that MAA is held in high regard by many. Don’t read her comments.
Sounds like a solid strategy. I am sorry you are bothered so much. That us not the intent. I hear what you are saying.
Thank you for understanding the intent, Dr. Linda. I realize it is difficult for some people to distinguish the spirit behind particular actions if they are viewing it from a place of cynicism or bitterness.
I know I find tremendous value in the contributions of other Substackers and am grateful when they share resources that have the potential to aid with our mutual goals of awakening minds, saving lives, and reversing totalitarianism, and I feel it is my duty to share in kind as together we work toward a deeper understanding of what is being inflicted upon the world and how to stop it.
What I create is offered in a spirit of love and passion for humanity, truth, liberty, and justice, and I feel it would be remiss not to share it if it is relevant to the discussion. Those who do not wish to avail themselves of this information are free to ignore it, but the hundreds of thousands of people who do feel it is of value can use it to advance the deepest aims that drive most of us in this space.
Math doesn’t project negative ulterior motives. Perhaps you’ve never created something you and others feel can be used to potentially red-pill the sleeping, combat tyranny, and save lives. Since I specifically write content to advance those goals, sharing it with those who have expressed interest in the topics I cover is a crucial part of building a community of people armed with the resources to help fulfill that mission.
You clearly don’t want to be part of that community, and that is completely your prerogative.
I look forward to whatever positive contributions you choose to make.
This is clearly a pet peeve of yours, and you don’t seem to get the difference between self-promotion and sharing relevant content that people have expressed profound appreciation for. You’re missing out on a lot of valuable information by assuming everyone who shares links to their content is doing it for self-serving reasons rather than out of a desire to share hard-won research, offer opportunities to take meaningful action, and help others. But that’s your choice, and you have every right to pass over those comments.
I have no idea what you’re talking about regarding shunning anyone who criticizes or critiques my posting. If you’re referring to yourself, I have attempted to engage in a civil discussion with you, but you have made it evident that you will continue to harbor your unfounded assumptions regardless of what I say, so there is no point in continuing.
It is a shame because you have made comments I have found funny and informative, and my assumption is that you also care about resisting totalitarianism and saving lives. We clearly have different views of how to approach the problems in the world, and that’s fine.
I wish you well and hope you will share your own valuable content should you decide to produce any in furtherance of your own goals and values.
I’m not, mzlizzi, and I appreciate your restraining yourself. Please take care, and I’ll see you around the Stacks.