The Democrats have had their most successful presidency in history. We're smack-dab in a cultural war and class war. They are winning on both fronts. Seriously, look at how much they've accomplished in 3 years.
How could they have inconsistent thoughts; they are angry, because they're right....and they are right, because they're angry. That pretty much ends the need to consider other viewpoints; it would be immoral for them to consider viewpoints that do not adhere to their angry/right:right/angry epistemology because anything outside the perfect purity circle is amoral.
They are in lockstep in THEIR two option game. It is non-optional for them, under their creed, to either stop you or they must help you understand that you do not have options otherwise.
The rules are simple. It's not their problem we don't understand. Any cognitive dissonance you may experience about their lack of cognitive dissonance affirms their purity and identifies you as the unwashed.
How could you not understand Tom that they had to break into your house to save the baby from a burning crib?
What kind of unappreciative monster leaves their baby in a burning house we were forced to cleans with fire on behalf of your child?!
Maybe a really, really scary monster who entertains competing ideas?
These are people who have proven time and again that they are willing to burn down "their" own neighborhood when they don't get what they want.
"Why is our neighborhood a food desert"
"Mmm! Desert!" (sic)
Exactly.
The Democrats have had their most successful presidency in history. We're smack-dab in a cultural war and class war. They are winning on both fronts. Seriously, look at how much they've accomplished in 3 years.
How could they have inconsistent thoughts; they are angry, because they're right....and they are right, because they're angry. That pretty much ends the need to consider other viewpoints; it would be immoral for them to consider viewpoints that do not adhere to their angry/right:right/angry epistemology because anything outside the perfect purity circle is amoral.
They are in lockstep in THEIR two option game. It is non-optional for them, under their creed, to either stop you or they must help you understand that you do not have options otherwise.
The rules are simple. It's not their problem we don't understand. Any cognitive dissonance you may experience about their lack of cognitive dissonance affirms their purity and identifies you as the unwashed.
How could you not understand Tom that they had to break into your house to save the baby from a burning crib?
What kind of unappreciative monster leaves their baby in a burning house we were forced to cleans with fire on behalf of your child?!
Maybe a really, really scary monster who entertains competing ideas?