This is from a CHD recent article entitled “‘Probably the Most Important Topic of Our Time’: DNA Contaminants in COVID Shots Can Trigger Cancer, Alter Human Genome”
McCullough said there is now “a sufficient body of knowledge” demonstrating that COVID-19 vaccines can cause cancer, noting that “rates of cancer are up in every …
This is from a CHD recent article entitled “‘Probably the Most Important Topic of Our Time’: DNA Contaminants in COVID Shots Can Trigger Cancer, Alter Human Genome”
McCullough said there is now “a sufficient body of knowledge” demonstrating that COVID-19 vaccines can cause cancer, noting that “rates of cancer are up in every single cancer surveillance system,” adding that “Now we have the situation where multiple administrations of a COVID-19 vaccine could accelerate” cancer progression.
“I think there’s probably no better term that’s come up for the concern here than ‘turbo cancer,’” he said.
I am still waiting for that time they run out of reasons why someone SADS, got turbo cancer, heart issues, blood clots, bells palsy, et al the issues and it becomes It Is the Vaxx. I am losing my empathy now. Ed Dowd said the same. He said something big would happen to cover tptb crimes. That's why I believe this Gaza Israel issue started. No one is talking about the vaxx crimes etc.
My working hypothesis is that the blame will be centered on the jabs when TPTB decide it's finally time for the whole world to hate the US for our role in this.
The numbers will still keep accumulating, insurance companies have to publish these numbers if they are publicly owned, certain governments are still publishing the numbers so the truth will come out no matter what emergency they use to cover it up unless they kill a whole lot us via nuclear or other means.
The numbers have been out. It's a big collusion. I work for an international brokerage and financial firm. This increase deaths, in normal times, would be front page news. Nothing. Nada. The advisors don't know. The firm is not saying anything. They are in on it. 🤨
Yes agree but somehow it’s all leaking out even though there is a massive coverup going on and everyone is beginning to know. I have ardent pro vaxxers telling me they regret getting the vaccine now. I never thought I would see them recant.
On Monday, nine leading experts convened for a four-hour emergency hearing on the discovery of plasmid DNA in covid-19 vaccines.
The hearing was to determine what is currently known about the plasmid DNA contamination in vials of covid injections and to discuss the implications of the possible integration of this DNA into the genomes of the billions of people who have been injected.
I watched the whole thing. Byram Bridle had to say three times, I think it was, that the "mRNA" that Dr. McCullough -- for some reason! -- continues to call "messenger" RNA is NOT "messenger" RNA. It's modified RNA, Peter. UGH! Bridle, in his last comment that followed McCullough's, said something like, "Let me say again...this is NOT 'messenger' RNA. It is modified RNA." For whatever reason, McCullough can't seem to get this...And it is a distinction with an enormous difference.
Raptor, NAB, SheTL, your posts prompted me to re-read an article I saved from the Epoch Times dated July 27, 2023 by Klaus Steger, PhD, a molecular biologist with 30 years of research/work experience. If you have a subscription, check out: "COVID-19 Vaccines and Boosters Were Never Made With mRNA - the Truth Behind RNA based Vaccine Technology."
If you cannot access this Epoch Times article, Dr. Steger wrote the following: (I'll direct quote or paraphrase)...
* mRNA occurs naturally, lives in our cells for a short time, and is relatively fragile.
* modRNA is a result of scientists having to artificially modify mRNA to increase its efficiency and lifetime for use in routine medicine.
* "How is RNA modified? Simply put one of the four compounds in RNA is modified (e.g., the natural nucleoside uridine is modified to make synthetic/artificial methyl-pseudouridine."
* "modRNA contains a viral gene sequence. Upon entering a cell, modRNA takes control of the cell machinery and reprograms it to produce a viral protein - for example, a spike protein."
* "The continuous production of an artificial viral protein robs the cell of energy, disrupts its metabolism, and leads to the cell no longer being able to perform its vital task for the organism as a whole."
* "What's worse, with virus proteins generated in them, those cells are subsequently destroyed by our immune system."
Thank you, Renee. I read that piece re this topic in the Epoch Times. Since then, we have Kevin McKernan's discovery re the DNA contamination. I confess when I first found out about this -- just last month though McKernan found it back in Mar! -- it just floored me. I was almost zombie-like for a week as I read and listened to more on this latest debacle related to this awful junk.
Dr. Jessica Rose's first two slides from the Monday symposium refer directly to modified RNA. Nowhere does she mention "messenger" RNA, and Professor Bridle was adamant about it. He made it a point toward the end to make the point again -- these needles contain modified RNA -- not "messenger" RNA. Stop saying that Peter...:)
Yes, felt the exact same thing when I learned of Kevin McKernan’s finding. Horrified for me is the best I can describe then, now just a simmering below the surface rage towards all involved with this purposeful bio-weapon manufacture & distribution.
Thank you for your original post and this follow up to me & all here. 🙏🏻
Thank you Renee. Kind of you to provide those quotes. SO helpful I am sending it to hubby since we were discussing it this morning. Did they mention bacterial contamination ? I read something about it a while back, but for the life of me I can't remember the consequence of the bacteria being in the vaccine and (shock) there is no looking it up on the net.
I'm gonna have to go thru articles I saved looking for some forgotten nuggets!
Hi Raptor - you're welcome! I am so glad it is helpful!
The article by Dr. Steger didn't mention the bacterial contamination, however, there have been a couple of great interviews with Kevin McKernan who discovered the contamination of the Pfizer injections with DNA. I believe both of the following interviews will also discuss the bacterial contamination and its' adverse effect:
I don't pretend to even begin to understand all of this highly complex stuff, and I tend to think that a 'unified field theory' nailing all of this down has yet to emerge, and certainly not yet into the domain of common knowledge. BUT please do 'splain this to me Lucy':
If "modRNA contains a viral gene sequence. [And] Upon entering a cell, modRNA takes control of the cell machinery and reprograms it to produce a viral protein", THEN is not 'modRNA' messaging? And maybe IT should be called mmRNA ... or something.
I've been wondering about this for time. And from the outside, this all looks like sown confusion ... either in whole or in parts. Or maybe mine is a simpleton's question. Whatever ... can someone please illume?
Macromolecules known as nucleic acids come in two naturally-occurring forms – DNA and RNA. DNA is a like a set of twins – two of the same thing. RNA is one of those twins. DNA contains chromosomes, which contain genes. Genes are the instructions for making “stuff” inside our bodies. Many genes – but not all – code for specific proteins. RNA is responsible for protein synthesis and gene regulation.
Within that one twin – RNA – we have subclasses: “transfer” RNA (tRNA), ribosome RNA (rRNA) and messenger RNA (mRNA). All naturally-occurring. It is that molecule of the RNA – mRNA – that contains chemical instructions (code) for making a protein product. That’s what mRNA does – it makes recognizable proteins, the building block of life.
Our immune system remains quiet in the face of naturally-occurring proteins -- unless there’s an auto-immune disorder. It goes on the attack when it sees a foreign protein such as that that enters the body via a “virus” such as SARS CoV2. All being well, the immune system mounts an attack to kill the cells containing the foreign protein, in this case the “spike” protein.
But what happens when some mad scientists get it into their little noggins that the way to beat this “virus” is to force the body to make the thing they allege infects us and makes us sick? I’d say that’s pretty sick itself, but that’s just me.
To do this, the white coats must take DNA and replicate it. With these copies of DNA, they then transcribe RNA out of it. They use that RNA to make a new, wholly synthetic subclass – a modified RNA crafted in the lab – outside of natural processes. This modRNA forces our cells to form the thing (“spike”) that they allege infects and sickens us in the first place! On all cells! Genius!
Part of the modification of this RNA subclass includes the use of the now Nobel-Prize winning stuff called pseudouridine. This substance enables the modRNA to evade the immune system’s natural response to a foreign protein. This enables the modRNA to stick around a whole lot longer than natural mRNA can/does; this is so it has time to make its way to every cell to start the process of forcing the cells to make a foreign protein…that makes us sick. But if every cell is making it – and keeps on making it – how does the immune system stand a chance?
This is highly simplified, daverkb, but I hope it helps. mRNA and modRNA are two very different things. Their origins and effects make it clear that using the terms interchangeably is impossible and wholly inaccurate – at best.
Hi NAB, because of your posts, I replied to SheThinksLiberty with information that you may find helpful. The mRNA vs. modRNA differences as written about by Klaus Steger, PhD. Because I replied directly to SheTL, I'm replying to you as well so you'll be notified. I've also replied to Raptor with this same quick post. :)
The mRNA is modified to the point of no longer being the original. From an Epoch Times article we have the following:
"mRNA and modRNA Are Not the Same
The two—mRNA and modRNA—are completely different. mRNA occurs naturally, lives in our cells for only a short time, and is relatively fragile. It is a specific type of RNA that carries instructions or “messages” from our genes to help make proteins, the building blocks of our cells. It is constantly produced as part of normal cellular processes. Once mRNA delivers the messages, its work is done, and it is broken down in the body.
When RNA from another source enters our cells—virus RNA, for example—these cells can generate virus proteins.
We have been told that COVID-19 injections are made with mRNA. However, a vaccine using “natural” mRNA would not last long enough to initiate an immune response before being destroyed by our immune system.
To make mRNA useful for routine medicine, scientists had to artificially modify mRNA to increase both its efficiency and lifetime. The result: modRNA."
So. This is artificial. It comes from outside our bodies; mRNA comes from us! :) modRNA is injected as part of a whole concoction of ingredients in the C-19 junk. It is designed to last longer so as to be more "effective." The pseudouridine concocted by Kariko and Weissman makes this substance last longer and evade the body's natural defenses.
To call this synthetic substance "modified messenger RNA" is a contradiction. It cannot be both at the same time -- and Peter McCullough should know this.
McCullough often refers to it as pseudouredinized (I believe at least partially meaning pseudouridine modified RNA. A new term I think) and he uses the term novel genetic code. mRNA traditionally means memory RNA.
A few months ago I read a big article about how it is not "messenger" RNA but rather, "modified" RNA. I wish I could remember the details, but it made sense to me as I read it. I'm going to look for that original article. The difference in terminology was important as there is not any messaging going on like it was presented to the gullible public. The effects of the manipulation is what the modification aspect of it is. I also found the modification features frightening.
Haha. That is a nice way to put that Florida mom. I had a brain malfunction. Yes, MESSENGER! Lord help the lady that the elevator skips the floor where she dropped off her brains!
You're very kind to afford the benefit of the doubt, Lisa. At this point though, especially in light of Kevin McKernan's discovery re the DNA contamination, it is long past time for Dr. McCullough to have any excuses for slipping up. In Jessica Rose's presentation during the World Council for Health symposium, she very clearly called the RNA modified. In her first two slides, Dr. Rose refers outright to "modified RNA."
This is 𝒔𝒖𝒄𝒉 an important point with regard to this junk. You and I can "slip up" and fall back on "messenger RNA," but an internationally known public figure like McCullough? Considered an expert on both the symptomology of this illness and the deadly concoctions allegedly made as weapons to fight the worst cases? He has lost the wiggle room to slip up on such a fundamental -- and now acknowledged -- feature of these weapons. And they are weapons with the modified RNA a key component.
All that said, you're probably a nicer person that I am, Lisa. 😊
and im now up here in ny, to say goodbyes to my dear old mom, who at 94 is throwing in that towel, to find out two of my nieces are so sick from this poison, that i truly want to go after some important people,and make them pay dearly for what they've done. i mean im livid. im almost hoping for revolution 2.0. Cover for eliminating those that desperately deserve to be eliminated. too much? deal.
Hi Raptor, because of your posts, I replied to SheThinksLiberty with information that you may find helpful. The mRNA vs. modRNA differences as written about by Klaus Steger, PhD. Because I replied directly to SheTL, I'm replying to you as well so you'll be notified. :)
John Campbell had a video which claimed that the vaxx that was “ tested” in the trials was not the same shot rolled out for the public. The public shot was made much more cheaply and was “dirty”. There’s a Jimmy Dore video about. We fell for the old bait and switch. Also, Pfizer gave their employees a different vaccine than the lab rats (us) got.
This appears to be true, Emumundo. Process 1 manufacturing used PCR to replicate the DNA in order to extract the RNA. Process 2 manufacturing used E coli to replicate DNA.
According to Kevin McKernan, making a piece of DNA that codes for your RNA and then putting that into a plasmid and then putting that plasmid into E coli is like "fermenting beer." The bacteria doubles every 20 minutes, so overnight, you get exponential "amplification" of your DNA. So it produces a ton of what you need, but that DNA has to be purified out of the E coli. Then to get your copies of RNA off of that DNA, a reaction called the "T 7 in vitro transcription reaction" must be done.
So, DNA gets 𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒏𝒔𝒄𝒓𝒊𝒃𝒆𝒅 into RNA. The RNA then gets 𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒏𝒔𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒅 into protein. In the case of this junk, that protein is the spike...In contrast to DNA (which is permanent) RNA is unstable, lasting only hours, maybe days. The pseudouridine is the now Nobel-prize winning substance that enables RNA to "hang around" a whole lot longer. IOW, it enables the modified RNA to evade the immune system response...
What the world did not know was that the "clinical trials" (such as they were) were done using "vaccines" made via Process 1 -- the clean manufacturing process (PCR is clean, but very expensive and much more time-consuming). What the world rolled its sleeves up for was junk made using Process 2. What has been discovered is that DNA did not get completely purified out of the junk. Part of the problem with this is the lipopolysaccharide or LPS that's in E coli! LPS is an endotoxin and is responsible for anaphylaxis!
Bottom line, this bait and switch in the manufacturing process means -- essentially -- that an untested product got injected into billions of arms around the world. In the world of biologics when you change the manufacturing process, you change the product. This is well known, which means those who should have known did -- and they did it anyway and the regulators let 'em get away with it.
SheThinksLiberty - thanks! Do I recall reading that the trials actually did contain about 250 people in an eColi arm of the trial? (250 getting the eColi and 250 getting a placebo) And that the eColi folks had about 2.5 times the number of adverse events? Maybe my brain is fried and I made this up?
You didn't make it up. Pfizer outlined this new "study" protocol in the Oct 2020 updated protocol. From that document:
"The initial BNT162b2 was manufactured using “Process 1”; however, “Process 2” was developed to support an increased scale of manufacture. In the study, each lot of “Process 2”-manufactured BNT162b2 will be administered to approximately 250 participants 16 to 55 years of age. The safety and immunogenicity of prophylactic BNT162b2 in individuals 16 to 55 years of age vaccinated with “Process 1” and each lot of “Process 2” study intervention will be described. A random sample of 250 participants from those vaccinated with study intervention produced by manufacturing “Process 1” will be selected for this descriptive analysis.
Participants are expected to participate for up to a maximum of approximately 26 months. The duration of study follow-up may be shorter among participants enrolled in Phase 1 dosing arms that are not evaluated in Phase 2/3."
And what results did Pfizer get from this little group of 250 people injected with the stuff made out of the E. coli soup? We don't know -- from them, at least. Others have had to do the work to figure out the figures you cite using batch numbers. Plus, the segment of the contract I copied here had to be dragged out of Pfizer via a FOIA request. 250 people injected with the new junk compared to 250 people injected with the original junk?? I'd say those 26 months are up, yes? Pfizer, oh Pfizer...:)
We know that 20% of trial 1 participants dropped out. That’s huge.
So all stats that Pfizer uses for trials 2 and 3 that there were about 48,000 participants are wrong. There were only about 36,000. (Numbers may be slightly off but 20% is right.)
When my daughter passed last December I did not donate her organs because she had taken the jab a year earlier. From the time I was 16 until my last renewal, I'd always put I'd donate organs on my DL, but I trust nothing about the medical establishment now, except for those who repair broken bones.
Agree 100% , so sorry about your daughter. I too stopped allowing organ donation on my DL but did some research and found out that you sometimes have to specifically talk to someone to have that designation removed depending on your state. 😡. There is BIG MONEY to be made on fresh organs. It’s awful. I no longer believe in the integrity of medical professionals.
After Deathisnear and ventilators, no more organ donation. No reason to give 'em another reason to make money by whacking me while 'visiting' the hospital. Maybe this sounds extreme, but I just don't trust them. And then there are the old people and the nursing homes saga of woe.
Anyone who does not get vaccinated will be refused a transplant. In Canada, 2 people were denied life saving transplants because they were not vaccinated. When these two sadly died, their survivors were asked to donate their organs. I took my name off of the organ donor list until they change their policy.
Driving to work this morning I put on AM radio for light news, weather, traffic.
The new covid booster was mentioned and how medical professionals across the country are advising to take it and **not to listen to the conspiracy theories that are out there.** Yes, the reporter actally had to say that!
Then I remembered Biden publicly saying that he told the pharmaceutical companies (paying them? ) to come up with a "covid vaccine that works."
So are they calling Biden a conspiracy theorist too, since it is clear that he was insinuating that the covid shots out there have been proven not to work?
What a crazy, flip flopping, contradicting, lying country we are living in!!
I find it depressing, disgusting, and deplorable. LIES are everywhere and trusting anybody is difficult.
I've heard yes but can't confirm. It makes sense tho, because they theoretically would be able to target the current circulating strain rather than "guess" as they've done in the past. Not sure why anyone would want even the old style, none of them "work" and predispose you to get the flu.
I would never take any flu shot. Year after year after year, peoplr are only contributing to a better chance of getting Alzheimers and God knows what else.
TURBO CANCER:
This is from a CHD recent article entitled “‘Probably the Most Important Topic of Our Time’: DNA Contaminants in COVID Shots Can Trigger Cancer, Alter Human Genome”
McCullough said there is now “a sufficient body of knowledge” demonstrating that COVID-19 vaccines can cause cancer, noting that “rates of cancer are up in every single cancer surveillance system,” adding that “Now we have the situation where multiple administrations of a COVID-19 vaccine could accelerate” cancer progression.
“I think there’s probably no better term that’s come up for the concern here than ‘turbo cancer,’” he said.
Read the full article here:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-vaccines-dna-contamination/?utm_source=luminate&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=defender&utm_id=20231011
I am still waiting for that time they run out of reasons why someone SADS, got turbo cancer, heart issues, blood clots, bells palsy, et al the issues and it becomes It Is the Vaxx. I am losing my empathy now. Ed Dowd said the same. He said something big would happen to cover tptb crimes. That's why I believe this Gaza Israel issue started. No one is talking about the vaxx crimes etc.
My working hypothesis is that the blame will be centered on the jabs when TPTB decide it's finally time for the whole world to hate the US for our role in this.
Totally agree. Smoke and mirrors! I’m just glad to see most people on here not debating sides!!!
I believe it also was started to cover up Biden’s crimes, which are currently being investigated.
They're starting to just blame it on the "longterm" effects of having a covid infection.
Medical Emergency is now a slight of hand rewording of “fully vaccinated “.
Maybe a better word choice would be “all jabbed up”.
The numbers will still keep accumulating, insurance companies have to publish these numbers if they are publicly owned, certain governments are still publishing the numbers so the truth will come out no matter what emergency they use to cover it up unless they kill a whole lot us via nuclear or other means.
The numbers have been out. It's a big collusion. I work for an international brokerage and financial firm. This increase deaths, in normal times, would be front page news. Nothing. Nada. The advisors don't know. The firm is not saying anything. They are in on it. 🤨
Yes agree but somehow it’s all leaking out even though there is a massive coverup going on and everyone is beginning to know. I have ardent pro vaxxers telling me they regret getting the vaccine now. I never thought I would see them recant.
Yeah. I wish more were seeing the truth. I wished this scamdemic never happened.
You’re right about that Annie. A big distraction
Absolutely.
On Monday, nine leading experts convened for a four-hour emergency hearing on the discovery of plasmid DNA in covid-19 vaccines.
The hearing was to determine what is currently known about the plasmid DNA contamination in vials of covid injections and to discuss the implications of the possible integration of this DNA into the genomes of the billions of people who have been injected.
https://expose-news.com/2023/10/12/leading-experts-discuss-plasmidgate/
I watched the whole thing. Byram Bridle had to say three times, I think it was, that the "mRNA" that Dr. McCullough -- for some reason! -- continues to call "messenger" RNA is NOT "messenger" RNA. It's modified RNA, Peter. UGH! Bridle, in his last comment that followed McCullough's, said something like, "Let me say again...this is NOT 'messenger' RNA. It is modified RNA." For whatever reason, McCullough can't seem to get this...And it is a distinction with an enormous difference.
Raptor, NAB, SheTL, your posts prompted me to re-read an article I saved from the Epoch Times dated July 27, 2023 by Klaus Steger, PhD, a molecular biologist with 30 years of research/work experience. If you have a subscription, check out: "COVID-19 Vaccines and Boosters Were Never Made With mRNA - the Truth Behind RNA based Vaccine Technology."
If you cannot access this Epoch Times article, Dr. Steger wrote the following: (I'll direct quote or paraphrase)...
* mRNA occurs naturally, lives in our cells for a short time, and is relatively fragile.
* modRNA is a result of scientists having to artificially modify mRNA to increase its efficiency and lifetime for use in routine medicine.
* "How is RNA modified? Simply put one of the four compounds in RNA is modified (e.g., the natural nucleoside uridine is modified to make synthetic/artificial methyl-pseudouridine."
* "modRNA contains a viral gene sequence. Upon entering a cell, modRNA takes control of the cell machinery and reprograms it to produce a viral protein - for example, a spike protein."
* "The continuous production of an artificial viral protein robs the cell of energy, disrupts its metabolism, and leads to the cell no longer being able to perform its vital task for the organism as a whole."
* "What's worse, with virus proteins generated in them, those cells are subsequently destroyed by our immune system."
Thank you, Renee. I read that piece re this topic in the Epoch Times. Since then, we have Kevin McKernan's discovery re the DNA contamination. I confess when I first found out about this -- just last month though McKernan found it back in Mar! -- it just floored me. I was almost zombie-like for a week as I read and listened to more on this latest debacle related to this awful junk.
Dr. Jessica Rose's first two slides from the Monday symposium refer directly to modified RNA. Nowhere does she mention "messenger" RNA, and Professor Bridle was adamant about it. He made it a point toward the end to make the point again -- these needles contain modified RNA -- not "messenger" RNA. Stop saying that Peter...:)
Yes, felt the exact same thing when I learned of Kevin McKernan’s finding. Horrified for me is the best I can describe then, now just a simmering below the surface rage towards all involved with this purposeful bio-weapon manufacture & distribution.
Thank you for your original post and this follow up to me & all here. 🙏🏻
❤️ You're welcome, and thank you!
Thank you Renee. Kind of you to provide those quotes. SO helpful I am sending it to hubby since we were discussing it this morning. Did they mention bacterial contamination ? I read something about it a while back, but for the life of me I can't remember the consequence of the bacteria being in the vaccine and (shock) there is no looking it up on the net.
I'm gonna have to go thru articles I saved looking for some forgotten nuggets!
Hi Raptor - you're welcome! I am so glad it is helpful!
The article by Dr. Steger didn't mention the bacterial contamination, however, there have been a couple of great interviews with Kevin McKernan who discovered the contamination of the Pfizer injections with DNA. I believe both of the following interviews will also discuss the bacterial contamination and its' adverse effect:
* From the High Wire: https://thehighwire.com/ark-videos/are-covid-vaccines-contaminated-with-dna/
* From Epoch Times, "American Thought Leaders": https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/kevin-mckernan-talks-covid-vaccine-dna-contamination-the-monkey-virus-sv40-promoter-and-whats-actually-in-the-vaccines-5481974?utm_source=Morningbrief&src_src=Morningbrief&utm_campaign=mb-2023-08-30&src_cmp=mb-2023-08-30&utm_medium=email&est=9ZZO%2FMmMIAIo5c5Z%2FJyVk%2F%2BpGCUV%2BIN7EPq68GLTN2v%2BB4n2yhpg0O4DtVX%2BxY4Los0%3D?utm_campaign=socialshare_email&utm_source=email
I don't pretend to even begin to understand all of this highly complex stuff, and I tend to think that a 'unified field theory' nailing all of this down has yet to emerge, and certainly not yet into the domain of common knowledge. BUT please do 'splain this to me Lucy':
If "modRNA contains a viral gene sequence. [And] Upon entering a cell, modRNA takes control of the cell machinery and reprograms it to produce a viral protein", THEN is not 'modRNA' messaging? And maybe IT should be called mmRNA ... or something.
I've been wondering about this for time. And from the outside, this all looks like sown confusion ... either in whole or in parts. Or maybe mine is a simpleton's question. Whatever ... can someone please illume?
Here comes a long one, my friend!
Macromolecules known as nucleic acids come in two naturally-occurring forms – DNA and RNA. DNA is a like a set of twins – two of the same thing. RNA is one of those twins. DNA contains chromosomes, which contain genes. Genes are the instructions for making “stuff” inside our bodies. Many genes – but not all – code for specific proteins. RNA is responsible for protein synthesis and gene regulation.
Within that one twin – RNA – we have subclasses: “transfer” RNA (tRNA), ribosome RNA (rRNA) and messenger RNA (mRNA). All naturally-occurring. It is that molecule of the RNA – mRNA – that contains chemical instructions (code) for making a protein product. That’s what mRNA does – it makes recognizable proteins, the building block of life.
Our immune system remains quiet in the face of naturally-occurring proteins -- unless there’s an auto-immune disorder. It goes on the attack when it sees a foreign protein such as that that enters the body via a “virus” such as SARS CoV2. All being well, the immune system mounts an attack to kill the cells containing the foreign protein, in this case the “spike” protein.
But what happens when some mad scientists get it into their little noggins that the way to beat this “virus” is to force the body to make the thing they allege infects us and makes us sick? I’d say that’s pretty sick itself, but that’s just me.
To do this, the white coats must take DNA and replicate it. With these copies of DNA, they then transcribe RNA out of it. They use that RNA to make a new, wholly synthetic subclass – a modified RNA crafted in the lab – outside of natural processes. This modRNA forces our cells to form the thing (“spike”) that they allege infects and sickens us in the first place! On all cells! Genius!
Part of the modification of this RNA subclass includes the use of the now Nobel-Prize winning stuff called pseudouridine. This substance enables the modRNA to evade the immune system’s natural response to a foreign protein. This enables the modRNA to stick around a whole lot longer than natural mRNA can/does; this is so it has time to make its way to every cell to start the process of forcing the cells to make a foreign protein…that makes us sick. But if every cell is making it – and keeps on making it – how does the immune system stand a chance?
This is highly simplified, daverkb, but I hope it helps. mRNA and modRNA are two very different things. Their origins and effects make it clear that using the terms interchangeably is impossible and wholly inaccurate – at best.
She, do you think it would be fair to say modified messenger RNA? Is the modification referring to the addition of pseudouridine?
Hi NAB, because of your posts, I replied to SheThinksLiberty with information that you may find helpful. The mRNA vs. modRNA differences as written about by Klaus Steger, PhD. Because I replied directly to SheTL, I'm replying to you as well so you'll be notified. I've also replied to Raptor with this same quick post. :)
The mRNA is modified to the point of no longer being the original. From an Epoch Times article we have the following:
"mRNA and modRNA Are Not the Same
The two—mRNA and modRNA—are completely different. mRNA occurs naturally, lives in our cells for only a short time, and is relatively fragile. It is a specific type of RNA that carries instructions or “messages” from our genes to help make proteins, the building blocks of our cells. It is constantly produced as part of normal cellular processes. Once mRNA delivers the messages, its work is done, and it is broken down in the body.
When RNA from another source enters our cells—virus RNA, for example—these cells can generate virus proteins.
We have been told that COVID-19 injections are made with mRNA. However, a vaccine using “natural” mRNA would not last long enough to initiate an immune response before being destroyed by our immune system.
To make mRNA useful for routine medicine, scientists had to artificially modify mRNA to increase both its efficiency and lifetime. The result: modRNA."
https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/covid-19-vaccines-and-boosters-were-never-made-with-mrna-5416427
So. This is artificial. It comes from outside our bodies; mRNA comes from us! :) modRNA is injected as part of a whole concoction of ingredients in the C-19 junk. It is designed to last longer so as to be more "effective." The pseudouridine concocted by Kariko and Weissman makes this substance last longer and evade the body's natural defenses.
To call this synthetic substance "modified messenger RNA" is a contradiction. It cannot be both at the same time -- and Peter McCullough should know this.
'..It is designed to last longer so as to be more "effective."...'
Mission accomplished! It's very effective at killing and disabling people over time.
McCullough often refers to it as pseudouredinized (I believe at least partially meaning pseudouridine modified RNA. A new term I think) and he uses the term novel genetic code. mRNA traditionally means memory RNA.
Sorta like Weapons of Mass Destruction.
Raptor, I've never heard of memory RNA, only messenger RNA (and now modified RNA, or modified messenger RNA, or whatever it will end up being called).
A few months ago I read a big article about how it is not "messenger" RNA but rather, "modified" RNA. I wish I could remember the details, but it made sense to me as I read it. I'm going to look for that original article. The difference in terminology was important as there is not any messaging going on like it was presented to the gullible public. The effects of the manipulation is what the modification aspect of it is. I also found the modification features frightening.
Haha. That is a nice way to put that Florida mom. I had a brain malfunction. Yes, MESSENGER! Lord help the lady that the elevator skips the floor where she dropped off her brains!
Lol!
probably just a slip. so used to thinking MRNA from med training with messenger….
You're very kind to afford the benefit of the doubt, Lisa. At this point though, especially in light of Kevin McKernan's discovery re the DNA contamination, it is long past time for Dr. McCullough to have any excuses for slipping up. In Jessica Rose's presentation during the World Council for Health symposium, she very clearly called the RNA modified. In her first two slides, Dr. Rose refers outright to "modified RNA."
This is 𝒔𝒖𝒄𝒉 an important point with regard to this junk. You and I can "slip up" and fall back on "messenger RNA," but an internationally known public figure like McCullough? Considered an expert on both the symptomology of this illness and the deadly concoctions allegedly made as weapons to fight the worst cases? He has lost the wiggle room to slip up on such a fundamental -- and now acknowledged -- feature of these weapons. And they are weapons with the modified RNA a key component.
All that said, you're probably a nicer person that I am, Lisa. 😊
and im now up here in ny, to say goodbyes to my dear old mom, who at 94 is throwing in that towel, to find out two of my nieces are so sick from this poison, that i truly want to go after some important people,and make them pay dearly for what they've done. i mean im livid. im almost hoping for revolution 2.0. Cover for eliminating those that desperately deserve to be eliminated. too much? deal.
Isn't the thing that is modified the memory RNA? Modified by pseudouridine (and probably other things).
Hi Raptor, because of your posts, I replied to SheThinksLiberty with information that you may find helpful. The mRNA vs. modRNA differences as written about by Klaus Steger, PhD. Because I replied directly to SheTL, I'm replying to you as well so you'll be notified. :)
John Campbell had a video which claimed that the vaxx that was “ tested” in the trials was not the same shot rolled out for the public. The public shot was made much more cheaply and was “dirty”. There’s a Jimmy Dore video about. We fell for the old bait and switch. Also, Pfizer gave their employees a different vaccine than the lab rats (us) got.
This appears to be true, Emumundo. Process 1 manufacturing used PCR to replicate the DNA in order to extract the RNA. Process 2 manufacturing used E coli to replicate DNA.
According to Kevin McKernan, making a piece of DNA that codes for your RNA and then putting that into a plasmid and then putting that plasmid into E coli is like "fermenting beer." The bacteria doubles every 20 minutes, so overnight, you get exponential "amplification" of your DNA. So it produces a ton of what you need, but that DNA has to be purified out of the E coli. Then to get your copies of RNA off of that DNA, a reaction called the "T 7 in vitro transcription reaction" must be done.
So, DNA gets 𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒏𝒔𝒄𝒓𝒊𝒃𝒆𝒅 into RNA. The RNA then gets 𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒏𝒔𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒅 into protein. In the case of this junk, that protein is the spike...In contrast to DNA (which is permanent) RNA is unstable, lasting only hours, maybe days. The pseudouridine is the now Nobel-prize winning substance that enables RNA to "hang around" a whole lot longer. IOW, it enables the modified RNA to evade the immune system response...
What the world did not know was that the "clinical trials" (such as they were) were done using "vaccines" made via Process 1 -- the clean manufacturing process (PCR is clean, but very expensive and much more time-consuming). What the world rolled its sleeves up for was junk made using Process 2. What has been discovered is that DNA did not get completely purified out of the junk. Part of the problem with this is the lipopolysaccharide or LPS that's in E coli! LPS is an endotoxin and is responsible for anaphylaxis!
Bottom line, this bait and switch in the manufacturing process means -- essentially -- that an untested product got injected into billions of arms around the world. In the world of biologics when you change the manufacturing process, you change the product. This is well known, which means those who should have known did -- and they did it anyway and the regulators let 'em get away with it.
SheThinksLiberty - thanks! Do I recall reading that the trials actually did contain about 250 people in an eColi arm of the trial? (250 getting the eColi and 250 getting a placebo) And that the eColi folks had about 2.5 times the number of adverse events? Maybe my brain is fried and I made this up?
You didn't make it up. Pfizer outlined this new "study" protocol in the Oct 2020 updated protocol. From that document:
"The initial BNT162b2 was manufactured using “Process 1”; however, “Process 2” was developed to support an increased scale of manufacture. In the study, each lot of “Process 2”-manufactured BNT162b2 will be administered to approximately 250 participants 16 to 55 years of age. The safety and immunogenicity of prophylactic BNT162b2 in individuals 16 to 55 years of age vaccinated with “Process 1” and each lot of “Process 2” study intervention will be described. A random sample of 250 participants from those vaccinated with study intervention produced by manufacturing “Process 1” will be selected for this descriptive analysis.
Participants are expected to participate for up to a maximum of approximately 26 months. The duration of study follow-up may be shorter among participants enrolled in Phase 1 dosing arms that are not evaluated in Phase 2/3."
And what results did Pfizer get from this little group of 250 people injected with the stuff made out of the E. coli soup? We don't know -- from them, at least. Others have had to do the work to figure out the figures you cite using batch numbers. Plus, the segment of the contract I copied here had to be dragged out of Pfizer via a FOIA request. 250 people injected with the new junk compared to 250 people injected with the original junk?? I'd say those 26 months are up, yes? Pfizer, oh Pfizer...:)
We know that 20% of trial 1 participants dropped out. That’s huge.
So all stats that Pfizer uses for trials 2 and 3 that there were about 48,000 participants are wrong. There were only about 36,000. (Numbers may be slightly off but 20% is right.)
Thank you for detailing this.
Thanks for this. I also sent to my friend.
Calls into question the safety of organ transplants, blood transfusions for all of us who refused the clot shot.
When my daughter passed last December I did not donate her organs because she had taken the jab a year earlier. From the time I was 16 until my last renewal, I'd always put I'd donate organs on my DL, but I trust nothing about the medical establishment now, except for those who repair broken bones.
Agree 100% , so sorry about your daughter. I too stopped allowing organ donation on my DL but did some research and found out that you sometimes have to specifically talk to someone to have that designation removed depending on your state. 😡. There is BIG MONEY to be made on fresh organs. It’s awful. I no longer believe in the integrity of medical professionals.
After Deathisnear and ventilators, no more organ donation. No reason to give 'em another reason to make money by whacking me while 'visiting' the hospital. Maybe this sounds extreme, but I just don't trust them. And then there are the old people and the nursing homes saga of woe.
https://t.me/artwithaim/28754
BRAIN DEATH is a lie. Here Dr. Byrne shares shocking information about organ Harvesting in "health-care".
I'm so very sorry for your loss. Thank you for your selfless decision in your daughter's behalf.
I pray you are doing better each day. ♥♥♥
Anyone who does not get vaccinated will be refused a transplant. In Canada, 2 people were denied life saving transplants because they were not vaccinated. When these two sadly died, their survivors were asked to donate their organs. I took my name off of the organ donor list until they change their policy.
been said here before. many of us will never consent to that!
Driving to work this morning I put on AM radio for light news, weather, traffic.
The new covid booster was mentioned and how medical professionals across the country are advising to take it and **not to listen to the conspiracy theories that are out there.** Yes, the reporter actally had to say that!
Then I remembered Biden publicly saying that he told the pharmaceutical companies (paying them? ) to come up with a "covid vaccine that works."
So are they calling Biden a conspiracy theorist too, since it is clear that he was insinuating that the covid shots out there have been proven not to work?
What a crazy, flip flopping, contradicting, lying country we are living in!!
I find it depressing, disgusting, and deplorable. LIES are everywhere and trusting anybody is difficult.
Thank you for this. I sent to my friend who has shot and her husband just cleared stage 3 colon ca
Anyone with info on whether flu vax has mrna in it?? I had heard it does but no proof. Need for friend.
I've heard yes but can't confirm. It makes sense tho, because they theoretically would be able to target the current circulating strain rather than "guess" as they've done in the past. Not sure why anyone would want even the old style, none of them "work" and predispose you to get the flu.
I would never take any flu shot. Year after year after year, peoplr are only contributing to a better chance of getting Alzheimers and God knows what else.