Well, only if the public actually see the paper and accept it.
I bet there will be a lot of jabbering about how unreliable the findings are, for one reason or another, and about this just being a pre-print, so of course it can’t be taken as gospel yet.
I have a long time friend who is multi-jabbed and who multi-jabbed their KIDS!!! 😳😳😳 …
Well, only if the public actually see the paper and accept it.
I bet there will be a lot of jabbering about how unreliable the findings are, for one reason or another, and about this just being a pre-print, so of course it can’t be taken as gospel yet.
I have a long time friend who is multi-jabbed and who multi-jabbed their KIDS!!! 😳😳😳 and who is unlikely to let this paper dissuade her from her belief in the allegedly God-given provision of the jabs and pax and all the rest. But not his provision of Ivy or any of the related stuff.
This preprint has been removed by Preprints with The Lancet because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology. Preprints with The Lancet reserves the right to remove a paper that has been posted if we determine that it has violated our screening criteria. Further information is available here: https://www.thelancet.com/preprint-faq
Well, only if the public actually see the paper and accept it.
I bet there will be a lot of jabbering about how unreliable the findings are, for one reason or another, and about this just being a pre-print, so of course it can’t be taken as gospel yet.
I have a long time friend who is multi-jabbed and who multi-jabbed their KIDS!!! 😳😳😳 and who is unlikely to let this paper dissuade her from her belief in the allegedly God-given provision of the jabs and pax and all the rest. But not his provision of Ivy or any of the related stuff.
This preprint has been removed by Preprints with The Lancet because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology. Preprints with The Lancet reserves the right to remove a paper that has been posted if we determine that it has violated our screening criteria. Further information is available here: https://www.thelancet.com/preprint-faq
Didn’t take long
Ugh 😡🤬
Geez!! Ughhh.
Funny how their belief in “the science” is so selective 🙄
Right !? 50 years of study on human sexuality and gender dysphoria…what to do with Dr Levine !? Such a conundrum on when to embrace science…or not.
Selective like evolution which if you use science is obviously an impossibly.
Because jabs have become their religion.