I respectfully disagree. He took huge amounts of money from half dozen or less billionaires and completely changed his messaging with implied policy changes. That screams, "control me, please!"
Taking money is likely necessary for most. But changing away from who you've been that got your name into the lottery is a bad, bad sign.
I respectfully disagree. He took huge amounts of money from half dozen or less billionaires and completely changed his messaging with implied policy changes. That screams, "control me, please!"
Taking money is likely necessary for most. But changing away from who you've been that got your name into the lottery is a bad, bad sign.
And let’s remember: he was not winning his first race, when he got the endorsement from DJT.
There are those who say loyalty is the highest virtue. It’s above my pay grade to assert this without doubt, yet when I consider the costs of betrayal I am inclined to agree.
I respectfully disagree. He took huge amounts of money from half dozen or less billionaires and completely changed his messaging with implied policy changes. That screams, "control me, please!"
Taking money is likely necessary for most. But changing away from who you've been that got your name into the lottery is a bad, bad sign.
And let’s remember: he was not winning his first race, when he got the endorsement from DJT.
There are those who say loyalty is the highest virtue. It’s above my pay grade to assert this without doubt, yet when I consider the costs of betrayal I am inclined to agree.