"You gave me proof of that last fact and then deflected and squirmed away."
I don't squirm away from anything. Just about got into a fight just a few minutes ago on the street. I'm 61, and I don't back down.
So I have no idea what you're speaking about here., and was surprised to see you say that.
As to lashing out, I don't start these things but despite not wanting to, I sometimes have a shorter fuse on replying to others than I'd like. Like St. Paul, I often do what I do not want to do, and then regret it. Lord, have mercy on me, a sinner.
I see it as the reverse: Trump supporters lash out at anyone who has even the slightest criticism of their idol.
And to be honest, I can see why. Not only is Trump being persecuted but they often are as well. I got used to it myself driving around with a Trump bumper sticker.
So I don't know precisely what you're talking about but to each his own. Unlike progressives and some Trump supporters, I don't assume someone who disagrees with me is evil.
It’s all good when iron sharpens iron and we don't resort to mischaracterizations and name-calling, so I'll try to be precise. Our disagreement is not about Trump. It’s about logic. You stated a premise: “Trump mandated lockdowns.” Then you cited a source contradicting your premise. I pointed that out, and you said your source is a murderous liar. Do we agree your source undermines if not disproves your premise? If verifiable facts prove Trump mandated lockdowns, I'd like to see them. You can move the goalposts or pivot to irrelevance, but so far, facts deny your premise.
I appreciate your comments.
"You gave me proof of that last fact and then deflected and squirmed away."
I don't squirm away from anything. Just about got into a fight just a few minutes ago on the street. I'm 61, and I don't back down.
So I have no idea what you're speaking about here., and was surprised to see you say that.
As to lashing out, I don't start these things but despite not wanting to, I sometimes have a shorter fuse on replying to others than I'd like. Like St. Paul, I often do what I do not want to do, and then regret it. Lord, have mercy on me, a sinner.
I see it as the reverse: Trump supporters lash out at anyone who has even the slightest criticism of their idol.
And to be honest, I can see why. Not only is Trump being persecuted but they often are as well. I got used to it myself driving around with a Trump bumper sticker.
So I don't know precisely what you're talking about but to each his own. Unlike progressives and some Trump supporters, I don't assume someone who disagrees with me is evil.
It’s all good when iron sharpens iron and we don't resort to mischaracterizations and name-calling, so I'll try to be precise. Our disagreement is not about Trump. It’s about logic. You stated a premise: “Trump mandated lockdowns.” Then you cited a source contradicting your premise. I pointed that out, and you said your source is a murderous liar. Do we agree your source undermines if not disproves your premise? If verifiable facts prove Trump mandated lockdowns, I'd like to see them. You can move the goalposts or pivot to irrelevance, but so far, facts deny your premise.