22 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Evans W's avatar

At this point I’m not brushing off even the most insane sounding conspiracy theories. ‘9/11 Was An Inside Job’ doesn’t even sound like a stretch anymore. 👀

Conspiracy Theorists - 37,386

MSM & Experts - 0

You don't hate the media enough - you think you do, but you don't. https://x.com/Evans_Wroten

Expand full comment
Lisa Ca's avatar

That’s pretty much how I feel

Nothing surprises me anymore

Expand full comment
Juju's avatar

I’ll admit I’m now starting to listen closer to the 9/11 theories. They are pretty damn compelling. If they had a desire to end the threats in the Middle East once and for all, orchestrating something that gave them a right to attack seems plausible, even though it was the stuff movies were made of. If you’re evil enough you can convince yourself it’s worth the sacrifice of thousands.

We are rewatching the series 24 and I am blown away by the sneaky propaganda woven into the script to influence how we see things. It’s glaringly obvious to me now but it wasn’t back in 2001 and 2002, and we didn’t get past season 3, or even when we tried to finish it in 2010, again only getting a few seasons in before life took us away. But today? After all we know now? I can clearly see the CIA and DOD influence over Hollywood scripts - it more than obvious. Still a good show but annoying to see how they were “leading” our perception.

A newer series we started watching called “Rabbit Hole” is really good, but again we are seeing the same thing in it. It was made in 2023 and you can see the preconditioning of the public mind prior to the 2024 elections.

Expand full comment
cltwilson1's avatar

This is a great video to watch for the unindoctrinated. It's long but necessary. I can't believe it's still up on YouTube.

https://youtu.be/niTwvtokYf0?si=RfI0yYw__CG9SY2w

Expand full comment
Evans W's avatar

Word.

Expand full comment
L1's avatar

Find and watch several video clips of planned implosions to demolish buildings with little damage to surroundings. Then go watch 9-11 videos. That’s all you need.

Expand full comment
MarilynJo's avatar

Plus ask questions like qui bono? The patriot act was conveniently all set to go to take away our liberties, submit Americans into fear, and then send more innocent men into another useless war for another country’s agenda. CIA/ Mossad evil. Some people saw it right away. Others of us have awakened over time. I still remember the good old days when we could take a flight without being treated like a criminal. And Americans to this day will say they are glad for TSA to protect us from the boogey man.

Expand full comment
Sam's avatar
Apr 16Edited

Bingo!

“ then send more innocent men into another useless war for another country’s agenda.”

Sachs discusses this with judge Nap.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RotWMZljITI

Expand full comment
MarilynJo's avatar

Great and timely video! Summarizes well the problem and solution!

Expand full comment
Sam's avatar

Carlson just covered 9/11. It was an inside job.

https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1911830764716535845

Check the other videos in the thread. 2 firefighters said they heard explosions in building 7 just before it collapsed.

Expand full comment
MarilynJo's avatar

And what the heck happened to the “planes”? We don’t ask that question often enough.

Expand full comment
Sam's avatar

All the rubbish was quickly shuttled away and no one got to look at it. Yeah not suspicious at all.

Expand full comment
79SmithW60's avatar

🎯🎯 So true!

Expand full comment
Rosie Langridge's avatar

9/11 as an inside job is pretty straightforward to see , once you can persuade your eyes to look at the footage instead of being blinded by trauma.

The official idea is that the impact of the plane plus combustion of the jet fuel was enough to destroy the structural integrity of the towers. From that point gravity pulled them down to the ground.

However the footage clearly shows debris going high into the sky, as opposed to dropping straight down the ground.

It looks like a giant firework. Not small bits of smoke, but vast amounts.

Expand full comment
Mountain Goat's avatar

Ok thats normal in a controlled demololition, but displaced air shooting up is a very weak argument- think 3rd building falling the same way, free fall speed of collapse, pentagon office getting hit in the office currently investigating pentagon malfeasance. These are better arguments

Expand full comment
Skeptical Actuary's avatar

All three buildings fell at near free fall speed, which can’t happen if each floor’s weight has to pound the support of the one below, and then the average speed of combined group of floors gets reduced each time a floor is added to the part that’s falling.

Expand full comment
Rosie Langridge's avatar

Many bits fall faster than gravity, change direction, go upwards, or fly out sideways damaging other buildings. So that's something other than gravity propelling these bits. Which can only have happened if propellents had been applied beforehand.

The idea that a small bit of damage near the top (relative to the size of the building) could cause the entire building to disintegrate, is absurd.

It's the brain numbing effect of the trauma that prevents it from being immediately obvious. On top of the dumbing down of our education and lived experiences.

Expand full comment
Skeptical Actuary's avatar

It's hard to explain it well in a post like that. Loose change discusses the problem of the near free fall speed and the symmetrical collapse at about the 1:10 mark: https://rumble.com/v46cfa0-911-loose-change-final-cut-full-documentary.html

I didn't really think very much about the world trade center narrative being completely unreasonable for years. The only thing that nagged at me was the Pentagon - because we had all seen the pictures of the Pentagon with a smallish hole and absolutely no sign of a plane except for small parts that could have been carried in.

Expand full comment
Rosie Langridge's avatar

Are you saying that it all fell down under gravity, and that no explosive or incendiary chemicals were involved?

Expand full comment
Skeptical Actuary's avatar

The people that think the twin towers fell under controlled demolition are closer to the truth than those who think they collapsed under their own weight. WTC 7 certainly looks like a controlled demolition job.

WTC 1 and 2 were largely turned to dust. You can see that in closeups of some of the "wheatchex" falling, and in the remaining 65 or 70 story "spire" (core columns) that turns to dust before falling. What weapon did that, I don't know. Judy Wood waves her hands and says "directed energy weapons", but there is no known or even theorized directed energy weapon that could do that.

Other people say mini nukes took down the towers. I don't see that as being the only thing that could have been used, although it's possible it was part of the destruction sequence.

Expand full comment
Carolyn's avatar

They probably were involved but our government was the underlying perp.

Expand full comment