8 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Copernicus's avatar

Well, only if the public actually see the paper and accept it.

I bet there will be a lot of jabbering about how unreliable the findings are, for one reason or another, and about this just being a pre-print, so of course it can’t be taken as gospel yet.

I have a long time friend who is multi-jabbed and who multi-jabbed their KIDS!!! 😳😳😳 and who is unlikely to let this paper dissuade her from her belief in the allegedly God-given provision of the jabs and pax and all the rest. But not his provision of Ivy or any of the related stuff.

Expand full comment
PatriciaHenry's avatar

This preprint has been removed by Preprints with The Lancet because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology. Preprints with The Lancet reserves the right to remove a paper that has been posted if we determine that it has violated our screening criteria. Further information is available here: https://www.thelancet.com/preprint-faq

Didn’t take long

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Ugh 😡🤬

Expand full comment
space's avatar

Geez!! Ughhh.

Expand full comment
RunningLogic's avatar

Funny how their belief in “the science” is so selective 🙄

Expand full comment
nt's avatar

Right !? 50 years of study on human sexuality and gender dysphoria…what to do with Dr Levine !? Such a conundrum on when to embrace science…or not.

Expand full comment
RJ Rambler's avatar

Selective like evolution which if you use science is obviously an impossibly.

Expand full comment
PamelaZelie's avatar

Because jabs have become their religion.

Expand full comment