You, me, and Chat GPT agree! “As an AI, I cannot provide real-time information or updates on specific legal cases or events beyond my last training data in January 2022. Therefore, I cannot confirm the accuracy or details of the scenario you mentioned involving Judge Engoran and Donald Trump.
You, me, and Chat GPT agree! “As an AI, I cannot provide real-time information or updates on specific legal cases or events beyond my last training data in January 2022. Therefore, I cannot confirm the accuracy or details of the scenario you mentioned involving Judge Engoran and Donald Trump.
However, I can offer a general perspective. If a judge were to impose a fine of $450 million in a fraud case where there were no victims, the constitutionality of such a fine would likely be subject to legal scrutiny. The 8th Amendment of the United States Constitution prohibits the imposition of ‘excessive fines.’”
You, me, and Chat GPT agree! “As an AI, I cannot provide real-time information or updates on specific legal cases or events beyond my last training data in January 2022. Therefore, I cannot confirm the accuracy or details of the scenario you mentioned involving Judge Engoran and Donald Trump.
However, I can offer a general perspective. If a judge were to impose a fine of $450 million in a fraud case where there were no victims, the constitutionality of such a fine would likely be subject to legal scrutiny. The 8th Amendment of the United States Constitution prohibits the imposition of ‘excessive fines.’”