Indeed it sounds so obvious. But.....what if it’s intended to look like a back & forth chess game? What if all of these events are perpetrated by the same entity? Say, an entity trying to provoke a global war. Or, an entity trying to control a stronghold over fuel prices. Food for thought. Just saying.
Indeed it sounds so obvious. But.....what if it’s intended to look like a back & forth chess game? What if all of these events are perpetrated by the same entity? Say, an entity trying to provoke a global war. Or, an entity trying to control a stronghold over fuel prices. Food for thought. Just saying.
I had the same thought. Putin's management of the Ukraine war has been VERY measured and limited to the immediate theater always with the stated objective in sight. Heck, he didn't even respond to the gas pipeline bombing.
I agree with Jeff that "anecdotal evidence is often the very best evidence" and have stated that myself on several occasions. Allow me to paint another scenario though perhaps less obvious. Soros, Gates and Company have spent untold amounts of effort and money to curtail America's food supply and energy supply. They are literally trying to induce a collapse in our food supply here and in Europe. They want results or all that effort and money is for naught. But how to attack our food infrastructure without raising public alarm? I would have all my "operatives" set up and ready to go on a moment's notice with the potential targets all mapped out and staged for attack. Then as soon as something happens overseas that takes the headlines and has everyone distracted, that's when you strike at the targeted infrastructure. The distraction provides cover for the attacks. Rather than a silly "tit for tat", it's a war using distraction to cover their attacks. Soros and Company cannot risk a direct attack revealing themselves because then they will be attacked. That would lose everything especially their efforts to impose the WHO upon America.
I don't see any advantage in Putin engaging in a tit-for-tat with the USG. He has a very specific goal in mind and has no interest in broadening the war. I think this has been demonstrated. What I am suggesting is that there is more than one explanation for the "pattern" of food and energy supply fires. When I look at the continual list of food supply fires in the US, I have to conclude that this is much more than a tit-for-tat campaign. This is a systematic and CONTINUOUS attack on our food and energy infrastructure. The list that ASK posted suggests this. Also, there is this elephant in the room: the globalists have openly stated that they intend to curtail farming because "climate", that they intend to eliminate meat production because "climate" and that they intend for us to eat insects. So... Are we not to take them at their word? It would be foolish to ignore.
And speaking of elephants in the room: In developing any scenario, it is always important to ask, what did I miss? It's always the elephant in the room no one is pointing to. The biggest elephant in the room is the answer to the question no one is asking: Who is controlling the US Presidency? Senile Biden surely is not the POTUS. He can't even string an entire sentence together. The answer is glaringly obvious, Obama. This immediately answers the question of who the Dems are going to run for POTUS. It's going to be "Mike" Obama on a ticket with Gavin Newsom as VP. This leaves Obama in control of the White House. We have already had 12 years of Obama rule in the White House and he does not intend to give up power. This is the most realistic scenario that fits all the facts.
Agree! Kinda what I was thinking. But there are so many evildoers on the world stage right now, hard to pinpoint just one. Along the lines of Soros & Company, let’s not forget how close his ties are to Schwab. And they have Antifa soldiers everywhere, just waiting for orders & a paycheck.
Yes, they are all linked. They are not operating in isolation. And over them are the Apex elite who control the world's banking system to which they have enslaved the entire West.
Antifa are but the tip of the iceberg and a small trial run. They have now imported an army of at least 2 million, out of the 22+ million that have crossed the border, who are now being trained at secret bases who will follow any orders and have no identity with the American people. We will be viewed by them as aliens and antagonists. We will be the enemy.
If it's not a tit-for-tat asymmetrical war going on, then what explains the close timing of these events? The advantage for Putin is that he is successfully sending a message to US operators in Russia. Note that the response from Russia is also proportionate to the damage we cause. This isn't a broadening of war; it's surgical precision. And he's got to respond somehow! The thing that is so worrisome is that it seems to be that we go first and Putin goes second. I don't like Noam Chomsky but he was exactly right when he said the U.S. is the most dangerous and violent force in the world today.
As I explained in my second paragraph, it looks to me (and I can only do my best to look through a glass darkly) like our local sociopaths, like Soros and Company, are using headline distractions (and remember they control the media) as cover for overt attacks on our infrastructure.
As for Putin, he is in control. There is no gain for him in a tit-for-tat game even assuming we have the ability to strike small attacks inside Russia that way. However, I find it difficult to believe that we can get small operatives inside Russia like that without getting caught. Just saying.....
We wouldn't have to get our operatives inside Russia. It may well be Russians who work for us. Brett Weinstein was right about this: given the insanity in the world and 5th generation warfare and asymmetrical warfare, it's not a bad idea to make connections and observe patterns that in a sane world we could afford to overlook. Jeff was right when he noted that "at some point correlation does definitely prove causation." He's got timing and proportionality in a multitude of cases.
Guess we'll have to wait and see. But that's an awful lot of James Bond. The much more relevant patterns I see are the attacks against us here at home and the domestic agendas that would serve. Now if the attacks were against some unrelated infrastructure, then I would wonder.
Do you really think Obama is the one in control? Honestly asking. I've always seen him as a puppet. Maybe the person/people who told Obama what to do is/are in control (or trying to be) of Bob Peters?
Definitely. But Obama is also in a sense a puppet to the Apex elites. This is all just informed speculation but ultimately the Apex elite that control the global banking system is at the top. Daverkb believes the Apex elite are now pivoting to roll back some of the excesses that are threatening the world banking system. But domestically, I'm convinced that Obama is the one calling the shots in the Biden White House. In the past, he has even verbalized that this is how he would like to rule the US. He vehemently hates America and is a Marxist to the core. If they try to install Michele Obama as POTUS, that would certainly confirm my belief.
As I read Jeff's laying out of the events, this is exactly what I thought. But I wasn't sure I was "with him" when he said "are you with me yet?" I guess I wasn't!
Your theory is much more obvious and plausible than the supposed tit for tat war on foreign lands. Of course that is what is happening. Slowly, methodically, quietly chipping away at the food and energy sources around the globe. There is one singular force driving this, not the pretend enemies we've been told about.
Indeed it sounds so obvious. But.....what if it’s intended to look like a back & forth chess game? What if all of these events are perpetrated by the same entity? Say, an entity trying to provoke a global war. Or, an entity trying to control a stronghold over fuel prices. Food for thought. Just saying.
I had the same thought. Putin's management of the Ukraine war has been VERY measured and limited to the immediate theater always with the stated objective in sight. Heck, he didn't even respond to the gas pipeline bombing.
I agree with Jeff that "anecdotal evidence is often the very best evidence" and have stated that myself on several occasions. Allow me to paint another scenario though perhaps less obvious. Soros, Gates and Company have spent untold amounts of effort and money to curtail America's food supply and energy supply. They are literally trying to induce a collapse in our food supply here and in Europe. They want results or all that effort and money is for naught. But how to attack our food infrastructure without raising public alarm? I would have all my "operatives" set up and ready to go on a moment's notice with the potential targets all mapped out and staged for attack. Then as soon as something happens overseas that takes the headlines and has everyone distracted, that's when you strike at the targeted infrastructure. The distraction provides cover for the attacks. Rather than a silly "tit for tat", it's a war using distraction to cover their attacks. Soros and Company cannot risk a direct attack revealing themselves because then they will be attacked. That would lose everything especially their efforts to impose the WHO upon America.
I don't see any advantage in Putin engaging in a tit-for-tat with the USG. He has a very specific goal in mind and has no interest in broadening the war. I think this has been demonstrated. What I am suggesting is that there is more than one explanation for the "pattern" of food and energy supply fires. When I look at the continual list of food supply fires in the US, I have to conclude that this is much more than a tit-for-tat campaign. This is a systematic and CONTINUOUS attack on our food and energy infrastructure. The list that ASK posted suggests this. Also, there is this elephant in the room: the globalists have openly stated that they intend to curtail farming because "climate", that they intend to eliminate meat production because "climate" and that they intend for us to eat insects. So... Are we not to take them at their word? It would be foolish to ignore.
And speaking of elephants in the room: In developing any scenario, it is always important to ask, what did I miss? It's always the elephant in the room no one is pointing to. The biggest elephant in the room is the answer to the question no one is asking: Who is controlling the US Presidency? Senile Biden surely is not the POTUS. He can't even string an entire sentence together. The answer is glaringly obvious, Obama. This immediately answers the question of who the Dems are going to run for POTUS. It's going to be "Mike" Obama on a ticket with Gavin Newsom as VP. This leaves Obama in control of the White House. We have already had 12 years of Obama rule in the White House and he does not intend to give up power. This is the most realistic scenario that fits all the facts.
Not to mention our own 3 letter agencies that have a history of seeking power regardless of collateral damage here at home.
Agree! Kinda what I was thinking. But there are so many evildoers on the world stage right now, hard to pinpoint just one. Along the lines of Soros & Company, let’s not forget how close his ties are to Schwab. And they have Antifa soldiers everywhere, just waiting for orders & a paycheck.
Yes, they are all linked. They are not operating in isolation. And over them are the Apex elite who control the world's banking system to which they have enslaved the entire West.
Antifa are but the tip of the iceberg and a small trial run. They have now imported an army of at least 2 million, out of the 22+ million that have crossed the border, who are now being trained at secret bases who will follow any orders and have no identity with the American people. We will be viewed by them as aliens and antagonists. We will be the enemy.
gotta go with you on this one. It's the globalists
If it's not a tit-for-tat asymmetrical war going on, then what explains the close timing of these events? The advantage for Putin is that he is successfully sending a message to US operators in Russia. Note that the response from Russia is also proportionate to the damage we cause. This isn't a broadening of war; it's surgical precision. And he's got to respond somehow! The thing that is so worrisome is that it seems to be that we go first and Putin goes second. I don't like Noam Chomsky but he was exactly right when he said the U.S. is the most dangerous and violent force in the world today.
As I explained in my second paragraph, it looks to me (and I can only do my best to look through a glass darkly) like our local sociopaths, like Soros and Company, are using headline distractions (and remember they control the media) as cover for overt attacks on our infrastructure.
As for Putin, he is in control. There is no gain for him in a tit-for-tat game even assuming we have the ability to strike small attacks inside Russia that way. However, I find it difficult to believe that we can get small operatives inside Russia like that without getting caught. Just saying.....
We wouldn't have to get our operatives inside Russia. It may well be Russians who work for us. Brett Weinstein was right about this: given the insanity in the world and 5th generation warfare and asymmetrical warfare, it's not a bad idea to make connections and observe patterns that in a sane world we could afford to overlook. Jeff was right when he noted that "at some point correlation does definitely prove causation." He's got timing and proportionality in a multitude of cases.
Guess we'll have to wait and see. But that's an awful lot of James Bond. The much more relevant patterns I see are the attacks against us here at home and the domestic agendas that would serve. Now if the attacks were against some unrelated infrastructure, then I would wonder.
Do you really think Obama is the one in control? Honestly asking. I've always seen him as a puppet. Maybe the person/people who told Obama what to do is/are in control (or trying to be) of Bob Peters?
Definitely. But Obama is also in a sense a puppet to the Apex elites. This is all just informed speculation but ultimately the Apex elite that control the global banking system is at the top. Daverkb believes the Apex elite are now pivoting to roll back some of the excesses that are threatening the world banking system. But domestically, I'm convinced that Obama is the one calling the shots in the Biden White House. In the past, he has even verbalized that this is how he would like to rule the US. He vehemently hates America and is a Marxist to the core. If they try to install Michele Obama as POTUS, that would certainly confirm my belief.
Interesting. Thanks for the response!
Interesting idea.
As I read Jeff's laying out of the events, this is exactly what I thought. But I wasn't sure I was "with him" when he said "are you with me yet?" I guess I wasn't!
Your theory is much more obvious and plausible than the supposed tit for tat war on foreign lands. Of course that is what is happening. Slowly, methodically, quietly chipping away at the food and energy sources around the globe. There is one singular force driving this, not the pretend enemies we've been told about.