6 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Tom's avatar

They pretended it was legal because they pretended they were giving Comirnaty. They even falsified labels. Comirnaty wasn't and I think still isn't being produced; they were using the production methods for the experimental batches, not the "approved" Comirnaty protocols.

So the standards for things like contamination by DNA plasmids was different, among other things.

They had to pretend it was Comirnaty because they couldn't force people to partake in an experiment against their will.

It was an unlawful order, given by the entire chain of command.

Expand full comment
rolandttg's avatar

100 % correct. Never available here because Pfizer would then have had liability from Cominarty damages.

Expand full comment
daverkb's avatar

It was 'color of law' by an out of control rogue military. An abomination.

Expand full comment
Sunnydaze's avatar

Thank you for explaining that. The day they “approved” it I read the actual document and tried telling people it wasn’t really approved and they did a bait and switch. Even conservatives were like, well I heard from reputable people in the know that it they really approved it. TO THIS DAY the sheep who can’t think for themselves STILL think the injections are approved. 🤮

Expand full comment
Fred's avatar

Monica Harris blogged about the switcheroo when it happened.

Expand full comment
Peace's avatar

I wonder if any military members could get a copy of vax health records that show Comirnaty given. Then sue for fraud since they weren't given Comirnaty? (Fraud is loophole to be able to sue for vaccines - unless EUA even allows fraud? Now I'm wondering about that!!)

Expand full comment