4 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
SteelJ's avatar

I disagree with your assessment. He specifically said they created batches with varying levels of toxicity to see how much they needed to kill 1%, 5%, 30%, or 100% so they could achieve whatever level they wished going forward. Can't get a whole lot more accusatory than that.

Expand full comment
Politico Phil's avatar

Boy I jumped the gun on that one! You're right. I posted that before finishing the video... I got too worked up. When I went back to finish the video, the doc does call them out for intentional murder. Fantastic! Now if we can just get that into the mainstream. The average person will NEVER see this because if they did that would mean full scale war against the cabal.

Expand full comment
Ddm's avatar

So I wonder what toxicity level they are at now. Are the new jabs of the 1%, 5%, 30% or 100%? Is it still a box of chocolates and or a game of Russian roulette? Have they finished their death rate experiment or is it still ongoing?

Expand full comment
Anna T's avatar

My considered opinion, after watching the different aftermaths for those who got shots inside my former DoD workplace and those who got shots on the outside (i.e., CVS, Walmart, doctor offices) is that government shots did not cause anywhere near the number of many bad reactions as the others. Were they placebos? Were they low doses of the shots? No way of verifying, just voicing my observation.

Expand full comment