"This is laughable, the President of the United States just said J6ers are terrorists who should be burned at the stake. And Epps gets a slap on the wrist, probably including 12 months pay on the FBl payroll. They are gaslighting you to your face and laughing about it." —Cardinal Fang
In case you missed this: Air marshals are only Flying with innocent people who flew into or were near the Capital on Jan 2021. They are literally ignoring everyone else including known wanted criminals, but if you were near the capital on Jan 6, they are on any flight you take. https://bitchute.com/video/V5F4w0HTRD8K [2:46mins]
"...we're following folks from January 2021. We're not out there doing our regular missions where we're out there looking for the bad guys."
This is an outright naked coup by the government against the people they serve (us).
For many years, I’ve forecasted that the US will evolve into a police state; that it will begin slowly; then as more and more freedoms are removed, the creation of the police state will accelerate.
We’re now seeing that acceleration, as more and more Americans are detained, questioned, and having their property confiscated than ever before.
As an example, recently, some 20,000 travellers in and out of the US were stopped, often at random. Typically, their baggage was searched, their documents photocopied, access codes to their electronic devices demanded and their files copied. In most cases, no explanation was given, but they were advised that if the search was refused, they would be detained indefinitely.
The following year, the numbers of people detained rose by 50%, to 30,000.
It’s important to note that the travellers were not threatened with arrest, which suggests that the authorities were working on the basis that the Patriot Act of 2001 allows all of the above activities—without cause being given, without a warrant being obtained, without access to a phone call or legal representation being allowed, and that the individuals in question may be detained, indefinitely...
Remember, the 30,000 above were just hoping to reach their destination with no trouble from anyone. A generation ago, they never would have tolerated such a violation to their rights. But now, they submit and accept whatever they’re told to do...
The object here is not to prosecute anyone; it is to teach people to submit. This will be important later on.
What we’re witnessing is a loss of freedom in slo-mo. Just as Germans stood by and accepted Kristallnacht; just as they stood by and watched the Berlin Wall be built that would close off their freedom of migration, the great majority of Americans ultimately will stand by and watch the last of their freedoms be removed, because they’ve already been trained to submit to whatever indignities and restrictions are placed upon them.
After World War II, Lutheran Pastor Martin Niemöller was questioned as to how he and other Germans could possibly have simply stood by and watched as freedoms were removed, resulting eventually in total domination of the German people. He said,
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
Pastor Niemöller was able to make the above statement in 1976, as he was one of the few survivors of the concentration camps...
Historically, the end-product is always the same. The final acceptance that you’ve waited too long to leave the increasingly oppressive country—and that you’ve been successfully locked in.
This was originally written during the era of 9/11 boogie-man terrorism. For the purposes of modernization, please replace any instance of the word 'security' with 'bio-security', and any instance of the word 'terror' with 'virus'. None of this theater has ever been about safety. It has only ever been about control.
_____________
We no longer know the meaning of freedom. We have traded away everything to a false prophet. We refuse to see that belonging to a government is a fate far worse than any terrorist can reap; than any madman can sow.
The word of a terrorist has no power over us. The government's word is law.
In the name of security we will lose our security. In addition to the terrorist we will have the relentless uncompromising gaze of the government.
The power of the people is born from its freedom, and it is the people who must be the guardians of that power. It is from our freedom that we draw the authority to force our government to abide its boundaries. Through the guise of security we are slowly allowing our government to relinquish that authority, and ultimately, the government will know no boundaries.
Once we allow our freedoms to categorically run dry, we, as a people, will no longer have the authority to stand up to our government.
______________
Those who would trade essential liberty, to purchase temporary security, deserve neither and will lose both. When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.
When you hear a proposal for a change in policy, procedure, or the law, and the basis for that change is 'safety,' ask yourself (and then also ask the person or group proposing the change), "Will this 'safety' measure reduce my liberty?"
We often are quick to agree to measures that will make people more safe. Who can be against safety? However, not only must we assess whether the proposed action will actually have the result we wish for, but we must also assess the costs, not just the potential benefits, of a proposed action. All of the benefits must be weighed against all of the costs in order to make a reasoned, sound judgment.
It is easy to point to, say, a person shot by another person and call for gun control measures. It's concrete, the victim has a face and a name. Or business shut-downs to make people 'safe' - there's that person in the hospital, or who just died.
Liberty, on the other hand, is more difficult - it has no physical form, it can't be seen in and of itself, and people may try to define it differently. But it is the basis for our entire form of government. The more of it we trade for 'safety' or other tempting-sounding alternatives, the more likely we make it that we cannot recover the form of government described in the Constitution nor the liberty it is meant to help guard. That is a tremendous cost, against which very few, if any, claims of 'safety' can stand.
In their Declaration of Independence from Great Britain, our Founders tell us what the *only* purpose of government is: "[T]o secure [our] rights, Governments are instituted among Men."
Fine, but then government can simply adjust which rights we have, in order to help make us safe, right? No! And why is that?
Where do rights come from?
Fortunately, our Founders told us that in the Declaration, too:
"[A]ll men...are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights...." To endow is to give or bestow, so our Creator, God, has given *all men,* all people, *certain* rights, meaning "sure" or "guaranteed" rights, that are unalienable, that cannot be taken away; they're in-born.
So, can government "adjust" our rights? No, because government didn't grant them to us. Not even the Constitution grants them to us; God did. Government doesn't have the authority to take them away.
Our Constitution, a compact between states, only grants a few enumerated powers to the federal government. The rest, it says, "are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." The Ninth Amendment makes clear that we have rights they didn't even write down: "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." So most power was retained by the states and the people retain all of their rights. But bit by bit, for one "good" reason or another, we have been trading our liberty, our rights, for various things, one of which is 'safety.' But how safe will we be when we can no longer control the government? Governments murdered over 100 million of their own citizens in the last century, in the Soviet Union, Communist China, Nazi Germany, and elsewhere. Those governments had all gained power at the expense of the liberty of their citizens.
James Madison, in discussing the checks and balances designed into the Constitution, wisely said, "It may be a reflection on human nature, that such devices should be necessary to control the abuses of government. But what is government itself, but the greatest of all reflections on human nature? If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself."
Benjamin Franklin, advising the colonies in 1775, the year before war broke out, against an agreement allowing the British Parliament to alter internal colonial legislation, said, "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Our Founders took that advice to heart. To keep their liberty, they risked all safety and declared war on what was then the greatest military power on Earth. They risked everything, concluding their Declaration by saying, "[W]e mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor."
That's excellent and right on the money Fla Mom, thank you. Two quotes come to mind:
“No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session.”
―Gideon J. Tucker
"When someone declares 'people will die' as a justification for curtailing liberty, the correct response is, 'what are you suggesting - that liberty isn't worth dying for? That those who sacrificed their lives for our freedoms made the wrong choice?' ―OldMugwump
One thing I read awhile back but which not only shocked me but which has stayed with me is something like this"A great many people would choose security over liberty." Since reading this, I've given it a lot of thought and it does seem to be true for unknown numbers of our fellow citizens. Over at least the last couple of decades, they have been nudged into being fearful of a lot of things in life, and if they perceive the government as being protective of them and providing security, they are more concerned with that than with keeping their liberty. All those (especially younger people) with massive government benefits is one example.
"Keeping people hopeless and pessimistic - see I think there are two ways in which people are controlled - first of all frighten people and secondly demoralize them. An educated, healthy and confident nation is harder to govern. A tiny percentage own 80% of the wealth and it's incredible that people put up with it, but, they're poor, they're demoralized, they're frightened, and think perhaps the safest thing to do is to take orders and hope for the best." —Tony Benn
“The Constitution has its place, but the Declaration of Independence is where it’s at. Judge Hand might just be right when he says no constitution can restore liberty to its rightful place in the hearts of men and women, but the Declaration?”
Can’t argue with that — THANK-YOU for sharing.
PS — I give you permission to go from “rarely do this” to “Steve gave me permission to do it more often!”
More required reading IMHO — thanks again for posting this gem!!
You should “do this” more! This was a bullseye moment. Thank you for sharing it here. It needs to be shared far and wide. We the People need to understand the foundations of what our forefathers actually said and did. This is certainly not taught in school. They don’t want us to understand this. 🎯 Because if we did…2020 scam never would have been allowed to happen.
Excellent. “We don’t have ‘Constitutional’ rights. We have natural rights.” That’s a fact. The Declaration of Independence provides a litany of how the violation of natural rights is immoral, unsustainable, and intolerable. Natural Law says that whatever is immoral *should* be illegal, but Liberty and Humility don’t draw such a strict line. Therefore, we’ve declined back to the Law of the Jungle: Whatever benefits ME is legal because only the “fittest” can survive. For a “moral and religious” people, that is an intolerable lie. We need to answer these questions: What are we going to do about it, where do we start, and when do we get started?
I was in utter astonishment this past summer when, upon having to submit to violation of our 4th amendment rights against search in order to enter our state fair, my mother - who raised me AND who taught my younger siblings at home and presumably taught them the Bill of Rights, replied to my consternation with, “well, if it keeps us safe, then I’m okay with it.”
🤯🤯🤯😡😡😡🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
Firstly, such searches do not keep people safe. I wanna see the study that proves they do.
And more importantly, I don’t wish to give up my freedoms.
Of course she also is the person who said that if the government tells us to wear masks and the masks aren’t hurting anything, we should just submit. The whole Romans 13 thing. I was not pleased about that either.
Thank God she has remained firmly opposed to the poison shot.
That’s exactly how people respond to me when I complain about the TSA process at airports. X-ray of our entire bodies, shoe, belt, and coat removal, X-ray scans of our personal belongings, etc…none of this theater keeps us safe, people! And look how now everyone just accepts this as ‘normal’.
I took a trip from Florida to Idaho, through Atlanta. I have a nice knife that I carry and forgot to take it out of my purse. As we were sitting at the gate in Sarasota (after security), I look down at my purse and my eyes get big and I nudge Hubs and look down...which of course he doesn't get and has to ask loudly WHAT!!!??? I take my purse and shove it in his face. Needless to say, I felt pretty safe in the air that day because the good guys had a chance of fighting back with my knife onboard.
My flying days were over after TSA was installed and I went through my first interrogation. Since I'm not a criminal I won't be treated as such. The dangling carrot of travel as my reward isn't worth it.
You can get around TSA searches by paying an extra fee. It's called TSA preapproval. I was approved almost immediately for it when I applied so you gotta wonder how much of a background check they did.
I remember back in 1973 my husband and I flew off to France where I was going to school for a year. We had 2 quite large military type duffle bags with all our things for the year in it, and we were at that time able to lug them onto the plane as carry-ons and stuff them in an overhead bin (which was considerably larger and higher than they are now). No one anywhere checked or looked into these bags at all.
Masks are harmful. One friend almost died of pneumonia from wearing a mask at work. A student, who was 18, had a root canal from wearing a mask all day at school. Another friend lost two teeth after 3 surgeries to deal with an infection that kept coming back. And then there’s the toxic levels of CO2, the difficulty for the hearing impaired to “hear” what people are saying, the language delays for children who can’t see their teachers’ faces, the social development interruptions for babies and toddlers who never saw a face outside of their homes….. I could go on and on.
Masks ARE NOT HARMLESS. I will never wear one again.
I’m beginning to consider Romans 13 in a different light. God created all, and He gave us free will. Therefore, ANY human condition is consistent with the faulty exercises of free will we inherited and fail to remedy. We have the entrenched-elite and corrupt government we “asked for.” Therefore, this government is “instituted” by God through our misuse of His permissive will (our free will) and to our own disgrace. But that doesn’t mean it is consistent with His perfect will and should be tolerated. I take the clearest point—that government does not carry the sword in vain—in light of this fact: we the people are the only legitimate government. When the time is upon us for wielding the sword, let’s not wield it in vain. In a free-will revolution, our Founders certainly did not.
"But in that obedience which we hold to be due to the commands of rulers, we must always make the exception, nay, must be particularly careful that it is not incompatible with obedience to Him to whose will the wishes of all kings should be subject, to whose decrees their commands must yield, to whose majesty their sceptres must bow. And, indeed, how preposterous were it, in pleasing men, to incur the offence of Him for whose sake you obey men! The Lord, therefore, is King of kings. When he opens his sacred mouth, he alone is to be heard, instead of all and above all. We are subject to the men who rule over us, but subject only in the Lord. If they command anything against Him let us not pay the least regard to it, nor be moved by all the dignity which they possess as magistrates—a dignity to which no injury is done when it is subordinated to the special and truly supreme power of God." - John Calvin, The Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book IV, Chapter 20, Of Civil Government, A.D. 1536
I live near a small town where a murder occurred last summer. Before that there hadn't been a murder in this town in 30 years. It happened on a running trail and there is speculation that the person murdered had turned state's evidence against some drug dealers or shady characters they associated with. Anyway, the local sheriff has now installed cameras on the trail "for our safety". This for the first murder in 30 years and not one person spoke out against it. People will literally submit to just about anything if they think it is for their own good. COVID proved that.
Now, here's a conundrum. There has been a rash of thefts in our open subdivision. Young men hooded and masked, with a pickup car riding along on the street running from house to house, breaking into cars stealing what they find - they stole a BMW also. They're bold and brazen. They steal anything including bicycles ridden off in the early hours; they steal Amazon packages and other delivered packages. The Ring cameras you might think as crazy actually can identify some repeat offenders. We here don't think of the cameras as silly or an invasion of privacy. And we don't peer at our neighbors. There's a no solicitation rule here but it isn't obeyed, and we have no idea who might be knocking on our doors. Did you know that crimes like breaking into cars escalates to home invasions? There are some single women living alone and we're - they're - not standing by and letting it happen. I don't know how you protect your homes or where you live. If you don't need our kind of surveillance, I'm happy for you. But I'll bet you lock your doors. A lot of us have put up signs signaling that what they can steal isn't worth dying for. You see, we take our 2nd amendment rights seriously in Florida with a "stand your ground" law, she said, kindly meant.
What little corner of hell do you live in? Granted that many may not be willing to escape their current place of residence, but I live in a small rural community and as the song goes, 'try that in a small town'. Lots of hunting people around here with lots of guns and good marksmen. Just sayin', get out while you can.
Many have installed those trying to catch package thieves... I don't have a Ring, but rather a Eufy, to try to prevent package theft. On the bright side, the video it takes is only stored on the camera, and I don't subscribed to any cloud "service."
One instance can be blown to international proportions. Then the Israeli-led Congress will act to save you from it assuming you will accept less privacy and more taxes.
A friend has cameras all over her house, inside and out. She spys on her kids and then talks to them via Alexa. They'll do well in the surveillance state! Breaks my heart!
Austin, ewww. I had a female friend whose husband worked in another state, only coming home on occasional vacations or something. They had a computer set up in the kitchen right inside the door. When I walked in, on an invited visit, my friend said, "Hi, Ed," to her husband. I looked around, and there was no one. I guess she had some way of knowing he had logged on to their two-way commo system through the computer. They/we had a brief conversation. It happened each time I went there, and sometimes they spoke to each other at other times as well. I could see how it would be helpful for a long-distance relationship, with her at home, home-schooling their son and the two of them taking care of their small farm, but it did seem odd at the same time.
With the "importation" of millions of military aged men, you may have need someday to resort to the ultimate "equalizer". Locked doors will not deter violence.
When they are saying, Peace and safety, then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall in no wise escape.
Our Founders have left us a wealth of information and examples of how to re-secure the Blessings of Liberty to Ourselves and Our Posterity...
I'm thinking I really need to pick up my copy of the Federalist Papers and start reading again. Any other suggestions?
I've had this thought before. I read McCullough's "1776" and was really impressed with the way these men looked at these challenges that came in establishing our Republic and their ability to lay out in logical fashion which was the right way to go.
I read the Federalist Papers too young and should revisit it. Might have been here among C&C comments, but “The Common Law” by O.W. Holmes came in on my radar and piled onto my “Read This” list. I'd love to dig further into biographies and autobios of the Founders. Ben Franklin's is a little gem. It's not about law. It's about character, which is far more important these days.
Ironic, isn't it? First jump out of the gate, human nature wants to establish authority over itself and everybody else. The Constitution is an impressive shot at doing that. Christ's teachings work better, and most of the Founders knew it.
Sobering but I see it. We allowed the government to “take care of us in retirement” via social security, the poor became dependent via welfare programs, our health became dependent on Medicare and Medicaid, and a variety of health insurance plans. CoVid was the final acceleration to this end…I see no good end….
You got it LMWC. Every time we outsource a responsibility to the government for the sake of convenience we become their dependent and weaker as a result. The people of old were resourceful, skilled, and as hard as stone. Many kids today can't use a can opener: https://bitchute.com/video/dxA9zUt67NG8 [1:27minutes]
As our abilities recede government fills in the gaps. This degradation can eventually only lead to one place: bureaucratic wolves feasting on citizen sheep. I encourage everyone to take a few minutes and read this: https://tritorch.substack.com/p/diary-of-the-end-of-the-world-and
We view life on this earth as too precious. As we have become more modernized, we have lost the work ethic and God’s plan to be the Light of the World. It becomes “all about me” and “what I deserve”. We no longer see the reality of death. It is not with us every day. We do not live in the communities we grew up in, therefore we do not see the progression of friends and relatives aging and dying. There is no mourning or celebration of lives well lived. Impermanence is the practiced art.
I'd say wish me luck, but i'm through with wishing and with luck.
It's on me. Finally, things are on me. On all of us. No more convenience no more rescuers no more sacrificing self-reliance and growth for comfort and a Skinner-Box with a screen. We are back in our element: stronger than ever and getting stronger all the time.
Good stuff, TT. Much truth here and on your stack. Those kids with can openers reminded me of a Waylon and Willie tune that says, "Somebody's gonna get hurt before you're through." They'll go hungry too if they can't open a can, raise an ear of corn, or harvest something running or swimming out in the natural world, assuming they can endure the natural world.
Since the 9/11 Theater was deployed and the word "TERROR" was invoked and now the involvement status quo lie. I changed the way I can only forever think about that word. I read it only now as a giant red flag I call "ERROR" !
Remove the "T" and what are we really dealing with? Error, a planned one.
A planned Error, that is genius randall. Absolutely on target. You just permanently changed the way I see that word as well.
Early on I recognized and wrote (and later modernized once COVID hit): Words like "pandemic" and "terrorism" are keywords used by politicians and pundits to manipulate the populace, in the same way and for the same reasons i use the word 'milkbone' to manipulate my dog.
How many times did you see and hear the words WAR ON TERROR? The next day.
Maybe as many or more times as the same hypnotic phrase SAFE AND EFFECTIVE!
9/11 was my day of total enlightenments of "IN GOD WE TRUST" (In .Gov we trust)
But Building # 7 was my Devils Food Chocolate cake with Maple Nut Ice Cream Dessert!
When Silverstein was caught live by a late coming to the scene reporting team, he said the following Dumbass Vomit of Bullshit: The fire was too great to put out(it wasn't) I talked
with the NYFD Chief and asked him to just PULL IT! Meaning for the NYFD to demolish it!
That is indeed an entire episode of MISSION IMPOSSIBLE. Drop a high rise within the hour in perfect free fall?
That is all the proof I needed that this was indeed a NEW WORLD ORDER AGENDA PLAN.
And then Silvertongue went on to collect his bribe/insurance money and sue for even more and win. How does a person do that and feel no guilt/shame/remorse? I believe there are people that walk around that have no soul and instead their bodies are controlled by malevolent spirits. How else can these things happen... They are the true zombie apocalypse.
I now see the sabotage in decisions made by governments that guarantee failure and chaos. The inevitable consequence of these decisions are meant to cause the people to cry out for one global leader with a strong hand.
Obdo ab chao: Order from chaos (thesis + antithesis = synthesis)
Novus ordo seclorum: Establishing a new order of the ages
"We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest." -James Warburg
Funny how there’s only a few of us, even here,that realize what this means, but are afraid to say it. And I get called a troll, or “ that’s just what they want, don’t fall into that trap”! Got news for all you darlings. If ten thousand showed up in dc prepared for war, you would see what a paper tiger these cretins are. Granted,we can’t call for that, because ray fucking Epps brothers will be the first to acknowledge. But unless you live in a broom closet, our only way out is through.
There is a growing bipartisan grassroots army of Citizens for Self Governance over 5 million strong who have united behind the U.S. Constitution, namely Article 5. Some very intelligent individuals are in support of it, and we have unpaid volunteers in all 50 states.
Please join us by signing the petition and volunteering to help!
The biggest crime IMO - yes bigger than covid b/c it paved the way for the outrageous covid attack - was giving the CIA and intelligence apparatus the powers they were given "to fight terrorism." It circumvented our rights as citizens granted in the foundational documents of this country and turned our own intelligence agencies against us. And yet, so many here and elsewhere still hold to the falsehood and repeat the propaganda that the Republicans are "conservatives" and different from the Democrats. It was the Republicans + Democrats who brought all of this on us, including the covid response. The Bushes = CIA. HW literally ran the CIA. Republicans and Democrats are two heads of the same totalitarian state beast. The sooner people wake up to this, the sooner we can start to fix the problem. Cheering on CINO Republicans is not going to help.
I'll see your biggest crime and raise all in: geoengineering. I think anyone thinking rationally would have to agree that, no matter what the cause, if there's no viable planet to live on, that cause is meaningless. Today's interview of Dane Wigington (geoengineeringwatch.org) by Mike Adams (brighteon.com). https://www.bitchute.com/video/4AjqkiB8sLBQ/
It goes even further. They have told us every lie under Heaven.
Liberty Biblically is freedom from the flesh. If, by the Spirit, we put to death the deeds of the flesh, we have true liberty. If one daily picks up his cross and reckons himself dead, with his life hidden in Christ Jesus, there is nothing left with which a government can threaten him.
They have corrupted liberty to mean "Do what thou wilt." Their corrupted concept of liberty includes the "liberty" to kill those whom one finds inconvenient, and whom one deems by their fleshly estimation to "not be human" (made to bear the image of Yahweh God.)
What they fear and hate is those who have put to death the deeds of the flesh by picking up their cross. Those whose lives are hidden in Christ.
They fear because there is nothing with which they can threaten such a person. And such people no longer "need" their provision.
They hate because they know that they are cravenly grasping to fulfill their desire to continue in wickedness for eternity with no consequences. The Gospel shows them what they are and what they could be, and they will have none of it.
2 Corinthians 2:15-16 (ESV)
"For we are the aroma of Christ to God among those who are being saved and among those who are perishing, to one a fragrance from death to death, to the other a fragrance from life to life."
We are not to be troubled by these things. The fact that we were told in advance that they would take place serves to strengthen my faith.
Mark Twain sums it up. If enough people did this John, it would end:
----
It doesn’t matter what the press says. It doesn’t matter what the politicians or the mobs say. It doesn’t matter if the whole country decides that something wrong is something right. Republics are founded on one principle above all else: The requirement that we stand up for what we believe in. no matter the odds or consequences.
When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move. Your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth and tell the whole world:
911 was the 'New Pearl Harbor' ... and by THEIR words (PNAC). The real Terrorists planned, instituted, aided and abetted ... and then covered up the damning hard evidence of their crime (of which there was plenty), their treason and murder and flagrantly ignored anyone with hard eye-witness accounting contrary to The Narrative. 911 was the launch of the Totalitarian Terror State which in inimitable lying fashion declared the War on Terror (they always project and gaslight!). Only the declared war of the Terror State missed the target ... itself. And ever since, there has not been any Liberty, real administration of law and justice. Nope! THEY took everything. There is no longer anything else left to lose except one's self respect ... and only that by a refusal to resist.
In this great resistance, let God's commandments be our guide. It's all we have left unto ourselves.
TriTorch- thank you. This is the crux of everything: ‘they’ only do to us, what we ALLOW them to do to us. I wish more people would see this. The Patriot Act was, and is, an awful thing, stripping us of so many rights! Instantly, cameras went up everywhere. Every time I complained about this to anyone, I always got the same response: ‘what’s the problem? I like them, they make me feel safer.’ They just don’t get it. And never will, I guess. People don’t seem to realize the power they have, if they would only resist what I call ‘bad’, or ‘wrong’ rules. I still think it’s only a very tiny percentage of people who get this.
These people have a collective mentality. They have lost all concepts of individualism and innate human rights, the basis of historical Americanism. Never would an American have tolerated and suffered such oversight and management of his life by anyone, much less the government.
But neither do Americans believe in the God of the Bible anymore so their god is now in the "collective" that will take care of them. No longer is there any faith or trust in a Creator's providence or recognition of our own responsibility for our own lives. Now man as the collective is god and there is no higher form of the collective than Government.
Such people have been brainwashed into being afraid of almost everything, including words. They live in a constant state of fear, which was most clearly seen in the maskoids during the worst of the scamdemic. Then the Marxist/Totalitarians in the government use a well known tool of "nudging", in which they implement tiny, seemingly harmless measures to lock us down just a little, and people either don't even notice or they believe it sounds reasonable. On and on it goes, until we are suddenly aware of all the liberties we have lost incrementally. Many people are never aware of this, to them it has all gradually become normal. Furthermore, they would deny we have lost liberties. For them, safety and security is more important than that scary liberty.
Yes it’s always slow because that is far more effective. Lots of Germans didn’t necessarily “accept” Kristallnacht. By that time, there was already a network of toadies and informants in place. My grandfather objected when he saw the windows of a Jewish shop shattered and a Nazi sympathizer heard what he said but not who had said it. He had to slip away from the crowd for fear of being arrested—even then. The system had already been set up to quash any dissent. That’s definitely a good reason to make sure we keep our 2nd amendment rights. The Nazis confiscated any guns even antique heirlooms and hunting rifles.
Yeah. When the time comes, they are going to have a BIG problem with Americans. There has never been a more heavily armed populace. Just came back from the local g store, to fill in some gaps.
In 2012, as we discussed the illegal alien invasion that was flagrant and unabated even then, I mentioned to a young colleague that the US border would eventually be closed.....not to keep people out but to keep people in. He laughed.....
The FIB Swat Teams have been very effective on anymore Jan 6 type gatherings of Citizens. ATF is eliminating FFL's (retail gun stores). DHS is Sponsoring an Illegal Invasion.
HHS, CDC, NIH, FDA, is Eliminating Carbon Based life Forms (YOU) via VaXXXes.
DOD is Pantygone-wokester cluster f'ck, DOInJ is the Stazi, IRS will be visiting the Normies.
A very interesting read. I have relatives who fly often. In fact, have 3 international trips planned for this year. Can you point me to the source of that article by Jeff Thomas? I'm sure they would like to be prepared. TY
Sorry, that article was an essay written by someone at International Man so I don't think it's available anywhere else. Best thing would be to just copy my post and send it.
Also, he was on video clear as day urging people to go into the capitol, and he should have been one of the first arrested. Yet they went after others who were identified by phone records as having been in the area. Epps' so-called arrest and prosecution is an obvious sham.
"This is laughable, the President of the United States just said J6ers are terrorists who should be burned at the stake. And Epps gets a slap on the wrist, probably including 12 months pay on the FBl payroll. They are gaslighting you to your face and laughing about it." —Cardinal Fang
In case you missed this: Air marshals are only Flying with innocent people who flew into or were near the Capital on Jan 2021. They are literally ignoring everyone else including known wanted criminals, but if you were near the capital on Jan 6, they are on any flight you take. https://bitchute.com/video/V5F4w0HTRD8K [2:46mins]
"...we're following folks from January 2021. We're not out there doing our regular missions where we're out there looking for the bad guys."
This is an outright naked coup by the government against the people they serve (us).
rom: Police State in Slo-Mo
by Jeff Thomas
For many years, I’ve forecasted that the US will evolve into a police state; that it will begin slowly; then as more and more freedoms are removed, the creation of the police state will accelerate.
We’re now seeing that acceleration, as more and more Americans are detained, questioned, and having their property confiscated than ever before.
As an example, recently, some 20,000 travellers in and out of the US were stopped, often at random. Typically, their baggage was searched, their documents photocopied, access codes to their electronic devices demanded and their files copied. In most cases, no explanation was given, but they were advised that if the search was refused, they would be detained indefinitely.
The following year, the numbers of people detained rose by 50%, to 30,000.
It’s important to note that the travellers were not threatened with arrest, which suggests that the authorities were working on the basis that the Patriot Act of 2001 allows all of the above activities—without cause being given, without a warrant being obtained, without access to a phone call or legal representation being allowed, and that the individuals in question may be detained, indefinitely...
Remember, the 30,000 above were just hoping to reach their destination with no trouble from anyone. A generation ago, they never would have tolerated such a violation to their rights. But now, they submit and accept whatever they’re told to do...
The object here is not to prosecute anyone; it is to teach people to submit. This will be important later on.
What we’re witnessing is a loss of freedom in slo-mo. Just as Germans stood by and accepted Kristallnacht; just as they stood by and watched the Berlin Wall be built that would close off their freedom of migration, the great majority of Americans ultimately will stand by and watch the last of their freedoms be removed, because they’ve already been trained to submit to whatever indignities and restrictions are placed upon them.
After World War II, Lutheran Pastor Martin Niemöller was questioned as to how he and other Germans could possibly have simply stood by and watched as freedoms were removed, resulting eventually in total domination of the German people. He said,
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
Pastor Niemöller was able to make the above statement in 1976, as he was one of the few survivors of the concentration camps...
Historically, the end-product is always the same. The final acceptance that you’ve waited too long to leave the increasingly oppressive country—and that you’ve been successfully locked in.
This was originally written during the era of 9/11 boogie-man terrorism. For the purposes of modernization, please replace any instance of the word 'security' with 'bio-security', and any instance of the word 'terror' with 'virus'. None of this theater has ever been about safety. It has only ever been about control.
_____________
We no longer know the meaning of freedom. We have traded away everything to a false prophet. We refuse to see that belonging to a government is a fate far worse than any terrorist can reap; than any madman can sow.
The word of a terrorist has no power over us. The government's word is law.
In the name of security we will lose our security. In addition to the terrorist we will have the relentless uncompromising gaze of the government.
The power of the people is born from its freedom, and it is the people who must be the guardians of that power. It is from our freedom that we draw the authority to force our government to abide its boundaries. Through the guise of security we are slowly allowing our government to relinquish that authority, and ultimately, the government will know no boundaries.
Once we allow our freedoms to categorically run dry, we, as a people, will no longer have the authority to stand up to our government.
______________
Those who would trade essential liberty, to purchase temporary security, deserve neither and will lose both. When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.
-Ben Franlkin+Thomas Jefferson
I wrote this on January 10, 2021:
"Safety"
When you hear a proposal for a change in policy, procedure, or the law, and the basis for that change is 'safety,' ask yourself (and then also ask the person or group proposing the change), "Will this 'safety' measure reduce my liberty?"
We often are quick to agree to measures that will make people more safe. Who can be against safety? However, not only must we assess whether the proposed action will actually have the result we wish for, but we must also assess the costs, not just the potential benefits, of a proposed action. All of the benefits must be weighed against all of the costs in order to make a reasoned, sound judgment.
It is easy to point to, say, a person shot by another person and call for gun control measures. It's concrete, the victim has a face and a name. Or business shut-downs to make people 'safe' - there's that person in the hospital, or who just died.
Liberty, on the other hand, is more difficult - it has no physical form, it can't be seen in and of itself, and people may try to define it differently. But it is the basis for our entire form of government. The more of it we trade for 'safety' or other tempting-sounding alternatives, the more likely we make it that we cannot recover the form of government described in the Constitution nor the liberty it is meant to help guard. That is a tremendous cost, against which very few, if any, claims of 'safety' can stand.
In their Declaration of Independence from Great Britain, our Founders tell us what the *only* purpose of government is: "[T]o secure [our] rights, Governments are instituted among Men."
Fine, but then government can simply adjust which rights we have, in order to help make us safe, right? No! And why is that?
Where do rights come from?
Fortunately, our Founders told us that in the Declaration, too:
"[A]ll men...are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights...." To endow is to give or bestow, so our Creator, God, has given *all men,* all people, *certain* rights, meaning "sure" or "guaranteed" rights, that are unalienable, that cannot be taken away; they're in-born.
So, can government "adjust" our rights? No, because government didn't grant them to us. Not even the Constitution grants them to us; God did. Government doesn't have the authority to take them away.
Our Constitution, a compact between states, only grants a few enumerated powers to the federal government. The rest, it says, "are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." The Ninth Amendment makes clear that we have rights they didn't even write down: "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." So most power was retained by the states and the people retain all of their rights. But bit by bit, for one "good" reason or another, we have been trading our liberty, our rights, for various things, one of which is 'safety.' But how safe will we be when we can no longer control the government? Governments murdered over 100 million of their own citizens in the last century, in the Soviet Union, Communist China, Nazi Germany, and elsewhere. Those governments had all gained power at the expense of the liberty of their citizens.
James Madison, in discussing the checks and balances designed into the Constitution, wisely said, "It may be a reflection on human nature, that such devices should be necessary to control the abuses of government. But what is government itself, but the greatest of all reflections on human nature? If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself."
Benjamin Franklin, advising the colonies in 1775, the year before war broke out, against an agreement allowing the British Parliament to alter internal colonial legislation, said, "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Our Founders took that advice to heart. To keep their liberty, they risked all safety and declared war on what was then the greatest military power on Earth. They risked everything, concluding their Declaration by saying, "[W]e mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor."
We should do no less. Never make that trade.
#LetAdultsBeAdultsAgain
#GiveMeLibertyOrGiveMeDeath
#EndowedByTheirCreatorWithCertainUnalienableRights
That's excellent and right on the money Fla Mom, thank you. Two quotes come to mind:
“No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session.”
―Gideon J. Tucker
"When someone declares 'people will die' as a justification for curtailing liberty, the correct response is, 'what are you suggesting - that liberty isn't worth dying for? That those who sacrificed their lives for our freedoms made the wrong choice?' ―OldMugwump
One thing I read awhile back but which not only shocked me but which has stayed with me is something like this"A great many people would choose security over liberty." Since reading this, I've given it a lot of thought and it does seem to be true for unknown numbers of our fellow citizens. Over at least the last couple of decades, they have been nudged into being fearful of a lot of things in life, and if they perceive the government as being protective of them and providing security, they are more concerned with that than with keeping their liberty. All those (especially younger people) with massive government benefits is one example.
"Keeping people hopeless and pessimistic - see I think there are two ways in which people are controlled - first of all frighten people and secondly demoralize them. An educated, healthy and confident nation is harder to govern. A tiny percentage own 80% of the wealth and it's incredible that people put up with it, but, they're poor, they're demoralized, they're frightened, and think perhaps the safest thing to do is to take orders and hope for the best." —Tony Benn
Fla-Mom -- BRILLIANT!
Damn girl...your post should be “required-reading” for EVERY citizen in our country...!!
You made my day -- 100% spot-on...nicely done...!
I rarely do this, but here goes: https://shethinksliberty.substack.com/p/everyday-is-the-day-to-remember-reaffirm
“The Constitution has its place, but the Declaration of Independence is where it’s at. Judge Hand might just be right when he says no constitution can restore liberty to its rightful place in the hearts of men and women, but the Declaration?”
Can’t argue with that — THANK-YOU for sharing.
PS — I give you permission to go from “rarely do this” to “Steve gave me permission to do it more often!”
More required reading IMHO — thanks again for posting this gem!!
You should “do this” more! This was a bullseye moment. Thank you for sharing it here. It needs to be shared far and wide. We the People need to understand the foundations of what our forefathers actually said and did. This is certainly not taught in school. They don’t want us to understand this. 🎯 Because if we did…2020 scam never would have been allowed to happen.
Excellent. “We don’t have ‘Constitutional’ rights. We have natural rights.” That’s a fact. The Declaration of Independence provides a litany of how the violation of natural rights is immoral, unsustainable, and intolerable. Natural Law says that whatever is immoral *should* be illegal, but Liberty and Humility don’t draw such a strict line. Therefore, we’ve declined back to the Law of the Jungle: Whatever benefits ME is legal because only the “fittest” can survive. For a “moral and religious” people, that is an intolerable lie. We need to answer these questions: What are we going to do about it, where do we start, and when do we get started?
Thank you!
I was in utter astonishment this past summer when, upon having to submit to violation of our 4th amendment rights against search in order to enter our state fair, my mother - who raised me AND who taught my younger siblings at home and presumably taught them the Bill of Rights, replied to my consternation with, “well, if it keeps us safe, then I’m okay with it.”
🤯🤯🤯😡😡😡🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
Firstly, such searches do not keep people safe. I wanna see the study that proves they do.
And more importantly, I don’t wish to give up my freedoms.
Of course she also is the person who said that if the government tells us to wear masks and the masks aren’t hurting anything, we should just submit. The whole Romans 13 thing. I was not pleased about that either.
Thank God she has remained firmly opposed to the poison shot.
That’s exactly how people respond to me when I complain about the TSA process at airports. X-ray of our entire bodies, shoe, belt, and coat removal, X-ray scans of our personal belongings, etc…none of this theater keeps us safe, people! And look how now everyone just accepts this as ‘normal’.
I took a trip from Florida to Idaho, through Atlanta. I have a nice knife that I carry and forgot to take it out of my purse. As we were sitting at the gate in Sarasota (after security), I look down at my purse and my eyes get big and I nudge Hubs and look down...which of course he doesn't get and has to ask loudly WHAT!!!??? I take my purse and shove it in his face. Needless to say, I felt pretty safe in the air that day because the good guys had a chance of fighting back with my knife onboard.
My flying days were over after TSA was installed and I went through my first interrogation. Since I'm not a criminal I won't be treated as such. The dangling carrot of travel as my reward isn't worth it.
You can get around TSA searches by paying an extra fee. It's called TSA preapproval. I was approved almost immediately for it when I applied so you gotta wonder how much of a background check they did.
One of the many v reasons I refuse to gly commercial these days.
I remember back in 1973 my husband and I flew off to France where I was going to school for a year. We had 2 quite large military type duffle bags with all our things for the year in it, and we were at that time able to lug them onto the plane as carry-ons and stuff them in an overhead bin (which was considerably larger and higher than they are now). No one anywhere checked or looked into these bags at all.
Masks are harmful. One friend almost died of pneumonia from wearing a mask at work. A student, who was 18, had a root canal from wearing a mask all day at school. Another friend lost two teeth after 3 surgeries to deal with an infection that kept coming back. And then there’s the toxic levels of CO2, the difficulty for the hearing impaired to “hear” what people are saying, the language delays for children who can’t see their teachers’ faces, the social development interruptions for babies and toddlers who never saw a face outside of their homes….. I could go on and on.
Masks ARE NOT HARMLESS. I will never wear one again.
I agree. Masks worn routinely by ordinary folks outside of the OR are dangerous.
I have a coworker who has permanent lung damage from wearing the nasty things.
I’m beginning to consider Romans 13 in a different light. God created all, and He gave us free will. Therefore, ANY human condition is consistent with the faulty exercises of free will we inherited and fail to remedy. We have the entrenched-elite and corrupt government we “asked for.” Therefore, this government is “instituted” by God through our misuse of His permissive will (our free will) and to our own disgrace. But that doesn’t mean it is consistent with His perfect will and should be tolerated. I take the clearest point—that government does not carry the sword in vain—in light of this fact: we the people are the only legitimate government. When the time is upon us for wielding the sword, let’s not wield it in vain. In a free-will revolution, our Founders certainly did not.
"But in that obedience which we hold to be due to the commands of rulers, we must always make the exception, nay, must be particularly careful that it is not incompatible with obedience to Him to whose will the wishes of all kings should be subject, to whose decrees their commands must yield, to whose majesty their sceptres must bow. And, indeed, how preposterous were it, in pleasing men, to incur the offence of Him for whose sake you obey men! The Lord, therefore, is King of kings. When he opens his sacred mouth, he alone is to be heard, instead of all and above all. We are subject to the men who rule over us, but subject only in the Lord. If they command anything against Him let us not pay the least regard to it, nor be moved by all the dignity which they possess as magistrates—a dignity to which no injury is done when it is subordinated to the special and truly supreme power of God." - John Calvin, The Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book IV, Chapter 20, Of Civil Government, A.D. 1536
Very interesting. Thanks for typing this out.
I live near a small town where a murder occurred last summer. Before that there hadn't been a murder in this town in 30 years. It happened on a running trail and there is speculation that the person murdered had turned state's evidence against some drug dealers or shady characters they associated with. Anyway, the local sheriff has now installed cameras on the trail "for our safety". This for the first murder in 30 years and not one person spoke out against it. People will literally submit to just about anything if they think it is for their own good. COVID proved that.
I hope people know what to do with that camera.
There were spy cameras placed all over London recently, and the angry locals smashed up of nearly all of them.
Now, here's a conundrum. There has been a rash of thefts in our open subdivision. Young men hooded and masked, with a pickup car riding along on the street running from house to house, breaking into cars stealing what they find - they stole a BMW also. They're bold and brazen. They steal anything including bicycles ridden off in the early hours; they steal Amazon packages and other delivered packages. The Ring cameras you might think as crazy actually can identify some repeat offenders. We here don't think of the cameras as silly or an invasion of privacy. And we don't peer at our neighbors. There's a no solicitation rule here but it isn't obeyed, and we have no idea who might be knocking on our doors. Did you know that crimes like breaking into cars escalates to home invasions? There are some single women living alone and we're - they're - not standing by and letting it happen. I don't know how you protect your homes or where you live. If you don't need our kind of surveillance, I'm happy for you. But I'll bet you lock your doors. A lot of us have put up signs signaling that what they can steal isn't worth dying for. You see, we take our 2nd amendment rights seriously in Florida with a "stand your ground" law, she said, kindly meant.
What little corner of hell do you live in? Granted that many may not be willing to escape their current place of residence, but I live in a small rural community and as the song goes, 'try that in a small town'. Lots of hunting people around here with lots of guns and good marksmen. Just sayin', get out while you can.
How about all the ring doorbells and the security cameras on peoples homes!
I refuse to have one. They creep me out.
My neighbor told me she uses hers to watch what everyone is doing on our street. She is really crazy.
Many have installed those trying to catch package thieves... I don't have a Ring, but rather a Eufy, to try to prevent package theft. On the bright side, the video it takes is only stored on the camera, and I don't subscribed to any cloud "service."
One instance can be blown to international proportions. Then the Israeli-led Congress will act to save you from it assuming you will accept less privacy and more taxes.
A friend has cameras all over her house, inside and out. She spys on her kids and then talks to them via Alexa. They'll do well in the surveillance state! Breaks my heart!
😬
Austin, ewww. I had a female friend whose husband worked in another state, only coming home on occasional vacations or something. They had a computer set up in the kitchen right inside the door. When I walked in, on an invited visit, my friend said, "Hi, Ed," to her husband. I looked around, and there was no one. I guess she had some way of knowing he had logged on to their two-way commo system through the computer. They/we had a brief conversation. It happened each time I went there, and sometimes they spoke to each other at other times as well. I could see how it would be helpful for a long-distance relationship, with her at home, home-schooling their son and the two of them taking care of their small farm, but it did seem odd at the same time.
😡
With the "importation" of millions of military aged men, you may have need someday to resort to the ultimate "equalizer". Locked doors will not deter violence.
When they are saying, Peace and safety, then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall in no wise escape.
I think of that passage often. First, during the covid madness and now when governments use those words to justify tyranny and an immoral society.
Every time I see the word ‘safe’, I know it’s a bad thing. My safety is my responsibility; no one else’s.
Every time I hear or read, ‘stay safe,’ I shudder with anger. It’s used ad nauseam since covid.
Yes. But it really ramped up after September 11, 2001. Covid19 is just their next big step.
Maybe you should end your conversations with "take risks". I think I am going to start saying that ;).
Our Founders have left us a wealth of information and examples of how to re-secure the Blessings of Liberty to Ourselves and Our Posterity...
I'm thinking I really need to pick up my copy of the Federalist Papers and start reading again. Any other suggestions?
I've had this thought before. I read McCullough's "1776" and was really impressed with the way these men looked at these challenges that came in establishing our Republic and their ability to lay out in logical fashion which was the right way to go.
GG, the Anti-Federalist Papers. They were much more prescient about human nature and what would happen. Have tissues. They sear me.
I read the Federalist Papers too young and should revisit it. Might have been here among C&C comments, but “The Common Law” by O.W. Holmes came in on my radar and piled onto my “Read This” list. I'd love to dig further into biographies and autobios of the Founders. Ben Franklin's is a little gem. It's not about law. It's about character, which is far more important these days.
Patrick Henry and the other anti-federalists who opposed the new constitution that centralized gov't. The Federalist Papers were pro-constitution.
Ironic, isn't it? First jump out of the gate, human nature wants to establish authority over itself and everybody else. The Constitution is an impressive shot at doing that. Christ's teachings work better, and most of the Founders knew it.
Liberty is a positive function. It is an Originalism that cannot be customized.
Liber being the root of the word in Roman times means 'THE FREE ONE".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liber
Fla Mom ... Excellent ..... I will share and hope that everyone else will do the same! Thank you.
Very well said!!!!
Magnificent writing
👏👏👏👏 Well done!!!
Sobering but I see it. We allowed the government to “take care of us in retirement” via social security, the poor became dependent via welfare programs, our health became dependent on Medicare and Medicaid, and a variety of health insurance plans. CoVid was the final acceleration to this end…I see no good end….
You got it LMWC. Every time we outsource a responsibility to the government for the sake of convenience we become their dependent and weaker as a result. The people of old were resourceful, skilled, and as hard as stone. Many kids today can't use a can opener: https://bitchute.com/video/dxA9zUt67NG8 [1:27minutes]
As our abilities recede government fills in the gaps. This degradation can eventually only lead to one place: bureaucratic wolves feasting on citizen sheep. I encourage everyone to take a few minutes and read this: https://tritorch.substack.com/p/diary-of-the-end-of-the-world-and
We view life on this earth as too precious. As we have become more modernized, we have lost the work ethic and God’s plan to be the Light of the World. It becomes “all about me” and “what I deserve”. We no longer see the reality of death. It is not with us every day. We do not live in the communities we grew up in, therefore we do not see the progression of friends and relatives aging and dying. There is no mourning or celebration of lives well lived. Impermanence is the practiced art.
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose!" - Jim Elliot
We've been taught backwards.
“There is no mourning or celebration of lives well lived.” This!
Since covid erupted its evil head, I’ve noticed a lack of funeral services or opportunities, to come together, to mourn the dead.
That is beautifully written LMWC, thank you.
____________
I'd say wish me luck, but i'm through with wishing and with luck.
It's on me. Finally, things are on me. On all of us. No more convenience no more rescuers no more sacrificing self-reliance and growth for comfort and a Skinner-Box with a screen. We are back in our element: stronger than ever and getting stronger all the time.
Grown-up at last. —https://tritorch.substack.com/p/diary-of-the-end-of-the-world-and
Agree! They now only have to threaten to take away our 'benefits' to keep us in line.
Good stuff, TT. Much truth here and on your stack. Those kids with can openers reminded me of a Waylon and Willie tune that says, "Somebody's gonna get hurt before you're through." They'll go hungry too if they can't open a can, raise an ear of corn, or harvest something running or swimming out in the natural world, assuming they can endure the natural world.
What's the fabled line about good intentions?
“ What's the fabled line about good intentions?”
Hell if I know. 😉
Ahhh....The road to Hell is paved with good intentions. (True)
Now u doo! hahahah
Since the 9/11 Theater was deployed and the word "TERROR" was invoked and now the involvement status quo lie. I changed the way I can only forever think about that word. I read it only now as a giant red flag I call "ERROR" !
Remove the "T" and what are we really dealing with? Error, a planned one.
A planned Error, that is genius randall. Absolutely on target. You just permanently changed the way I see that word as well.
Early on I recognized and wrote (and later modernized once COVID hit): Words like "pandemic" and "terrorism" are keywords used by politicians and pundits to manipulate the populace, in the same way and for the same reasons i use the word 'milkbone' to manipulate my dog.
How many times did you see and hear the words WAR ON TERROR? The next day.
Maybe as many or more times as the same hypnotic phrase SAFE AND EFFECTIVE!
9/11 was my day of total enlightenments of "IN GOD WE TRUST" (In .Gov we trust)
But Building # 7 was my Devils Food Chocolate cake with Maple Nut Ice Cream Dessert!
When Silverstein was caught live by a late coming to the scene reporting team, he said the following Dumbass Vomit of Bullshit: The fire was too great to put out(it wasn't) I talked
with the NYFD Chief and asked him to just PULL IT! Meaning for the NYFD to demolish it!
That is indeed an entire episode of MISSION IMPOSSIBLE. Drop a high rise within the hour in perfect free fall?
That is all the proof I needed that this was indeed a NEW WORLD ORDER AGENDA PLAN.
And then Silvertongue went on to collect his bribe/insurance money and sue for even more and win. How does a person do that and feel no guilt/shame/remorse? I believe there are people that walk around that have no soul and instead their bodies are controlled by malevolent spirits. How else can these things happen... They are the true zombie apocalypse.
I now see the sabotage in decisions made by governments that guarantee failure and chaos. The inevitable consequence of these decisions are meant to cause the people to cry out for one global leader with a strong hand.
It's a script:
E pluribus unum: One from many.
Obdo ab chao: Order from chaos (thesis + antithesis = synthesis)
Novus ordo seclorum: Establishing a new order of the ages
"We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest." -James Warburg
“...these decisions are meant to cause the people to cry out for one global leader with a strong hand.”
He’s coming. We know him as the anti Christ.
What’s discouraging is how well it works.😒
Funny how there’s only a few of us, even here,that realize what this means, but are afraid to say it. And I get called a troll, or “ that’s just what they want, don’t fall into that trap”! Got news for all you darlings. If ten thousand showed up in dc prepared for war, you would see what a paper tiger these cretins are. Granted,we can’t call for that, because ray fucking Epps brothers will be the first to acknowledge. But unless you live in a broom closet, our only way out is through.
There is a growing bipartisan grassroots army of Citizens for Self Governance over 5 million strong who have united behind the U.S. Constitution, namely Article 5. Some very intelligent individuals are in support of it, and we have unpaid volunteers in all 50 states.
Please join us by signing the petition and volunteering to help!
https://conventionofstates.com/?ref=57705
The biggest crime IMO - yes bigger than covid b/c it paved the way for the outrageous covid attack - was giving the CIA and intelligence apparatus the powers they were given "to fight terrorism." It circumvented our rights as citizens granted in the foundational documents of this country and turned our own intelligence agencies against us. And yet, so many here and elsewhere still hold to the falsehood and repeat the propaganda that the Republicans are "conservatives" and different from the Democrats. It was the Republicans + Democrats who brought all of this on us, including the covid response. The Bushes = CIA. HW literally ran the CIA. Republicans and Democrats are two heads of the same totalitarian state beast. The sooner people wake up to this, the sooner we can start to fix the problem. Cheering on CINO Republicans is not going to help.
I'll see your biggest crime and raise all in: geoengineering. I think anyone thinking rationally would have to agree that, no matter what the cause, if there's no viable planet to live on, that cause is meaningless. Today's interview of Dane Wigington (geoengineeringwatch.org) by Mike Adams (brighteon.com). https://www.bitchute.com/video/4AjqkiB8sLBQ/
I agree. Thank you Bushes
Exactly right. The security state was brought in by 911 which itself was a CIA/Cabal event for that very purpose.
It goes even further. They have told us every lie under Heaven.
Liberty Biblically is freedom from the flesh. If, by the Spirit, we put to death the deeds of the flesh, we have true liberty. If one daily picks up his cross and reckons himself dead, with his life hidden in Christ Jesus, there is nothing left with which a government can threaten him.
They have corrupted liberty to mean "Do what thou wilt." Their corrupted concept of liberty includes the "liberty" to kill those whom one finds inconvenient, and whom one deems by their fleshly estimation to "not be human" (made to bear the image of Yahweh God.)
What they fear and hate is those who have put to death the deeds of the flesh by picking up their cross. Those whose lives are hidden in Christ.
They fear because there is nothing with which they can threaten such a person. And such people no longer "need" their provision.
They hate because they know that they are cravenly grasping to fulfill their desire to continue in wickedness for eternity with no consequences. The Gospel shows them what they are and what they could be, and they will have none of it.
2 Corinthians 2:15-16 (ESV)
"For we are the aroma of Christ to God among those who are being saved and among those who are perishing, to one a fragrance from death to death, to the other a fragrance from life to life."
We are not to be troubled by these things. The fact that we were told in advance that they would take place serves to strengthen my faith.
A beautiful piece of writing.
"Do what thou wilt." is a the Marxist ethic and is satanic.
Brilliant, thanks for sharing.
How would you recommend us respond when faced with this airport scenario? Serious question.
Mark Twain sums it up. If enough people did this John, it would end:
----
It doesn’t matter what the press says. It doesn’t matter what the politicians or the mobs say. It doesn’t matter if the whole country decides that something wrong is something right. Republics are founded on one principle above all else: The requirement that we stand up for what we believe in. no matter the odds or consequences.
When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move. Your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth and tell the whole world:
“No. You move.”
—Mark Twain
---
More solutions here: https://tritorch.substack.com/p/dancing-doctors-unclean-lies-unchained
Love Samuel Clemens! He would fit right in this C&C community.
Hear, hear!
911 was the 'New Pearl Harbor' ... and by THEIR words (PNAC). The real Terrorists planned, instituted, aided and abetted ... and then covered up the damning hard evidence of their crime (of which there was plenty), their treason and murder and flagrantly ignored anyone with hard eye-witness accounting contrary to The Narrative. 911 was the launch of the Totalitarian Terror State which in inimitable lying fashion declared the War on Terror (they always project and gaslight!). Only the declared war of the Terror State missed the target ... itself. And ever since, there has not been any Liberty, real administration of law and justice. Nope! THEY took everything. There is no longer anything else left to lose except one's self respect ... and only that by a refusal to resist.
In this great resistance, let God's commandments be our guide. It's all we have left unto ourselves.
And that is the bottom line.
TriTorch- thank you. This is the crux of everything: ‘they’ only do to us, what we ALLOW them to do to us. I wish more people would see this. The Patriot Act was, and is, an awful thing, stripping us of so many rights! Instantly, cameras went up everywhere. Every time I complained about this to anyone, I always got the same response: ‘what’s the problem? I like them, they make me feel safer.’ They just don’t get it. And never will, I guess. People don’t seem to realize the power they have, if they would only resist what I call ‘bad’, or ‘wrong’ rules. I still think it’s only a very tiny percentage of people who get this.
These people have a collective mentality. They have lost all concepts of individualism and innate human rights, the basis of historical Americanism. Never would an American have tolerated and suffered such oversight and management of his life by anyone, much less the government.
But neither do Americans believe in the God of the Bible anymore so their god is now in the "collective" that will take care of them. No longer is there any faith or trust in a Creator's providence or recognition of our own responsibility for our own lives. Now man as the collective is god and there is no higher form of the collective than Government.
Such people have been brainwashed into being afraid of almost everything, including words. They live in a constant state of fear, which was most clearly seen in the maskoids during the worst of the scamdemic. Then the Marxist/Totalitarians in the government use a well known tool of "nudging", in which they implement tiny, seemingly harmless measures to lock us down just a little, and people either don't even notice or they believe it sounds reasonable. On and on it goes, until we are suddenly aware of all the liberties we have lost incrementally. Many people are never aware of this, to them it has all gradually become normal. Furthermore, they would deny we have lost liberties. For them, safety and security is more important than that scary liberty.
"Slowly at first, then all at once" - Sundance @ CTH
Yes it’s always slow because that is far more effective. Lots of Germans didn’t necessarily “accept” Kristallnacht. By that time, there was already a network of toadies and informants in place. My grandfather objected when he saw the windows of a Jewish shop shattered and a Nazi sympathizer heard what he said but not who had said it. He had to slip away from the crowd for fear of being arrested—even then. The system had already been set up to quash any dissent. That’s definitely a good reason to make sure we keep our 2nd amendment rights. The Nazis confiscated any guns even antique heirlooms and hunting rifles.
Yeah. When the time comes, they are going to have a BIG problem with Americans. There has never been a more heavily armed populace. Just came back from the local g store, to fill in some gaps.
Thanks for this. I copied this content and forwarded it to my audience. Definitely, a clarion call to repeal the Patriot Act.
In 2012, as we discussed the illegal alien invasion that was flagrant and unabated even then, I mentioned to a young colleague that the US border would eventually be closed.....not to keep people out but to keep people in. He laughed.....
The FIB Swat Teams have been very effective on anymore Jan 6 type gatherings of Citizens. ATF is eliminating FFL's (retail gun stores). DHS is Sponsoring an Illegal Invasion.
HHS, CDC, NIH, FDA, is Eliminating Carbon Based life Forms (YOU) via VaXXXes.
DOD is Pantygone-wokester cluster f'ck, DOInJ is the Stazi, IRS will be visiting the Normies.
Si vis pacem, Para Bellum
A very interesting read. I have relatives who fly often. In fact, have 3 international trips planned for this year. Can you point me to the source of that article by Jeff Thomas? I'm sure they would like to be prepared. TY
Ooops...I'm losing it. That wasn't the one you were asking for. Got to close some windows.
Oh dear. Can you locate it? My cousin is probably wondering WTH?
Sorry, that article was an essay written by someone at International Man so I don't think it's available anywhere else. Best thing would be to just copy my post and send it.
Ah. I did send the post. He said he was interested in finding out more. Perhaps to confirm the contents? Thanks. He’s on his own now.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2024/01/david-stockman/why-stalin-and-hitler-should-never-have-happened/
I'm on Doug Casey's mailing list for his "International Man".....
https://internationalman.acemlnb.com/lt.php?s=4a405679d2b311287e3bb43c2d1869ff&i=2313A2322A1A39516
Thanks. I sent it off to him.
Thank you! You are 100% correct. And we just sit here like ducks on a fence.
Our first clue about Ray was the fact it took like, umm, forever to file a charge on his ass.
While more than a few tons of audio/video just keeps him showing up as a "major dude".
Also, he was on video clear as day urging people to go into the capitol, and he should have been one of the first arrested. Yet they went after others who were identified by phone records as having been in the area. Epps' so-called arrest and prosecution is an obvious sham.
Yeah they began arresting people that weren't even there 🤯🎯 unreal eh?
Was he a plant by 3 letter orgs? I haven’t followed
Seems he has been rooted out, then protected greatly. I'd bet 99% informant then.
And for sure as hell now, after all his mug shots on persons vids. So, you decide.
He had his day in court. Can not be accused and tried for this again.
Yes and it was not his first rodeo.
They are targeting folks who just flew into DC 1/6 and who weren’t even at the rally, for ex 1 guy who flew to DC that day for a funeral!