8 Comments
User's avatar
โญ  Return to thread
Alan Davis's avatar

Klepto-transvestitism ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜†๐Ÿ˜‚

So did you already write about Sen Ron Johnsonโ€™s hearing Wed? The society of Actuaries said 40% increase in excess death for 25-64 yr olds. That is 1x in like 1000 yr event?? Will the normies ever wake up to this once in a thousand year event? How could they sleep through it unless they are all one of the statistic?

Expand full comment
Bubblehead's avatar

They aren't "normies", that bridge has been crossed.

Expand full comment
Copernicus's avatar

That stat has been known for some months now. I think he has written about it before??

It was a great summary of all the bad that is the vaccine though, wasnโ€™t it? The hearing, that is.

Expand full comment
taxpayer's avatar

What I don't know, and haven't seen discussed, is to what extent are the excess deaths due to jabs, and to what extent due to lockdowns and the impacts thereof. Have folks here seen any reports that try to tease that out?

Expand full comment
Copernicus's avatar

Good, legitimate question.

The excess deaths didnโ€™t start being very excessive until 2021, despite lockdowns for most of 2020. Although granted, the effects of lockdowns would be delayed and not immediate.

I suppose that deaths due to heart attacks and strokes and blood clots and autoimmune conditions are very unlikely due to lockdowns. So perhaps attempting to speculate based on cause of death?

Wonder what Ed Dowd has to say?

As I recall, spikes in deaths occur in proximity to new mandates. Soโ€ฆ.

Expand full comment
Woody's avatar

I was very annoyed that no one from the CDC seems to care about all the excess deaths.

Expand full comment
Copernicus's avatar

Well, they havenโ€™t cared about baby deaths from SIDS for decades. So.

*SIDS likely being the infant equivalent of SADS, and we all know the product causing THAT.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Of course they donโ€™t. They knew it and wanted it ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ

Expand full comment