Why is the word 'violent' in quotes in the NY Post headline, as in 'violent' perps? The headline implies that the beating of two policemen was NOT violent. No wonder illegals LOVE New York City.
Why is the word 'violent' in quotes in the NY Post headline, as in 'violent' perps? The headline implies that the beating of two policemen was NOT violent. No wonder illegals LOVE New York City.
Sending the illegals to NYC was BRILLIANT! Now to change the Constitution so that only citizens count for the census. Thus making them a burden without any compensation for the corrupt politicians.
You must have missed the lawsuits about the previous census. No. The census does not differentiate between citizen and noncitizens. Neither does the Constitution. So, I was suggesting a Constitutional Amendment.
Perfect example of scare quotes. The media does it all the time with the message being; "this is what people are saying but it's false (in our opinion) so we are going to mock their usage by putting it in quotes".
Whenever you see it used it's almost always a red flag for bad faith emotional manipulation.
Why is the word 'violent' in quotes in the NY Post headline, as in 'violent' perps? The headline implies that the beating of two policemen was NOT violent. No wonder illegals LOVE New York City.
Sending the illegals to NYC was BRILLIANT! Now to change the Constitution so that only citizens count for the census. Thus making them a burden without any compensation for the corrupt politicians.
The census differentiates between citizens and non citizens. The illegals don’t come forth for the counting though.
You must have missed the lawsuits about the previous census. No. The census does not differentiate between citizen and noncitizens. Neither does the Constitution. So, I was suggesting a Constitutional Amendment.
So fucking wrong.
They mean to imply that it was a "mostly peaceful" beating.
Like the Portland Oregon 2020 non-violent riots.......um.......protests.
Perfect example of scare quotes. The media does it all the time with the message being; "this is what people are saying but it's false (in our opinion) so we are going to mock their usage by putting it in quotes".
Whenever you see it used it's almost always a red flag for bad faith emotional manipulation.
Why did these officers not shoot these fuvking animals dead after the first three seconds?
It's all self-defense, same as bombing Syria and Iraq.