15 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Karenbytherideau's avatar

“Dr. Paul Offit was not pleased.” That is rich. As a committee member he should have requested the data, without which a vote could not have happened. That my friends, is NOT rocket science.

Expand full comment
Richard S.'s avatar

Go look into his history. Pretty sure he's the guy who invented / pushed the horrible rotovirus vaccine, got rich from it, then from his position as a member of the advisory panel said: "This vaccine should have never been approved."

The gall of these people is unreal.

Expand full comment
Jeff C's avatar

Offit has been around this game a long time and knows how it's played. He's been a staunch defender of the childhood vax schedule and even has a financial interest in the rotavirus vaccine. He's made absurd unsupported claims in the past like stating a child's immune system can tolerate a thousand different immune stimulations at once. He has completely overlooked past vax concerns and belittled the parents of kids with autism and other post-vax medical issues.

Offit is worried the Covid vax stink will rub off on the childhood vax schedule, and he's right to be worried as it's happening. He is smart but he is not a straight-shooter. He's now claiming he was "misled" (not given all the info), despite the fact it's his job to not be "misled". Strangely enough those of us with critical thinking skills who didn't receive pharma payoffs weren't misled.

He is not one of the good guys. Just because he's saying thing now that we like doesn't absolve him of his decades of pharma-pushing and bad-faith actions.

Expand full comment
CMCM's avatar

I'd say at this point the childhood vax schedule has been completely smeared with a thick layer of covid vax S**t.

Expand full comment
Freebird's avatar

Let’s hope!!

Expand full comment
devoalan's avatar

One can hope.

Expand full comment
Copernicus's avatar

I recall Offit saying that mice data was insufficient for authorizing the bivalent jab. And now he complains about no clinical data? I’m confused.

Expand full comment
Freebird's avatar

Feigned anger is sometimes a useful ploy. But we can pray that justice comes for these pharma frauds. There’s a local story today of a little girl fighting for her life from a severe allergic reaction. And of course one wonders if the child was vaxxed.

Righteous anger should be directed at the evil posing as “health care experts”.

Expand full comment
OJen's avatar

Yeah, funny how WE knew but he didn't...🙄

Expand full comment
Seeking Grace's avatar

IIRC, Dr. Paul Alexander (who was recently stripped of his license in Oregon (?) for wrongthink), said Offit’s nickname is “For Profit Offit.” 😒 He made this bed; he can lie in it and be “not pleased” all he wants. #consequences

Expand full comment
PA's avatar

Those doctors are idiots! To even consider any of this experiment is truly ignorant!

Expand full comment
Freebird's avatar

We have to wonder just how far a plea of ignorance of the data will go. These guilty characters are grasping at straws.

Expand full comment
Wendy Montgomery's avatar

I was under the impression that the “new Covid booster shot” referenced was the one that was only tested on 8 mice before being approved. If so, what early data was he waiting for?

Expand full comment
N Springer's avatar

They call him Dr Profit for a reason.

Expand full comment
CMCM's avatar

Offit thinks he can get off by pretending he was not pleased? Really? He's not gong to be absolved of his guilt that easily!

Expand full comment