Jeff, in my "reformed attorney" (retired from 36 years of successful very active practice), opinion, Justice Gorsuch's commentary is of first rank importance. Without your work, I doubt I would have ever seen it. I urge your followers to join me in sharing it as widely as possible, via their internet resources. Thank you for your diligence. John Schwab
Jeff, in my "reformed attorney" (retired from 36 years of successful very active practice), opinion, Justice Gorsuch's commentary is of first rank importance. Without your work, I doubt I would have ever seen it. I urge your followers to join me in sharing it as widely as possible, via their internet resources. Thank you for your diligence. John Schwab
But isn't something missing? Where's the part where the Supreme Court refused to allow vaccine mandates? Where's the part where the court protected individual inalienable rights over alleged medical expert claims for all?
SCOTUS refused to rein in the executive. Over and over, COVID-1984 and election fraud. The next step must be for SCOTUS to do THEIR job fully.
I would really appreciate hearing Jeff Childers thoughts on this. I always wondered if it was just technicalities (spoken like a layman) that kept them from acting on some pandemic and election fraud cases brought to it.
allowing Mandated health insurance, Mandated taxes for entitlements, Mandated pretty dam much anything/everything eventually: while addressing election rigging and "enhancing" democracy to the level that is occurring are apparently taboo
Gorsuch’s should have placed his comments in writing back in 2020 and the Supreme Court should have taken up the 2020 election issue. The United States Constitution guarantees each state a republican form of government. In a republican form of government the law rules, not some petty dictator and/or unelected bureaucrat. Each state has a constitution, the supreme law of the state. The United States Constitution also gives the power to the manner of choosing of Presidential electors to the respective state legislatures. For the presidential election of 2020 in several states that power granted by the Constitution to the states’ legislatures was illegally usurped by unelected election officials for the choosing of electors. No court, including the Supreme Court of the United States (their responsibility under the United States Constitution), would hear the objections brought to the courts by some of the states’ legislators. Congress under the leadership of Vice President Pence in a joint session of Congress on January 6, 2021 also failed its responsibility to uphold the guarantee of a republic form of government in each state required by the United States Constitution. We have been left with a runaway federal executive branch hell-bent on destroying the Constitution and our Republican form of government with little hope for honest elections in most states.
I went ahead and read it, too. Gorsuch seems to be thinking pretty clearly about these issues.
[I wonder if he got the vax?] His reflections on emergency powers and many people's willingness to so easily give up rights for safety are so encouraging, that at his level in the government at least one person has his head screwed on straight.
I hope he is a reflection of the majority's thinking and that his perspective holds sway on any covid-related cases that get to the SCOTUS.
Agree with John Schwab! Were the Supreme Court military vaccine mandate cases decided on the basis of emergency powers? Perhaps they can be revisited somehow? (How about the cases involving the changes made by many states to voting procedures as a result of the "Covid emergency"?) I seem to recall that Justice Gorsuch made some uninformed and surprising comments about the efficacy of the Covid vaccines at oral argument in the vaccine mandate cases; perhaps and hopefully he has seen the truth on this as well.
Jeff, in my "reformed attorney" (retired from 36 years of successful very active practice), opinion, Justice Gorsuch's commentary is of first rank importance. Without your work, I doubt I would have ever seen it. I urge your followers to join me in sharing it as widely as possible, via their internet resources. Thank you for your diligence. John Schwab
But isn't something missing? Where's the part where the Supreme Court refused to allow vaccine mandates? Where's the part where the court protected individual inalienable rights over alleged medical expert claims for all?
SCOTUS refused to rein in the executive. Over and over, COVID-1984 and election fraud. The next step must be for SCOTUS to do THEIR job fully.
I would really appreciate hearing Jeff Childers thoughts on this. I always wondered if it was just technicalities (spoken like a layman) that kept them from acting on some pandemic and election fraud cases brought to it.
allowing Mandated health insurance, Mandated taxes for entitlements, Mandated pretty dam much anything/everything eventually: while addressing election rigging and "enhancing" democracy to the level that is occurring are apparently taboo
I wondered the same thing
Gorsuch’s should have placed his comments in writing back in 2020 and the Supreme Court should have taken up the 2020 election issue. The United States Constitution guarantees each state a republican form of government. In a republican form of government the law rules, not some petty dictator and/or unelected bureaucrat. Each state has a constitution, the supreme law of the state. The United States Constitution also gives the power to the manner of choosing of Presidential electors to the respective state legislatures. For the presidential election of 2020 in several states that power granted by the Constitution to the states’ legislatures was illegally usurped by unelected election officials for the choosing of electors. No court, including the Supreme Court of the United States (their responsibility under the United States Constitution), would hear the objections brought to the courts by some of the states’ legislators. Congress under the leadership of Vice President Pence in a joint session of Congress on January 6, 2021 also failed its responsibility to uphold the guarantee of a republic form of government in each state required by the United States Constitution. We have been left with a runaway federal executive branch hell-bent on destroying the Constitution and our Republican form of government with little hope for honest elections in most states.
Exactly. You said what I was thinking
I went ahead and read it, too. Gorsuch seems to be thinking pretty clearly about these issues.
[I wonder if he got the vax?] His reflections on emergency powers and many people's willingness to so easily give up rights for safety are so encouraging, that at his level in the government at least one person has his head screwed on straight.
I hope he is a reflection of the majority's thinking and that his perspective holds sway on any covid-related cases that get to the SCOTUS.
Jeff left EPA off the executive bloating danger list, which is responsible for some of our"climate" tyranny.
Agree with John Schwab! Were the Supreme Court military vaccine mandate cases decided on the basis of emergency powers? Perhaps they can be revisited somehow? (How about the cases involving the changes made by many states to voting procedures as a result of the "Covid emergency"?) I seem to recall that Justice Gorsuch made some uninformed and surprising comments about the efficacy of the Covid vaccines at oral argument in the vaccine mandate cases; perhaps and hopefully he has seen the truth on this as well.
Well, let's face it, you can pretty much list them all.
totally agree. Well worth reading the entire document. Not difficult or that long.
We’ll said and exactly what I wanted to comment. I have shared this far and wide! Thank you Jeff!!