381 Comments
User's avatar
Roger Beal's avatar

Jeff, Brandon's off-script blurt that "the pandemic is over" should be headline news. Because with no pandemic, the meagre legal support for mandates, closures, and the whole jabb-erwocky package is undermined. When do we start the legal challenges against those agencies and jurisdictions still enforcing "pandemic" rules?

Expand full comment
Jeff C's avatar

Not to mention the student loan forgiveness scheme was legally-premised (albeit dubiously so) on the covid emergency.

Biden has been a politician his whole life, at some level he must know covid is bad politics despite his addled state. He can't seem to help himself in blurting out stuff that seems appropriate in the moment despite undermining much of the leftist agenda.

Expand full comment
CPK (Charles Kalina)'s avatar

He's also been stuck with a dilemma: he was elected on a promise to end the pandemic, so at some point he has to declare victory and take credit. Otherwise, continuing to encourage hysteria about it becomes a tacit admission of failure.

Expand full comment
Mike Perceval's avatar

He wasn’t ‘elected’; he was ‘selected’…

Expand full comment
Bingham22's avatar

Biden was not elected, he was installed…like a broken down, and very dirty toilet.

Expand full comment
No Communism Here's avatar

Well said!!!

Expand full comment
AngelaK's avatar

Yup by Soros and friends who now run the demoncrat party.

Expand full comment
Fortified City's avatar

Yes, he is fraudulent.

Being called in some places as pResident and White Occupant but he certainly was not elected

As far as I’m concerned Trump is the President who has been dispose by election fraud carried out by the Washington political elites, Congress and metacapitalist

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

This is an academic question but it really puzzles me. The west coast has been stealing elections for decades. Louisiana and Chicago has nothing on them. Obama's elections, especially his re-election, is suspect especially since the mid-term elections had killed the Democrats. Some even say that the Sandy storm which hit a week before was driven by HAARP and from what I've seen that is plausible. (Check out the History Channel special on Weather Modification and the HAARP program.) Now jump ahead to Trump's failed re-election. There is no way anyone is going to convince me that know-nothing Joe got the kind of voter turnout they claim unless a whole lotta dead people voted. Patently stolen. So here's my question: How the heck did Trump get elected to begin with? The Dems already were practiced at stealing elections. I don't have an answer.

Expand full comment
Fortified City's avatar

Talking about how he won in 2016??

Expand full comment
Sunnydaze's avatar

Thank you! Was gonna say it too but you beat me to it. 😂

Expand full comment
No Communism Here's avatar

Exactly

Expand full comment
John Cougar Misanthrope's avatar

Joe will run his victory lap by declaring that Covid is now endemic, that it's the same as flu, that those in the higher risk categories should take their quarterly booster, everyone else has to factor in their own risk tolerance and act accordingly, that through the Biden Administration's aggressive efforts 95% of Americans have taken at least one shot and are better protected than the unvcaccinated who will have to live with the consequences of their choice and live in fear of imminent death due to mutations.

People who want to wear masks can (like the lady I saw in Costco yesterday whose mask matched the band on her hat and her sweater). How that affects people who were fired for being unvaccinated, private mask and vaccine mandates, and travel bans remains to be seen. Judging by comments from my friends and relatives in my former home state of Michigan, democrats like Gretchen Whitmer will be forgiven for their misguided and often disastrous response because it was "in good faith" and "based upon what we knew at the time".

All will be forgiven and forgotten until the next "thing". (Not by us, of course).

Expand full comment
Donna in MO's avatar

Ron DeSantis came to Kansas on Sunday stumping for KS Governor candidate Derek Schmidt. Opening speech by Sen Roger Marshall. ALL 3 hammered on current gov Laura Kelly for her covid measures, especially shutting down schools and admonished the crowd to 'not let her forget' what she did. Of course DeSantis was a huge hit. But the interesting part to me was that the 2 standing ovations Schmidt got in his speech were for: boys not being allowed to compete in girl's sports, and keeping sexual references out of the classroom. FOR ME all that is important but my #1 issue is not caving into big pharma, big science/university, and big fear. BUT my kids are grown. Suppose I would feel differently if mine were school age, but if they were, they would not be in public schools.

Expand full comment
SheThinksLiberty's avatar

Yes...in short the 𝒉𝒖𝒎𝒂𝒏 right of medical freedom.

Expand full comment
Donna in MO's avatar

YES! DeSantis spoke for almost a full hour, and one of his best points IMHO was his reference to Eisenhower's parting speech - yes, the 'military industrial complex' that is well known, but DeSantis actually emphasized his lesser known warning “We must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.” I had seen that warning floating around social media in the last 2 years, but before that, had not known that. Huge props to DeSantis for hammering this point home.

Expand full comment
Andrew Dickens's avatar

"taken at least one shot and are better protected than the unvcaccinated"? Are you serious! Name at least one mRNA genetic therapy that has passed clinical trials. You can't because there are none.

How about looking at this paper on Israel and the overt deception going on about the risks of the mRNA genetic therapy: (no, I won't call it a vaccine because that is a misnomer!)

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/exclusive-proof-that-the-top-israeli?r=b939i&s=r&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email

Expand full comment
John Cougar Misanthrope's avatar

That's what Biden will claim, not me. Sorry for not adding the /S symbol. I thought my sarcasm was fairly clear. Of course: the shots don't work, 95% didn't receive one shot; the unvaccinated do not risk imminent death due to mutations, etc.

Expand full comment
Help Needed in KS's avatar

"People who want to wear masks can (like the lady I saw in Costco yesterday whose mask matched the band on her hat and her sweater)". AHaaaaaa, isn't that sweet!!

Expand full comment
SadieJay's avatar

I just got mask handled at the ortho clinic where hubs is having surgery. I walked out. Next time I am not going without speaking my mind! Had to keep it civil today. But walking out is better than masking up.

Expand full comment
Donna in MO's avatar

I cave to the mask-holes at my mom's dr appointments, as much as I hate it, just because I need to be with her as I ask questions and take notes. Interestingly, I wore it on my chin at her last PCP appt and no one said boo to me. Mom brought up that she had not yet gotten her booster - I interjected and said, mom, you shouldn't get that anyway, and she replied, oh don't listen to her she's an anti-vaxxer. Her PCP just smiled and said NOTHING. Did not tell to get the booster. Praying she does not get it, but mom will not listen to me.....

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Good for you!!

Expand full comment
John Cougar Misanthrope's avatar

Disturbing, actually. I've noticed a lot of sartorial attention being devoted to masks.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Reinforcing their claim that it is akin to clothing and thus falls under a dress code, and is not a medical device (although they also claim it prevents disease which clearly makes the clothing analogy moot but confuses enough people to convince them).

Expand full comment
Katcando's avatar

So, you shop at same Costco as nancy pelosi. Wondered what she was doing with all of those scarf & mask accessories that coordinated with her wardrobe, the beetch.

Expand full comment
John Cougar Misanthrope's avatar

No, it's the Costco in Nashville. Thankfully, it's only a small percentage - maybe 5% - who insist on wearing the mask to protect me.

Expand full comment
SheThinksLiberty's avatar

Where are you getting your numbers from, ejsmith? "95%"? Last I heard from Neil Cavuto talking with Deborah "sleight of hand" Birx was that approximately 70 million people have declined all "COV!D" "vaccinations". Has that changed so much since that conversation that we're now at 95%? Can you provide a link? Or are you crafting statements that the demented one at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue would say -- "95%"?

As for the hogwash of injected with at least one shot "better protected" than the "unvaccinated"? Again, are you suggesting that that would be the official line coming out of the swamp? All those people did get a needle--some of them multiple needles -- but 𝒏𝒐𝒏𝒆 of them are "vaccinated" -- the W.H.O.'s changed definition notwithstanding.

Just trying to get clarity, wondering if you're being sarcastic in this comment.

Expand full comment
John Cougar Misanthrope's avatar

Please see my reply to Andrew. Of course it was sarcastic. "Joe will run his victory lap by declaring ... ." Joe will make that claim, just like he claimed to have graduated at the top of his law school class.

Expand full comment
Riki Tiki Tavi's avatar

Yes...I am suspicious of the reported jabb'd numbers for many reasons. Supposedly, the majority of humans on the planet got the jab--due to the tally of the numbers of "delivered injections." However, the caveat may be that of these numbers many of the reported injections were only administered to those people who got 2-3 shots. So--rather than say 6 Bil people getting the jab--perhaps only 2 Bil got several jabs. 2 Bil would still be a high number in my guidebook on de-pop menu options.

Expand full comment
Lisa Ca's avatar

Bahahahaha! "has to declare victory and take credit" LOL

Expand full comment
CPK (Charles Kalina)'s avatar

Hey, I'm not saying I think it's TRUE -- just that this is what he's got to say. We're pretty much past the point where he can say he inherited the problem and it's not his fault. He's got to say he fixed it. Doesn't matter if it's true or not. No politicians is ever going to say "that thing I promised to protect you from wasn't really a threat after all". Nor "I didn't do anything but it sorted itself out." Still less "actually I made it worse".

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

I don’t know about that, Obama claimed every problem was Bush’s fault for 8 years 😛

Expand full comment
Help Needed in KS's avatar

The site won't allow me to like your comment, so consider this a "LIKE".

Expand full comment
Jack D Crack's avatar

Does anyone remember "3 months"?

Expand full comment
Lisa Ca's avatar

Not sure what you are referring to here.

Expand full comment
Chevrus's avatar

No but I coined "3 years to fatten the curve"

Expand full comment
Jack D Crack's avatar

I seem to recall that in one of the debates, Joey managed to get the words out of his mouth that he would end the plandemic in 3 months.

Expand full comment
Julie Ann B's avatar

Biden doesn’t know anything! He’s a dirty corrupt politician with advanced dementia who is a puppet for Obama and the Marxists in that administration. They will do whatever it takes to retain power.

Expand full comment
CMCM's avatar

I have long thought the mastermind behind puppet Biden is undoubtedly Obama, with the help of Susan Rice and others who are visible. Don't forget Obama's words ON VIDEO about a third term, where he talked about running things from a basement but not having to be the face of things. It has to be Obama, conducting his third term in the shadows. I'm sure a lot of Democrats know this is the case. Republicans too, but they are too feckless to say it.

Expand full comment
Tory's avatar

Agree!

Expand full comment
44Sonshine's avatar

Chinese Biotech Firm with Deep Links to China’s Military and its COVID-19 Program Just Bought Land in Florida for a Massive Research Complex https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/chinese-biotech-firm-deep-links-chinas-military-covid-19-program-just-bought-land-florida-massive-research-complex/ Perhaps we need a multiplier to someone who is on board to stop this. Morriston Fla. is right near Gainesville THIS THING NEEDS TO BE CANCELLED AND STOPPED ASAP.

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

China is a self-proclaimed overt enemy and they are going to build a research lab in FL?!!! All CCP organizations in the US need to be deported and their property forced to be sold. They can take their money and go back to China.

Expand full comment
Elaine H's avatar

Why do we allow foreign countries to buy land here in the first place?

Expand full comment
Odd One's avatar

You’ve made a bad assumption that he’s thinking at all.

Expand full comment
Harold Saive's avatar

CNN Did better than I thought they would - (CNN) President Joe Biden said he believes the Covid-19 pandemic is “over” in an appearance on CBS’ “60 Minutes,”

Biden on 2024? - The President told “60 Minutes” in the interview aired Sunday he had not made a “firm decision” on whether he would run for reelection in 2024 but said he intended to run.

“Look, my intention, as I said to begin with, is that I would run again. But it’s just an intention. But is it a firm decision that I run again? That remains to be seen,” Biden said. - https://tinyurl.com/c4wbvfzt

Expand full comment
OnTheJump's avatar

Seems " word-salad " disease is contagious within the White House.

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

Can one be vaccinated for that? Quick, someone call pfizer.

Expand full comment
OnTheJump's avatar

Pretty sure they can locate something suitable on their menu. ;]

Expand full comment
Chevrus's avatar

Karmella holds the title though....

Expand full comment
OnTheJump's avatar

Many club members - but she the Club President.

Words fall out of her mouth ahaped like pretzels.

Expand full comment
Help Needed in KS's avatar

Word salad, Bullsh!t...to-mato, to-mat-o.....

Expand full comment
Frab's avatar

"But is it a firm decision that I run again? That remains to be seen,”

The same people who tell Joey what he is and isn't allowed to say or he'll get in trouble, as he repeatedly tells us, haven't decided yet if they can replace the Biden puppet with another, less dementia afflicted, puppet.

Expand full comment
MsReid's avatar

Evidently there ARE no firm decisions coming from this man. He's waffled on just about every dictate he's uttered. Considering his utter failure for two years, I suppose he thinks he needs to do SOMETHING to boost his "popularity" given he has 50+ days to turn his pathetic, evil agenda around in the eyes of the voters.

Expand full comment
Lisa Ca's avatar

Great share here. It's rather hilarious. He has to put on a front he is running but obviously the deep state dems are telling him he shouldn't run. They are likely coming up with who will run in place, at this time. My bet is they want Newsom, governor of CA.

Expand full comment
Harold Saive's avatar

How can he run for re-election when he was never elected in the first place? NOT MY PRESIDENT!

Expand full comment
Frab's avatar

The Dems have a serious problem in 2024. Rich Baris, who is unarguably the best pollster in the business, polled all the possible 2024 Dem candidates, Kamala, Pete the Mayor, Hillary and Newsom, against Trump. Trump trounces all of them, but Dementia Joe currently has the best odds against him. It's part of why they're so hysterical about trying to take Trump out of the running.

Expand full comment
CMCM's avatar

I heard a news report the other day on some radio station, and they were saying Trump's approval rating is 34%. I don't believe that, but this is the narrative they are pushing to discourage Trump supporters now.

Expand full comment
Lisa Ca's avatar

Wow! This is fascinating. Wonder how many people here in CnC have been polled by this guy!

Expand full comment
CMCM's avatar

It sure looks like they are pushing Newsom into the spotlight. He may challenge Harris. He's a pretty face without a brain, but the Dems figure vacuous females will rush out to vote for him, no matter that he has no ideas. He's an ideal next puppet for those who are really in control.

Expand full comment
Harold Saive's avatar

Newsom wins VP. Biden vaxxi-croaks in office. Newsom is President.

Expand full comment
Lisa Ca's avatar

I actually disagree. Have you seen him in Ca!? He has a ton of ideas. All bad. He is smooth as silk like O. And he’s Nancys nephew. I’ll be shocked if he doesn’t get the nomination.

Expand full comment
AM's avatar

Heaven help us with Newsom.

Expand full comment
Lisa Ca's avatar

My thoughts exactly! I LIVE in Ca! But dems love him! He’s another O!

Expand full comment
AM's avatar

He’s a far far cry from BHO but I’m sure he thinks of himself in that vein 🙄

Expand full comment
Lisa Ca's avatar

He’s actually not that dumb. I hate his ideas but he’s been successfuk and they all eat out of his hand like candy. Its disgusting.

Expand full comment
CMCM's avatar

He's a stupid, empty, silly little boy who is drunk on a perception of his own self importance. He's quite simply an idiot of the first order.

Expand full comment
Martha's avatar

The faux "emergency" has to be extended by HHS to allow continued injections of the EUA "vaccines", at least until they are added to the Childhood Immunization Schedule.

Expand full comment
OnTheJump's avatar

......which should NEVER happen, but their 'fake' advisory committee will surely support (after checking wallets).

Expand full comment
OnTheJump's avatar

Yes, seems he took the legs right out from under the declared "EMERGENCY".

how they gonna " walk that back " ?

Expand full comment
Kim's avatar

Jabberwocky 👍

My vocabulary ammo increased today. Thanks!

Expand full comment
SomeDude's avatar

Jabberwocky

BY LEWIS CARROLL

’Twas brillig, and the slithy toves

Did gyre and gimble in the wabe:

All mimsy were the borogoves,

And the mome raths outgrabe.

“Beware the Jabberwock, my son!

The jaws that bite, the claws that catch!

Beware the Jubjub bird, and shun

The frumious Bandersnatch!”

He took his vorpal sword in hand;

Long time the manxome foe he sought—

So rested he by the Tumtum tree

And stood awhile in thought.

And, as in uffish thought he stood,

The Jabberwock, with eyes of flame,

Came whiffling through the tulgey wood,

And burbled as it came!

One, two! One, two! And through and through

The vorpal blade went snicker-snack!

He left it dead, and with its head

He went galumphing back.

“And hast thou slain the Jabberwock?

Come to my arms, my beamish boy!

O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!”

He chortled in his joy.

’Twas brillig, and the slithy toves

Did gyre and gimble in the wabe:

All mimsy were the borogoves,

And the mome raths outgrabe.

Source: The Random House Book of Poetry for Children (1983)

Expand full comment
Kim's avatar

Beware the jabjab mandate, and shun the Faucious Beaglesnatcher. 😎

Expand full comment
Riki Tiki Tavi's avatar

Except that mass formation psychosis holds the bureaucratic management shills in its spell, as NY lays off un-jabb'd workers. The pandemic dictates, that includes mask mandates and jabb regulations, is still playing out in real time. Scary,eh? Zombification is a reality.

Expand full comment
Fortified City's avatar

Exactly!!!

Expand full comment
Amy M Castro's avatar

yes, let's learn more about the truth related to 5G - how bad is it really?

Expand full comment
Michelle Flanigan's avatar

It’s bad. I’ve started turning off my router when we are not using it. We will soon have no where to hide from

These micro energy waves.

Expand full comment
Amy M Castro's avatar

I feel the same - it’s everywhere. So how do we handle it? Can we do anything?

Expand full comment
Jeff C's avatar

Minimize exposure through distance (very important), reduce exposure duration, and outright avoidance.

RF signal levels decrease at the square of the distance so levels fall fast. Don't live right next to a cell tower as an example, but with one a half mile away the signal level can be reduced at least ten-thousand fold. Don't a use wifi headset, signal levels are low but the are right next to your brain. Don't keep a cell phone in your pocket next to your body, they are occasionally transmitting even when you aren't on a call.

If you use a cell phone in your home, have it use wi-fi calling rather than over the cell network. This will reduce the transmitted power of the cell phone a thousand-fold or more depending on how far you are from the cell tower. Assuming you have a home wi-fi network, don't place the router right next to where you sleep or spend a lot of time, use distance to your advantage. Many routers and devices such as laptops have wi-fi power level setting. They are usually defaulted to high to increase range but it often isn't needed, set it to low. Don't sleep right next to things like smart meters.

The thing is is that the dose makes the poison, and unless you are close to a high power transmitter (cell phone, cell tower, smart meter, etc.) the exposure is typically very low. I'm in the business and have made countless RF measurements, if you take the steps I mention above it will dramatically reduce your exposure on the order of a million-fold. It can't be entirely avoided, TV and radio waves are RF signals that we have lived with for a hundred years. You can dramatically reduce exposure though.

Edit: fixed a few typos

Expand full comment
Julie's avatar

Thank you! Great information!

Expand full comment
LizardFro's avatar

Does hard wiring things in your house help? Like running a CAT5 into each room. Using wired cameras that upload non-wi-fi.

Expand full comment
Tucson Tanya's avatar

Yes it will help

Expand full comment
Lisa Ca's avatar

Can you please start a blog on this??!!! :)

How do I get my energy company to reverse the smart metere I never signed uo for. ?

Expand full comment
Unapologetically Me's avatar

I tried to refuse to get a smart meter installed on my elderly mother's house, in October of 2015, in Canada, when it was already getting pretty cold.

She has a pacemaker and I believed, still do, that Smart Meters are harmful.

I fought the installation for 8 months.

The power company personnel arrived, with legal counsel, and while my 83 year old mum stood in the yard watching, shivering and crying helplessly, they turned off her power.

FORTIS B.C.

Expand full comment
RebeccaGrrrl's avatar

😵‍💫😭

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Very interesting, thanks!

Expand full comment
CaplT's avatar

Thank you! I have been wondering about 5g

1 Do the stick on buttons sold now work to absorb 5g?

2 I wfh in a tiny office niche with our wifi booster (?) box on the wall beside me. Our geek son put a box on the wall of the garage in the garage which may be a large router, and this 8x8x3” box with little antennas on the inside wall.

I am less than 2’ away from the box on the inside wall.

Do I move my work or get him to move the inside box at least to the ceiling?

Expand full comment
Jeff C's avatar

Don't waste your money on any of that stuff, it's all gimmicks to pander to the paranoid. The covid vaccines of RF so to speak.

Distance is your friend due to the inverse square law. If it's now 2 feet away square that to get four. Compare that to 20 feet way, square that to get 400. 4/400 = 100 times lower. A simple change and you just reduced your exposure 100-fold.

Expand full comment
Lisa Ca's avatar

Interesting.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 19, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Jeff C's avatar

Most professional meters are very expensive as they require accuracy for *absolute* measurements used in industrial applications. These devices need certification and regular calibration.

This is overkill for most people looking to reduce exposure, they just need something that accurately shows *relative* levels (so they can see the strong sources and mitigate them) and if absolute values are off by several decibels it's no big deal. Believe it or not, most of the cheaper ones are fine for this.

I have this one linked below and have checked it against professional equipment and found it to be quite accurate. It was $300 IIRC.

https://www.alphalabinc.com/product/rfm1/

Expand full comment
Lisa Ca's avatar

I have one that seems reliable but unsure. Care to share what your industry is so we can pick a locals brain?

Expand full comment
Lisa Ca's avatar

yes- the best thing you can do is try to block your EMF. Don’t go in cities with 5G. Keep a 4G phone. and increase your supplements to help your body fight off.

Expand full comment
Martha's avatar

In some states, you can opt out of Smart Meters, which are another source of EMF.

Expand full comment
Natalie's avatar

I live in Michigan and opted out of the Smart Meters several years ago. I do pay an extra charge every month--I think it's about $10--but it's worth it to me to keep my privacy. Here's a recent article about Smart Meters: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/smart-meters-surveillance-control-energy-use-emf-cola/?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=e143d6dd-f1a8-4dff-8e11-65b3063aaa54 By the way, the Neil Oliver monologue video is priceless and a must-see.

Expand full comment
Martha's avatar

Excellent source. It amazes me how much you have to pay in some states to protect your privacy/health and opt out...

Expand full comment
CraigN's avatar

You can purchase a faraday cage that is designed to fit over smart electrical meters. I'm sure there are other faraday solutions for the other types of devices.

Expand full comment
Martha's avatar

Wouldn't that prevent them from reading the meter and be verboten?

Expand full comment
CraigN's avatar

Probably prevent them from reading the meter remotely but it is your home so I do not see where they could prevent you from doing what you want to your home. Not certain how it would all play out but you are not restricting them from physically accessing their meter. Maybe take it off once a month for an hour. 😉

Expand full comment
AngelaK's avatar

RFK Jr. was ranting about how this was being done without anyones knowledge and while we were locked down. . I used to follow him on Instagram, then they banned him. He is a very good man. I think his father and uncle would be proud but most of his contemporary relatives have disavowed him as an anti vaxx nut.

Expand full comment
Ellen Komorowski's avatar

I agree with you Angela. I think he is a very good man!

Expand full comment
CMCM's avatar

I just downloaded his new book "Letter to Liberals." It has some very good information in it. If you go to this Children's Health Defense site, it's a free e-book download. It's also in hardback form on the evil Amazon.

Expand full comment
JMH75's avatar

You can follow him now on his podcast channel, RFK Jr The Defender Podcast.

Expand full comment
Ellen Komorowski's avatar

Yes-I would like to know more as well. I know that the few articles that I have read indicate that there "are no long term studies." That is the part that scares me. Have no long term studies been done because "they" don't want the results out there? It was the same thing with the pharmaceutical companies. There were no long term studies on the COVID vaccines and look where that has gotten us. My personal opinion is that 5G has got to be bad for our long term health. It is the reason why I haven't gotten a smart watch. You are wearing that right on your skin and God only knows what is coursing through your body. I limit my talking on my cell for the same reason. I text more. Again, I believe that 5G is just another way to reduce the surplus population under the guise of super cool technology! I think that we need to wake up before the effects of 5G kill a lot of people too. Just my opinion of course!

Expand full comment
SomeDude's avatar

the FCC and telecom companies still rely on (weak) studies of 2G from the 1990s to make their excuses for newer cellular frequency bands.

Expand full comment
steve's avatar

telecom studies are very much like pharma studies

Expand full comment
SomeDude's avatar

Yes, cherry picking the only positive data points and ignoring (or refusing to test for at all) any negative effects

Expand full comment
CMCM's avatar

I've always worried about cell phones up to the ear and thus by your head, but now I always talk on speaker so at least the phone is farther away.

Expand full comment
Viya's avatar

You have a VALID reason to be concerned: https://lenasfabulousfrequencies.com/research

Expand full comment
Natalie's avatar

When they try to suppress information about something and call it a conspiracy theory, you know there's some truth they're trying to hide.

Expand full comment
OnTheJump's avatar

Children's Health Defense has covered it in great detail - and MANY other topics as well.

Give them a look, well worth a view.

Expand full comment
Natalie's avatar

I've heard that 5G towers went up silently near schools when no one was around during the lockdown. One went up at a Michigan high school in the Grand Rapids area.

Expand full comment
Chevrus's avatar

In the rural area I live in, the 5G towers went up rapidly during the "lockdown" ...although its Maine so nobody payed attention to being "locked"

Expand full comment
Bingham22's avatar

It was Gates and Soros who were backing 5G from the beginning…just like with the jab, that was enough for me.

Anything they back is meant as tool for depopulation and subjugation.

Expand full comment
TRM's avatar

From what I've read the major concerns are 60 GHz. That frequency interferes with oxygen absorb-ability and it has an effect on water. We breathe oxygen so absorbing it crucial and we are mostly water so ...

Expand full comment
Sheryl T2's avatar

I was not aware of that, but there are also frequencies that help the body heal. Check out Michael Tyrrell's music based on healing frequencies.

Expand full comment
TRM's avatar

There are different approaches to using sound on the human body like hemisync & solfeggio that are very interesting. I'll check out MT's music.

There are also "pain ray" frequencies that are not pleasant LOL.

Expand full comment
John Galt?'s avatar

My 5G service got a lot better after the shots

Expand full comment
Credenda's avatar

Do the magnets still stick to your arms? That was so strange!

Expand full comment
Ellen Komorowski's avatar

Now that's funny!!

Expand full comment
Karen Bandy's avatar

🤣😃🤣

Expand full comment
GoodGrief-239's avatar

🤣

Expand full comment
CMCM's avatar

Our little town (mountains of N. CA) mounted a big uproar of protest against them putting a 5G tower up in town, and they managed to squash the project.....for now, anyway.

Expand full comment
Ellen Komorowski's avatar

Good for you guys. We just don't seem to have enough people making enough noise!!

Expand full comment
Dave's avatar

Its dangerous for high precision location tracking.

Because the frequencies used are so easily blocked you need lots of transmitters to make it work. Because you have lots of transmitters you can then get tracking accuracy within a foot or two.

That is the bad

As for the rest

No matter how many crackpots cherry pick data to make it look otherwise, there are no adverse health conditions associated with low power radio emissions as used in short range communication devices.

No matter how many crackpots tell you that their spider senses tingle when wifi is around, you will never get one in a Faraday cage, sitting next to a wifi router, and get them to have anything but a random chance of telling you if the wifi is on or off.

Expand full comment
Jeff C's avatar

There's a difference between crackpots that think they see auras from cell towers versus the proven cumulative damaging health effects from high power RF radiation exposure. The latter is a demonstrable fact, the argument is at what power and duration level it occurs.

The truth is that we really don't know which is why reducing exposure makes sense. I have no desire to be part of a real-time experiment. Agree though that most wi-fi type devices put out signal levels so low that they are probably negligible unless placed right next to the body for long durations (e.g. a wi-fi headset). Cell phones are a different story though as they transmit up to a 1000x higher power.

Expand full comment
Dave's avatar

Crackpots cherry picking data does not cumulative damaging health effects prove

Expand full comment
Jeff C's avatar

Hey big talker, what are your qualifications? I'll tell you mine, thirty years antenna design and Radio Frequency systems engineering experience.

I make the very reasonable comment that we really don't know at what level harm occurs but it is proven that it happens at high enough exposure levels. I also explain common sense, easy, and low cost methods to reduce cumulative exposure. You respond by mouthing off about crackpots.

Folks, Dave is a bad-faith troll who just materialized this morning as far as I can tell. I would not be surprised if he's a sock puppet of horsey and benjaminn.

Expand full comment
Dave's avatar

Simply being logical.

RF is non-ionizing. It hasn't the energy to do so.

If RF is ionizing then so too would IR and Visible light given that they are higher energy. Anybody out there talking about the cancer causing open flames (apart from combustion gases) or visible light?

All RF can do to is heat it up the things that absorb it, just like all EM from the longest to shortest wavelengths.

Concentrate that RF (such as in a microwave oven) and/or increase the power substantially (ADS) over that used for short range communication and you have a problem (burns).

That is why you have your exposure limits for working on Cell and radio towers, and hams have recommendations as well.

Diffuse, low power RF (cell phones, wifi routers, etc) on the other hand were are talking heating so small its almost impossible to measure, even when the transmitter is close to the skin.

Our bodies are capable of radiating substantially more heat than is absorbed from a cell phone or wifi.

Sunlight, exercise, wearing of clothing all cause localized heating of our body substantially greater than any common RF.

The most dangerous thing about RF as used for communication is that it is perfectly safe for our bodies, and because it provides us with some real benefits (access to knowledge/communication) it is the perfect tracking system because it will be voluntarily embraced, rather than imposed from on high.

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

In my experience it is always what we don't know that is dangerous. To assume that what we do know is exhaustive is a mistake.

Expand full comment
Jeff C's avatar

What does that mean and how is it responsive to my comment?

Expand full comment
SomeDude's avatar

other crackpots complaining about studies they disagree with also does not cumulative damaging health effects disprove, either

Expand full comment
Dave's avatar

RF causes cancer and anal leaking is right up there with flat earther nonsense

Expand full comment
Viya's avatar

Declassified Military Research and More: https://lenasfabulousfrequencies.com/research

Expand full comment
SomeDude's avatar

🙄🤣

Expand full comment
Viya's avatar

One of the best presentations I watched on 5G: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1pzeTFmCn8&t=0s

Expand full comment
Ellen Komorowski's avatar

Thank you!

Expand full comment
Natalie's avatar

Thank you!

Expand full comment
Karen Bandy's avatar

I only have a 4G phone, have resisted getting a newer 5G. Maybe it doesn’t matter, 5G is out there anyway???

Expand full comment
Natalie's avatar

I have a Light Phone II. I've resisted getting a smart phone.

Expand full comment
Ellen Komorowski's avatar

Good question!!

Expand full comment
Yarrow's avatar

My thoughts exactly!

Expand full comment
Big E's avatar

5G and Smart Meters are detrimental to health and privacy. Here is some info:

5G

* Children’s Health Defense: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/?s=5G

* Truth for Health Foundation: https://truthforhealth.org/?s=5G

Smart Meters:

* https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/smart-meters-surveillance-control-energy-use-emf-cola/

* https://www.ncsl.org/research/energy/smart-meter-opt-out-policies.aspx

Note: Idaho currently has an opt-out bill in progress. I plan to write my legislators asking them to pass this bill (current status unknown): https://legislature.idaho.gov/sessioninfo/2022/legislation/H0706/

Expand full comment
John infinity N's's avatar

"I didn’t used to be too interested in the whole 5G thing, but this gives me pause."

The 5G thing isn't about making everyone's facebook browsing faster while out in public. They need the speed and width of 5G for their geospacial intelligence to work. Basically full blown digital surveillance on everyone can't work at that scale with less than 5G. David Knight explains it pretty good.

Expand full comment
OnTheJump's avatar

I believe 'surveillance ' may only be the tip of the iceberg, unfortunately.

Expand full comment
Martha's avatar

It can be linked to the transhumanism agenda, which got a boost with a recent Executive Order (EO):

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/leo-hohmann-bidens-executive-order-designed-release-transhumanist-america/

[link to EO in cited article]

Expand full comment
OnTheJump's avatar

Spot on, Martha!

Biotechnology suddenly very important to our very science-minded prez, huh? Another excuse to throw (steal) tax $ around like tic tacs.

Expand full comment
SYFY's avatar

Yep, lots bad about 5G and people were trying to get that info out there, but it coincided with the Covid lockdowns and many of the 5G towers were built during that time as well :(

Expand full comment
Katcando's avatar

5g may not have needed lockdowns to proceed. Way too many people oblige the narrative and dismiss any rebuttal as coming from a conspiratorial foil-hat brigade.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Another bonus/benefit or reason for the lockdowns? To sneak the towers in?

Expand full comment
Scott Kinghorn's avatar

I saw a video with a Canadian professor from 1995 speaking about mandatory vaccines that contained some sort of liquid crystals and could then be turned on when exposed to magnetic frequencies. I don't know if the components of such a vaccine has been changed since the making of that video. Just something to think about.

Expand full comment
Martha's avatar

Unusual Toxic Components Found in COVID Vaccines, ‘Without Exception’: German Scientists [paywalled ~ link to actual study is at the bottom]

https://www.theepochtimes.com/unusual-toxic-components-found-in-covid-vaccines-without-exception-german-scientists_4673873.html

Report from Working Group of Vaccine Analysis in Germany

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22140176-report-from-working-group-of-vaccine-analysis-in-germany

Expand full comment
JW's avatar

The German study is very interesting. Thank you.

Expand full comment
Martha's avatar

Shockingly so. Hard to wrap my head around it, but it seems pretty legit compared to some vaccine analyses I've read about.

Expand full comment
Maureen ODH's avatar

5G, the space fence true purpose, transhumanism and why O’Biden just signed an EO to fund GOF cell and DNA biology, and everything “directed energy destruction” to humanity information , start with Elana Freeland... what Catherine Austin Fitts has to say about Freeland: https://home.solari.com/book-review-geoengineered-transhumanism-by-elana-freeland/

Expand full comment
Maureen ODH's avatar

“Freeland reviews the different ways in which the human species is being reengineered on an involuntary basis. She introduces what she calls the “three primary transhumanist delivery systems”: spraying (“The Chemical Aerosol Soup”), food (“GMO Frankenfoods”) and vaccines (“The Medical Industry’s Third Rail”). Much of what she describes is a major portion of what I call “the great poisoning.” She also covers many technologies and aspects of building out a transhumanist control grid, including nanotechnology, 5G, satellites and surveillance technology, smart cities, and synthetic biology.” Catherine Austin Fitts

Expand full comment
Karen Bandy's avatar

I’m sure you’ve heard of Dane Wigington and his talk of chemtrails and global heating. David Rodriguez recently interviewed him on Rumble.

Geoengeringwatch.org

Expand full comment
Maureen ODH's avatar

Of course... Dane has been consistently reporting for at least two decades... and I just can’t help connect the dots to Gates many NGO’s. Pharmaceutical companies, “shots” and an airline of tankers reported by Gates specifically to carry out “solar radiation management” aka “sun dimming” via chemical spraying... what else does this fake so-called philanthropist fill those tankers with? Hmmmm.... what’s Gates all too public agenda? What does Gates control through all his organizations connected to all the global so-called health organizations including control over the CDC and WHO... hmmmm.....

Expand full comment
Maureen ODH's avatar

... as for the propaganda.... this stack sums the last 30 months insightfully well: https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/100-scam?utm_campaign=post_embed

Expand full comment
John infinity N's's avatar

yea I read about those direct energy weapons. They can be attached to a satellite and make entire skyscrapers collapse and disintegrate in a cloud of dust.🤔

Expand full comment
Maureen ODH's avatar

You’re well read John 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

My understanding as well

Expand full comment
Ray's avatar

the smell of democrat desperation hangs heavy in the air, bit like San Francisco

Expand full comment
CariAnne's avatar

Has anyone heard of the smith mundt modernization act of 2012? This piece of Obama legislation is what allows the government to spend taxpayer dollars on propaganda. Look into it. It’s real! https://www.usagm.gov/who-we-are/oversight/legislation/smith-mundt-faqs/ https://foreignpolicy.com/2013/07/14/u-s-repeals-propaganda-ban-spreads-government-made-news-to-americans/ https://www.fayobserver.com/story/opinion/columns/2020/04/30/opinion-government-propaganda-exposed/112322534/

Expand full comment
Hayli Watts's avatar

Let us imagine the world 20 years from now, when these kids who've lost 20 years of education during the pandemic are the voters and consumers as adults. Their current scheme isn't working yet because the control group is too big, too smart, too coordinated. But in 20 years, when these kids who are consumers and contributors of TikTok and GIF (that's all they've cared about for 20 years now, social media), the "Brave New World" won't be so hard to control because the foundations laid by BigTech and BigPharma and Covid19 crippled their liberated futures, they'll all be too dumb and sick to put up a fight.

Expand full comment
Jack's avatar

Don't forget...by then, we will be in mostly electric cars with mostly electric home appliances...all of which will be linked to the internet. Given the state of our electric grid and direction of electricity production...how do you think Electricity Rations will be determined in 20 years?

Sick or not, it's kinda hard to put up a fight when you can't travel to where the fight is...and never hear about it...

Expand full comment
AngelaK's avatar

They have been dumb from indoctrination from even before the lost year of the pandemic. Critical thinking used to start in college. They arent allowed to do that anymore.

Expand full comment
Gigi Gummerson's avatar

At that point or possibly sooner, we’ll be living in The Hunger Games 🤦🏻‍♀️

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

I know. My thoughts as well

Expand full comment
SLien's avatar

We’ll be living in a combo of Hunger Games and Wall-E.

Expand full comment
Rhonda Roland's avatar

Exactly!

Expand full comment
Surviving the Billionaire Wars's avatar

Re: free google phone #, sorry but I don't trust google with free anything!

Always remember, & never forget, with Google (& few few others) "free" products mean *you* are the product.

Expand full comment
Sunnydaze's avatar

That’s what I was thinking. I’m not giving google any more power than they already have. It’s too much as it is. Wayyyy too much!

Expand full comment
CariAnne's avatar

Google is everywhere. Aka as parent company alphabet! Owned by Blackrock and Vanguard.

Expand full comment
M2's avatar

You don't have to use it, just create a number that you can put down when you don't want to give out your own. I've used it for years. Works great and I don't get all the crap I don't want to hear or see.

Expand full comment
Kim's avatar

Ditched anything Google (that I know of) years ago. Not getting a phone number from them.

Expand full comment
Credenda's avatar

Yep. It took me 3 months to extricate myself completely from Google. No way I’m going back.

Expand full comment
Unapologetically Me's avatar

Try Skype. They will sell you a number, or used to, for a few bucks a month.

Worked great for me when I didn't want to spend a ton of money on a US phone, when I was allowed to visit America, before I became a banned Canadian unvaxxed threat to Americans.

Expand full comment
Dana's avatar

Can’t you just enter a fake phone # when completing the form?

Expand full comment
CaplT's avatar

Or home phone. It’s worth the minimal amount we pay and texting doesn’t work on it.

Expand full comment
Solzhenitsyn’s Ghost's avatar

Jeff, backing up to 30,000 feet, what does it say about our situation that it’s even a possibility that Dems (essentially, cruel anti-American authoritarians) retain the House or the Senate? What does it say about our state of affairs when their crimes and lies are so obvious, and policies they tell the truth about are so obviously destructive - and they might yet win or cheat their way to a win, again?

Expand full comment
OnTheJump's avatar

Frightening that this even appears a possibility, given all that has gone, is going, on, right ?

Expand full comment
AngelaK's avatar

Propaganda is strong. Pure and simple.

Expand full comment
Penny North's avatar

My thoughts exactly!

Expand full comment
Dave the barnacle's avatar

I didn’t used to be too interested in the whole secret earthquake technology thing, but this gives me pause.

Expand full comment
Surviving the Billionaire Wars's avatar

As soon as I saw news of the quake, I wondered "what if ..."

Expand full comment
Matt's avatar

me too!

Expand full comment
Chevrus's avatar

Apparently somewhat related to scalar electromagnetic waves, something Tesla was working on....

Expand full comment
Cher's avatar

“I didn’t used to be too interested in the whole 5G thing, but this gives me pause.“ LOL. That same thought ran through my mind as soon as I read the preceding list 😂

Expand full comment
Wesley Hoyle's avatar

The walkback of "the pandemic is over" is going to make Michael Jackson's moonwalk look quaint and unimpressive.

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

Well said

Expand full comment
signcut's avatar

People are indeed not only paying less attention to legacy media, but also distrust it at historical levels. Which comes as a complete surprise to those involved; "People don't trust or believe us because we lie pretty much every time we open our mouths. I don't get it; what are we doing wrong?"

'Journalists'... smh

https://nationalfile.com/video-msnbc-anchor-wonders-if-shes-doing-more-harm-than-good-after-learning-americans-hate-the-media/

Expand full comment
AngelaK's avatar

In 2003 George Soros has invested more than 48 million dollars into journalism schools and media organizations to influence the American people.

He was on record around that time saying that the US was the hardest to swing over to his new world order.

The man is pure evil. His son shows off his occultic satanic 'spirit cooking' fun on Instagram.

He will continue funding the demonic ideology and agenda after his father is gone.

Expand full comment
signcut's avatar

Really, the saddest thing about that, or any number of others doing the same thing, for various reasons, is how easily people are manipulated for a few measly dollars. But, with no sense of shame, or morality, or conscience, in either giver or taker, why wouldn't it be...?

Expand full comment
Peace's avatar

I was wondering who would take over when he is gone. And wonder about Schwab as well.

Expand full comment
Jack D Crack's avatar

We need the equivalent of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for personal healthcare. Any time any person, nurse,doctor, teacher, journalist, politician, social media platform, media outlet, hospital, university, or government agency at any level recommends or mandates any medical intervention, device, procedure, injection, or drug, in the course of their professional duties and charters, that entity MUST COMPLETELY disclose ALL SOURCES of funding the recommending or mandating entity receives, directly or indirectly, from those that directly or indirectly profit from, or gain an advantage to influence others from, the use of the medical intervention, device, procedure, injection, or drug.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

And they must give reasonable evidence that it does what they claim it does, and must take responsibility for any adverse effects if they claim the medical intervention is safe.

Expand full comment
Jack D Crack's avatar

ABSOLUTELY! The fact that the average everyday American does not demand this is deeply disturbing. WAKE UP AMERICA!

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

I wish I could find some way to enforce this. It just seems obvious that of someone requires a medical intervention, then it should have proven efficacy and they should take responsibility for any harm.

Expand full comment
Jack D Crack's avatar

The problem is we think and therefore, use logic. Thinking is a disease that we need to be cured from... ;)

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Yes, can’t have any of us doing THAT 😱😉

Expand full comment
Unapologetically Me's avatar

Speaking of injections and informed consent: does this look, or sound remotely like informed consent to you?

Not FAKE news: the woman in question died while awaiting the "15 minute" period to leave the pharmacy. While texting her daughter...

She left the pharmacy in a coroner's wagon.

https://twitter.com/MarkFriesen08/status/1571886262964948994?s=20&t=FU7XcT4ofehfLYKaVtHpmQ

This pharmacist walked off the job, LOUDLY, proclaiming why she was handing in her white coat: with an unequivocal WARNING to those hapless, trusting humans waiting in line to roll up their sleeves...

https://twitter.com/patriot_north/status/1571597604345069570?s=20&t=FU7XcT4ofehfLYKaVtHpmQ

Expand full comment
Cinghale's avatar

Ack! Jeff please do not encourage people to do anything with Google! There are other virtual phone number apps and burner email apps/websites that can be used! Please check websites like restoreprivacy.Com for suggestions. Example Burner Mail

10minutemail - verification purposes, EmailOnDeck, or Guerrilla Mail. All of your data on gmail and other google apps, as well as regular texting is being scraped and sold. Those still using these products are feeding the beast and their [all of our ) data is being compiled into our ESG scores…

Expand full comment
MarkGW's avatar

I use phoner app for virtual phone numbers.

Expand full comment
RebeccaGrrrl's avatar

Thank you, @Cinghale, for this link!

Expand full comment
A guy's avatar

The biggest 60 minutes headline is that "The White House" announced that the President of the USA is not really the President of the USA.

On 60 minutes last night, Joe Biden, who is the Commander in Chief of the entire US military, reversed 50 years of foreign policy and told the World that the USA would send US troops to fight in Taiwan if China took control of that portion of their mainland (Geographically, Taiwan is to China as Hawaii is to USA...an island-State)

This would mean instantaneous nuclear war, the death of 4 billion people, and the end of our civilization; WW3.

IMMEDIATELY afterward, "The White House" (who is that? name the puppeteer) effectively announced that "The President of the USA does not speak for the USA or its military and that the USA has no official position about what it would do if China took control of Taiwan."

i.e. The President is not The President, and the Commander In Chief is not the Commander In Chief.

The "journalist" who asked the question, and who knows US foreign policy, even recognized the gaffe and tried to help/coach Biden by ignoring that first answer and re-asking the question, but emphasized that he was asking about "Taiwan", and not "Ukraine"; clearly believing that Biden's dementia was confusing him. Biden simply confirmed that the US would invade Taiwan.

If this does not clarify the charade of "governance" in the USA, and the reality of an unelected group of people controlling this country, there is no hope for any of us.

Expand full comment
Martha's avatar

Speaking of Steve Bannon (GIF portion of Jeff's article), if you don't get War Room and/or prefer to read, the following free Substack provides transcripts of some of his interviews. It is a labor of love for the transcriptionist, who is just doing what she can to fight media lies...

Bannon’s War Room Transcripts

https://warroomposse.substack.com/

Expand full comment
Teresa Carstensen's avatar

THANK you!...from a HEARING IMPAURED person. :)

Expand full comment
Martha's avatar

👍

Expand full comment
Natalie's avatar

Thank you! Steve Bannon and the War Room are invaluable fighters in this war. I learn so much from them.

Expand full comment
Penny North's avatar

Thank you!

Expand full comment
Peace's avatar

are you the transcriptionist?

Expand full comment
Martha's avatar

No. Only discovered her Substack a week ago and wanted to help boost her traffic.

Expand full comment