All "peer-reviewed" means is that the published paper has passed conformity to the established scientific paradigm for that subject. IE, nothing new. I would also point out that science is mostly theory, very little of which is proven. Science is the process of postulating a theory to explain observed phenomenon until a new observation cā¦
All "peer-reviewed" means is that the published paper has passed conformity to the established scientific paradigm for that subject. IE, nothing new. I would also point out that science is mostly theory, very little of which is proven. Science is the process of postulating a theory to explain observed phenomenon until a new observation comes along that demonstrates that the theory is incorrect or incomplete leading to a new theory. But people being people, scientists are loath to recognize that the established paradigm no longer holds water.
That's why the leading Medical Journal in the world threw 175 of them in the bin 2 weeks ago, the peer reviewed papers were either flat out lies or plagerized. (John Hopkins, I think)
All "peer-reviewed" means is that the published paper has passed conformity to the established scientific paradigm for that subject. IE, nothing new. I would also point out that science is mostly theory, very little of which is proven. Science is the process of postulating a theory to explain observed phenomenon until a new observation comes along that demonstrates that the theory is incorrect or incomplete leading to a new theory. But people being people, scientists are loath to recognize that the established paradigm no longer holds water.
That's why the leading Medical Journal in the world threw 175 of them in the bin 2 weeks ago, the peer reviewed papers were either flat out lies or plagerized. (John Hopkins, I think)