I don't know when you started reading Mr Childer' Substack, but I've been doing it since early in the pandemic when he started it. He was one of the first lawyers to win cases in Florida in regards to masking, so I respect his legal perspective and definitely his way with words.
I don't know when you started reading Mr Childer' Substack, but I've been doing it since early in the pandemic when he started it. He was one of the first lawyers to win cases in Florida in regards to masking, so I respect his legal perspective and definitely his way with words.
I agree with your assessment of Jeff's accomplishments and his skill at writing, it's just that sometimes he seems naive about some accountability for the crimes, suggesting that accountability is coming through laws or courts. I have eyes, that ain't happening. I just want to be able to talk about reality.
It's the man in the arena (I'm not that man), as they say, who really sees what going on in the courts, and that's not me, even though I follow a lot of cases as much as I can with sources I trust, based on my own discernment such as it is.
I have alerts on CourtListener.com for some cases, and I really appreciate the links to court documents in other stories. The Epoch Times and Emerald Robinson are good at giving links, and sometimes CD Media, and The Gateway Pundit.
The outrageous verdicts and decisions get a lot of print, not so much the victories.
I don't know when you started reading Mr Childer' Substack, but I've been doing it since early in the pandemic when he started it. He was one of the first lawyers to win cases in Florida in regards to masking, so I respect his legal perspective and definitely his way with words.
I agree with your assessment of Jeff's accomplishments and his skill at writing, it's just that sometimes he seems naive about some accountability for the crimes, suggesting that accountability is coming through laws or courts. I have eyes, that ain't happening. I just want to be able to talk about reality.
It's the man in the arena (I'm not that man), as they say, who really sees what going on in the courts, and that's not me, even though I follow a lot of cases as much as I can with sources I trust, based on my own discernment such as it is.
I have alerts on CourtListener.com for some cases, and I really appreciate the links to court documents in other stories. The Epoch Times and Emerald Robinson are good at giving links, and sometimes CD Media, and The Gateway Pundit.
The outrageous verdicts and decisions get a lot of print, not so much the victories.
AND it seems to me, we HAVE BEEN talking.
I have not used CourtListener, I'll try it out, thanks for the link!
AND, you're right, I appreciate the discussion, thanks again.