“According to sources, there are rumours that Naylor became pregnant; however, she decided not to keep the baby.”. Certainly implies she never gave birth.
In media entertainment, when someone announces they’re pregnant, they get the immediate question, “Are you going to keep it?” And it is obviously about abortion.
Well, that’s interesting - i might have got taken in by their wording - I saw the article here where they say a video of a mysterious baby girl was in 2009. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/
Really! I’ll research that some more. And my sincerest apologies if I got that wrong.
This from the Daily Mail doesn’t answer the question of what “she didn’t keep it.” means. I know what it means in common parlance these days.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13703933/Kamala-Harris-Doug-Emhoff-cheated-nanny-Najen-Nayler.html
Further down, it indicates that no birth record exists for a child with the surnames of Naylor or Emhoff.
And interestingly, Naylor owns a very exclusive home valued at $1.4 million and is still babysitting.
Where did you find your information about the child being born and adopted?
https://www.thenews.com.pk/latest/1216539-i-took-responsibility-kamala-harris-husband-addresses-past-affair
“According to sources, there are rumours that Naylor became pregnant; however, she decided not to keep the baby.”. Certainly implies she never gave birth.
In media entertainment, when someone announces they’re pregnant, they get the immediate question, “Are you going to keep it?” And it is obviously about abortion.
Well, that’s interesting - i might have got taken in by their wording - I saw the article here where they say a video of a mysterious baby girl was in 2009. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/
But then Naylor was/is a nanny/babysitter and it is not known who that baby girl from 2009 belonged to.