Most of them will comply again in a New York minute. They like being ruled. But it doesn't take a majority to change history, either. Majorities are either dragged kicking and screaming into the next phase of history or go along passively. They don't move history themselves. Somewhere I read that it takes just a committed 3% of people to…
Most of them will comply again in a New York minute. They like being ruled. But it doesn't take a majority to change history, either. Majorities are either dragged kicking and screaming into the next phase of history or go along passively. They don't move history themselves. Somewhere I read that it takes just a committed 3% of people to force change. How many people make up the WEF, WHO, and their captured governments and bureaucracies? They're not even close to 3% of everyone on earth. They're not even close to 3% of the US or Europe. It's not *good* that majorities remain susceptible to the next thing, but throughout history majorities have always been susceptible and our time is no different. The right, moral side has prevailed before and will again. Besides: ultimately evil is self-defeating and wins only when it's unopposed.
"How many people make up the WEF, WHO, and their captured governments and bureaucracies? They're not even close to 3% of everyone on earth. They're not even close to 3% of the US or Europe. " All very valid points if you consider body count but change that up and consider dollar count. It's a game changer and not so good for our side.... just saying. Their pathway is "green" and always has been.
The money was on the side of the British empire when it was beaten by the American Founders. It was still on the Brits' side when India told it to pack salt. It was on the side of Russia and the US when Afghanistan outlasted both of them. Money isn't the key. Ideas and commitment are.
You took the words out of my mouth. They have the green - an unlimited amount - all because of the central banking system which allows the cabal to vacuum up the wealth of the people through monetary inflation. Easy peasy. The downfall of the US began with the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913. All of this international banking is controlled by the BIS. Somebody give me just one nuke - please.
It is 3% to change the tide. The tide is that WEF, UN, etc are all in cahoots and have the control already. So it take 3% of us the people to change the existing contollers/control mechanism. Do you think there are 3% of us that will stand next time around? I'm actually not convinced we are there yet.
I think so, but of course I can't say for sure. I do think that there are many more than 3% who would have stood up the last time if they'd seen more examples of moral courage. They won't be the first to stand up and say they're Spartacus, but they will follow someone who does. No one talks about South Dakota, but with a sensible governor who refused to lose her shit over a cold virus, most of the people didn't lose theirs, either. It quickly became a non-event within the state. Then there's Mark Twain's observation: "In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot."
And yet... SD ranked 27/51 "states" (because they counted Wash DC as a state!?) vaxxed, with 66.5% getting vaxxed. Florida ranked 22/51 because they are 69% vaxxed?! So, "mostly" sensible governors and leadership, is not necessarily a protection against propaganda. Which I guess says something for the average person having more sway over a population than the leadership? It is VERY disconcerting, though, that even Wyoming, at 51/51, is over 50% vaxxed. I will try to remain optimistic that all this just increases the odds that there are more people harmed or know people harmed, who will thus speak out and help change course in the future.
I can say that while I will be the black sheep again if needed, that it was a lonely road being the only unmasked person every time I went somewhere. And I know that one friend was physically assaulted during that time, and have to imagine that the hatred and irrationality will be exponentially worse earlier on, so there will be exponentially more risk to the naysayers this time. Maybe that means there will be more willing to stand up when an assault happens, but who knows? Interesting times ahead. Now, or 20 years from now.
Overall around 80% of Americans were injected, I think, so South Dakota and Florida are still ahead of that curve. The rates would probably have been somewhat lower if people hadn't needed them (or thought they did) for travel out of state and out of the US. They're still watching the same fear porn on the national news and reading the same websites, but 69% and 66% are statistically significant differences from the national average of 80%.
Very early on I was accosted by two women in a grocery store because I wasn't muzzling and failed to worship the floor arrows. When I ignored them, one grabbed my cart to try to stop me. I told her so immediately, convincingly, and *eagerly* that if she did that again I'd kick her effing ass that she backed right off.
I can't predict how people will react next time, but if it's any barometer at all I see a lot of evidence on social media sites (like Breitbart's and similar accounts) that many people have woken up to the agenda. Many, many more than were aware of it in 2020. Many more people are not just skeptical of but resistant to that agenda now. Will enough of them stand up to bring the total of active resisters to 3%? I think so. I think there will be a lot more pushback the next time, even if "the next time" takes a different form than a fake virus. Meanwhile, I'm the only person whose reaction I can control, and I'm going to keep taking Alexandr Solzhenitsyn's advice: "Let a lie come into the world. Let it even triumph. But not through me." Not. Through. Me.
Most of them will comply again in a New York minute. They like being ruled. But it doesn't take a majority to change history, either. Majorities are either dragged kicking and screaming into the next phase of history or go along passively. They don't move history themselves. Somewhere I read that it takes just a committed 3% of people to force change. How many people make up the WEF, WHO, and their captured governments and bureaucracies? They're not even close to 3% of everyone on earth. They're not even close to 3% of the US or Europe. It's not *good* that majorities remain susceptible to the next thing, but throughout history majorities have always been susceptible and our time is no different. The right, moral side has prevailed before and will again. Besides: ultimately evil is self-defeating and wins only when it's unopposed.
Evil does eventually burn itself out but that is not much consolation. The trouble is as it burns out it also burns down everything around it.
Only if it's left alone. When it's opposed it falls a lot faster and with less collateral damage in the long run.
"How many people make up the WEF, WHO, and their captured governments and bureaucracies? They're not even close to 3% of everyone on earth. They're not even close to 3% of the US or Europe. " All very valid points if you consider body count but change that up and consider dollar count. It's a game changer and not so good for our side.... just saying. Their pathway is "green" and always has been.
Later Jay
The money was on the side of the British empire when it was beaten by the American Founders. It was still on the Brits' side when India told it to pack salt. It was on the side of Russia and the US when Afghanistan outlasted both of them. Money isn't the key. Ideas and commitment are.
You took the words out of my mouth. They have the green - an unlimited amount - all because of the central banking system which allows the cabal to vacuum up the wealth of the people through monetary inflation. Easy peasy. The downfall of the US began with the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913. All of this international banking is controlled by the BIS. Somebody give me just one nuke - please.
It is 3% to change the tide. The tide is that WEF, UN, etc are all in cahoots and have the control already. So it take 3% of us the people to change the existing contollers/control mechanism. Do you think there are 3% of us that will stand next time around? I'm actually not convinced we are there yet.
I think so, but of course I can't say for sure. I do think that there are many more than 3% who would have stood up the last time if they'd seen more examples of moral courage. They won't be the first to stand up and say they're Spartacus, but they will follow someone who does. No one talks about South Dakota, but with a sensible governor who refused to lose her shit over a cold virus, most of the people didn't lose theirs, either. It quickly became a non-event within the state. Then there's Mark Twain's observation: "In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot."
And yet... SD ranked 27/51 "states" (because they counted Wash DC as a state!?) vaxxed, with 66.5% getting vaxxed. Florida ranked 22/51 because they are 69% vaxxed?! So, "mostly" sensible governors and leadership, is not necessarily a protection against propaganda. Which I guess says something for the average person having more sway over a population than the leadership? It is VERY disconcerting, though, that even Wyoming, at 51/51, is over 50% vaxxed. I will try to remain optimistic that all this just increases the odds that there are more people harmed or know people harmed, who will thus speak out and help change course in the future.
I can say that while I will be the black sheep again if needed, that it was a lonely road being the only unmasked person every time I went somewhere. And I know that one friend was physically assaulted during that time, and have to imagine that the hatred and irrationality will be exponentially worse earlier on, so there will be exponentially more risk to the naysayers this time. Maybe that means there will be more willing to stand up when an assault happens, but who knows? Interesting times ahead. Now, or 20 years from now.
Overall around 80% of Americans were injected, I think, so South Dakota and Florida are still ahead of that curve. The rates would probably have been somewhat lower if people hadn't needed them (or thought they did) for travel out of state and out of the US. They're still watching the same fear porn on the national news and reading the same websites, but 69% and 66% are statistically significant differences from the national average of 80%.
Very early on I was accosted by two women in a grocery store because I wasn't muzzling and failed to worship the floor arrows. When I ignored them, one grabbed my cart to try to stop me. I told her so immediately, convincingly, and *eagerly* that if she did that again I'd kick her effing ass that she backed right off.
I can't predict how people will react next time, but if it's any barometer at all I see a lot of evidence on social media sites (like Breitbart's and similar accounts) that many people have woken up to the agenda. Many, many more than were aware of it in 2020. Many more people are not just skeptical of but resistant to that agenda now. Will enough of them stand up to bring the total of active resisters to 3%? I think so. I think there will be a lot more pushback the next time, even if "the next time" takes a different form than a fake virus. Meanwhile, I'm the only person whose reaction I can control, and I'm going to keep taking Alexandr Solzhenitsyn's advice: "Let a lie come into the world. Let it even triumph. But not through me." Not. Through. Me.