7 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Anita from Tucson - Now In MI's avatar

Thank you for the link! The entire ruling is linked in the article. Down goes the case to Judge Chutkan again. BOUNCE! Let's see how far that bouncing up and down lasts. Pretty good odds, it wouldn't be over before November, or even next January.

AND now, Trump has, through his challenges, courage, choices and actions, forced another ''precedential'' ruling which can be used (once it's fleshed out in the courts as to what is core, official and unofficial immunity) to address and adjudicate the actions of any other current or future FPOTUS ("Former President of the United States," as they like to call Trump).

Expand full comment
Hoffmeister's avatar

Youre comment made me realize that PDJT has done for this country in the last three years what he may not have been able to do with a consecutive 2nd term

Expand full comment
Anita from Tucson - Now In MI's avatar

AND ultimately, it's what GOD has done through PDJT and these circumstances, in my view.

Expand full comment
Silent scorn's avatar

Some believe he planned it that way, or his higher power did!

Expand full comment
FH's avatar

And and and: is bribery an official or an unofficial act? How about being the leader of a RICO situation? Here's looking at you Robert Peters.

Expand full comment
TB's avatar

The ruling pretty clearly stated that bribery is "unofficial" and can be prosecuted. (With some dissent over what the limits are on evidence that can be used in the prosecution as to official acts done in exchange for the bribe.)

Expand full comment
Reasonable Horses's avatar

Yes, official vs unofficial is the sticky wicket. How Chutkan parses the two will indeed force a ruling for the ages. This is far from over.

Expand full comment