Interesting, in this clip Stephen Miller himself admits that while the guy was deemed deportable in 2019, he had a 'withholding order' because of the threat on his life if he went back to El Salvador. That means he couldn't deported back to ES and would have to be sent somewhere else if he was in fact deported.
Interesting, in this clip Stephen Miller himself admits that while the guy was deemed deportable in 2019, he had a 'withholding order' because of the threat on his life if he went back to El Salvador. That means he couldn't deported back to ES and would have to be sent somewhere else if he was in fact deported.
Then Miller jumps to an assertion that members of terrorist orgs don't qualify for 'withholding orders' therefore he could actually be deported.
My question is, where was he adjudicated as a member of a terrorist organization? I mean beyond govt allegations/DOJ assertions.
Also, I don't think conservatives should fall into calling everything terrorism. Slippery slope that could be turned against us at some point if it hasn't been already. This has been Glen Greenwald's argument if I remember correctly.
The slippery slopes are everywhere right now, and it seems many here are not realizing the very real dangers of this - these precedents can be set and used against us in the future.
Thank you Seeking Grace!
Interesting, in this clip Stephen Miller himself admits that while the guy was deemed deportable in 2019, he had a 'withholding order' because of the threat on his life if he went back to El Salvador. That means he couldn't deported back to ES and would have to be sent somewhere else if he was in fact deported.
Then Miller jumps to an assertion that members of terrorist orgs don't qualify for 'withholding orders' therefore he could actually be deported.
My question is, where was he adjudicated as a member of a terrorist organization? I mean beyond govt allegations/DOJ assertions.
Also, I don't think conservatives should fall into calling everything terrorism. Slippery slope that could be turned against us at some point if it hasn't been already. This has been Glen Greenwald's argument if I remember correctly.
Anyway, appreciate the link.
How do we know he had a threat on his life in ES?
PS: sorry my link looks weird / posting from my phone but will repost from my computer later.
Apparently a US immigration judge found there to be one. I asked Groq for a timeline and here’s what it came back with:
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fx.com%2Fi%2Fgrok%2Fshare%2FtuDlch96AkALJde75Vhv7DbqD&data=05%7C02%7C%7Cae66ba557eb6479057d108dd7cfb733f%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C638804141593821821%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=rQlN%2BL0lpdOybsH7EbZUu9sxw5AuXpFA8a6Ndl0e9Gw%3D&reserved=0
LOL, you mean one of those blue pilled numbnut judges. No thank you.
The slippery slopes are everywhere right now, and it seems many here are not realizing the very real dangers of this - these precedents can be set and used against us in the future.
Agree 100%.